Quality in Higher Education: From the Diversity of Conceptions to the Relentless Conceptual Subjectivity

Abstract

The current article approaches and assesses the different conceptions and understandings of quality in the higher education scope. Initially, the text reviews the concepts of quality based on the taxonomies presented by the top researchers approaching this subject; next, it shows a list of terms that have been recently identified according to the views of quality in higher education, such as economic competitiveness and market growth, sustainable sociocultural and economic development or, yet, to a view of higher education that has the prior mission of social cohesion and equity. Finally, the relentless conceptual relativity of quality in the higher education is approached.

Share and Cite:

Bertolin, J. (2015) Quality in Higher Education: From the Diversity of Conceptions to the Relentless Conceptual Subjectivity. Creative Education, 6, 2410-2421. doi: 10.4236/ce.2015.622247.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Amaral, A. (2002). The Management of Universities and Representatives of External Stakeholders. Jornal a Página, 11, 27.
[2] Barnett, R. (1992). Improving Higher Education—Total Quality Care. Bristol: SRHE and Open University Press.
[3] Bertolin, J. C. G. (2007). Quality Assessment of the Brazilian Higher Education System in Marketization Times—From 1994 to 2003. PhD Thesis, Porto Alegre: Federal Universityof Rio Grande do Sul.
[4] Brazil (2003). National Examination Course 2003 Report—Synthesis Report. National Institute for Educational Studies and Research “Anísio Teixeira”, Brasília: Inep.
[5] Brovetto, J. (2005). New Challenges in Higher Education in Latin America. In Brazil/NationalInstitute for Educational Studies and Research “Anísio Teixeira” Inep, InternationalSeminary “Reforma e avaliação da educação superior—Ten-dências na europa e américa latina”. Brasília: Inep.
[6] De la Orden Hoz, A., et al. (1997). Development and Validation of a University’s Quality Model as a Basis for Evaluation. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 3, 1-2.
[7] Delors, J. (1999). Learning: The Treasure Within. São Paulo: Cortez/MEC/Unesco.
[8] Dias Sobrinho, J. (2005). Dilemmas of Higher Education in a Globalized World: The Knowledge Society and Knowledge Economy. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.
[9] Durkheim, é. (1967). The Evolution of Educational Thought. Porto Alegre: Art Méd.
[10] Estrada, L. R. G. (1999). Towards a Model of Assessment in Higher Education Institutions. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 21, 93-106.
[11] European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education—ENQA (2005). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Helsinki: ENQA.
[12] Fazendeiro, A. (2002). Education Quality Assessment: An Approach Based on the Planning. In CNE (Ed.), Qualidade e avaliação da educação. Seminários e Colóquios. Lisboa: CNE—Ministério da Educação.
[13] García, M. G. (2000). Assessment and Quality of the Education Systems. In T. G. Ramírez (Ed.), Assessment and Management of Education Quality (pp. 227-268). Málaga: Ediciones Aljibe.
[14] Genro, T. (2005). The Reform of Higher Education in Brazil. In Brazil/National Institute for Educational Studies and Research “Anísio Teixeira”—INEP (Ed.), International Seminary “Reforma e avaliação da educação superior— Tendências na europa e américa latina”. Brasília: INEP.
[15] Gentilli, P., & Silva, T. T. (1995). Neoliberalism, Total Quality and Education (2nd ed.). Petrópolis: Vozes.
[16] Green, D. (1994). What Is Quality in Higher Education? Bristol: SRHE and Open University Press.
[17] Harvey, L. (2002). The End of Quality? Quality in Higher Education, 8, 5-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13538320220127416
[18] Harvey, L. (2004). Analytic Quality Glossary.
http://www.qualityresearchinternational.com/glossary/
[19] Harvey, L. (2005). A History and Critique of Quality Evaluation in the UK. Quality Assurance in Education, 13, 263-276.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684880510700608
[20] Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining Quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 9-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
[21] Leite, D. (2003). Institutional Evaluation, Reorganizations e Capitalist Redesign of Universities. In J. Dias Sobrinho, & D. Ristoff (Eds.), Assessment and Public Commitment (pp. 53-76). Florianópolis: Insular.
[22] Lemaitre, M. J. (2005). The Colonized Quality: University and Globalization. Revista de la Educación Superior, 34, 123-134.
[23] McCowan, T. (2005). The Growth of Private Higher Education in Brazil: Implications for Issues of Equity, Quality and Public Benefit. Arquivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 13, 1-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v13n27.2005
[24] Mizikaci, F. (2006). A Systems Approach to Program Evaluation Model for Quality in Higher Education. Quality Assurance Education, 14, 37-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684880610643601
[25] Morosini, M. C. (2001). The Quality of Higher Education: Isomorphism, Diversity and Fairness. Interface—Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, 5, 89-102.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1414-32832001000200006
[26] Organisation Economic Co-Operation and Development—OECD (1999). Quality and Internationalisation in Higher Education. Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education-IMHE, Paris: OECD.
[27] Rodrigues Dias, M. A. (2003). Trade in Higher Education: Can We Maintain the Idea of Public Good? Revista Educação & Sociedade, 24, 817-838.
[28] Sahney, S., Banwet, D. K., & Karunes S. (2004). Conceptualizing Total Quality Management in Higher Education. The TQM Magazine, 16, 145-159.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09544780410523044
[29] Sander, B. (1995). Management Education in Latin America: Construction and Reconstruction of Knowledge. Campinas: Editora Autores Associados.
[30] Santiago, R. (1999). The Concept of Quality in Higher Education. In Encontro INA (Ed.), A Avaliação na Administração Pública. Lisboa: Instituto Nacional de Administração.
[31] Santos, B. de S. (2004). The University in the Twenty-First Century. Towards a Democratic and Emancipatory University Reform. São Paulo: Cortez.
[32] United Nations Children’s Fund—Unicef (2004). Quality Indicators in Education. São Paulo: Ação Educativa.
[33] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization—Unesco (1997). Standards in Education: Fundamental Concepts. Documents—Latin American Laboratory for Assessment of the Quality of Education. Chile: Lecce/Orealc/ Unesco.
[34] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization—Unesco (1998). Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Vision and Action. World Conference on Higher Education. Paris: Unesco.
[35] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization—Unesco (2003). Quality of Higher Education—Comission II. Paris: Unesco.
[36] Vlãsceanu, L., Grünberg, L., & Parlea, D. (2004). Quality Assurance and Accreditation: A Glossary of Basic Terms and Definitions. Bucharest: Unesco-Cepes Papers in Higher Education.
[37] Vroeijenstijn, T. (1992). External Quality Assessment, Servant of Two Masters? The Netherlands University Perspective. In A. Craft (Ed.), Quality Assurance in Higher Education (pp. 109-131). Lewes: Falmer Press.
[38] Watty, K. (2005). Quality in Accounting Education: What Say the Academics? Quality Assurance in Education, 13, 120-131.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684880510594373
[39] Werthein, J. (2003). Education: The Challenge of Quality.
http://www.unesco.org.br/noticias/opiniao/artigow/artigow_qual/mostra_documento
[40] World Bank (2001). Higher Education in Brazil: Challenges and Options. Washington DC: World Bank Publications.
[41] World Bank (2002). Constructing Knowledge Societies: New Challenges for Tertiary Education. Washington DC: World Bank Publications.
[42] World Bank (2005). World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development (Vol. 28). Washington DC: World Bank Publications.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6249-5

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.