Scoping the Possibilities: Student Preferences towards Open Textbooks Adoption for E-Learning

Deepak Prasad, Tsuyoshi Usagawa

Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2014.524227                

Abstract

Many universities have begun implementing e-Learning systems due to their low cost. However, publishers of expensive textbooks stand in the way of e-Learning’s ability to provide a cost-effective educational delivery model. While many universities aim to overcome this opposition and replace traditional publishers’ textbooks with free open textbooks, such plans cannot be executed successfully unless students are open to their use. As such, a study into students’ preferences towards open textbook adoption is vital to provide clear indication as to their opinions regarding open textbook use. Thus, this study conducted a study of University of the South Pacific (USP) students’ preferences towards open textbook adoption for e-Learning using a survey administered during Semester 2, 2013 which generated 1077 responses. Areas examined include: Impacts of textbook costs on students’ academic careers; preferences towards open textbook adoption; perceived barriers to and motivations for adoption of open textbooks; and preferred digital features and reading devices. Results show that textbook prices adversely impact students. Furthermore, a high level of acceptance towards the adoption of open textbooks was found. The study revealed that the preference for reading printed material was the highest rated barrier to open textbook adoption, while the free availability of open textbooks was rated the greatest motivator. Study findings are being used to inform efforts to develop open textbooks at the USP and may assist other universities seeking to start similar projects.

Keywords

Open Textbook, Digital Textbook, Student Preferences, Adoption, E-Learning, The University of the South Pacific

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	AdHoc Senate Committee on Student Textbook Savings (2014). Recommendations to Save on Student Textbooks Costs. http://www.lib.utah.edu/pdf/TextbookSavingsReport_FINAL.pdf
[2]	Allen, N. (2008a). Course Correction: How Digital Textbooks Are off Track and How to Set Them Straight (pp. 1-21). http://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/ST_PIRGS/S080826A.pdf
[3]	Allen, N. (2008b). Digital Textbooks: A Student Perspective. New England Journal of Higher Education, 23, 32.
[4]	Allen, N. (2011). High Prices Prevent College Students from Buying Assigned Textbooks. Student PIRGs. http://www.studentpirgs.org/news/ap/high-prices-prevent-college-students-buying-assigned-textbooks
[5]	Anuradha, K. T., & Usha, H. S. (2006). Use of E-Books in an Academic and Research Environment: A Case Study from the Indian Institute of Science. Program, 40, 48-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00330330610646807
[6]	Armatus, C., Holt, D., & Rice, M. (2003). Impacts of an On-Line-Supported, Resource-Based Learning Environment: Does One Size Fit All? Distance Education, 24, 140-158.
[7]	Armstrong, C. (2008). Books in a Virtual World: The Evolution of the E-Book and Its Lexicon. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 40, 193-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000608092554
[8]	Behler, A., & Lush, B. (2010). Are You Ready for E-Readers? The Reference Librarian, 52, 75-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2011.523261
[9]	Berg, S. A., Hoffmann, K., & Dawson, D. (2010). Not on the Same Page: Undergraduates’ Information Retrieval in Electronic and Print Books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36, 518-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2010.08.008
[10]	Brahme, M., & Gabriel, L. (2012). Are Students Keeping up with the E-Book Evolution? Are E-Books Keeping up with Students’ Evolving Needs? Distance Students and E-Book Usage, a Survey. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 6, 180-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2012.705109
[11]	Buell, C. (2013). E-Textbook Matchmaking: Assessing Compatibility between Hardware and Software. http://edcetera.rafter.com/e-textbook-matchmaking-assessing- compatibility-between-hardware-and-software/
[12]	Buzzetto-More, N., Sweat-Guy, R., & Elobaid, M. (2007). Reading in a Digital Age: E-Books Are Students Ready for This Learning Object? Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 239-250.
[13]	Carpenter, P., Bullock, A., & Potter, J. (2006). Textbooks in Teaching and Learning. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 2, No. 1. http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/paper/textbooks_in_teaching_and_learning-2/
[14]	Cavanaugh, T. (2002). Ebooks and Accommodations: Is There the Future. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 56-61.
[15]	Chong, P. F., Lim, Y. P., & Ling, S. W. (2009). On the Design Preferences for Ebooks. IETE Technical Review, 26, 213-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0256-4602.50706
[16]	Chou, I. C. (2014). Reading for the Purpose of Responding to Literature: EFL Students’ Perceptions of E-Books. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.881388
[17]	Cragun, R. T. (2007). The Future of Textbooks? Electronic Journal of Sociology. http://www.sociology.org/content/2007/_cragun_futureoftextbooks.pdf
[18]	Croft, R., & Davis, C. (2010). E-Books Revisited: Surveying Student E-Book Usage in a Distributed Learning Academic Library 6 Years Later. Journal of Library Administration, 50, 543-569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2010.488600
[19]	Cuillier, C. A., & Dewland, J. C. (2014). Understanding the Key Factors for E-Textbook Integration into a Business Course: A Case Study. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 19, 32-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2013.824338
[20]	Education for Change Ltd., & University of Stirling (2003). A Strategy and Vision for the Future for Electronic Textbooks in UK Further and Higher Education. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Annex_E_E_Textbooks_Strategy_final_report.pdf
[21]	Educause (2011). 7 Things You Should Know about Open Textbook Publishing. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli7070.pdf
[22]	Florida Virtual Campus (2012). 2012 Florida Student Textbook Survey. Tallahassee. http://www.openaccesstextbooks.org/pdf/2012_Florida_Student_Textbook_Survey.pdf
[23]	Folb, B. L., Wessel, C. B., & Czechowski, L. J. (2011). Clinical and Academic Use of Electronic and Print Books: The Health Sciences Library System E-Book Study at the University of Pittsburg. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 99, 218-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.009
[24]	Government of British Columbia (2014). Students Saving Money with Open Textbooks. http://www.newsroom.gov.bc.ca/2014/01/students-saving-money-with-open-textbooks.html
[25]	Graydon, B., Urbach-Buholz, B., & Kohen, C. (2011). A Study of Four Textbook Distribution Models. Educause Quarterly, 34, 1-11. http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/study-four-textbook-distribution-models
[26]	Guthrie, K. M. (2012). Will Book Be Different? Journal of Library Administration, 52, 353-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2012.700805
[27]	Hilton, J. L., & Wiley, D. (2011). Open-Access Textbooks and Financial Sustainability: A Case Study on Flat World Knowledge. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 18-26.
[28]	Hilton, J. L., Gaudet, D., Clark, P., Robinson, J., & Wiley, D. (2013). The Adoption of Open Educational Resources by One Community College Math Department. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14, 37-50.
[29]	Hilton, J. L., Robinson, T. J., Wiley, D., & Ackerman, J. D. (2014). Cost-Savings Achieved in Two Semesters through the Adoption of Open Educational Resources. International Review of Research in Open Distance Learning, 15, 67-84.
[30]	Hoseth, A., & Merinda, M. (2012). Perspectives on E-Book from Instructors and Students in the Social Sciences. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 51, 278-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.51n3.278
[31]	Hwang, J. Y., Kim, J., Lee, B., & Kim, J. H. (2014). Usage Patterns and Perception toward E-Books: Experiences from Academic Libraries in South Korea. The Electronic Library, 32, 522-541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EL-11-2012-0150
[32]	Landoni, M., & Hanlon, G. (2007). E-Books Reading Groups: Interacting with E-Books in Public Libraries. The Electronic Library, 25, 599-612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02640470710829578
[33]	Lee, H. J., Messom, C., & Yau, K. A. (2013). Can an Electronic Textbooks Be Part of K-12 Education? Challenges, Technological Solutions and Open Issues. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12, 32-44.
[34]	Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and Predicting Users’ Continuance Intention toward E-Learning: An Extension of the Expectation-Confirmation Model. Computers & Education, 54, 506-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
[35]	Levine-Clark, M. (2006). Electronic Book Usage: A Survey at the University of Denver. Collection Building, 26, 7-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01604950710721548
[36]	Li, C., Poe, F., Potter, M., Quigley, B., & Wilson, J. (2011). UC Libraries Academic E-Book Usage Survey, Springer E- Book Pilot Project. http://www.cdlib.org/services/uxdesign/docs/2011/academic_ebook_usage_survey.pdf
[37]	Matkin, G. W. (2009). Open Learning: What Do Open Textbooks Tell Us about the Revolution in Education? In Center for Studies in Higher Education, Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.1.09 (pp. 1-8). Berkeley, CA: University of California. http://cshe.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/shared/publications/docs/ ROPs-Matkin-OpenLearning-03-31-09.pdf
[38]	McKnight, C., & Dearnley, J. (2003). Electronic Book Use in a Public Library. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 35, 235-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000603035004003
[39]	Morris-Babb, M., & Henderson, S. (2012). An Experiment in Open-Access Textbook Publishing: Changing the World One Textbook at a Time. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 43, 148-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jsp.43.2.148
[40]	Nelson, M. R. (2008). E-Books in Higher Education: Nearing the End of an Era of Hype? Educause Review, 43, 40-56.
[41]	Nix, L. (2010). Ebook Formats: The Basics. http://goldenorbcreative.wordpress.com/2010/09/02/ebook-formats-the-basics/
[42]	Okamoto, K. (2013). Making Higher Education More Affordable, One Course Reading at a Time: Academic Libraries as Key Advocates for Open Access Textbooks and Educational Resources. Public Services Quarterly, 9, 267-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2013.842397
[43]	Oliveira, S. M. (2012). E-Textbooks Usage by Students at Andrews University: A Study of Attitudes, Perceptions, and Behaviors. Library Management, 33, 536-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01435121211279894
[44]	Perry, M. (2012). The College Textbook Bubble and How the “Open Educational Resources” Movement Is Going up against the Textbook Cartel. American Enterprise Institute. http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/12/the-college-textbook-bubble-and-how-the-open-educational-resources-movement-is-going-up-against-the-textbook-cartel/
[45]	Philip, G. C., & Moon, S. Y. (2013). An Investigation of Student Expectation, Perceived Performance and Satisfaction of E-Textbooks. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12, 287-298.
[46]	Prasad, D., & Usagawa, T. (2014). Towards Development of OER Derived Custom-Built Open Textbooks: A Baseline Survey of University Teachers at the University of the South Pacific. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14, 226-247.
[47]	Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus Traditional Print Textbooks: A Comparison Study on the Influence of University Students’ Learning. Computers & Education, 63, 259-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022
[48]	Rube, K. (2005). Ripoff 101: How the Publishing Industry’s Practices Needlessly Drive up Textbook Costs: A National Survey of Textbook Prices (2nd ed.). Washington DC. http://www.studentpirgs.org/sites/student/files/reports/ripoff-101-2nd.pdf
[49]	Senack, E. (2014). Fixing the Broken Textbook Market: How Students Respond to High Textbook Costs and Demand Alternatives. Washington DC. http://www.washpirg.org/sites/pirg/files/reports/1.27.14 Fixing Broken Textbooks Report.pdf
[50]	Spencer, C. (2006). Research on Learners’ Preference for Reading from a Printed Text or from a Computer Screen. Journal of Distance Education, 21, 33-50.
[51]	Stein, M., Stuen, C., Carnine, D., & Long, R. (2001). Textbook Evaluation and Adoption. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 17, 5-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/105735601455710
[52]	Thomas, S. E. (2007). Another Side of the E-Book Puzzle. Indiana Libraries, 26, 39-45.
[53]	University of the South Pacific (2013). Strategic Plan 2013-2018. Suva. http://www.usp.ac.fj/index.php?id=12556
[54]	Wiley, D., Hilton, J. L., Ellington, S., & Hall, T. (2012). A Preliminary Examination of the Cost Savings and Learning Impacts of Using Open Textbooks in Middle and High School Science Classes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 262-276.
[55]	Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-Books or Textbooks: Students Prefer Textbooks. Computers & Education, 55, 945-948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005
[56]	Zimerman, M. (2011). E-Readers in an Academic Library Setting. Library Hi Tech, 29, 91-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831111116930