Teacher Education and the Targeting of Disadvantage

Bruce Burnett, Jo Lampert
DOI: 10.4236/ce.2011.25064                

Abstract

This paper outlines the Exceptional Teachers for Disadvantaged Schools (ETDS) project which began in June 2010 with the aim of developing and documenting an Australian university-based teacher education program specifically focusing on the preparation of high quality teachers for the disadvantaged school sector. ETDS constitutes a novel model of teacher education targeting disadvantaged schooling in that the selection of participating pre-service teachers has been based on their proven academic performance over the first 2 years of their 4-year Bachelor of Education degree. ETDS has established a modified curriculum that better supports the on-campus training of this cohort while also targeting the role of field experience within partner disadvantaged school settings. This paper offers a rationale for the model, unpacks its various phases and provides a justification of the model’s selection criteria based on high academic achievement.

Keywords

Teacher Education, Teacher Quality, Disadvantaged Schools

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Adams, A., & Tulasiewicz, W. (1995). The crisis in teacher education: A European concern? London: Falmer Press.
[2]	Berliner, D. C. (1992). Telling the stories of educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 27, 143-161. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2702_2
[3]	Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor and Francis.
[4]	Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
[5]	Castro, A. J., Kelly, J., & Shih, M. (2010). Resilience strategies for new teachers in high needs areas. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 622-629. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.010
[6]	Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2005). Researching teacher education in changing times: Politics and paradigms. In M. Cochran-Smith, & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 69-107). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
[7]	Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2004). Turn-around pedagogies: Improving the education of at-risk students. Improving Schools, 8, 121-131.
[8]	Connell, R. W. (1994). Poverty and education. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 125-150.
[9]	Connell, R. W., White, V. M., & Johnston, K. M. (1991). Running twice as hard: The disadvantaged schools program in Australia. Burwood: Deakin University Press.
[10]	Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass.
[11]	Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 35-47. doi:10.1177/0022487109348024
[12]	Donaldson, M, L., Moore, J. S. (2010) The price of misassignment: The role of teaching assignments in teach for America teachers’ exit from low-income schools and the teaching profession. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 299-323. doi:10.3102/0162373710367680
[13]	Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 17-30. doi:10.1177/0022487101052001003
[14]	Ferfolja, T. (2008). Building teacher capital in pre-service teachers: Reflections on a new teacher-education initiative. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 68-84.
[15]	Flessa, J. J. (2007). Poverty and education: Towards effective action. Toronto: Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario.
[16]	Freebody, P. (1992). A socio-cultural approach: Resourcing four roles as a literacy learner. In A. Watson, & A. Badenhop (Eds.), Prevention of reading failure (pp. 48-60). Sydney: Ashton-Scholastic.
[17]	Gannon, S. (2009). Rewriting “the road to nowhere”: Place pedagogies in western Sydney. Urban Education, 44, 608-624. doi:10.1177/0042085909339377
[18]	Grossman, P., & Loeb, S. (2010). Learning from multiple routes. Educational Leadership, 67, 22-27.
[19]	Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. The Journal of Human Resources, 39, 326- 354. doi:10.2307/3559017
[20]	Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? ACER Annual Conference, Melbourne, 7-11 July 2003.
[21]	Hattie, J. (2004). It’s official: Teachers make a difference. Educare News: The National Newspaper for All Non-Government Schools, 144, 24-31,
[22]	Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P., & Lingard, B. (2006). Teachers and schooling making a difference: Productive Pedagogies, assessment and performance. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
[23]	Howard, T. C., & Aleman, G. R. (2008). Teacher capacity for diverse learners: What do teachers need to know? In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[24]	Kennedy, M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39, 591-598. doi:10.3102/0013189X10390804
[25]	Ladson-Billings, G. (2008). A letter to our next president. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 235-239. doi:10.1177/0022487108317466
[26]	Levin, B. (2010). How to change 5000 schools: A practical and positive approach for leading change at every level. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
[27]	Logan, C., & Binnie, K. (2010). Union rejects “flawed” teacher training plan. ABC News, 22 February 2010.
[28]	Luke, A. (2004). Australia: The challenges of poverty, pedagogy and pathways. In I. C. Rotberg (Ed.), Balancing change and tradition in global education reform. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
[29]	McCarthy, M., & Guiney, E. (2004). Building a professional teaching corps in Boston: Baseline study of new teachers in Boston’s public schools. Boston: Boston Plan for Excellence.
[30]	McDougall, D., Gaskell, J., Flessa, J. J., Kugler, J., & Jang, E. E. (2006). Improving student achievement in schools facing challenging circumstances. Toronto: University of Toronto.
[31]	Nieto, S. (2005). Why we teach. New York: Teachers College Press.
[32]	Quartz, K, H., Thomas, A. & Anderson, L. (2008) Careers in motion: A Longitudinal retention study of role changing among early-career urban educators. Teachers College Record, 110, 218-250.
[33]	Ravitch, D. (2010). The myth of charter schools. The New York Review of Books. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/nov/11/myth-charter-schools/?pagination=false
[34]	Rice, S. (2008). Getting good teachers into challenging schools. Curriculum Leadership, 6, 1-3.
[35]	Rotberg, I. C. (2004). Balancing change and tradition in global education reform. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
[36]	Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1994). The Tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS): Mixed-model methodology in educational assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8, 299-311. doi:10.1007/BF00973726
[37]	Sanders, W. L., & J. C., Rivers. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value Added Research and Assessment Centre.
[38]	Sleeter, C. (2008). Preparing white teachers for diverse students. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[39]	Somerville, M. (2006). An enabling place pedagogy for new teachers. Annual AARE Conference, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 8-9 November 2006.
[40]	Timperley, H., & Alton-Lee, A. (2008). Reframing teacher professional learning: An alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. Review of Research in Education, 32, 328-369. doi:10.3102/0091732X07308968
[41]	Vickers, M., & Ferfolja, T. (2006). The classmates education initiative. Curriculum Leadership, 4. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/leader/the_classmates_teacher_education_initiative_at_uws,15816.html?issueID=10414