Procedural Skills, SketchUp and Vodcasting: Distance Teaching of Design Drawing Skills and Student Learning Autonomy

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2014.512125   PDF   HTML     4,270 Downloads   6,377 Views   Citations


The popularity of sites like YouTube demonstrates the potential preference for users to use video podcasts (vodcasts) as an instructional tool. As educators have been encouraged to become more literate in authoring Web 2.0 technologies, the implementation of vodcasts as an effective pedagogy has been increasingly used in educational settings. The recent proliferation of distance education courses caused educators in higher education settings to consider why some programs are more suitable for distance education than others, and whether procedural knowledge and skills that are required in various industries may be able to be delivered using contemporary technologies. This article discusses the efficacy of using vodcasting as a pedagogical tool, in developing procedural knowledge and skills in computer aided design and drawing, to pre-service teachers studying via distance education, and demonstrates the capacity for vodcasts to foster autonomous student learning.

Share and Cite:

Ellis, D. and Boyd, W. (2014) Procedural Skills, SketchUp and Vodcasting: Distance Teaching of Design Drawing Skills and Student Learning Autonomy. Creative Education, 5, 1106-1117. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.512125.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] ABS (2010). Education and Training Cat. No. 1301.0 Year Book Australia. Australian Bureau of Statistics.
[2] Anderson, J. R., & Fincham, J. M. (1994). Acquisition of Procedural Skills from Examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition, 20, 1322.
[3] Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Complete Edition. New York: Longman.
[4] Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1.
[5] Boud, D. (1993). Experience as the Base for Learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 12, 33-44.
[6] Boyd, W. E., & Ellis, D. (2013). Sketching up New Geographies: Open Sourcing and Curriculum Development. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 403-415.
[7] Boyd, W. E., & Horta, H. (2011). Network Ethics in the Growing Global, Multi-Dimensional and Technological Academy: Introduction to Articles Presented at the 2009 Network Ethics Conference. International Journal of Cyber Ethics in Education, 1, i-v.
[8] Boyd, W. E., & Newton, D. (2011). Times of Change, Times of Turbulence: Seeking an Ethical Framework for Curriculum Development during Critical Transition in Higher Education. International Journal of Cyber Ethics in Education, 1, 1-11.
[9] Brown, R. A., & Brown, J. W. (2010). What Is Technology Education? A Review of the “Official Curriculum”. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83, 49-53.
[10] Bourne, J., Harris, D., & Mayadas, F. (2005). Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 131-146.
[11] Carroll, J. B. (1963). A Model of School Learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
[12] Chi, M. T., & Ohlsson, S. (2005). Complex Declarative Learning. In Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Clifton, A., & Mann, C. (2011). Can YouTube Enhance Student Nurse Learning?
[14] Coggins, C. C. (1989). Preferred Learning Styles and Their Impact on Completion of External Degree Programs. In M. G. Moore, & G. C. Clark (Eds.), Readings in Distance Learning and Instruction (No. 2, pp. 1-13). University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
[15] CHCC (2013). Land Use. Coffs Harbour City Council.
[16] Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A Systemic and Cognitive View on Collaborative Knowledge Building with Wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 105-122.
[17] den Exter, K., Rowe, S., Boyd, W., & Lloyd, D. (2012). Using Web 2.0 Technologies for Collaborative Learning in Distance Education—Case Studies from an Australian University. Future Internet, 4, 216-237.
[18] Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Toronto: Collier-MacMillan.
[19] Diaz, D. P., & Cartnal, R. B. (1999). Students’ Learning Styles in Two Classes. College Teaching, 47, 130-135.
[20] Drago, W. A., & Wagner, R. J. (2004). Vark Preferred Learning Styles and Online Education. Management Research News, 27, 1-13.
[21] Dunn, R., Beaudry, J., & Klavas, A. (1989). Survey of Research on Learning Styles. Educational Leadership, 46, 50-58.
[22] Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 395-430.
[23] Feisel, L. D., & Rosa, A. J. (2005). The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 121-130.
[24] Fleming, N., & Baume, D. (2006). Learning Styles Again: VARKing up the Right Tree! Educational Developments, 7, 4-7.
[25] Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11, 137.
[26] Gee, D. B. (1990). The Impact of Students’ Preferred Learning Style Variables in a Distance Education Course: A Case Study. Unpublished Research/Technical Report, Texas Technical University.
[27] Gough, J. E. (1980). The Use of Study Centres in Four Distance Education Systems. Victoria: Deakin University.
[28] Griffiths, M. (2010). Improving the Asynchronous Video Learning Model. PhD Dissertation, Birmingham Young University.
[29] Hammersley, B. (2004). Audible Revolution. The Guardian.
[30] Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2000). Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory and Its Application in Geography in Higher Education. Journal of Geography, 99, 185-195.
[31] Henry, J. (1989). Meaning and Practice in Experiential Learning. In S. W. Weil, & I. McGill (Eds.), Making Sense of Experiential Learning: Diversity in Theory and Practice (pp. 25-37). Milton Keynes: UK Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
[32] Hymel, G. M. (1988). The Carroll Model of School Learning: A 25-Year Retrospective View of Its Foundational Role in Mastery Learning Theory and Practice.
[33] ITEA (2005). Developing Professionals: Preparing Technology Teachers. Addenda to Technological Literacy Standards Series. Advancing Technological Literacy: ITEA Professional Series. International Technology Education Association (ITEA).
[34] Kao, I. (2008). Using Video Podcast to Enhance Students’ Learning Experience in Engineering. American Society for Engineering Education.
[35] Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[36] Leite, W. L., Svinicki, M., & Shi, Y. Y. (2009). Attempted Validation of the Scores of the VARK: Learning Styles Inventory With Multitrait-Multimethod Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 323-339.
[37] Miller, D., Alway, M., & McKinley, D. (1987). Effects of Learning Styles and Strategies on Academic Success. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 399-404.
[38] NSWBOS (2003). Graphics Technology Years 7-10 Syllabus. New South Wales Board of Studies.
[39] NSWIT (2011). Subject Content Requirements for Teaching in a NSW Primary or Secondary School (Abridged). New South Wales Institute of Teachers.
[40] Oosterhof, A. (2012). Types of Changes that Occur as Declarative Knowledge Increases. Tallahassee, FL: Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment, Florida State University.
[41] Parker, A. (2003). Motivation and Incentives for Distance Faculty. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6.
[42] Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1-6.
[43] Putnam, A. R. (1992). What People Mean When They Say They Teach Technology Education. Paper presented at the American Vocational Association Convention, St. Louis, MO, December 1992.
[44] Rafi, A., Samsudin, K., & Ismail, A. (2006). On Improving Spatial Ability through Computer-Mediated Engineering Drawing Instruction. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9, 149-159.
[45] Rudestam, K. E. (2004). Distributed Education and the Role of Online Learning in Training Professional Psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 427-432.
[46] Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The Cognitive Benefits of Interactive Videos: Learning to Tie Nautical Knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293-305.
[47] Scott, B. (2014). Coffs Harbour Entertains the Idea of a Major Project.
[48] Shin, D. H. (2009). The Evaluation of User Experience of the Virtual World in Relation to Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 530-553.
[49] Shin, D. H., & Kim, W. Y. (2008). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Cyworld User Behavior: Implication of the Web 2.0 User Acceptance. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 378-382.
[50] Thompson, C., & Absalom, M. (2011). Working with Wikis: Collaboration, Authorship and Assessment in Higher Education. In S. M. Barton, J. Hedberg, & K. Susuki (Eds.), Global Learn Asia Pacific 2011 (pp. 375-384). Melbourne: AACE.
[51] van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing Knowledge-Sharing, Knowledge-Construction, and Knowledge-Creation Discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 259-287.
[52] Williams, P. P. (2009). Technological Literacy: A Multliteracies Approach for Democracy. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 19, 237-254.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.