
holds true for any
. The technique used in the paper can give more general results, e.g. by replacing sine or cosine with continuous function
having an irrational period.
Keywords:
Subject Areas: Mathematical Analysis, Number Theory, Numerical Mathematics
1. Introduction
There are several arguments known showing that the ranges of the sequences
and
to be dense in the interval
(see for example [1] , Problem 4.22, p. 33 and [2] , Problem 1.4.26, p. 45). In [3] the authors considered the limit points of the sequence
rather constructively. Subsequently Ogilvy [4] presented more elegant but less direct analysis. In [5] it was demonstrated, on the basis of continued fraction
theory, that the set
is dense too in
. Recently, these results were generalized in some
directions in [6] , considering instead of cosine and sine, a continuous function
having an irrational
period. As a corollary the authors obtained that the sets
and
are dense in
. However, it was not confirmed in [6] that
is dense too in
. The technique used in the above cited literature is more or less constructive or quantitative. To the best knowledge of the author, the most constructive approach to the problem of denseness of the sequence
or more general of the sequence
for a continuous function
having an irrational period can be found in [7] .
We offer a concrete―direct, constructive and also quantitative (computational) approach to the limit points of
the sequences
and
, i.e. to the limit points of complex-valued sequence
.
The idea of continued fraction representation of a number suggests how to construct an algorithm producing a sequence of positive integers such that by applying the functions sin and cos we obtain two convergent sequences with prescribed limits in the interval
. Crucial is the well-known fact that for any irrational number
the fractional parts
,
, are dense in
. The purpose of the paper is to construct explicitly, for any positive irrational
and any
, the sequence
of positive integers such that the sequence of fractional parts of products
converges towards t, and consequently, to construct explicitly, for any
, the sequence of positive integers
such that the estimate
![]()
holds true for any
.
2. Preliminaries
We begin with formal definition making possible to construct the desired sequence.
![]()
1The literature usually uses for fractional part of x different notations such as for example
or
or even
. The last one symbol is not suitable due to possible confusion with the singleton containing the only element x.
Definition 2.1 For any
the integer part or floor
and the fractional part
of x are defined as follows1:
![]()
As an immediate consequence of this definition we have, for any
:
1)
(1)
2)
(2)
Moreover, for any positive irrational number
and any positive integer n there exist (only one) non-nega- tive number k and (only one)
such that
(3)
Indeed, considering Definition above, the numbers
and
confirm the assertion. Namely, using (1), we have
and
, i.e.
with
irrational.
The crucial role is played by the following lemma.
Lemma 2.2. Let
,
,
and let
be such that
. Then
there exist
and
such that
,
,
and
. Construc- tively, letting
![]()
the numbers
![]()
verify the statement.
Proof. Let us suppose that
(4)
Then
. Hence, the integer
and, considering (1),
, i.e.
(5)
Moreover,
(6)
where
and
(7)
Consequently,
(8)
Now, we distinguish two cases: (A)
and (B)
.
(A) In this case we can set in Lemma 2.2 the integers
and
, and the fractional part
.
(B) In this case we have the difference
(9)
Therefore, there exists an integer
such that the inequality
(10)
holds. Now, referring to (4), (6) and (8), we have
![]()
Hence,
(11)
where
(12)
and, according to (8),
(13)
Since
, due to (10) and (13), we can take in Lemma 2.2 the integers
,
and
.
We also note that the integer
satisfies the estimate
![]()
i.e., referring to (9), we have
![]()
Thus,
satisfies (10) and
for every p satisfying (10). Moreover, in case (B), we have
. But, this estimate implies the inequality
. Consequently,
, i.e. we have
. Hence,
in case (B), we estimate
and
.
Corollary 2.3. Let
be any positive irrational,
any positive integer and for every
let us define
1) ![]()
2) ![]()
3) ![]()
4) ![]()
5) ![]()
6) ![]()
In this way we obtain the sequences
and
of positive integers and the sequence
such that for any
there hold the following relations:
i) ![]()
ii)
and ![]()
iii)
.
iv)
.
Proof. For the sequences, which are given inductively, we can apply the preceding Lemma 2.2 to verify the assertions i)-iii) of the Corollary 2.3. Concerning the estimate iv), it is certainly true for
and, if
for some
, then, using iii), we have
.
Remark 2.4. The estimate iii) in Corollary 2.3 is rather sharp as is illustrated2 in Figure 1 where the graph of the sequence
is depicted using
.
Remark 2.5. The estimate iv) in Corollary 2.3 seems to be rather rough as it is evident from Figure 2 showing the graph of the sequence
.
Remark 2.6. Given positive irrational
, smaller is the factor
in Corollary 2.3 iv) faster is the convergence
as
. Therefore, for the initial number
in Corollary 2.3 a positive
integer m should be chosen in such a way that the number
should be as small as possi-
ble. The Table 1 illustrates the dynamics of the sequence
.
Remark 2.7. The Table 2 shows, for
, the dynamics of the sequences
and
. The latter grows very fast. However, if we put, for example,
in Corollary 2.3, we would get a sequence that would grow a bit more slowly. By experimenting with Mathematica [8] we come to the conjecture that
![]()
for
and
. However, this is only a hypothesis.
3. Denseness
Theorem 3.1. For
being any positive irrational,
and, using the sequences
and
from Corollary 2.3, let us define
1)
,
2)
.
![]()
Table 2. Dynamics of the sequences
and
.
Then the sequence
converges towards t as
. Hence, the sequence of fractional parts of products
,
, is dense in the interval
.
For several
, Figure 3 and Figure 4 on page 7 illustrate convergence of the sequence
towards t, using
.
Proof. Let us take
and
. Now, considering Corollary 2.3 iv), we estimate
![]()
Therefore, according to the definition i) of
and considering the equivalence (1) on page 2, we have
and
![]()
Consequently, again thanks to Corollary 2.3 iv),
![]()
or
(14)
Now, for
, using the definition ii) of
and considering Corollary 2.3 i), we have
![]()
or
(15)
Also, using (14),
![]()
holds for
![]()
Thus, according to (15), the fractional part of
is equal to
, for
, and, thanks to (14), converges towards t as
. ![]()
Theorem 3.2. The closures of the sets
and
are equal to the interval
. More constructively, setting
in Corollary 2.3, and considering the sequences
and
defined in Corollary 2.3, let us define, for any
and
,
1) ![]()
2)
.
Then
(16)
The estimate (16) is illustrated on the Figure 5 where is plotted the graph of the sequence
together with the graph of continuous function
.
Proof. Assume that all the suppositions of Theorem 3.2 are fulfilled. Then, since
we have, considering Corollary 2.3 iv), the estimate
, i.e.
(17)
Moreover, referring to the definition of
,
![]()
Figure 3. The graphs of the sequences
using
.
![]()
Figure 4. The graphs of the sequences
using
.
![]()
Figure 5. The graph of the sequence
and the graph of continuous function
.
![]()
That is, considering (17), we estimate
(18)
Now, according to Corollary 2.3, we have
![]()
Hence,
(19)
To conclude the proof we estimate
(20)
for
. For such h we also have
(21)
The relations (18)-(21) imply the inequalities
![]()
verifying (16).
4. Conclusions
Using only elementary tools, no use of convergents of continued fraction theory, we derived two main results about the denseness:
1) For any positive irrational
and every
we constructed inductively a sequence of positive integers
such that the appropriate sequence of fractional parts of products
converges towards t.
2) We demonstrated constructively and quantitatively the well known fact that the ranges of cosine and sine are dense in the interval
; for any real
we constructed inductively the sequence of positive integers
such that
, for any
.
In [7] is presented very nice approach to the denseness problem which is also constructive. Essential for this paper are two lemmas.
Lemma A. [Lemma 1, p. 402] Let L be any irrational number greater than 1, and suppose that
,
and
for
. Then the sequence
is well defined and
![]()
for all
.
Lemma B. [Lemma 2, p. 403] For each xk defined in Lemma A we can find integers mk and nk such that
, with
and
for
. As the consequence of these lemmas in [7] is constructively proved the next theorem.
Theorem. [Theorem 3, p. 404] Let
be continuous function with irrational period. Then, for any
point
in the range of f, there exists a sequence
of positive integers such that
.
This theorem could be proved and expanded also using our technique.
NOTES
![]()
2In this article all figures are produced using Mathematica [8] .