Efficacy and Safety of Continuing Bevacizumab beyond Disease Progression plus Docetaxel in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

Takashi Yokoi^1,2*, Takayasu Kurata^1,2, Yoshitaro Torii^1,2, Yuichi Katashiba^1,2, Makoto Ogata¹, Naoko Murakami Satsutani^1,2, Maiko Niki^1,2, Noriko Inagaki Katashiba^1,2, Kayoko Nishimura Kibata^1,2, Shosaku Nomura^1,2

¹First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
²Department of Thoracic Oncology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

DOI: 10.4236/alc.2015.41002                

Abstract

Background: Bevacizumab-based chemotherapy has been shown to extend progression-free survival (PFS) of lung cancer, but its effect on overall survival (OS) remains unclear. However, bevacizumab beyond disease progression (BBP) significantly improved OS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Therefore, we retrospectively analysed 22 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated with docetaxel plus BBP at the Department of Thoracic Oncology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, between November 2009 and March 2013. Results: The response rate was 31.8% and the disease control rate was 86.4%. The median PFS was 4.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 - 8.7 months) and the median OS was 17.2 months (95% CI, 8.5 - 25.9 months). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events included leukocytopenia (68.2%), neutropenia (77.3%), fatigue (9.1%), proteinuria (9.1%), febrile neutropenia (4.5%), anemia (4.5%), and anorexia (4.5%). Conclusion: Docetaxel plus BBP was found to be generally well tolerated and effective.

Keywords

Bevacizumab beyond Disease Progression, NSCLC, Second-Line Chemotherapy, Docetaxel

1. Introduction

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), primarily including adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma, accounts for approximately 80% - 85% of all lung cancers, and approximately two-thirds of NSCLC patients are found to have advanced-stage disease at diagnosis. The standard of care for the initial treat- ment of these patients is a platinum-based, two-drug chemotherapy. However, its therapeutic effect is limited and the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC remains poor.

Recently, new treatment strategies for NSCLC have been introduced. One of these is based on targeting driver mutations such as the anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement and the epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. Other strategies include the use of the folate antimetabolite pemetrexed, the administration of maintenance therapy, and the disruption of neo-angiogenesis using anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies such as bevacizumab. The latter is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits angiogenesis and results in tumour necrosis and the inhibition of metastasis. A randomized phase II study of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy showed promising results and suggested that this was suitable for non-squamous NSCLC patients in terms of its acceptable serious toxicity profile [1] . Two randomized phase III studies and a randomized phase II study were subsequently performed in Japan in order to compare chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with chemotherapy alone for the initial treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC [2] -[4] . However, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 4599 was the first phase III study that showed a statistically significant benefit in terms of both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin plus paclitaxel compared with carboplatin plus paclitaxel alone in NSCLC [2] . In contrast, both the Avastin in Lung trial (AVAiL), which evaluated cisplatin plus gemcitabine with or without beva- cizumab, and a Japanese randomized phase II study, which evaluated carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab, demonstrated a significantly longer PFS in the bevacizumab arm, but there was no significant difference in OS [3] [4] . Although the combination of bevacizumab and carboplatin plus paclitaxel was established as a standard of care for non-squamous NSCLC patients based on the ECOG study results, many oncologists doubt whether bevacizumab is truly beneficial in the treatment of NSCLC because bevacizumab-containing regimens did not prolong OS in other studies.

Recently, the administration of bevacizumab beyond disease progression (BBP) has been of interest. Preclinical studies have shown rapid reconstruction of tumour blood vessels after the discontinuation of angiogenesis inhibitors [5] [6] and have suggested that permanent vascularization inhibition could maintain antitumour efficacy. Indeed, a randomized phase III study demonstrated that the maintenance of VEGF inhibition with beva- cizumab as BBP in combined second-line chemotherapy significantly improved OS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [7] . This approach has also been under consideration for non-squamous NSCLC, but until now, there has been no evidence to support the administration of BBP in patients with this malignancy. Therefore, we retrospectively analysed the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus BBP in patients with non-squamous NSCLC who showed disease progression after first-line treatment with bevacizumab.

2. Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective study of 22 advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients who were treated with docetaxel plus bevacizumab as second-line therapy after disease progression following first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus platinum-based doublet therapy at the Department of Thoracic Oncology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, between November 2009 and March 2013. From the patient charts, we retrieved the following data: age, gender, disease stage, histology, complete blood count, liver and kidney function test results, computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging scans of the whole body and brain, and the epidermal growth factor receptor status.

Objective tumour responses were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 [8] , by each attending physician. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 [9] . PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

Twenty-two non-squamous NSCLC patients were treated with docetaxel plus BBP as second-line therapy. The patient characteristics are listed in Table 1. Sixteen patients (72%) were male and 6 (28%) were female, and their median age was 63 years (range, 40 - 70 years). Three patients (13%) had an ECOG performance status of 0, 16 (74%) had an ECOG performance status of 1, and 3 (13%) had an ECOG performance status of 2. One patient (7%) had stage IIIB disease, 19 (86%) had stage IV disease, and 2 (9%) had postoperative recurrence. All of the patients had adenocarcinoma. As first-line chemotherapy, 21 patients were treated with carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab, and 1 (5%) patient was treated with cisplatin, gemcitabine, and bevacizumab. The median course of docetaxel plus BBP was 7 courses (range, 1 - 22).

3.2. Efficacy

Of the 22 patients, 7 (31.8%) achieved a partial response (PR), resulting in a response rate (RR) of 31.8%. The other 12 patients (54.6%) achieved stable disease (SD) as their best response to therapy, resulting in a disease control rate (DCR) of 86.4% (Table 2). The median PFS was 4.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 - 8.7 months) (Figure 1), and the median OS was 17.2 months (95% CI, 8.5 - 25.9 months) (Figure 2).

3.3. Safety

All AEs are listed in Table 3. AEs of grade 3 or higher were observed in 18 patients (81.8%). Grade 3 and 4 haematological AEs included leukocytopenia (68.2%), neutropenia (77.3%), febrile neutropenia (4.5%) and anemia (4.5%), and grade 3 and 4 non-haematological AEs included fatigue (9.1%), proteinuria (9.1%), and

Table 1. Patient characteristics.

CBDCA: carboplatin; Pem: pemetrexed; Bev: bevacizumab; Gem: gemcitabine.

Table 2. Response to treatment.

CR: complete response; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; PD: progressive disease; RR: response rate; DCR: disease control rate.

Figure 1. Progression-free survival.

Figure 2. Overall survival.

anorexia (4.5%). No patient experienced hypertension or venous thrombosis of grade 3 or higher severity (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Docetaxel or pemetrexed monotherapy are the current standard chemotherapies for non-squamous NSCLC patients who have previously failed platinum-containing chemotherapy. In phase III studies by Shepherd et al. and Fossella et al., docetaxel for pretreated NSCLC patients with a good PS increased the 1-year survival rate by 10% to 20% compared with treatment with ifosfamide, vinorelbine, or best supportive care alone [10] [11] . In

Table 3. Adverse events.

these studies, the median time to progression was 8.5 - 10.6 weeks, the RR was 6.7% - 7.1%, and the 1-year survival rate was 32% - 37%. However, in a phase III randomized controlled trial, second-line pemetrexed monotherapy resulted in an RR of 9.1%, a median PFS of 2.9 months, and a median OS of 8.3 months [12] . This study also showed that treatment with pemetrexed resulted in clinically equivalent efficacy with significantly fewer side effects compared to docetaxel in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Several clinical studies of combined doublet chemotherapy for NSCLC as second-line treatment have also been conducted. In a meta-analysis of second-line single-agent chemotherapy compared with combination chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC, the latter was found to have significantly increased the response rate and PFS, but was more toxic and did not improve OS compared to single-agent therapies [13] . Thus, single-agent monotherapy is still the standard second-line chemotherapy for NSCLC.

Recently, there has been growing interest in treatment using BBP. Preclinical studies have shown that rapid reconstruction of tumour blood vessels occurs after discontinuation of angiogenesis inhibitors [5] [6] and have suggested that permanent vascularization inhibition maintains antitumor efficacy. In fact, a randomized phase III study demonstrated that maintenance of VEGF inhibition with bevacizumab as BBP in combined second-line chemotherapy significantly improved OS in metastatic colorectal cancer [7] . Similarly, BBP is also expected to be beneficial in other cancers.

In this retrospective analysis, which is also the first analysis of BBP in NSCLC, docetaxel plus BBP resulted in a good response rate and longer PFS and OS. In the DELTA study, which was a phase III study to compare erlotinib and docetaxel in the treatment of Japanese pretreated non-squamous NSCLC patients, docetaxel resulted in a response rate of 17.9%, a median PFS of 3.2 months, and a median OS of 12.2 months [14] , which is an improvement compared to previous studies. Our findings suggested the possibility of superior therapeutic results compared to the DELTA study and other previous studies (Table 4, Table 5), although there is a possibility of selection bias arising from the small sample size and retrospective nature of our analysis. To assess the

Table 4. Efficacy of second-line, post-progression treatment in this and previous studies.

RR: response rate; DCR: disease control rate; mPFS: median progression-free survival; mOS: median overall survival; DTX: docetaxel; Bev: bevacizumab; Pem: pemetrexed.

Table 5. Grade 3 - 4 adverse events comparing this analysis versus DELTA study.

DTX: docetaxel; Bev: bevacizumab.

efficacy and safety of chemotherapy plus BBP for patients who had previously failed platinum-containing chemotherapy, a further prospective study is required. Indeed some prospective studies of BBP, for example, West Japan Oncology Group 5910L and AvaALL (MO22097) [15] [16] , are already underway.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, docetaxel plus BBP showed good efficacy and safety in patients with non-squamous NSCLC who showed disease progression after first-line treatment with bevacizumab in this retrospective analysis. It is possible, therefore, that this regimen will become a standard second-line treatment for non-squamous NSCLC.

NOTES

^*Corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Johnson, D.H., Fehrenbacher, L., Novotny, W.F., Herbst, R.S., Nemunaitis, J.J., Jablons, D.M., Langer, C.J., DeVore 3rd, R.F., Gaudreault, J., Damico, L.A., Holmgren, E. and Kabbinavar, F. (2004) Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Bevacizumab plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Alone in Previously Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22, 2184-2191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.11.022
[2]	Sandler, A., Gray, R., Perry, M.C., Brahmer, J., Schiller, J.H., Dowlati, A., Lilenbaum, R. and Johnson, D.H. (2006) Paclitaxel-Carboplatin Alone or with Bevacizumab for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 2542-2550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061884
[3]	Reck, M., von Pawel, J., Zatloukal, P., Ramlau, R., Gorbounova, V., Hirsh, V., Leighl, N., Mezger, J., Archer, V., Moore, N. and Manegold, C. (2009) Phase III Trial of Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine with either Placebo or Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy for Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: AVAil. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27, 1227-1234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5466
[4]	Niho, S., Kunitoh, H., Nokihara, H., Horai, T., Ichinose, Y., Hida, T., Yamamoto, N., Kawahara, M., Shinkai, T., Nakagawa, K., Matsui, K., Negoro, S., Yokoyama, A., Kudoh, S., Kiura, K., Mori, K., Okamoto, H., Sakai, H., Takeda, K., Yokota, S., Saijo, N. and Fukuoka, M. (2012) Randomized Phase II Study of First-Line Carboplatin-Paclitaxel with or without Bevacizumab in Japanese Patients with Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Lung Cancer, 76, 362-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.12.005
[5]	Mancuso, M.R., Davis, R., Norberg, S.M., O’Brien, S., Sennino, B., Nakahara, T., Yao, V.J., Inai, T., Brooks, P., Freimark, B., Shalinsky, D.R., Hu-Lowe, D.D. and McDonald, D.M. (2006) Rapid Vascular Regrowth in Tumors after Reversal of VEGF Inhibition. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 116, 2610-2621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI24612
[6]	Steeghs, N., Rabelink, T.J., op’t Roodt, J., Batman, E., Cluitmans, F.H., Weijl, N.I., de Koning, E. and Gelderblom, H. (2010) Reversibility of Capillary Density after Discontinuation of Bevacizumab Treatment. Annals of Oncology, 21, 1100-1105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp417
[7]	Bennouna, J., Sastre, J., Arnold, D., ?sterlund, P., Greil, R., Van Cutsem, E., von Moos, R., Viéitez, J.M., Bouché, O., Borg, C., Steffens, C.C., Alonso-Ordu?a, V., Schlichting, C., Reyes-Rivera, I., Bendahmane, B., André, T. and Kubicka, S. (2013) ML18147 Study Investigators. Continuation of Bevacizumab after First Progression in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (ML18147): A Randomised Phase 3 Trial. The Lancet Oncology, 14, 29-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70477-1
[8]	Eisenhauer, E.A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L.H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., Rubinstein, L., Shankar, L., Dodd, L., Kaplan, R., Lacombe, D. and Verweij, J. (2009) New Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours: Revised RECIST Guideline (Version 1.1). European Journal of Cancer, 45, 228-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
[9]	Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program [NCCN Web Site]. http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm
[10]	Shepherd, F.A., Dancey, J., Ramlau, R., Mattson, K., Gralla, R., O’Rourke, M., Levitan, N., Gressot, L., Vincent, M., Burkes, R., Coughlin, S., Kim, Y. and Berille, J. (2000) Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel versus Best Supportive Care in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18, 2095-2103.
[11]	Fossella, F.V., DeVore, R., Kerr, R.N., Crawford, J., Natale, R.R., Dunphy, F., Kalman, L., Miller, V., Lee, J.S., Moore, M., Gandara, D., Karp, D., Vokes, E., Kris, M., Kim, Y., Gamza, F. and Hammershaimb, L. (2000) Randomized Phase III Trial of Docetaxel versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated with Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18, 2354-2362.
[12]	Hanna, N., Shepherd, F.A., Fossella, F.V., Pereira, J.R., De Marinis, F., von Pawel, J., Gatzemeier, U., Tsao, T.C.Y., Pless, M., Muller, T., Lim, H.L., Desch, C., Szondy, K., Gervais, R., Shaharyar, Manegold, C., Paul, S., Paoletti, P., Einhorn, L. and Bunn Jr., P.A. (2004) Randomized Phase III Trial of Pemetrexed versus Docetaxel in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated with Chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22, 1589-1597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.08.163
[13]	Di Maio, M., Chiodini, P., Georgoulias, V., Hatzidaki, D., Takeda, K., Wachters, F.M., Gebbia, V., Smit, E.F., Morabito, A., Gallo, C., Perrone, F. and Gridelli, C. (2009) Meta-Analysis of Single-Agent Chemotherapy Compared with Combination Chemotherapy as Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27, 1836-1843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.5844
[14]	Kawaguchi, T., Ando, M., Asami, K., Okano, Y., Fukuda, M., Nakagawa, H., Ibata, H., Kozuki, T., Endo, T., Tamura, A., Kamimura, M., Sakamoto, K., Yoshimi, M., Soejima, Y., Tomizawa, Y., Isa, S., Takada, M., Saka, H. and Kubo, A. (2014) Randomized Phase III Trial of Erlotinib versus Docetaxel as Second- or Third-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Docetaxel and Erlotinib Lung Cancer Trial (DELTA). Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32, 1902-1908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4694
[15]	Takeda, M., Okamoto, I., Yamanaka, T., Nakagawa, K. and Nakanishi, Y. (2012) Impact of Treatment with Bevacizumab beyond Disease Progression: A Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel with or without Bevacizumab after Platinum-Based Chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (WJOG 5910L). BMC Cancer, 12, 327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-327
[16]	Gridelli, C., Bennouna, J., de Castro, J., Dingemans, A.M., Griesinger, F., Grossi, F., Rossi, A., Thatcher, N., Wong, E.K. and Langer, C. (2011) Randomized Phase IIIb Trial Evaluating the Continuation of Bevacizumab beyond Disease Progression in Patients with Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after First-Line Treatment with Bevacizumab plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: Treatment Rationale and Protocol Dynamics of the AvaALL (MO22097) Trial. Clinical Lung Cancer, 12, 407-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2011.05.002
[17]	Roszkowski, K., Pluzanska, A., Krzakowski, M., Smith, A.P., Saigi, E., Aasebo, U., Parisi, A., Pham Tran, N., Olivares, R. and Berille, J. (2000) A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Study of Docetaxel plus Best Supportive Care versus Best Supportive Care in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients with Metastatic or Non-Resectable Localized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer, 27, 145-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(00)00094-5