On the (Δ + 2)-Total-Colorability of Planar Graphs with 7-Cycles Containing at Most Two Chords ()
1. Introduction
In this paper, we consider only finite, simple, undirected graphs, and follow [1] for the undefined terminology and notation here. Given a graph G, we denote its vertex set, edge set and maximum degree by
,
and
(or simply V, E and Δ), respectively. A cycle of length
is called a
-cycle, two cycles C1 and C2 are said to intersecting (resp., adjacent) if C1 and C2 share at least one vertex (resp., one edge). A 3-cycle is also called a triangle. For a cycle C of G, an edge
is called a chord of C if
.
A
-total-coloring of graph G is a coloring of
using
colors such that no two adjacent or incident elements receive the same color. A graph G is
-totally-colorable if it admits a
-total-coloring. Obviously, at least Δ + 1 colors are necessitated to color G totally. Behzad [2] and Vizing [3] independently put forward the following conjecture, which is well known as the Total Coloring Conjecture (TCC).
Conjecture Every graph is (Δ + 2)-totally-colorable.
Clearly, TCC is true for Δ ≤ 2. Rosenfeld [4] and Vijayaditya [5] solved it for Δ = 3. Kostochka solved the cases of Δ = 4 [6] and Δ = 5 [7] successively. For planar graphs, more results are known, TCC is true for Δ = 7 [8], and Δ ≥ 8 [9]. So the only open case for planar graphs is Δ = 6. While TCC remains unsolved for general planar graphs G with Δ = 6, it is known to hold for some special cases, as follows.
Theorem 1. Let G be a planar graph with Δ = 6. Then G is 8-totally-colorable if one of the following conditions holds.
(1) G contains no adjacent triangles (see [10]).
(2) G contains no chordal
-cycles for some
(see [11]).
(3) For every vertex
of G, there is an integer
, such that
is not in any
-cycle (see [12]).
(4)
, where
denotes the number of vertices of degree
that lie on
distinct triangles in G (see [13]).
(5) G contains no any subgraph isomorphic to a 4-fan (see [14]).
(6) G is claw-free (see [15]).
(7) G is recursive maximal (see [16]).
In this paper, we obtain the following result.
Theorem 2. Let G be a planar graph with Δ = 6. If every 7-cycle of G contains at most two chords, then G is 8-totally-colorable.
On the other hand, Shen et al. [17] conjectured that every planar graph is (Δ + 1)-totally-colorable, for
. This first result was given in [18] for Δ ≥ 14, which was finally improved to Δ ≥ 9 in [19]. Some related results can be found in [20]-[30].
Now, we define some more definitions and notations. A vertex of degree
, at most
or at least
is called a
-vertex,
-vertex or a
-vertex, respectively. A
-face (resp.,
-face,
-face) is a face of degree
(resp., at most
, at least
). A face
with consecutive vertices
along its boundary is called a
-face. Denote by
the number of
-faces incident with
, by
the number of
-faces incident with
.
2. Proof of Theorem 2
Let
be a minimal counterexample to Theorem 2, such that
is minimum. Thus every proper subgraph of G admits an 8-total-coloring. Embed G into the plane, and denoted face set of G by F. We first show some structure properties of G.
Lemma 3. ([10]) (1) G is 2-connected.
(2) G contains no edge
with
and
.
By Lemma 3(1), if
is a face of G, then the boundary of
is a cycle. By Lemma 3(2),
and if
is 3-vertex of G, then the three neighbors of
are all 6-vertices.
Lemma 4. ([13]) (1) G contains no
-triangle.
(2) G contains no
-triangle.
(3) G contains no
-triangle.
Lemma 5. ([13] [14]) If
is a triangle in G, where
,
and
, then
(1) both
and
are only incident with one triangle, i.e.
.
(2)
is only incident with one
-triangle, i.e.
.
(3)
is not adjacent to any 3-vertex.
Lemma 6. ([13]) (1) G contains no 4-face incident with more than one 3-vertex.
(2) G contains no 5-face incident with more than one 3-vertex.
We shall complete the proof of Theorem 2 by using the discharging method. According to the Euler’s formula
, we have
For each
, we define
to be the initial charge of
. In particular,
(
),
(
). Obviously,
. Then, we will apply the following discharging rules to reassign a new charge denoted by
. If we can get
, then we obtain an obvious contradiction to
, and complete the proof.
For a face
of G, we use
to denote that
sends
to
for
. Define the discharging rules that we need as follows.
R1. For
, we have
,
.
R2. For
, we have
,
.
R3. For any 5-vertex
and
, let
. In addition,
,
,
,
,
,
.
For every vertex
and every face
, we will check that
and
. Denote by
the total charge from
to
.
Let
. If
is a 6+-face, then
. If
is a 5-face, then
by Lemma 3, Lemma 6(2) and R1. If
is a 4-face, then
by Lemma 3, Lemma 6(1) and R2.
Suppose
is a 3-face. If
is not a
-face, then
by Lemma 3, Lemma 4 and R3. Now we consider the case that
is a
-face, that is,
,
and
are all 5-vertices. By
R3,
transfers at least
to each 3-face incident with
. By R1 and R2,
transfers at most
to each 4+-face incident with
. Thus if
, then
, we have
. Otherwise, without loss of generality (WLOG), assume
, it follows that both
and
must be incident with at least two 5+-faces, i.e.
and
. Therefore,
,
we have
.
Let
. If
is a 3-vertex, then
. If
is a 4-vertex or 5-vertex, then
according to the above discharging rules.
Suppose
is a 6-vertex. Let
be all the neighbors of
and
be all the faces incident with
, where
is incident with
,
, and
. In general, each subscript of this paper is taken modulo 6. First, we give two lemmas.
Lemma 7. If
and
are two triangles in G, where
,
and
, then both
and
are 5+-vertices.
Proof. By Lemma 3 and Lemma 4, we have min
and max
. Assume to be contrary that
or
. WLOG, suppose that
. Let
and
. We only need to consider the case that
and
by Lemma 5, see Figure 1(a).
The proof consists of two steps. First, we show that G has a partial 8-total-coloring in which only
is not colored. Second, we show how to extend it to an 8-total-coloring of G. If
is a (partial) 8-total-coloring of G,
, let
,
. Consider a proper subgraph
of G,
has a 8-total-coloring
:
.
Erase the colors on
. Clearly,
,
and
. Let
. If
, then there are at most 7 forbidden colors for
, so
can be properly colored. Thus we can assume that
(i.e.
), so
or
. If
, then we color
with
, and recolor
with
. Otherwise, we color
with
, and recolor
with
. Hence, G has such an 8-total-coloring.
Suppose now that
is a partial 8-total-coloring of G in which only
is uncolored. If we cannot extend
to G, then there are exactly 8 forbidden colors for
. WLOG, suppose that
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, see Figure 1(b). Also let
. Obviously,
. Otherwise, we can choose a color
or
, recolor
or
with β, color
with 7 or 8. Note that
.
Figure 1. Configurations for the proof of Lemma 7, where vertices marked by • have no other neighbors.
Suppose
. If
or
, then we exchange
and
, or
and
, color
with 7 or 8. Otherwise,
and
, it follows that
, we can recolor
with
,
with
, color
with 7. Suppose
. WLOG, assume
(i.e.
and
). Then
, for otherwise, we can recolor
with 6 or 8, color
with 3. Note that
.
If
(i.e.
), then
. Otherwise, we can recolor
with 7,
with 5,
with 3, and color
with 7. Now we exchange
and
, recolor
with 7, color
with 3. In the rest of this proof we assume that
, then
and
, this situation is very complicated. First, we have
, for otherwise, we can recolor
with 6,
with 5, and color
with 3. WLOG, suppose that
,
,
,
,
,
, see Figure 1(c). Second, we have
, for otherwise, we can choose a color
, recolor
with β,
with
, color
with 8 (here, we need to further recolor
with 6 when
, and recolor
with 3 and
with 7 when
). Similarly,
. Let
. In terms of γ, there are the following two cases.
Case 1.
.
Then
. Otherwise, we can exchange
and
, recolor
with
, color
with 8 (here, we need to further recolor
with 6 when
, and recolor
with 3 and
with 7 when
). Similarly,
. Thus
, we can choose a color
, recolor
with β,
with γ,
with
, color
with 8 (here, we need to further recolor
with 6 when
, and recolor
with 3 and
with 7 when
).
Case 2.
.
Then
. If
, then we choose
, recolor
with β,
with
,
with
, color
with 8 (here, we need to further recolor
with 6 when
, and recolor
with 3 and
with 7 when
). Otherwise,
. If
, then
, we choose a color
, recolor
with β,
with γ,
with
,
with
, color
with 8 (here, we need to further recolor
with 3 and
with 7 when
). Otherwise,
. Now we recolor
and
with
,
with γ,
with
, color
with 8 (here, we need to further recolor
with 6 when
, and recolor
with 3 and
with 7 when
).
All of the above show that G is 8-totally-colorable, a contradiction.
Lemma 8. Suppose
is a triangle with
, we have
(1) If
and
, then
.
(2) If
, then
.
Proof. (1) Note that
by Lemma 5(1), we have
by R4, so
.
(2) If
and
, then
and
, so
. Otherwise, WLOG, assume
. Then
by the choice of G, we have
,
so
. Since
,
.
Now, we begin to show that
for 6-vertex
. Note that
is 0 or 1 by Lemma 7,
by the choice of G. In terms of
, there are the following four cases.
Case 1.
. Note that
transfers at most
to each 3-face incident with
by Lemma 8, at most
to each 4+-face incident with
by R1 and R2. So
.
Case 2.
. If
, then another 3-face is a
-triangle by Lemma 7, it follows that
. Otherwise,
, then
transfers at most
to each 3-face incident with
by Lemma 8 and R2. Hence,
.
Case 3.
. If
, then
.
Otherwise,
, we have
.
Case 4.
. Note that either
or
. If
, then
. Otherwise,
, we have
.
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, the proof of the Theorem 2 is now complete.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Research Project of Higher Education Institutions in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (Grant Nos. NJZY22599, NJZY22600), the Key Laboratory of Infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian System and Its Algorithm Application (Inner Mongolia Normal University), Ministry of Education (Grant Nos. 2023KFZR01, 2023KFZR02), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Inner Mongolia Normal University (Grant No. 2022JBTD007).