Food and Nutrition Sciences

Volume 4, Issue 3 (March 2013)

ISSN Print: 2157-944X   ISSN Online: 2157-9458

Google-based Impact Factor: 2.37  Citations  

Food for Thought: Have We Been Giving the Wrong Dietary Advice?

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 83KB)  PP. 240-244  
DOI: 10.4236/fns.2013.43032    21,029 Downloads   50,681 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Background: Since 1984 UK citizens have been advised to reduce total dietary fat intake to 30% of total energy and saturated fat intake to 10%. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence [NICE] suggests a further benefit for Coronary Heart Disease [CHD] prevention by reducing saturated fat [SFA] intake to 6% - 7% of total energy and that 30,000 lives could be saved by replacing SFAs with Polyunsaturated fats [PUFAs]. Methods: 20 volumes of the Seven Countries Study, the seminal work behind the 1984 nutritional guidelines, were assessed. The evidence upon which the NICE guidance was based was reviewed. Nutritional facts about fat and the UK intake of fat are presented and the impact of macronutrient confusion on public health dietary advice is discussed. Findings: The Seven Countries study classified processed foods, primarily carbohydrates, as saturated fats. The UK government and NICE do the same, listing biscuits, cakes, pastries and savoury snacks as saturated fats. Processed foods should be the target of public health advice but not natural fats, in which the UK diet is deficient. With reference to the macro and micro nutrient composition of meat, fish, eggs, and dairy foods the article demonstrates that dietary trials cannot change one type of fat for another in a controlled study. Interpretation: The evidence suggests that processed food is strongly associated with the increase in obesity, diabetes, CHD, and other modern illness in our society. The macro and micro nutrients found in meat, fish, eggs and dairy products, are vital for human health and consumption of these nutritious foods should be encouraged.

Share and Cite:

Z. Harcombe, J. Baker and B. Davies, "Food for Thought: Have We Been Giving the Wrong Dietary Advice?," Food and Nutrition Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 3, 2013, pp. 240-244. doi: 10.4236/fns.2013.43032.

Cited by

[1] Saturated fat: villain and bogeyman in the development of cardiovascular disease?
European Journal of Preventive …, 2022
[2] La carne bovina como parte de una dieta saludable. Una revisión
Gilis - Agro sur, 2022
[3] Beef as part of a healthy diet. a review.
2022
[4] A Prospective Assessment of Bariatric Surgery Outcomes
2022
[5] Diabetes self-management using online low carbohydrate support groups
2021
[6] Fatty acids: facts vs. fiction
2021
[7] DESVENDANDO O PARADIGMA DAS GORDURAS SATURADAS E DO COLESTEROL PARTE 2: IMPORT?NCIA BIOQUíMICA E FISIOLóGICA E ALGUMAS CONSEQUêNCIAS PATOLóGICAS DA FALTA DESSAS MOLéCULAS
2019
[8] DESVENDANDO O PARADIGMA DAS GORDURAS SATURADAS E DO COLESTEROL PARTE 2: IMPORTÂNCIA BIOQUÍMICA E FISIOLÓGICA E ALGUMAS …
Brazilian Journal of …, 2019
[9] US dietary guidelines: is saturated fat a nutrient of concern?
2018
[10] The US Dietary Guidelines
2018
[11] The Doctor's Kitchen: Supercharge your health with 100 delicious everyday recipes
2017
[12] Is the calorie concept a real solution to the obesity epidemic?
International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2017
[13] Climate wars and fat wars: A new role for law
2017
[14] Problems with the 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: An Alternative
2016
[15] Evidence from prospective cohort studies does not support current dietary fat guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2016
[16] Dietary fat guidelines have no evidence base: where next for public health nutritional advice?
2016
[17] Two lipids in the diet, rather than cholesterol, are responsible for heart failure and stroke
Clinical Lipidology, 2014
[18] The Questionable Benefits of Exchanging Saturated Fat With Polyunsaturated Fat
Mayo Clinic …, 2013
[19] IT'S THE INSULIN RESISTANCE, STUPID: PART 7 By Prof. Timothy Noakes

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.