Open Journal of Soil Science

Volume 12, Issue 2 (February 2022)

ISSN Print: 2162-5360   ISSN Online: 2162-5379

Google-based Impact Factor: 2.27  Citations  

How United States Agricultural Herbicides Became Military and Environmental Chemical Weapons: Historical and Residual Effects

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 28878KB)  PP. 13-81  
DOI: 10.4236/ojss.2022.122002    2,468 Downloads   10,247 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Discoveries in Charles Darwin’s laboratory led to modern herbicides. Darwin discovered the internal mechanism that directed plants to grow toward sunlight and sources of water. Scientists in Europe and America later called this mechanism a plant’s hormone response system. Administrators and scientists, including Dr. Ezra J. Kraus, the Head of the Botany Department at the University of Chicago and a plant physiologist, suggested on the eve of WWII that weed killers had significant military value as chemical weapons. Dr. Kraus obtained access to a synthetic chemical, 2,4-D, and found that when the chemical was absorbed through the leaves of plants, it destroyed a plant’s hormones. After exposure, the plant experienced rapid and uncontrolled growth, and then the leaves shriveled, died and fell off. Dr. Kraus obtained funding for his Department of Botany research program from Department of Defense (DOD) during World War II (WWII). Camp Detrick (Biological Weapons Laboratory) scientists later obtained samples of newly created 2,4,5-T which contained unknown amounts of the by-product dioxin TCDD. In the 1950s and 1960s, Fort Detrick military scientists formulated the herbicide Agent Orange, which was a 50 - 50 mixture of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. These dual purpose herbicides were used by DOD and USDA. American and European farmers in the 1940s used 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T to eliminate weeds from pastureland and cropland. After WWII, synthetic herbicides (and pesticides) development continued in tandem with production of synthetic fertilizers and breeding of high-yield plant varieties. These new agricultural products were then shipped worldwide to increase crop yields, as part of the Green Revolution. This new system of agricultural technologies was intended to eliminate global starvation and increase food security by increasing field and farm crop yields. In contrast, the goal of military use of herbicides, as chemical weapons, was to defoliate jungle forests and destroy food crops as a strategy to win battles and wars. The primary objective of this research study is to describe how agricultural herbicides became tactical chemical weapons. A current assessment will address the environmental impacts of military and environmental chemical weapons on the United States and Vietnam ecosystems and need for additional dioxin TCDD hotspot clean-up efforts.

Share and Cite:

Olson, K. and Cihacek, L. (2022) How United States Agricultural Herbicides Became Military and Environmental Chemical Weapons: Historical and Residual Effects. Open Journal of Soil Science, 12, 13-81. doi: 10.4236/ojss.2022.122002.

Cited by

[1] Fast high-resolution mass spectrometry in the triage investigation of poisonings by pesticides in unusual samples-a case study
Forensic chemistry, 2024
[2] Agent Blue: A secret military and environmental chemical weapon used for food denial in South Vietnam during the Vietnam Civil War (1962-1965)
Open Journal of Soil Science, 2023
[3] The past recollected: One Day We'll Understand
Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 2023
[4] Review and Analysis: Did the United States Transport, Off-Load and Use Commercial 2, 4, 5-T Herbicides with Unknown Amounts of Dioxin TCDD on Military …
Open Journal of Soil Science, 2023
[5] Campesinos, Environmental Racism, and Ecotheatre: Toward an Inclusive Environmental Education Through BIPOC Storytelling
2023
[6] Strategies of chemical warfare: understanding the purposes of norm transgression in war
2023
[7] Agent Blue Spraying in the Mekong Delta during the Vietnam War: Fate of the Arsenic Based Herbicide Weapon Used to Destroy Rice Crop and Mangrove …
Open Journal of Soil Science, 2022
[8] Nonhuman Livelihoods in the Columbia River Basin: A study of salmon-sea lion-human relations
2022

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.