Creative Education

Volume 8, Issue 5 (April 2017)

ISSN Print: 2151-4755   ISSN Online: 2151-4771

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.02  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Relationships between Translation and Transcription Processes during fMRI Connectivity Scanning and Coded Translation and Transcription in Writing Products after Scanning in Children with and without Transcription Disabilities

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 494KB)  PP. 716-748  
DOI: 10.4236/ce.2017.85055    1,404 Downloads   2,700 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Students with transcription disabilities (dysgraphia/impaired handwriting, n = 13 or dyslexia/impaired word spelling, n = 16) or without transcription disabilities (controls) completed transcription and translation (idea generating, planning, and creating) writing tasks during fMRI connectivity scanning and compositions after scanning, which were coded for transcription and translation variables. Compositions in both groups showed diversity in genre beyond usual narrative-expository distinction; groups differed in coded transcription but not translation variables. For the control group specific transcription or translation tasks during scanning correlated with corresponding coded transcription or translation skills in composition, but connectivity during scanning was not correlated with coded handwriting during composing in dysgraphia group and connectivity during translating was not correlated with any coded variable during composing in dyslexia group. Results are discussed in reference to the trend in neuroscience to use connectivity from relevant seed points while performing tasks and trends in education to recognize the generativity (creativity) of composing at both the genre and syntax levels.

Share and Cite:

Wallis, P. , Richards, T. , Boord, P. , Abbott, R. and Berninger, V. (2017) Relationships between Translation and Transcription Processes during fMRI Connectivity Scanning and Coded Translation and Transcription in Writing Products after Scanning in Children with and without Transcription Disabilities. Creative Education, 8, 716-748. doi: 10.4236/ce.2017.85055.

Cited by

[1] Emergent neuroimaging findings for written expression in children: A scoping review
Brain Sciences, 2022
[2] Emergent Neuroimaging Findings for Written Expression in Children: A Scoping Review. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 406
2022
[3] Writing across the academic languages: introduction
2020
[4] The self in self-regulated writing of fourth to ninth graders with dysgraphia
2020
[5] Multiple perspectives on the nature of writing: Typically developing writers in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7 and students with writing disabilities in grades 4 to 9
2018
[6] Behavioral and brain evidence for language by ear, mouth, eye, and hand and motor skills in literacy learning
International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 2018
[7] Changes in DTI Diffusivity and fMRI connectivity cluster coefficients for students with and without specific learning disabilities in written language: Brain's …
Journal of nature and science, 2017
[8] Take a look at the Recent articles
2017
[9] Self-government of complex reading and writing brains informed by cingulo-opercular network for adaptive control and working memory components for …
2017

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.