[1]
|
Boswell, C. A., Tesar, D. B., Mukhyala, K., Theil, F.-P., Fielder, P. J., & Khawli, L. A. (2010). Effects of Charge on Antibody Tissue Distribution and Pharmacokinetics. Bioconjugate Chemistry, 21, 2153-2163. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc100261d
|
[2]
|
Bremer, M. G. E. G., Duval, J., Norde, W., & Lyklema, J. (2004). Electrostatic Interactions between Immunoglobulin (IgG) Molecules and a Charged Sorbent. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 250, 29-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.05.026
|
[3]
|
Coulomb, C. A. (1785). Premier mémoire sur l’électricité et le magnétisme. Histoire de l’Académie Royale Des Sciences, 569-577.
|
[4]
|
Fernández, A. (2020). Structural Impact of Mutation D614G in SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein: Enhanced Infectivity and Therapeutic Opportunity. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 11, 1667-1670. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00410
|
[5]
|
Gobeil, S. M.-C., Janowska, K., McDowell, S., Mansouri, K., Parks, R., Manne, K., Stalls, V., Kopp, M. F., Henderson, R., Edwards, R. J., Haynes, B. F., & Acharya, P. (2021). D614G Mutation Alters SARS-CoV-2 Spike Conformation and Enhances Protease Cleavage at the S1/S2 Junction. Cell Reports, 34, Article ID: 108630.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108630
|
[6]
|
Goher, S. S., Ali, F., & Amin, M. (2022). The Delta Variant Mutations in the Receptor Binding Domain of SARS-CoV-2 Show Enhanced Electrostatic Interactions with the ACE2. Medicine in Drug Discovery, 13, Article ID: 100114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medidd.2021.100114
|
[7]
|
Hanoian, P., Liu, C. T., Hammes-Schiffer, S., & Benkovic, S. (2015). Perspectives on Electrostatics and Conformational Motions in Enzyme Catalysis. Accounts of Chemical Research, 48, 482-489. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar500390e
|
[8]
|
Ishikawa, T., Ozono, H., Akisawa, K., Hatada, R., Okuwaki, K., & Mochizuki, Y. (2021). Interaction Analysis on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Receptor Binding Domain Using Visualization of the Interfacial Electrostatic Complementarity. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 12, 11267-11272.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02788
|
[9]
|
Koenig, P.-A., & Schmidt, F. I. (2021). Spike D614G—A Candidate Vaccine Antigen against Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine, 384, 2349-2351.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcibr2106054
|
[10]
|
Laskowski, R. A., Gerick, F., & Thornton, J. M. (2009). The Structural Basis of Allosteric Regulation in Proteins. FEBS Letters, 583, 1692-1698.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2009.03.019
|
[11]
|
Mansbach, R. A., Chakraborty, S., Nguyen, K., Montefiori, D. C., Korber, B., & Gnanakaran, S. (2022). The SARS-CoV-2 Spike Variant D614G Favors an Open Conformational State. Science Advances, 7, eabf3671. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf3671
|
[12]
|
Nakamura, H. (1996). Roles of Electrostatic Interaction in Proteins. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 29, 1-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033583500005746
|
[13]
|
Nguyen, H., Lan, P. D., Nissley, D. A., O’Brien, E. P., & Li, M. S. (2021). Electrostatic Interactions Explain the Higher Binding Affinity of the CR3022 Antibody for SARS-CoV-2 than the 4A8 Antibody. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 125, 7368-7379.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c03639
|
[14]
|
Oostenbrink, C., Villa, A., Mark, A. E., & van Gunsteren, W. F. (2004). A Biomolecular Force Field Based on the Free Enthalpy of Hydration and Solvation: The GROMOS Force-Field Parameter Sets 53A5 and 53A6. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 25, 1656-1676. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20090
|
[15]
|
Osorio-González, D., Muniz-Orozco, V. J., González, C. P., Fuentes-Acosta, M., Mulia- Rodríguez, J., & Mandujano-Rosas, L. A. (2021). Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) Structural Susceptibility in the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Spike Protein Exposed to a Pulsed Electric Field. Journal of Nuclear Physics, Material Sciences, Radiation and Applications, 8, 177-182. https://doi.org/10.15415/jnp.2021.82023
|
[16]
|
Pena-Negrete, C., Fuentes-Acosta, M. A., Mulia, J., Mandujano-Rosas, L. A., & Osorio- Gonzalez, D. (2020). Structural Variations Induced by Temperature Changes in Rotavirus VP6 Protein Immersed in an Electric Field and Their Effects on Epitopes of the Region 300-396. Journal of Nuclear Physics, Material Sciences, Radiation and Applications, 7, 189-194. https://doi.org/10.15415/jnp.2020.72024
|
[17]
|
Plante, J. A., Liu, Y., Liu, J., Xia, H., Johnson, B. A., Lokugamage, K. G., Zhang, X., Muruato, A. E., Zou, J., Fontes-Garfias, C. R., Mirchandani, D., Scharton, D., Bilello, J. P., Ku, Z., An, Z., Kalveram, B., Freiberg, A. N., Menachery, V. D., Xie, X., Plante, K. S., Weaver, S. C., & Shi, P.-Y. (2021). Spike Mutation D614G Alters SARS-CoV-2 Fitness. Nature, 592, 116-121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2895-3
|
[18]
|
Sheinerman, F. B., Norel, R., & Honig, B. (2000). Electrostatic Aspects of Protein-Protein Interactions. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 10, 153-159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00065-8
|
[19]
|
Takeda, M. (2022). Proteolytic Activation of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. Microbiology and Immunology, 66, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1348-0421.12945
|
[20]
|
Voet, A., Berenger, F., & Zhang, K. Y. J. (2013). Electrostatic Similarities between Protein and Small Molecule Ligands Facilitate the Design of Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors. PLOS ONE, 8, e75762. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075762
|
[21]
|
Walls, A. C., Park, Y.-J., Tortorici, M. A., Wall, A., McGuire, A. T., & Veesler, D. (2020). Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell, 181, 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058
|
[22]
|
Warshel, A., & Russell, S. T. (1984). Calculations of Electrostatic Interactions in Biological Systems and in Solutions. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 17, 283-422.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033583500005333
|
[23]
|
Weissman, D., Alameh, M.-G., de Silva, T., Collini, P., Hornsby, H., Brown, R., LaBranche, C. C., Edwards, R. J., Sutherland, L., Santra, S., Mansouri, K., Gobeil, S., McDanal, C., Pardi, N., Hengartner, N., Lin, P. J. C., Tam, Y., Shaw, P. A., Lewis, M. G. et al. (2021). D614G Spike Mutation Increases SARS CoV-2 Susceptibility to Neutralization. Cell Host & Microbe, 29, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2020.11.012
|
[24]
|
Yurkovetskiy, L., Wang, X., Pascal, K. E., Tomkins-Tinch, C., Nyalile, T. P., Wang, Y., Baum, A., Diehl, W. E., Dauphin, A., Carbone, C., Veinotte, K., Egri, S. B., Schaffner, S. F., Lemieux, J. E., Munro, J. B., Rafique, A., Barve, A., Sabeti, P. C., Kyratsous, C. A. et al. (2020). Structural and Functional Analysis of the D614G SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Variant. Cell, 183, 739-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.032
|
[25]
|
Zhang, J., Cai, Y., Xiao, T., Lu, J., Peng, H., Sterling, S. M., Walsh, R. M., Rits-Volloch, S., Zhu, H., Woosley, A. N., Yang, W., Sliz, P., & Chen, B. (2021). Structural Impact on SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein by D614G Substitution. Science, 372, 525-530.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf2303
|
[26]
|
Zhou, H.-X., & Pang, X. D. (2018). Electrostatic Interactions in Protein Structure, Folding, Binding, and Condensation. Chemical Reviews, 118, 1691-1741.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00305
|