Mohanty, N. (1994) Translation: A Symbiosis of Cultures. In: Dollerup, C. and Lindegaard, A., Eds., Teaching Translation and Interpreting 2. Insights, Aims, Visions. Papers from the Second Language International Conference Elsinore, Denmark, 4-6 June 1993, Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 25-37.
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.5.06moh

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: On Conceptual Potentials of Metonymy

  AUTHORS: Hans-Harry Droessiger

  KEYWORDS: Metonymy, Contiguity, Cognitive Linguistics, Translation Studies, Etymology

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Access Library Journal, Vol.3 No.11, November 14, 2016

  ABSTRACT: Metonymy is a more deeply embedded and ingrained capability of the human mind than classical approaches may tell. The cognitive turn in linguistics changed the point of view to the interaction between language and mind, thus, new approaches to understand what metonymy is might come into life. The takeover of ideas of metonymy into applied branches of linguistics like translation studies (as a complement to the idea of equivalence), into researches of language comparison (intracultural-intercultural, diachronic-synchronic), or into the philosophy of science (on sorts and forms of definition of terms) may reveal the true nature and the potentials of metonymy. This leads to a comprehension of metonymy as a common, probably universal capability of human language and thinking—beyond the boundaries of languages and cultures.