Farrell Jr, H., Jimenez-Flores, R., Bleck, G., Brown, E., Butler, J., Creamer, L., Hicks, C., Hollar, C., Ng-Kwai-Hang, K. and Swaisgood, H. (2004) Nomenclature of the Proteins of Cows’ Milk—Sixth Revision. Journal of Dairy Science, 87, 1641-1674.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73319-6

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Feeding Protected Lysine and Methionine Modifies Milk Protein Profile in Grazing Dairy Cows

  AUTHORS: Mónica Duque Quintero, Martha Olivera-Angel

  KEYWORDS: Grazing Dairy Cows, Protected Amino Acids, Milk Proteins

  JOURNAL NAME: Agricultural Sciences, Vol.10 No.2, February 28, 2019

  ABSTRACT: The experiment was designed to determine the effect of protected lysine (Lys) and methionine (Met) supply on milk protein profile in grazing dairy cows specifically in the caseins (CNs) and α-lactalbumin fractions. Twelve multiparous mid lactation Holstein cows producing 24 (±4.76) kg of milk were assigned to one of two treatments (six cows per treatment) during an experimental period of 21 days. In the control (C) group, cows grazed a Pennisetum clandestinum pasture and were supplemented with a commercial concentrate according to milk production. In the Met-Lys treatment, cows received the same ration supplemented with protected Lys and Met. Milk yield and composition and milk protein profile were measured at the start and the end (21st day) of the experimental period. The Tricine-SDS-PAGE and the Gel-Quant Express Analysis (Invitrogen) software were used to determine milk protein composition. Statistical analysis was performed using the SAS’s PROC MIXED procedure through a mixed model that included the animal as a random effect and the treatments as a fixed effect adjusted by covariables. Milk production averaged 23.7 (±2.0) kg cow-1 day-1 without differences between treatments (P P -1 day-1) compared to C (24.2 kg cow-1 day-1). Milk protein content (g/kg) did not differ (C = 30.4; Met-Lys = 31.1) and lactose content tended (P P β-CN also increased (P