Rolland, J.-P., & De Fruyt, F. (2003). The Validity of FFM Personality Dimensions and Maladaptive Traits to Predict Negative Affect at Work: A Six Month Prospective Study in a Military Sample. European Journal of Personality, 17, S101-S121.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.485

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Dark Side Traits at Work: Bright and Dark Side Traits and Job Value Preferences

  AUTHORS: Adrian Furnham, David Pendleton

  KEYWORDS: Dark Side Personality

  JOURNAL NAME: Psychology, Vol.7 No.5, May 19, 2016

  ABSTRACT: Two hundred and twenty-one business executives completed the Big Five NEO-RI-R (Costa & McCrae, 1992; an inventory of normal personality), the Hogan Development Survey (HDS) (Hogan & Hogan, 1997; an inventory of career derailing tendencies) and the Motives, Values and Preferences Inventory (MVPI) (Hogan & Hogan, 1999; an inventory of ten core occupational values). Correlational and regression analyses revealed modest but predictable relationships between all personality traits (except Neuroticism) and the values, particularly Recognition, Power and Security. The personality traits accounted for most variance with respect to Aesthetics, Altruism, Security and Power. Correlations and regressions for the HDS and MVPI showed that the values most related to “flawed interpersonal style” were Recognition, Affiliation, Power and Security. Step- wise regressions indicated that the HDS accounted for incremental validity over the Big Five in predicting core work values. Implications of these findings were considered.