Study on the Existence of Sign-Changing Solutions of Case Theory Based a Class of Differential Equations Boundary-Value Problems ()

Hongwei Ji^{}

Department of Mathematics and Physics, Nantong Normal College, Jiangsu, China.

**DOI: **10.4236/apm.2017.712042
PDF
HTML XML
884
Downloads
1,566
Views
Citations

Department of Mathematics and Physics, Nantong Normal College, Jiangsu, China.

By using the fixed point theorem under the case structure, we study the existence of sign-changing solutions of A class of second-order differential equations three-point boundary-value problems, and a positive solution and a negative solution are obtained respectively, so as to popularize and improve some results that have been known.

Share and Cite:

Ji, H. (2017) Study on the Existence of Sign-Changing Solutions of Case Theory Based a Class of Differential Equations Boundary-Value Problems. *Advances in Pure Mathematics*, **7**, 686-691. doi: 10.4236/apm.2017.712042.

1. Introduction

The existence of nonlinear three-point boundary-value problems has been studied [1] - [6] , and the existence of sign-changing solutions is obtained. In the past, most studies were focused on the cone fixed point index theory [7] [8] [9] , just a few took use of case theory to study the topological degree of non-cone mapping and the calculation of fixed point index, and the case theory was combined with the topological degree theory to study the sign-changing solutions. Recent study Ref. [10] [11] have given the method of calculating the topological degree under the case structure, and taken use of the fixed point theorem of non-cone mapping to study the existence of nontrivial solutions for the nonlinear Sturm-Liouville problems. Relevant studies as [12] [13] [14] .

Inspired by the Ref. [8] - [13] and by using the new fixed point theorem under the case structure, this paper studies three-point boundary-value problems for A class of nonlinear second-order equations

$\{\begin{array}{l}{u}^{\u2033}\left(t\right)+f\left(u\left(t\right)\right)=0,\text{\hspace{0.17em}}0\le t\le 1;\\ {u}^{\prime}\left(0\right)=0,\text{\hspace{0.17em}}u\left(1\right)=\alpha u\left(\eta \right),\end{array}$ (1)

Existence of the sign-changing solution, constant $0<\alpha <1,0<\eta <1$ , $f\in C\left(R,R\right)$ .

Boundary-value problem (1) is equivalent to Hammerstein nonlinear integral equation hereunder

$u\left(t\right)={\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(t,s\right)f\left(u\left(s\right)\right)\text{d}s},\text{\hspace{0.17em}}0\le t\le 1$ (2)

Of which $G\left(t,s\right)$ is the Green function hereunder

$G\left(t,s\right)=\frac{1}{1-\alpha}\{\begin{array}{l}\left(1-s\right)-\alpha \left(\eta -s\right),0\le s\le \eta ,0\le t\le s;\\ \left(1-s\right),\eta \le s\le 1,0\le t\le s;\\ \left(1-\alpha \eta \right)-t\left(1-\alpha \right),0\le s\le \eta ,s\le t\le 1;\\ \left(1-\alpha y\right)-t\left(1-\alpha \right),\eta \le s\le 1,s\le t\le 1.\end{array}$

Defining linear operator K as follow

$\left(Ku\right)\left(t\right)={\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(t,s\right)u\left(s\right)\text{d}s},\text{\hspace{0.17em}}u\in C\left[0,1\right].$ (3)

Let $Fu\left(t\right)=f\left(u\left(t\right)\right)$ , $t\in \left[0,1\right]$ , obviously composition operator $A=KF$ , i.e.

$\left(Au\right)\left(t\right)={\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(t,s\right)f\left(u\left(s\right)\right)\text{d}s},\text{\hspace{0.17em}}0\le t\le 1$ (4)

It’s easy to get: $u\in {C}^{2}\left[0,1\right]$ is the solution of boundary-value problem (1), and $u\in C\left[0,1\right]$ is the solution of operator equation $u=Au$ .

We note that, in Ref. [9] [10] , an abstract result on the existence of sign- changing solutions can be directly applied to problem (1). After the necessary preparation, when the non-linear term $f$ is under certain assumptions, we get the existence of sign-changing solution of such boundary-value problems. Compared with the Ref. [8] , we can see that we generalize and improve the nonlinear term $f$ , and remove the conditions of strictly increasing function, and the method is different from Ref. [8] .

For convenience, we give the following conditions.

(H_{1})
$f\left(u\right):R\to R$ continues,
$f\left(u\right)u>0$ ,
$\forall u\in R,u\ne 0$ , and
$f\left(0\right)=0$ .

(H_{2})
$\underset{u\to 0}{\mathrm{lim}}\frac{f\left(u\right)}{u}=\beta $ , and
${n}_{0}\in N$ , make
${\lambda}_{2{n}_{0}}<\beta <{\lambda}_{2{n}_{0}+1}$ , of which
$0<{\lambda}_{1}<{\lambda}_{2}<\cdots <{\lambda}_{n}<{\lambda}_{n+1}<\cdots $ is the positive sequence of
$\mathrm{cos}\sqrt{x}=\alpha \mathrm{cos}\eta \sqrt{x}$ .

(H_{3}) exists
$\epsilon >0$ , make
$\underset{\left|u\right|\to +\infty}{\mathrm{lim}}\mathrm{sup}\frac{f\left(u\right)}{u}\le {\lambda}_{1}-\epsilon $ .

2. Knowledge

Provided P is the cone of E in Banach space, the semi order in E is exported by cone P. If the constant $N>0$ , and $\theta \le x\le y\Rightarrow \Vert x\Vert \le N\Vert y\Vert $ , then P is a normal cone; if P contains internal point, i.e. $\mathrm{int}P\ne \varnothing $ , then P is a solid cone.

E becomes a case when semi order £, i.e. any $x,y\in E$ , $\mathrm{sup}\left\{x,y\right\}$ and $\mathrm{inf}\left\{x,y\right\}$ is existed, for $x\in E$ , ${x}^{+}=\mathrm{sup}\left\{x,\theta \right\}$ , ${x}^{-}=\mathrm{sup}\left\{-x,\theta \right\}$ , we call positive and negative of x respectively, call $\left|x\right|={x}^{+}+{x}^{-}$ as the modulus of x. Obviously, ${x}^{+}\in P$ , ${x}^{-}\in \left(-P\right)$ , $\left|x\right|\in P$ , $x={x}^{+}-{x}^{-}$ .

For convenience, we use the following signs: ${x}_{+}={x}^{+}$ , ${x}_{-}=-{x}^{-}$ . Such that $x={x}_{+}+{x}_{-}$ , $\left|x\right|={x}_{+}-{x}_{-}$ .

Provided Banach space $E=C\left[0,1\right]$ , and E’s norm as $\Vert \text{\hspace{0.05em}}\cdot \text{\hspace{0.05em}}\Vert $ , i.e.

$\Vert u\Vert =\underset{0\le t\le 1}{\mathrm{max}}\left|u\left(t\right)\right|$ . Let $P=\left\{u\in E|u\left(t\right)\ge 0,t\in \left[0,1\right]\right\}$ , then P is the normal cone of

E, and E becomes a case under semi order £.

Now we give the definitions and theorems

Def 1 [10] provided $D\subset E,A:D\to E$ is an operator (generally a nonlinear). If $Ax=A{x}_{+}+A{x}_{-},\forall x\in E$ , then A is an additive operator under case structure; if ${v}^{\ast}\in E$ , and $Ax=A{x}_{+}+A{x}_{-}+{v}^{\ast},\forall x\in E$ , then A is a quasi additive operator.

Def 2 provided x is a fixed point of A, if $x\in \left(P\backslash \left\{\theta \right\}\right)$ , then x is a positive fixed point; if $x\in \left(\left(-P\right)\backslash \left\{\theta \right\}\right)$ , then x is a negative fixed point; if $x\notin \left(P\cup \left(-P\right)\right)$ , then x is a sign-changing fixed point.

Lemma 1 [6] $G\left(t,s\right)$ is a nonnegative continuous function of $\left[0,1\right]\times \left[0,1\right]$ ,

and when $t,s\in \left[0,1\right]$ , $G\left(t,s\right)\ge \gamma G\left(0,s\right)$ , of which $\gamma =\frac{\alpha \left(1-\eta \right)}{1-\alpha \eta}$ .

Lemma 2 $K:P\to P$ is completely continuous operator, and $A:E\to E$ is completely continuous operator.

Lemma 3 A is a quasi additive operator under case structure.

Proof: Similar to the proofs in Lemma 4.3.1 in Ref. [10] , get Lemma 3 works.

Lemma 4 [6] the eigenvalues of the linear operator K are

$\frac{1}{{\lambda}_{1}},\frac{1}{{\lambda}_{2}},\cdots ,\frac{1}{{\lambda}_{n}},\frac{1}{{\lambda}_{n+1}},\cdots $ . And the sum of algebraic multiplicity of all eigenvalues is

1, of which
${\lambda}_{n}$ is defined by (H_{2}).

The lemmas hereunder are the main study bases.

Lemma 5 [10] provided E is Banach space, P is the normal cone in E, $A:E\to E$ is completely continuous operator, and quasi additive operator under case structure. Provided that

1) There exists positive bounded linear operator ${B}_{1}$ , and ${B}_{1}$ ’s $r\left({B}_{1}\right)<1$ , and ${u}^{\ast}\in P,{u}_{1}\in P$ , get

$-{u}^{\ast}\le Ax\le {B}_{1}x+{u}_{1},\forall x\in P;$

2) There exists positive bounded linear operator ${B}_{2}$ , ${B}_{2}$ ’s $r\left({B}_{2}\right)<1$ , and ${u}_{2}\in P$ , get

$Ax\ge {B}_{2}x-{u}_{2},\forall x\in \left(-P\right);$

3) $A\theta =\theta $ , there exists Frechet derivative ${{A}^{\prime}}_{\theta}$ of A at $\theta $ , 1 is not the eigenvalue of ${{A}^{\prime}}_{\theta}$ , and the sum $\mu $ of algebraic multiplicity of ${{A}^{\prime}}_{\theta}$ ’s all eigenvalues in the range $\left(1,\infty \right)$ is a nonzero even number,

$A\left(P\backslash \left\{\theta \right\}\right)\subset \stackrel{\xb0}{P},\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}A\left(\left(-P\right)\backslash \left\{\theta \right\}\right)\subset -\stackrel{\xb0}{P}$

Then A exists three nonzero fixed points at least: one positive fixed point, one negative fixed point and a sign-changing fixed point.

3. Results

Theorem provided (H_{1}) (H_{2}) (H_{3}) works, boundary-value problem (1) exists a sign-changing solution at least, and also a positive solution and a negative solution.

Proof provided linear operator $B=\left({\lambda}_{1}-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\right)K$ , Lemma 2 knows $B:C\left[0,1\right]\to C\left[0,1\right]$ is a positive bounded linear operator. Lemma 4 gets K’s $r\left(K\right)=\frac{1}{{\lambda}_{1}}$ , so $r\left(B\right)=\left({\lambda}_{1}-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\right)r\left(K\right)=1-\frac{\epsilon}{2{\lambda}_{1}}<1$ .

(H_{3}) knows
$m>0$ and gets

$f\left(u\right)\le \left({\lambda}_{1}-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\right)u+m,\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\forall t\in \left[0,1\right],\text{\hspace{0.17em}}u\ge 0$ (5)

$f\left(u\right)\ge \left({\lambda}_{1}-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\right)u-m,\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\forall t\in \left[0,1\right],\text{\hspace{0.17em}}u\le 0$ (6)

Let ${u}_{0}\left(t\right)=m{\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(t,s\right)\text{d}s}$ , obviously, ${u}_{0}\in P$ . Such that, for any $u\left(t\right)\in P$ ,

there

$\begin{array}{c}\left(Au\right)\left(t\right)={\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(t,s\right)f\left(u\left(s\right)\right)\text{d}s}\\ \le {\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(t,s\right)\left(\left({\lambda}_{1}-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\right)u+m\right)\text{d}s}\\ \le \left({\lambda}_{1}-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\right){\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(t,s\right)u\left(s\right)\text{d}s}+m{\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(t,s\right)\text{d}s}\\ =\left({\lambda}_{1}-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\right)Ku\left(t\right)+{u}_{0}\left(t\right)\\ =Bu\left(t\right)+{u}_{0}(\; t\; )\end{array}$

And for any
${u}^{\ast}\in P$ , from (H_{1}), obviously gets
$\left(Au\right)\left(t\right)\ge -{u}^{\ast}\left(t\right)$ .

For any $u\left(t\right)\in -P$ , there

$\begin{array}{c}\left(Au\right)\left(t\right)={\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(t,s\right)f\left(u\left(s\right)\right)\text{d}s}\\ \ge {\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(t,s\right)\left(\left({\lambda}_{1}-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\right)u-m\right)\text{d}s}\\ \ge \left({\lambda}_{1}-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\right){\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(t,s\right)u\left(s\right)\text{d}s}-m{\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(t,s\right)\text{d}s}\\ =\left({\lambda}_{1}-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\right)Ku\left(t\right)-{u}_{0}\left(t\right)\\ =Bu\left(t\right)-{u}_{0}(\; t\; )\end{array}$

Consequently (1) (2) in lemma 5 works.

We note that
$f\left(0\right)=0$ can get
$A\theta =\theta $ , from (H_{2}), we know
$\forall \epsilon >0$ , and
$\exists r>0$ gets

$\left|f\left(u\right)-\beta u\right|\le \epsilon u,\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\left|u\right|\le r$

Then

$\left|\left(Fu\right)\left(t\right)-\lambda u\left(t\right)\right|=\left|f\left(u\left(t\right)\right)-\beta u\left(t\right)\right|\le \epsilon \Vert u\Vert ,\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\forall \Vert u\Vert \le r$

$\Vert Au-A\theta -\beta Ku\Vert =\Vert K\left(Fu\right)-\beta Ku\Vert \le \epsilon \Vert K\Vert \Vert u\Vert ,\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\forall \Vert u\Vert \le r$

Such that

$\underset{\Vert u\Vert \to 0}{\mathrm{lim}}\frac{\Vert Au-A\theta -\beta Ku\Vert}{\Vert u\Vert}=0$

i.e. ${{A}^{\prime}}_{\theta}=\beta K$ , from lemma 4 we get linear operator K’s eigenvalue is $\frac{1}{{\lambda}_{n}}$ , then ${{A}^{\prime}}_{\theta}$ ’s eigenvalue is $\frac{\beta}{{\lambda}_{n}}$ . Because ${\lambda}_{2{n}_{0}}<\beta <{\lambda}_{2{n}_{0}+1}$ , let $\mu $ be the sum of

algebraic multiplicity of ${{A}^{\prime}}_{\theta}$ ’s all eigenvalues in the range $\left(1,\infty \right)$ , then $\mu =2{n}_{0}$ is an even number.

From (H_{1})
$f\left(u\right)u>0$ ,
$u\in R\backslash \left\{0\right\}$ , there

$f\left(u\left(t\right)\right)>0,\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\forall t\in \left[0,1\right],\text{\hspace{0.17em}}u\left(t\right)>0,$

$f\left(u\left(t\right)\right)<0,\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\forall t\in \left[0,1\right],\text{\hspace{0.17em}}u\left(t\right)<0.$

Easy to get

$F\left(P\backslash \left\{\theta \right\}\right)\subset P\backslash \left\{\theta \right\},\text{\hspace{0.17em}}F\left(\left(-P\right)\backslash \left\{\theta \right\}\right)\subset \left(-P\right)\backslash \left\{\theta \right\},$

Lemma (1) for any $u\left(t\right)\in P$ , $\left(Ku\right)\left(t\right)={\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(t,s\right)u\left(s\right)\text{d}s}\ge \gamma {\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{1}G\left(0,s\right)u\left(s\right)\text{d}s}$ ,

consequently $K\left(P\backslash \left\{\theta \right\}\right)\subset \stackrel{\xb0}{P}$ . Such that

$A\left(P\backslash \left\{\theta \right\}\right)\subset \stackrel{\xb0}{P},\text{\hspace{0.17em}}A\left(\left(-P\right)\backslash \left\{\theta \right\}\right)\subset -\stackrel{\xb0}{P},$

Such that (3) in lemma 5 works. According to lemma 5, A exists three nonzero fixed points at least: one positive fixed point, one negative fixed point and one sign-changing fixed point. Which states that boundary-value problem (1) has three nonzero solutions at least: one positive solution, one negative solution and one sign-changing solution.

4. Conclusion

Provided that all conditions of the theorem are satisfied, and $f\left(u\right)$ is an odd function, then boundary-value problem (1) has four nonzero solutions at least: one positive solution, one negative solution and two sign-changing solutions.

Note

By using case theory to study the topological degree of non-cone mapping and the calculation of fixed point index, it’s an attempt to combine case theory and topological degree theory, the author thinks it’s an up-and-coming topic and expects to have further progress on that.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

[1] | Ma, Y.H. and Ma, R.Y. (2002) Positive Downward Convex Positive Solutions of a Class of Second-Order Three-Point Boundary-Value Problems. (Natural Science Edition) Journal of Northwest Normal University, 38, 8-13. |

[2] | Sun, J.P. and Zhang, X.L. (2012) Existence of Positive Solutions of Nonlinear Third-Order Three-Point Boundary-Value Problems. (Natural Science Edition) Journal of Northwest Normal University, 48, 1-5. |

[3] | Zhou, S.L., Wu, H.P. and Han, X.L. (2014) Existence of Positive Solutions of a Class of Four-Order Three-Point Boundary-Value Problems. (Natural Science Edition) Journal of Sichuan University, 51, 11-15. |

[4] | Ma, Y.H. and Ma, R.Y. (2003) Positive Solutions of a Class of Singular Nonlinear Three-Point Boundary-Value Problems. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 23A, 583-588. |

[5] | Shen, W.G. and Song, L.A. (2007) Existence of Positive Solutions of Singular Second-Order Ordinary Differential Equations Three-Point Boundary Value Problems under Superlinear Condition. (Science Edition) Journal of Shandong Uni-versity, 42, 91-94. |

[6] | Xie, C. and Luo, Z.G. (2009) Existence of Multiple Positive Solutions of a Class of Second-Order Ordinary Differential Equations Multi-Point Boundary-Value Problems. (Natural Science Edition) Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University, 38, 647-652. |

[7] | Liu, J.S. and Qiao, J. (2007) Existence of Sign-Changing Solutions of a Class of Second-Order Three-Point Boundary-Value Problems. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 38, 374-376. |

[8] | Xu, X.A. (2006) Sign-Changing Solutions of Impulsive Three-Point Boundary-Value Problems. Applied Mathematics, 19, 606-612. |

[9] | Cui, Y.J., Zou, Y.M. and Li, H.Y. (2009) Sign-Changing Solutions and Applications of Nonlinear Operator Equations. Systems Science and Mathematics, 29, 1094-1101. |

[10] |
Sun, J.X. and Liu, X.Y. (2008) Computation of Topological Degree for Nonlinear Operators and Application. Nonlinear Analysis, 69, 4121-4130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2007.10.042 |

[11] | Sun, J.X. (2008) Non-linear Functional Analysis and Its Applications. Science Press—CSPM, Bei-jing. |

[12] | Wang, Y.P. and Zhao, Z.Q. (2014) Existence of Sign-Changing Solutions of a Class of Nonlinear Third-Order Differential Equations Two-Point Boundary-Value Problems. Journal of Qufu Normal University, 40, 29-32. |

[13] |
Zhang, X. and Sun, J. (2010) On Multiple Sign-Changing Solutions for Some Second-Order Integral Boundary Value Problems. Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations, No. 44, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.14232/ejqtde.2010.1.44 |

[14] |
Li, H. and Liu, Y. (2011) On Sign-Changing Solutions for a Second-Order Integral Boundary Value Problem. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, No. 62, 651-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.05.046 |

Journals Menu

Contact us

+1 323-425-8868 | |

customer@scirp.org | |

+86 18163351462(WhatsApp) | |

1655362766 | |

Paper Publishing WeChat |

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.