Immunological Status to Hepatitis B Virus of Pregnant Women in Dakar, Senegal ()
1. Introduction
Hepatitis B is a major public health problems, represents potentially mortal hepatic infection. About 257 million people suffer from chronic infection with the hepatitis B virus defined as positivity for the HBs antigen (HBs Ag) for at least 6 months. In 2015, 887,000 people died from cirrhosis or liver cancer deriving from hepatitis B infection. Africa has the heavier burden with a prevalence of over 6.1% in adults. The vaccine against hepatitis B, available since 1982, is effective at 95% in preventing the infection, development of chronic hepatitis and liver cancer [1] . The vertical transmission of the hepatitis B virus remains a major cause of the maintenance of the hepatitis B epidemic in the world [2] .
As a matter of fact, the risk of transmission to the newborn is high when the mother is HBs Ag positive and the risk of passage to the chronicity of the contaminated newborn is also high. Therefore, investigation of HBs Ag must be carried out in all the pregnant women [3] . Senegal is a highly endemic area for viral hepatitis and especially of hepatitis B. As consequence of such high prevalence, 85% of the Senegalese population has at least one marker of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) [4] [5] . Despite implementation of hepatitis B national program since 1999 to fight against the infection, there are few efforts to evaluate efficacy of implemented policies. In this context, we decided to investigate the prevalence of HBs Ag in a population of pregnant women in Dakar and assess risk transmission from mother to child through the level HBe antigen (HBe Ag).
2. Materials and Methods
The study is an exploratory, descriptive, and analytical spanned over 4 months, from July to October 2014, at the Medical Biology Laboratory (MBL) of the General Hospital of Grand-Yoff (HOGGY) in Dakar, Senegal.
2.1. Study Population
The selection criteria of the women were their presence at the laboratory for their biological follow up.
2.2. Data Collection
A questionnaire was administered to collect data related to the socio-demo- graphic characteristics (matrimonial situation, profession, geographic origin, place of residence), the stage of the pregnancy, the number of former pregnancies, the number of children, the serologic status with respect to the HBV, notion of previous vaccination against the HBV, family history of jaundice and hepatitis, history of surgery, gynaecological antecedents (IVG, abortions) and risk factors such as scarifications, tattoos, and transfusions. Data were electronically recorded using the Microsoft Office Excel version 2007.
2.3. Biological Tests
HBs Ag was screened in all study participants by immunochromatography (Determine TM HBs Ag Alere, USA). Analysis of the HBe Ag and anti-HBe antibodies, markers of chronic hepatitis B (HBe Ag, anti HBe), was carried out in the HBs-Ag positive pregnant women by chimiluminescence using Cobas e411 (Roche Diagnostics, France) and viral DNA was assessed by real time PCR using Real Time (m2000, Abbott Diagnostics, USA). The anti-HBs antibodies were measured in HBs Ag negative women using a microparticular immunological technique by chimiluminescence with Architect i1000 (Abbott Laboratories, USA). The prevalence was defined by reporting the number of HBs Ag-positive women to the total population.
2.4. Data Analysis
Data was exported and analyzed using Statview® 5.1 (SAS Institute Inc. Version 5.0). The degree of dependence between the risk factors and the presence of HBs Ag was evaluated. A p-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The risk factors with a p-value < 0.05 were considered as associated with the presence of HBs Ag. Level of dependence between qualitative variables was calculated using the odds ratio.
2.5. Ethical Aspects
The study was conducted in concordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All volunteers provided informed consent.
3. Results
3.1. Characteristics of the Study Population
A hundred and fifteen pregnant women were included in the study from July to October, 2014. Their age average was of 29 ± 6 years with the extremes going from 16 to 47 years.
Thirty eight percent of the patients were jobless and the majority (98%) was married. The average stage of the ongoing pregnancy was 4 ± 1.7 months with a range of 1 to 8 months. The average number of children per woman was 1.16 with extremes from 0 to 7 children. Table 1 describes in detail these characteristics.
3.2. HBV Serological Status
The majority of the pregnant women (n = 98) declared that they were not vaccinated against hepatitis B while 10% (n = 11) were. The other ignores their vaccination status.
3.3. HBs Ag Prevalence
HBs Ag was positive in 14 out of 115 pregnant women, representing a prevalence of 12% (Figure 1).
3.4. Risk Factors of HBV Infection
We did not find significant relationship between the risk factors and the presence of HBs Ag (Table 2).
3.5. Markers of Chronic Hepatitis B
Among the HBs Ag positive patients (n = 14), any of them did not express serum HBe Ag characteristic of active multiplication. Moreover, all of them
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of pregnant women.
Figure 1. Prevalence of HBV Ag. This figure illustrates the frequency of HBS Ag positive pregnancy women according the age group they belong.
were positive for anti-HBe antibodies. Their viral load (HBV DNA) was undetectable. The alanine amino transferase (ALT) and aspartate amino transferase (AST) in the serum were normal.
3.6. HBV Immunization
Table 3 summarizes the characteristics of the pregnant women according to their serologic status with respect to the HBV.
We screened and titrated the anti-HBs antibodies in HBs Ag negative women. Among them, 46 had protective immunity against the HBV, with antibody concentrations above 10 mUI/ml while 55 were not protected (without antibodies) against the virus; fifty-one women ignored their vaccination status. Figure 2 shows the characteristic of the study population according the serological status.
Table 2. Risk factors of HBV infection among pregnant women (95% CI).
Table 3. Characteristics of pregnant women according to their HBV serological status.
Figure 2. Frequencies of HBs negative women. From the 55 pregnant women protected against the hepatitis B, the frequency of antibody anti-HBs negative participants are shown for each age range < 20 years, [20 - 29], [30 - 39] and [40 - 47]. Their average age was of 29 years with extremes of 16 and 47 years.
4. Discussion
The hepatitis B virus infection is a major public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa. A large proportion of infection has been conducted through vertical mother-child transmission and horizontal transmission in early childhood. The HBs antigen is used as biomarker to diagnosis the infectious at its chronic and acute stages. That is why we aim to evaluate the prevalence of HBs Ag in a population of pregnant women to gather essential information in the fight against HBV infections. Overall, there are variations in the prevalence of HBs antigen worldwide with 9.9% in Picardie (France) [6] , 2.1% in Turkey [7] , 3% and 4% in Tunisia [8] [9] [10] , 8.26% in Benin [11] , 15.5% in Mali [12] .
Our study highlighted a prevalence of HBs Ag of 12% in pregnancy women, which is similar to those published in 2012 by the National Program of Fight against Hepatitis of Senegal which found a prevalence of HBs Ag of 11.7%. Similar trends were also found in Dakar in 1993 [13] and in 2012 [14] by other teams, supporting pregnant women as reservoir of HBV infection.
All the 14 HBs Ag positive women were unaware of their HBV serologic status, suggesting ignorance of the HBV infection in pregnant women.
Systematic screening however constitutes one of the most important tools to prevent the mother-child transmission of the HBV. The absence of a screening for the HBV infection before marriage supports the transmission (5 women were in a polygamous household), which increases the sexual transmission risk currently considered as the major mode of transmission of the HBV in countries where the transfusion is secure.
HBe Ag, characterizing active replication, was assessed for HBs Ag positive pregnant women. None of them expressed HBe Ag, and all were anti-HBe antibodies positive. Those anti-HBe antibodies, characterising the end of viral replication, were found in all HBs Ag positive women.
Their viral load, used to monitor the viral replication, was undetectable and serum transaminases ALT and AST appeared normal. Analysis of pre-C mutant did not show mutation because the viral replication was inexistent for HBe Ag negative women.
The comparison between HBs Ag-positive and HBs Ag-negative women did not show any significant difference for exposure factors studied.
We calculated the odds ratio to evaluate the impact of history of surgery and transfusion as well as that of tattoos and scarifications. Among the HBs Ag-positive patients, any of them did not carried HBe Ag which is associated with a high risk of perinatal transmission of the HBV. Indeed, it has been reported that newborns of simultaneously HBs Ag and HBe Ag-positive mothers at the same time will have a chance of the perinatal acquisition of the infection by the HBV of 70% - 90% [15] .
These results, along with others, enable exploring the transmission risk perinatal of the HBV on the basis of the estimate prevalence of HBe Ag in all the areas of the world. Those revealed that in 2005, more than 22.7% to 29.9% of the HBs Ag-positive women in age to procreate in sub-Saharan Africa and Central Africa were HBe Ag-positive [16] .
The low viral loads going from undetectable to 202 copies/ml showed that the hepatitis was inactive. However, assessment of viral load at the end of the pregnancy should be performed in slightly viremic women since it was described a possible increase of the maternal viremia of a factor of up to 1 log in HBe Ag-women [17] .
These HBs Ag positive women, although carrying inactive hepatitis, remain contagious.
In seronegative women, previous vaccination against the HBV was reported in only 10.9% of the cases. The high family antecedents of hepatitis B in HBs Ag-positive women (14.2%) is consistent with previous work reporting acquisition of the disease before 20 years of age, suggesting an intrafamily horizontal transmission or inter-children in childhood and adolescence.
The intrafamily transmission from a young age seems to be an important mode of contamination in our country and an early screening of the infection among women would allow protection by vaccination of the partners and all the people living under the same roof.
5. Conclusion
In light of our results, it would be reasonable to promote vaccination before the pregnancy and to make a systematic screening of HBs Ag. Beyond vaccination of newborns from HBs Ag positive mothers, it is important to measure the viral load of HBs Ag positive and HBe Ag negative women to monitor the perinatal transmission risk and to prevent HBV by a neonatal seroprophylaxis. Advices on prevention of HBV transmission should also be provided to pregnant women positive for HBs Ag.