Strong Laws of Large Numbers for Fuzzy Set-Valued Random Variables in Gα Space ()
Received 7 July 2016; accepted 12 August 2016; published 15 August 2016

1. Introduction
With the development of set-valued stochastic theory, it has become a new branch of probability theory. And limits theory is one of the most important theories in probability and statistics. Many scholars have done a lot of research in this aspect. For example, Artstein and Vitale in [3] had proved the strong law of large numbers for independent and identically distributed random variables by embedding theory. Hiai in [4] had extended it to separable Banach space. Taylor and Inoue had proved the strong law of large numbers for independent random variable in the Banach space in [5] . Many other scholars also had done lots of works in the laws of large numbers for set-valued random variables. In [2] , Li proved the strong laws of large numbers for set-valued random variables in
space in the sense of dH metric.
As we know, the fuzzy set is an extension of the set. And the concept of fuzzy set-valued random variables is a natural generalization of that of set-valued random variables, so it is necessary to discuss convergence theorems of fuzzy set-valued random sequence. The limits of theories for fuzzy set-valued random sequences are also been discussed by many researchers. Colubi et al. [6] , Feng [7] and Molchanov [8] proved the strong laws of large numbers for fuzzy set-valued random variables; Puri and Ralescu [9] , Li and Ogura [10] proved convergence theorems for fuzzy set-valued martingales. Li and Ogura [11] proved the SLLN of [12] in the sense of
by using the “sandwich” method. Guan and Li [13] proved the SLLN for weighted sums of fuzzy set- valued random variables in the sense of
which used the same method. In this paper, what we concerned are the convergence theorems of fuzzy set-valued sequence in
space in the sense of
.
The purpose of this paper is to prove the strong laws of large numbers for fuzzy set-valued random variables in
space, which is both the extension of the result in [1] for single-valued random sequence and also the extension in [2] for set-valued random sequence.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we shall briefly introduce some concepts and basic results of set-valued and fuzzy set-valued random variables. In Section 3, I shall prove the strong laws of large numbers for fuzzy set-valued random variables in
space, which is in the sense of Hausdorff metric
.
2. Preliminaries on Set-Valued Random Variables
Throughout this paper, we assume that
is a complete probability space,
is a real separable
Banach space,
is the family of all nonempty closed subsets of
, and
is the family
of all non-empty bounded closed(compact) subsets of
, and
is the family of all non-empty compact convex subsets of
.
Let A and B be two nonempty subsets of
and let
, the set of all real numbers. We define addition and scalar multiplication by
![]()
![]()
The Hausdorff metric on
is defined by
![]()
for
. For an A in
, let
.
The metric space
is complete, and
is a closed subset of
(cf. [14] ,
Theorems 1.1.2 and 1.1.3). For more general hyperspaces, more topological properties of hyperspaces, readers may refer to the books [15] and [14] .
For each
, define the support function by
![]()
where
is the dual space of
.
Let
denote the unit sphere of
,
the all continuous functions of
, and the norm is defined
as ![]()
The following is the equivalent definition of Hausdorff metric.
For each
,
![]()
A set-valued mapping
is called a set-valued random variable (or a random set, or a multi-
function) if, for each open subset O of
,
.
For each set-valued random variable F, the expectation of F, denoted by
, is defined by
![]()
where
is the usual Bochner integral in
, the family of integrable
-valued random variables,
and
.
Let
denote the family of all functions
which satisfy the following conditions:
1) The level set
.
2) Each v is upper semicontinuous, i.e. for each
, the
level set
is a closed subset of
.
3) The support set
is compact.
A function v in
is called convex if it satisfies
![]()
for any
.
Let
be the subset of all convex fuzzy sets in
.
It is known that v is convex in the above sense if and only if, for any
, the level set
is a convex subset of
(cf. Theorem 3.2.1 of [16] ). For any
, the closed convex hull
of v is
defined by the relation
for all
.
For any two fuzzy sets
define
![]()
for any ![]()
Similarly for a fuzzy set
and a real number
, define
![]()
for any ![]()
The following two metrics in
which are extensions of the Hausdorff metric dH are often used (cf. [17] and [18] , or [14] ): for
,
![]()
![]()
Denote
, where
is the fuzzy set taking value one at 0 and zero for all
. The space
is a complete metric space (cf. [18] , or [14] : Theorem 5.1.6) but not separable (cf. [17] , or [14] : Remark 5.1.7).
It is well known that
, for every
. Due to the completeness of
, every
Cauchy sequence
has a limit v in
.
A fuzzy set-valued random variable (or a fuzzy random set, or a fuzzy random variable in literature) is a mapping
, such that
is a set-valued random variable for every
(cf. [18] or [14] ).
The expectation of any fuzzy set-valued random variable X, denoted by
, is an element in
such that, for every
,
![]()
where the expectation of right hand is Aumann integral. From the existence theorem (cf. [19] ), we can get an equivalent definition: for any
,
![]()
Note that
is always convex when
is nonatomic.
3. Main Results
In this section, we will give the limit theorems for fuzzy set-valued random variables in
space. I will firstly introduce the definition of
space. The following Definition 3.1 and Lemma 3.2 are from Taylor’s book [8] , which will be used later.
Definition 3.1. A Banach space
is said to satisfy the condition
for some
. If there exists a mapping
, such that
1)
;
2)
;
3)
, for all
and some positive constant A.
Note that Hilbert spaces are
with constant
and identity mapping G.
Lemma 3.2. Let
be a Banach space which satisfies the condition of
,
be independent
random elements in
, such that
and
for each
. Then
![]()
where A is the positive constant in 3) of definition 3.1.
In order to obtain the main results, we firstly need to prove Lemma 3.5. The following lemma are from [14] (cf. p89, Lemma 3.1.4), which will be used to prove Lemma 3.5.
Lemma 3.3. Let
be a sequence in
. If
![]()
for some
, then
![]()
Lemma 3.4. (cf. [13] ) For any
, there exists a finite
, such that
![]()
Now we prove that the result of Lemma 3.3 is also true for fuzzy sets.
Lemma 3.5. Let
be a sequence in
. If
(3.1)
for some
, then
![]()
Proof. By (3.1), we can have
![]()
and
![]()
for
. Then by Lemma 3.3, for
, we have
![]()
and
![]()
By Lemma 3.4, take an
, there exists a finite
, such that
![]()
Then for
,
![]()
Consequently,
![]()
Since the first two terms on the right hand converge to 0 in probability one, we have
![]()
but
is arbitrary and the result follows. ,
Theorem 3.6. Let
be a Banach space which satisfies the condition of
, let
be independent fuzzy set-valued random variables in
, such that
for any n. If
![]()
where
for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 and
for t ≥ 1, then
converges with probability 1 in the sense of
.
Proof. Define
![]()
Note that
for each j, and both
and
are independent sequence of
fuzzy set-valued random variables. When
, we have
, and
. Then, for any ![]()
![]()
And from
, we know that
is a Cauchy sequence. So, we have
![]()
Since convergence in the mean implied convergence in probability, Ito and Nisios result in [9] for independent random elements (cf. Section 4.5) provides that
![]()
So, for any n, m ≥ 1, m > n, by triangle inequality we have
![]()
It means
is a Cauchy sequence in the sense of
. By the completeness of
, we have
converges almost everywhere in the sense of
.
Next we shall prove that
converges in the sense of
. Firstly, we assume that
are all convex fuzzy set-valued random variables. Then by the equivalent definition of Hausdorff metric, we have
![]()
For any fixed n, m, there exists a sequence
, such that
![]()
That means there exist a sequence
, such that
![]()
Then by Cr inequality, dominated convergence theorem and Lemma 3.2, we have
![]()
for each n and m.
Then, we know
is a Cauchy sequence. Hence,
is a Cauchy sequence. Thus by the similar way as above to prove
converges with probability 1 in the sense of
. We also can prove that
![]()
with probability 1 in the sense of
. In fact, for each
,
![]()
So, we can prove that
![]()
with probability 1 in the sense of
. If
are not convex, we can prove
converges with probability 1 in the sense of
as above, and by the Lemma 3.5, we can prove that
converges with proba-
bility 1 in the sense of
. Then the result was proved. ,
From Theorem 3.6, we can easily obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 3.7. Let
be a separable Banach space which is
for some
. Let
be
a sequence of independent fuzzy set-valued random variables in
, such that
for each n. If
are continuous and such that
and
are non-decreasing, then for each
the convergence of
![]()
implies that
![]()
converges with probability one in the sense of
.
Proof. Let
![]()
If
, by the non-decreasing property of
, we have
![]()
That is
(4.1)
If
, by the non-decreasing property of
, we have
![]()
That is
(4.2)
Then as the similar proof of Theorem 3.6, we can prove both
and
converges with probability
one in the sense of
, and the result was obtained. ,
Acknowledgements
We thank the Editor and the referee for their comments. Research of Li Guan is funded by the NSFC (11301015, 11571024, 11401016).