Bi-Polar RF, Still the Gold Standard for Non-Invasive Fat Volume Reduction ()
1. Introduction
Non-invasive body contouring treatments is one of the fastest growing markets in the aesthetic field [1] . These treatments have grew from mechanical rollers and suction technologies, to thermal based technologies including radio-frequency (RF) energy, infrared light, high intensity focused ultrasound energy (HIFU), and for non- thermal technologies such as cryolipolysis, pulsed focused ultrasound energy, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), etc. [2] -[10] . In some devices the thermal heat is combined with mechanical pressure technology [2] - [6] [11] . The mechanical pressure stimulates the lymphatic flux which reduces edema and toxic environment.
Main purposes of RF-based devices are skin tightening and decrease the volume of adipose tissue. Skin is tightened by immediate collagen contraction, subsequent collagen production and remodeling. Reduction of the adipocyte’s cytosolic volume by normal lipolysis without direct cellular destruction is also obtained due to heat generation in the tissue. The lipolysis process is a normal metabolism of the adipose tissue through stimulation of epinephrine mediated membrane bound lipase enzyme. During the lipolysis process the triglycerides (the main cytosolic volume) are converted (hydrolyzed) to glycerol and free fatty acids. These free fatty acids and glycerol egress out of the cell and are mobilized and metabolized according to body’s needs [2] .
The cutaneous application of RF devices in Asian patients differs in several respects from their use in Caucasians [12] . But, since RF energy is color-blind technology, the response of the Asian population to the body con- touring treatments is assumed to be similar to the Caucasian Population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel RF-based device used for focal fat reduction.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patient’s Specifications
Twenty-two Asian patients from Hong Kong (16 females and 6 males) aged 24 - 51 (average 39.59 years, SD 7.14 years), Fitzpatrick skin types III-V (according to 6 types Fitzpatrick phototyping scale), were enrolled to the study after informed consent was obtained. The patients selected according to the following inclusion criteria: 1) no contraindication for the RF-based treatment; 2) age below 18 years old; 3) BMI 18.5 - 39.9; 4) realistic treatment expectations.
The height range of patients deployed between 152 - 180 cm (average 166.27 cm, SD 7.92 cm) with initial body weight of 49 - 114.5 Kg (average 63.36 Kg, SD 14.63 Kg) and calculated BMI (Body Mass Index) of 18 - 36 (average 22.78, SD 4.06). Seventeen patients were in range of “normal” (healthy weight), one patient was in the “underweight” category, with BMI = 18.0 (patient No. 21), three patients were in “overweight” category (patient No. 1, 17 and 19) and one patient was in “obese class I” (moderately obese) category (patient No. 18) (Table 1).
All patients, except patients No. 18 and 21, had maintained a stable weight (weight fractionations were limited to ±2 Kg) during the whole period of the trial (Table 1). Patients presented similar focal fat accumulation on the abdomen area. No patient had undergone any previous treatments and/or medications for fat volume reduction.
2.2. Treatment Device and Treatment Regime
2.2.1. RF-Based Device
All twenty two patients were treated with bi-polar RF device (Viora Inc., Jersey City, NJ, USA) combined with a mechanical pressure. The system integrates CORE™ technology, which allows independent heating depth control with three distinguished frequencies of RF energy: 0.8, 1.7 and 2.45 MHz, and an additional channel which combines all three frequencies in a single pulse [11] .
2.2.2. Treatment Applicator
All patients were treated with B-Contour applicator which designed for treatment of large skin areas. This applicator emits vacuum-assisted pulsed RF power up to 50 W with a treatment spot size of 35 × 30 mm [11] .
2.2.3. Treatment Area and Regime
The entire study period was hold during 6 months, including the 3 months follow-up visits. All patients kept on their normal diet and level of exercise during treatment period. The patients received 6 consecutive sessions on the abdomen area with one week interval. The treatment procedure was based on “Body Contouring Protocol” designed in three phases: I) Pre-heating phase, II) adipose tissue heating phase and III) fibroblast stimulation
F: Female. M: Male.
phase (skin tightening finishing) [11] . The skin temperature was continuously monitored at 39˚C - 42˚C, using IR (infrared) thermometer (Fluke 561, Everett, WA USA).
Each treatment session lasted about 20 ± 2 minutes in accordance with protocol guidelines.
2.3. Clinical Measurements and Statistical Analysis
2.3.1. Clinical Measurements
During the enrollment visit, patient’s parameters including gender, age, height, weight, BMI and circumferential measurements were recorded before each treatment and in 3-month follow-up visit.
The weight fluctuations (in Kg) were calculated as following: weight (Kg) measured one week after the last treatment session minus weight (Kg) measured in the baseline meeting. The BMI was calculated according to standard guidelines.
The circumferential measurements of the neck, arms, chest, upper abdomen, umbilicus, lower abdomen, hips, thighs and knees, were made using measuring tape, on constant points on each body part. The upper abdomen was determined as a part above the umbilicus and the lower abdomen, as part below. The “Total” circumferential measurement was calculated as a sum of all body parts circumferential measurements. The “Upper body” circumferential measurement was calculated as a sum of neck, arms, chest and upper abdomen circumferential measurements. The “Lower body” circumferential measurement was calculated as a sum of lower abdomen, hips, thighs and knees circumferential measurements.
The circumferential change (in cm) was calculated as following: circumference (cm) recorded one week after the last session minus circumference (cm) recorded in the baseline meeting.
Photography was taken in the baseline, one week after the 6th session and one week after the last treatment session if a patient had more than 6 treatment sessions.
2.3.2. Statistical Analysis
Twenty patients were enrolled to the statistical analysis. Patients No. 18 and 21 were excluded due to unstable weight during the trial. These patients were also excluded when we enrolled only patients that are in range of average value of the initial patient’s weight ± 2SD.
All statistical tests were performed using the software package for statistical science (SPSS for Windows, Version 14, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Total 20 patients were included in statistical analysis since patients number 18 and 21 were excluded due to unstable weight fluctuations (over two kilos change).
Descriptive analysis was performed on the cohort, recording the number of valid cases for each test, minimum and maximum values measured, mean and standard deviation (SD), shown in Table 2.
Weight and BMI category refer to the initial weight and BMI. Weight change and waist’s circumference change refer to the measurements’ difference between the baselines and post six treatment sessions. Another parameter indicated is the percentage change, referring to each patient’s net measurement divided by the initial factor. For example weight percentage change was calculated as the change between the patient’s baseline and post six treatment sessions weight measurement divided by the patient's baseline weight measurement.
A linear correlation tests (R squared) were performed between two parameters: circumference change as dependent variable and weight percentage change, age, initial BMI or high as independent variable.
3. Results
All twenty two patients treated for six treatments by the bi-polar RF device showed some degree of total circumferential reduction from −25.0 cm up to −1.5 cm (Table 2). Since the calculation of total circumferential reduction was inconsistent (in some of the patients not all anatomic parts of body where measured), the umbilicus circumference change was chosen as a constant parameter for statistical analysis and comparison. The umbilicus circumference change ranged between the loss of 5 cm to no change with a mean value of −2 cm (SD = ~1.5; Table 2).
In contrary to the circumference change, the weight change was low (Table 2) with a mean value of −0.0720 Kg and mean percentage of −0.0016% (SD = 0.01499), demonstrating stable weight of the cohort.
No adverse events were recorded during the whole period of trial. The side effects were limited to local bruises, which resolved during the next 4 to 9 days post-treatment. Temporary erythema, which accepted as positive end-point, lasted up to 60 minutes post-treatment.
During the 3-month follow up visit, no rebound of the body condition was detected (data not shown).
A linear correlation tests (R squared) between umbilicus’s circumference change and weight change %, did not reveille strong statistical significant relation, with R2 of 0.07 and sig = 0.260.
Also, there was no statistical significant relation between the umbilicus’s circumference change and the age (R2 = 0.09, sig = 0.299), height (R2 = 0.17, sig = 0.409) or initial BMI of the patient (R2 = 0.20, sig = 0.443).
4. Discussion and Conclusions
This is well known that body shape and body image are negatively impacted by unwanted local subcutaneous fat. Therefore body contouring treatments are increasingly popular cosmetic procedures. Thermal stimulus by non-invasive systems can increase physiological breakdown of triglycerides within adipocytes. Besides, recent animal and human studies showed there was macrophage infiltration and delayed adipocytes cellular death or Apoptosis after an adipose tissue was exposed to therapeutic temperature at 43˚C to 45˚C for 15 minutes. Consequently, shrinkage of subcutaneous fat layer was resulted [13] - [14] .
Most RF-based systems aimed for body shaping and contouring report 2 - 4 cm circumferential reductions in abdominal-hip measurements, and usually happy patients [2] - [8] [15] . Therefore it is not surprisingly that in current study the majority of the patients exhibited a substantial circumferential reduction, not at the expense of weight loss.
Two of the patients (patient No. 3 and 13) did not exhibit any circumferential reduction, according to the umbilicus measurements, but did show substantial circumferential reduction of the hip and tights (lower body). Here it is interesting to speculate about concept called redistribution of the fat, due to “fat communication” hormones or peptides. That is why when abdominal subcutaneous fat is reduced or influenced, measurement of other areas like frank, thighs, arms, even neck may also be reduced subsequently. View of the aforesaid, it is quite interesting to investigate this area in more scientific framework.
The lack of statistically significant correlation between umbilicus’s circumference change and weight change, portraits the independent relation between the two, leaving the impressive loss of patients waists’ circumferential reduction be the solely result of the treatment’s course. The thermal stimulus by RF energy to the superficial adipose tissue, enhance the natural lipolysis.
When randomly selected six of the enrolled patients received additional series of treatment sessions (more than six sessions), the circumferential reduction further accelerated (data not shown). These patients exhibited up to 3 times more circumferential reduction reduced, compared to the achieved reduction after the first six treatment sessions (see Example in Figure 1). For example, patient No. 2 reduced only 0.5 cm according to umbilicus’s measurements after the first six treatment sessions and additional 1.5 cm after additional six sessions (total―2 cm post 12 treatment sessions). This acceleration of clinical outcomes can be contributed to enhanced metabolic rate of the adipose tissue. This type of “buildup” in circumferential reduction can be assumed when the initial blood microcirculation in the treatment area is poor. While increasing the blood flow by the thermal influence of RF energy, every consecutive treatment will lead to greater physiological response, due to increase in skin conductivity and the ability to reach higher end point temperature during the treatment [11] .
Three of the patients enrolled in currents study were also treated on additional body areas, including underarms, hips and thighs with notable improvement in circumferential reduction (Table 3). Due to very small sample size of the additional areas, only abdomen area was chosen for statistical analysis. In addition, abdominal measurements were the most consistent, while other areas were highly variable and differentiated in measurement (some measurements were missing or taken in different locations on the body or position) which affected the variability of the patients.
Although no significant correlation was found between the circumferential measurements and initial patients parameters, it could have been interesting to check the correlation between the clinical outcomes and the patient’s gender due to physiological/metabolic differences between the genders. In women, lipid changes occur more slowly within the femoral region than within the abdominal region; the adipocytes within the femoral region are
Table 3. Circumferential reduction on additional body areas.
NA: Not Available.
Figure 1. 38-year-old female patient, before, after 6 and 12 abdomen contouring treatments with bi-polar RF device.
larger and are influenced by female sex hormones. They are metabolically more stable and resistant to lipolysis [13] . But, since the male group in this study was relatively low (only 6 males), statistical examination of this theory was impossible.
Safety issues are main concern in performing aesthetic procedures. This non-invasive bi-polar RF-based system delivers therapeutic thermal energy selectively to subcutaneous adipose tissues without causing damages to surrounding epidermis, dermis and muscles.
Since RF energy, in contrary to light energy, produces an electrical current, epidermal melanin reminds unscathed, making the RF-based devices as a safe choice for patients of all skin types.
Facial aging are resulted from combination effects of gravity, reduced skin elasticity, rearrangement of subcutaneous volume, change in supporting bony structure and etc. There may be areas of fat accumulation such as at lower face, submental and submandibular regions, which are particularly common in aging Asians.
Recently, the safety and efficacy of the system was also evaluated on Asian patients with facial aging and local facial fat accumulation (data not shown). A group of 15 participants underwent a treatment course of 4 - 8 sessions and showed notable facial skin tightening, upward repositioning of facial volume and reduction in excessive fat accumulation at lower face and neck regions.
In conclusion, the bi-polar RF system, which is a bi-polar RF system utilizing multiple frequencies of RF together with vacuum associated mechanical pressure, is a safe and effective treatment option of non-invasive body contouring and localized fat reduction among Asian population.
NOTES
*Corresponding author.