Genetic Diversity Analysis of Cotoneaster schantungensis Klotz. Using SRAP Marker


In order to detect the genetic relationship of different Cotoneaster schantungensis natural populations, 16 samples were selected for genetic diversity analysis based on SRAP markers. Twelve pairs primers were selected out, 93 bands were amplified, of which 91 bands (97.85%) were polymorphic. At species level, the average value of Nei’s genetic diversity (H) was 0.2213, Shannon’s information index (I) was 0.3596, whereas at population level, they were 0.1955, 0.3121, the percentage of polymorphic loci was 75.27%. The genetic differentiation coefficient in populations (Gst) was 0.0788, gene flow Nm was 5.8467, indicating that there was 7.88% of the variation among populations and 92.12% of the variance within populations and the variation within populations was relatively high. These results indicate that C. schantungensis has high genetic diversity and low differentiation among populations. Although most Cotoneaster species are apomictic, C. schantungensis, however, may be an exception.

Share and Cite:

Ma, Y. , Qu, S. , Xu, X. , Liang, T. and Zang, D. (2015) Genetic Diversity Analysis of Cotoneaster schantungensis Klotz. Using SRAP Marker. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 6, 2860-2866. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2015.618283.

1. Introduction

Cotoneaster schantungensis Klotz. is a unique species of Shandong, the distribution of it is limited in southern mountain area of Jinan, and it is scattered under Platycladus orientalis and Cotinus coggygria plantation sporadic sporadically, with very few numbers. It is in state of extreme endangerment [1] - [3] . Genetic diversities of endangered plants can be tested effectively with molecular marker technology, thus the threatening mechanism can be grasped and the corresponding protection measures can be formulated [4] - [14] . Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) is a kind of new molecular marker technology based on PCR, it is more convenience, high co-dominance, easy for separation of strips and sequencing, and it doesn’t need to know sequence information of species in advance, and is richer in information provided in the aspect of morphologic variation and evolutionary history when compared with AFLP, so it has been widely used at present [15] - [17] . As a kind of extremely small population species, the previous research has been studies only on its living environment and community structure and there is no report on its genetic diversity [18] . Our research makes genetic diversity study on 16 samples of C. schantungensis with SRAP marker technology, the result shows that the genetic diversity level of intrapopulational of C. schantungensis is high, genetic differentiation is large, which provides scientific basis for the formulation of reasonable and efficient protection measures and enhances the protection of endangered species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

C. schantungensis distributes in low altitude mountain area of limestone in southern Jinan, at present, two distributions, “Fo Yu” and “Red Leaves Valley” are found, and there are only about 300 clumps. In these 16 samples of C. schantungensis materials are used for experiment, No. 1 - No. 11 are derived from “Fo Yu” (36˚35'N 117˚06'E, elevation 300 - 350 m), No. 12 - No. 16 are derived from “Red Leaves Valley” (36˚28'N 117˚09'E, elevation 500 - 600 m). The sampling interval of individuals is more than 30 meters, and normal growing healthy without diseases and insect pests are selected, the young fresh leaves on the top of it are collected to be put in quick-seal bags with allachroic silica gel, the air in bags is squeezed out, which makes it rapid drying.

2.2. Research Methods

2.2.1. Genome DNA Extraction

Total DNA was obtained from young leaves using improved CTAB method [19] . The quality and concentration of DNA was tested with 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis and ultraviolet spectrophotometer, then diluted it to 50 ng∙μL−1 and stored it in −20˚C for standby application.

2.2.2. SRAP-PCR Amplification Analysis

SRAP-PCRs were run in 25 µl volumes containing 2.5 µl 10× PCR buffer (5.0 mM MgCl2), 30 ng genomic DNA, 0.3 µM of each primer, 7.5 mM dNTPs and 2 Unit of Taq DNA polymerase. PCR amplifications were performed in Bio-Rad PCR amplifier Cycler using the following cycling parameters: 5 min denaturing at 94˚C; 5 cycles of 94˚C for 1 min; 35˚C for 1 min and 72˚C for 1 min; 30 cycles of 94˚C for 1 min, 50˚C for 1 min and 72˚C for 1 min; followed by a final extension of 7 min at 72˚C, then store at 4˚C.

Twelve pairs of primer combinations, selected from the initial 150 pairs of primer combinations, were used for the study (Table 1). Amplified products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gel at 120 V for 2 hour, stained

Table 1. Primer sequences used for SRAP analysis.

with ethidium bromide (EB) and then visualized and photographed by using gel documentation system (Beijing LiuyiWD-9403CS type UV Apparatus).

2.2.3. Data Statistics and Analysis

SRAP products obtained were manually scored as present (1) or absent (0). The number and percentage of polymorphic loci, effective number of allele Ne, Nei’s genetic similarity coefficient among various materials, Nei’s genetic diversity index (H) and Shannon information index (I) was then analyzed by using POPGENE 1.32 [20] . Dice similarity coefficient was calculated and the corresponding cluster analysis was performed using the Unweighted Pair-Group Method with Arithmetic Average (UPGMA) [21] .

3. Result and Analysis

3.1. SRAP-PCR Amplification

The selected 12 pairs of primers are used to amplify 16 pieces of materials (Figure 1), and then the statistics of amplified primer sites is carried on with binary character coding method (Table 2). It amplifies 93 sites, among them there are 91 polymorphic loci, the percentage of polymorphism is as high as 97.85%, and each primer amplifies 7.75 loci and 7.58 polymorphic loci averagely, it indicates that there are rich genetic diversities among C. schantungensis, and the genetic background is very complex. The number of polymorphic loci amplified by primer combination ME8-EM9 is the most, there are 12, the number of polymorphic loci amplified by primer combination ME8-EM5 is the least, and there are 3. In the 12 pairs of primers, the percentage of polymorphic loci of primer combination ME6-EM12 is the lowest, it is 75%, the percentage of polymorphic loci of the rest primer combinations are all 100%. The Effective number of alleles is 1.1788 - 1.5849, the average value is 1.3420, and the value of primer combination ME6-EM8 is the largest.

3.2. Genetic Diversity Analysis

Based on the test result of SRAP molecular marker, it shows that there is a big difference in genetic diversity of two populations of C. schantungensis. The percentage of polymorphic loci (86.02%), Shannon information index

Figure 1. The amplification result of ME8-EM9. No. 1-No. 11: C. schantungensis derived from “Fo Yu”; No. 12-No. 16: C. schantungensis derived from “Red Leaves Valley” M: DNA Marker 2000.

(0.3550), Nei genetic diversity of the population in “Fo Yu” is much higher than the population in “Red Leaves Valley” (Table 3). Because the three parameters could uncover the genetic diversity condition of population effectively, so it indicates that the genetic diversity of population in “Fo Yu” is much higher than population in “Red Leaves Valley”. The observation of two parameters of number of alleles and effective number of alleles also proves it.

In the level of species, the number of alleles and effective number of alleles is 1.9785 and 1.3405 respectively; Nei’s gene diversity index H is 0.2213, Shannon polymorphic information index I is 0.3596. it indicates that the genetic diversity of C. schantungensis presents a high level in the level of population and species.

Table 2. Sequences of 12 pairs of SRAP primers and amplification results.

Table 3. The genetic diversity among different populations of C. schantungensis based on SRAP analysis.

3.3. Genetic Differentiation of Population of C. schantungensis

Gene differentiation analysis among populations shows that the Genetic differentiation coefficient Gst of two populations of C. schantungensis is 0.0788, because the Gst overall level of perennial plant, hybridization plant, insect-pollinated plant is 0.19, 0.22, 0.264 respectively [22] - [24] , so the Gst of C. schantungensis is obvious low.

The total genetic diversity of population Ht is 0.2123, and most heritable variations exist in the population, and the genetic diversity in population Hs is 0.1955, intra-population occupies 92.1%, among populations only occupies 7.88%. The gene flow among populations estimated by Gst is 5.8467, it shows that there are frequent gene flows between the two populations.

At the same time, the UPGMA with Nei method also shows that the genetic identity of the two populations is 0.9766, the genetic distance is only 0.0236, the genetic similarity among populations is very high, and it is the same as the result that the heritable variation among populations is small.

3.4. The Genetic Distance and Cluster Analysis among Individuals and Populations

Based on genetic similarity coefficient, SRAP marker genetic diversity molecular dendrogram (Figure 2) of tested materials is drawn with UPGMA method.

The result shows that the similarity coefficients of all materials are between 0.47 - 0.92, the average is 0.68, and it proves that the genetic relationship of tested materials is very close [25] . It can be seen from dendrogram that 16 pieces of materials can be divided into three classes at the similarity coefficients of 0.38. Individuals among populations have obvious overlaps phenomenon, and they are not classified with geographic features, three materials (15, 16, 12) of “Red Leaves Valley” and all materials of “Fo Yu” are crossed gathered as the first and second class, and No. 13 and No. 14 of “Red Leaves Valley” are solely gathered as the third class. It shows that there is no obvious correlation between genetic distance and geographic space, and it is also not obvious related to distance of two populations and genetic differentiation among populations. At the same time, the genetic distance among individuals of C. schantungensis in populations of “Fo Yu” is close, while the distance is far in populations of “Red Leaves Valley”, it is speculate that populations in “Fo Yu” are formed by the spread distribution of populations in “Red Leaves Valley”.

4. Discussion

The percentage of polymorphic loci is one of the important indexes that reflect variation level in populations [26] . At present, there is no study report of SRAP of Cotoneaster. In species levels, the genetic diversity of C. schantungensis is 97.85%, which is higher than Amygdalus ledebouriana (P = 92.1%), plants in the same family, but Nei’s genetic diversity index (H = 0.2213) and Shannon information index (I = 0.3596) are a little lower than those of A. ledebouriana (H = 0.2809, I = 0.4327 [27] . So, although C. schantungensis is a unique species, it still has a high basis of genetic diversity. Previous studies also show that narrow distributed species could have higher genetic diversity [28] [29] .

Gene flow is very important for evolution of plants, and it has negative correlations with population genetic differentiation [30] . For spermatophyte, the gene flow among populations is mainly produced by foreign genes brought by pollens and seeds [31] . Gene flow among population Nm is less than 1.0, various populations could differentiate intensively, when it is between 1.0 and 4.0, gene flow could give play to its homogenizing function to prevent differentiation among each population caused by genetic drift, when Nm is bigger than 4.0, the population is a random unit [32] . The Nm of C. schantungensis is 5.8765, it shows that gene exchange among populations is very frequent, which weakens genetic differentiation among populations, and the genetic distance between two populations is only 0.0236, the genetic identity is high, it also highly inosculates with the value of

Figure 2. UPGMA cluster analysis of genetic similarity of 16 pieces of tested materials No. 1-No. 11: C. schantungensis derived from “Fo Yu”; No. 12-No. 16: C. schantungensis derived from “Red Leaves Valley”.

gene flow among populations. Although most Cotoneaster are apomixes [33] [34] , the research shows that C. schantungensis might be an exception.


This work was funded by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (30972406) and Shandong agricultural seeds engineering major issue (No. 20106).


*These authors contribute equally.

#Corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] China Flora Editorial Board of CAS (1974) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, Vol. 36. Science Press, Beijing, 149.
[2] Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H. and Hong, D.Y., Eds. (2003) Flora of China, Vol. 9. Science Press & St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing, 99.
[3] Li, F.Z. (2004) Shandong Plant Essence. Science Press, Beijing, 296.
[4] Cole, C.T. and Kuchengeuther, M.A. (2001) Molecular Markers Reveal Little Genetic Differentiation among Aconitum noveboracense and A. columbianum (Ranunculaceae) Populations. American Journal of Botany, 88, 337-347.
[5] Ledig, F.T. and Conkle, M.T. (1983) Gene Diversity and Genetic Structure in a Narrow Endemic, Torrey Pine (Pinustorreyana Parry ex Carrière). Evolution, 37, 79-86.
[6] Lemes, M.R., Gribel, R., Proctor, J. and Grattapaglia, D. (2003) Population Genetic Structure of Mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King, Meliaceae) across the Brazilian Amazon, Based on Variation at Microsatellite Loci: Implications for Conservation. Molecular Ecology, 12, 2875-2883.
[7] Torres, E., Iriondo, J.M. and Pérez, C. (2003) Genetic Structure of a Endangered Plant, Antirrhinum microphyllum (Scrophulariaceae ): Allozyme and RAPD Analysis. American Journal of Botany, 90, 85-92.
[8] Ge, S. and Hong, D.Y. (1999) Studies of Morphological and Allozyme Variation of the Endangered Adenophoralobophylla and Its Widespread Congener A. potaninii. Journal of Genetics & Genomics, 26, 410-417.
[9] Ge, S., Wang, H.Q., Zhang, C.M., et al. (1997) Genetic Diversity and Population Differentiation of Cathaya argyrophylla in Bamian Mountain. Act Botanic Sinica, 39, 266-271.
[10] Han, C.Y., Sun, W.B. and Gao, L.M. (2004) Analysis of Genetic Diversity of Trigonobalanus doichangensis (Fagaceae) by RAPD. Acta BotanicaYunnanica, 26, 513-518.
[11] Ji, Z.X. and Li, J.M. (2007) ISSR Analysis on Genetic Diversity of Endangered Relic Shrub Sinocanthus chinensis. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 18, 247-253.
[12] Su, H.L. and Tang, S.Q. (2004) Genetic Diversity of the Endangered Plant Abiesziyuanensis in Two Populations. 24, 414-417.
[13] Xiao, Y.A., He, P., Deng, H.P., et al. (2003) Study on Population Genetic Diversity and Genetic Differentiation of Disanthus Cercidifolius Maxim var. Longipes H.T. Chang in Jinggangshan. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science), 28, 444-449.
[14] Xie, G.W., Peng, X.Y., Zheng, Y.L., et al. (2007) Genetic Diversity of Endangered Plant Monimopetalumchinense in China Detected by ISSR Analysis. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 43, 48-53.
[15] Li, G. and Quiros, C.F. (2001) Sequence-Related Amplified Polymorphism (SRAP), a New Marker System Based on a Simple PCR Reaction: Its Application to Mapping and Gene Tagging in Brassica. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 103, 455-461.
[16] Ferriol, M., Pico, B., de Cordova, P.F. and Nuez, F. (2004) Molecular Diversity of a Germ Plasm Collection of Squash (Cucurbita moschata) Determined by SRAP and AFLP Markers. Crop Science, 44, 653-664.
[17] Ferriol, M., Pico, B. and Nuez, F. (2003) Genetic Diversity of a Germplasm Collection of Cucurbita pepo Using SRAP and AFLP Markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 107, 271-282.
[18] Qu, S.Q., Liu, D., Xie, X.M., et al. (2012) Study on Composition and Structure Characteristics of Cotoneaster schantungensis Community. Journal of Anhui Agriculture Science, 40, 1426-1430
[19] Kidwell, K.K. and Osborn, T.C. (1992) Simple Plant DNA Isolation Procedures. In: Beckman, J. and Osborn, T.C., Eds., Plant Genomes: Methods for Genetic and Physical Mapping, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1-13.
[20] Qu, S.Q. (2013) Evaluation and Investigation of the Germplasm of the Precious Species Cotoneaster schantungensis Klotz. and Rosa rugosa Thunb. Shandong Agricultural University, Taian.
[21] Xu, K.X. (1994) Numerical Taxonomy. Science Press, Beijing.
[22] Nybom, H. (2004) Comparison of Different Nuclear DNA Markers for Estimating Intraspecific Genetic Diversity in Plants. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1143-1155.
[23] Zhang, D.Q. and Yang, Y.P. (2008) A Statistical and Comparative Analysis of Genetic Diversity Detected by Different Molecular Markers. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 30, 159-167.
[24] Nei, M. (1978) Estimation of Average Heterozygosity and Genetic Distance from a Small Number of Individuals. Genetics, 89, 583-590.
[25] Zhang, D.Y. (2003) Plant Life-History Evolution and Reproductive Ecology. Science Press, Beijing, 208-212.
[26] Liu, J.F. and Xiao, W.F. (2008) RAPD Analysis of the Genetic Diversity of a Critically Endangered Plant, Thuja Sutchuensis (Cupressaceae). Acta Agriculture University Jiangxiensis, 30, 68-72.
[27] Lü, Z.J., Li, J., Omir, S.T., et al. (2010) ISSR Analysis for Genetic Diversity of Amygdalus ledebouriana Germplasm from Xinjiang, China. Journal of Fruit Science, 27, 918-923.
[28] Martinez-Palacios, A., Eguiarte, L.E. and Fornier, G.R. (1999) Genetic Diversity of the Endangered Endemic Agave victoriae-reginae (Agavaceae) in the Chihuahuan Desert. American Journal of Botany, 86, 1093-1098.
[29] Dolan, R.W., Yahr, R., Menges, E.S. and Halfhill, M.D. (1999) Conservation Implications of Genetic Variation in Three Rare Species Endemic to Florida Rosemary Scrub. American Journal of Botany, 86, 1556-1562.
[30] Grant, V. (1991) The Evolutionary Process: A Critical Study of Evolutionary Theory. Columbia University Press, New York.
[31] Hamrick, J.L. (1987) Gene Flow Distributing of Genetic Variation in Plant Populations. In: Urbanska, K., Ed., Differentiation Patterns in Higher Plants, Academy Press, New York, 53-67.
[32] Wright, S. (1931) Evolution of Mendelian Populations. Genetics, 16, 91-176.
[33] Fryer, J. and Hylmo, B. (2001) Captivating Cotoneaster. New Plantsman, 8, 227-238.
[34] Wu, Z.-Y., Lu, A.-M., et al. (2003) The Families and Genera of Angiosperms in China. Science Press, Beijing, 647.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.