Effect of Fucoidan Dietary Supplement on the Chemotherapy Treatment of Patients with Unresectable Advanced Gastric Cancer ()
1. Introduction
Outcomes are extremely poor in patients with unresectable gastric cancer. To prolong the survival of these patients, it is important to continue effective chemotherapy for as long as possible. Casaretto et al. [1] reported that chemotherapy increased the 1-year survival rate, provided a longer symptom-free period and improved the quality of life (QOL) of patients. Recently, S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS) trial identified the S-1 plus cisplatin regimen, which comprises S-1 at a dose of 40 - 60 mg/m2, in a 5-week cycle (3 weeks on and 2 weeks off), and cisplatin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 8, as a standard first-line treatment for unresectable gastric cancer in Japan [2] . Unfortunately, the severe side effects of this treatment mean it is difficult for most patients to continue the S-1 plus cisplatin regimen [3] , and many patients suffer from reduced QOL [4] . Thus, it is clinically important to reduce the toxicity of the chemotherapy regimen so it can be more effective for these patients.
Previously, we reported that fucoidan could reduce the toxicity of combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (FOLFOX) or irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV (FOLFIRI) for patients with advanced colorectal cancer [5] . Fucoidan is a sulfated polysaccharide that is found in various species of brown seaweed, such as kombu, wakame, mozuku, and hijiki. It has been reported to have anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and antitumor activity [6] -[8] . Recently, substantial pharmaceutical research has been carried out on fucoidan.
In the present study, we investigated whether fucoidan could reduce the toxicity associated with the chemotherapy treatment of patients who were diagnosed with unresectable gastric cancer at Tottori University Hospital using a randomized study and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0 and 1.
2. Methods
2.1. Patients
Between April 2010 and June 2014, 24 patients who were diagnosed with unresectable advanced gastric cancer and who were to undergo S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy in our hospital were enrolled in the study. Gastric adenocarcinoma was confirmed histologically by endoscopic biopsy in all patients. The clinical stage of the patients was Stage IV and ECOG PS of these patients was 0 or 1. They had adequate bone marrow (platelet count > 100,000/L, white blood cell count > 4000/L, granulocyte count > 1500/L, hemoglobin level > 10.0 mg/dL), and renal (serum creatinine concentration < 2.0 mg/dL) and hepatic (serum bilirubin level < 2.0 mg/dL) function. The ethics committee of Tottori University approved this study in 2010 (approval number: 1445). Informed consent was obtained from the 24 patients, and they were randomly allocated into a fucoidan treatment group (n = 12) and a control group without fucoidan treatment (n = 12). The patients were followed until July 2015. The patient details are shown in Table 1.
2.2. Chemotherapy
Standard S-1 plus cisplatin regimen [S-1: 40 - 60 mg/m2, in a 5-week cycle (3 weeks on and 2 weeks off), in combination with 60 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 8] was administered to all 24 patients [2] .
2.3. Fucoidan Treatment
Fucoidan is a sulfated polysaccharide that is extracted from brown seaweed. In the present study, we used a high-molecular-weight product of fucoidan derived from Cladosiphon okamuranus (Okinawa mozuku) by Marine Products Kimuraya Co., Ltd. (Tottori, Japan). In the fucoidan group, every patient took 150 mL/day of liquid that contained 4.05 g fucoidan for 6 months after commencing chemotherapy [5] .
2.4. Clinical Assessment
All toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) [9] . Hematological variables and clinical status were recorded every 2 weeks during the chemotherapy period. The drug dose levels were reduced in the case of severe or persistent toxicity, according to the protocol [2] . In the case of persistent grade 3 toxicity, chemotherapy was stopped. The occurrence of grade 2 adverse events was compared between both groups.
SD: standard deviation.
Blood samples were taken from each patient routinely before chemotherapy and every 2 weeks during chemotherapy. The serum albumin (ALB) concentration and total lymphocyte count were recorded. The patients’ prognostic nutritional indices (PNIs) at 3 months after commencing chemotherapy were compared with their PNIs before chemotherapy as nutritional and immunological parameters of the patients. Each PNI was calculated using the following formula: 10 × serum ALB concentration (g/dL) + 0.005 × lymphocyte count (number/mm3) in peripheral blood [10] .
2.5. Endpoints
The patients’ survival, measured from the date of commencement of chemotherapy until death, was assessed as the primary endpoint. The incidence and severity of adverse events were also assessed as the secondary endpoints. The continuance of chemotherapy was compared in both groups.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
The χ-square test for independence, Fisher’s exact probability test, and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare patient characteristics, treatment status, adverse events, and antitumor effect. The survival rates of the two groups were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the statistical differences between survival curves were examined by the log-rank test. A P score of <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
3. Results
All patients were followed up at our hospital. The median follow-up period of the 24 patients was 10 months (range: 3 - 17 months). During the follow-up period, 23 patients (11 in the fucoidan group and 12 in the control group) died because of gastric cancer progression; however, no patient died while undergoing treatment. Additionally, we found no side effects of fucoidan, such as allergic dermatitis. All patients were able to complete fucoidan therapy safely.
The mean survival time (MST) of the 24 patients was 10 months. During the treatment period, 12 of the 24 patients underwent surgical interventions (gastric resection: six and bypass operation: six) because of bleeding from the stomach (n = 6) and stenosis (n = 6). The MST of the 12 patients with surgical intervention (10 months) was similar to that of the 12 patients without surgical intervention (10 months, P = 0.63). In contrast, the MST of the 12 patients who underwent fucoidan treatment (12 months) was significantly better than that of the 12 patients without fucoidan treatment (8 months, P = 0.039, Figure 1).
The observed toxicities (≥grade 2) of the chemotherapy drugs are listed in Table 2. We found no patients with severe toxicity (grade 4) in either group. The occurrence of myelosuppression was similar in both the fucoidan and control groups. Appetite loss, nausea and stomatitis caused by S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy were not suppressed by fucoidan. In contrast, the occurrence of diarrhea and general fatigue was observed in about 60% of control group patients, but such adverse events were suppressed in the fucoidan group (the statistical differences were not observed). Because fucoidan was able to suppress diarrhea and fatigue, we found that chemotherapy treatment for these patients could be prolonged. The mean chemotherapy treatment period of the fucoidan group (7.4 months, range: 2 - 12 months) was significantly longer than that of the control group (4.6 months, range: 1 - 10 months, P = 0.044, Figure 2).
The PNIs of all 24 patients at 3 months after commencing chemotherapy (post-treatment) were compared with those of the patients before treatment (pre-treatment). The PNIs of post-treatment (mean: 43.5, range: 22.1 - 60.7) were similar to those pre-treatment (mean: 44.1, range: 30 - 55.3). The results also indicate that the PNI increased at post-treatment compared with pre-treatment for 14 patients (eight: fucoidan group and six: control group). The MST of the 14 patients with increased PNI at post-treatment (11 months) was significantly better than that of 10 patients with decreased PNI post-treatment (6 months, P = 0.006). Correlation between fucoidan treatment, chemotherapy, and PNI is indicated in Table 3. These results indicate that fucoidan may prevent the deterioration of patients’ PNI due to chemotherapy.
Table 2. Major adverse events (≥grade 2) from the chemotherapy drugs.
Figure 1. Survival curves of patients with unresectable gastric cancer. Solid line: survival curve of 12 patients with fucoidan treatment. Dotted line: survival curve of 12 patients without fucoidan treatment. The difference was significant (P = 0.039).
Table 3. Prognostic nutritional indexes (PNIs) before S-1 plus cisplatin treatment (pre-treatment) and at 3 months after commencing chemotherapy (post-treatment).
Mean ± SD, SD: standard deviation.
Figure 2. The chemotherapy treatment periods of 12 patients in the fucoidan-treated group were significantly longer than those of the 12 patients in the control group (P = 0.004).
4. Discussion
Fucoidan is one of the major sulfated polysaccharides of brown seaweeds, such as kombu, wakame, mozuku and hijiki. Recently, substantial research has been carried out on the medical benefits of fucoidan and a wide range of biological activities has been reported. Choi et al. [11] indicated that fucoidan protects the gastric mucosa from inflammatory cytokine-mediated oxidative damage in rats. Hayashi et al. [6] reported that fucoidan reduces CCl4-induced acute and chronic liver failure with hepatic fibrosis and anti-inflammatory activity of fucoidan has been demonstrated in rats [12] . Moreover, it has been demonstrated that fucoidan is not toxic in rats at high doses [13] . Thus, fucoidan has demonstrated potential to improve human health as a supplement rather than as a drug; however, a detailed mechanism of action of fucoidan has not been verified, and its effects in humans have not been reported.
Since the SPIRITS trial, the S-1 plus cisplatin regimen has been recommended in Japan as a standard first-line treatment for unresectable gastric cancer; however, the MST of such patients remains after 10 months [14] . Prolonging the survival of such patients, and continuing the administration of effective chemotherapy as long as possible, are of critical importance. The S-1 plus cisplatin regimen has severe toxicities, such as nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, diarrhea, fatigue, leukocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Thus, many patients who suffer from these adverse events may discontinue treatment. Therefore, the prognosis of patients with unresectable gastric cancer is still low even with advances in chemotherapy drug design. To reduce the toxicity of the chemotherapy agents, various types of drugs or dietary supplements have been introduced [15] - [17] .
Previously, we found that fucoidan could reduce the toxicities of chemotherapy drugs in patients with colorectal cancer [3] . Thus, in the present study, we analyzed whether fucoidan could protect patients from the toxicities of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with unresectable gastric cancer and whether this resulted in prolonging the patients’ survival. The results indicate that fucoidan suppresses the occurrence of diarrhea and general fatigue during chemotherapy. It has been demonstrated that fatigue graded using NCI CTC was observed in almost 30% of the treated patients. This fatigue influences the patients’ nutritional status, increases morbidity, and can negatively affect the dose intensity of chemotherapy [18] . The addition of fucoidan to the patient reduced the rate of grade 2 and 3 fatigue from 60% to 25%. The addition of fucoidan to the patients’ diets also meant that chemotherapy could be continued for longer time periods, and as a result, convalescence of patients tended to be improved. Moreover, fucoidan was able to maintain the nutritional condition of patients during chemotherapy. How fucoidan is able to control general fatigue induced by chemotherapy is unknown, but we will explore this in the future.
Recent research reported that fucoidan is also able to suppress in vitro tumor progression. Yamasaki-Miya- moto et al. [7] and Hyun et al. [19] have demonstrated that fucoidan activates caspase-8 or extracellular signal- regulated kinase and induced apoptosis in tumor cells. The pro-apoptotic effects of fucoidan have been shown in a gastric cancer cell line [20] . In the present study, even though the number of patients was small, the prognosis of patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer was better with fucoidan treatment compared with those patients not supplemented with fucoidan. One reason could be that fucoidan prolonged chemotherapy duration by suppressing the toxicity of the chemotherapy drugs. Another reason might be an anticancer effect of fucoidan itself. This highlights the need for larger controlled studies to evaluate the therapeutic effect of fucoidan for patients with gastrointestinal carcinoma.
Competing Interests
We have no competing interests about this manuscript.
NOTES
*Corresponding author.