Orthodontic Management of Occlusal Prematurity in Early Mixed Dentition ()
1. Introduction
The masticatory system is a functional unit composed of the teeth; their supporting structures, the jaws; the temporomandibular joints; the muscles involved directly or indirectly in mastication (including the muscles of the lips and tongue); and the vascular and nervous systems supplying these tissues. Functional and structural disturbances in any one of the components of the masticatory system may be reflected by functional or structural disorders in one or more of its other components [1] [2] . However, there is a lot of evidence that the masticatory system has ability to the wide range of adaptive modalities. These adaptations can be functional and/or structural and may respond to transient and/or permanent demands. Therefore, this system, like any biological system, cannot be viewed as a rigid and immutable [2] [3] .
Knowledge of how the mandible moves during mastication has greatly influenced procedures in clinical dentistry. Historically, an understanding of mandibular movement was considered important in removable prosthodontics. Later, this information was used in the design and setting of articulators, and in the design of the dentures and denture teeth themselves. Today the importance of jaw movements has become apparent in fixed prosthodontics, periodontics, orthodontics, and in the diagnosis and treatment of pain disorders of the masticatory system [2] [4] .
In regard to the occlusion of the teeth, there are two concepts to be recognized; the first is the morphological or anatomical concept as the name implies an occlusion based on the forms of the teeth while the second is the physiologic concept. The physiologic occlusion is a living-dynamic as it participates as one of the components of the masticatory system.
Abnormal functional relationship of the teeth may vary in degree of abnormality from mild to extreme. In the first instance certain teeth may occlude slightly in advance of the other teeth. This is premature contact of the teeth. This condition may also exist in the functional movements of the mandible during mastication [5] .
Dental professionals must consider the importance of occlusal contacts for the success of dental treatment, maintaining occlusal stability and orofacial harmony, as occlusal interferences may implicate potential damages to the whole stomatognathic system, which includes teeth, supporting structures, neuromuscular system and temporomandibular joints [6] -[12] .
This paper presents a clinical case which is demonstrating orthodontic management of premature contacts in early mixed dentition.
1.1. Case History
A 7-year-old boy attended to my private orthodontic clinic with chief compliant of lower anterior teeth overlapping of upper anterior teeth. He was in early mixed dentition stage. In the extraoral lateral view, the patient profile was straight while lip profile was reversed giving the appearance of class III (Figures 1-3).
The intraoral examination revealed a forward shift of the mandible, with a marked class III molar relationship and an anterior crossbite (Figures 4-6).
1.2. Diagnosis
The clinical examination revealed retruded upper lip with protruded lower lip giving the view of deficient mid face as seen in class III. The upper incisors retroclined and spaced while lower incisors slightly proclined. An anterior crossbite in the presence of a forward mandibular displacement and functional shift to the left side due to premature contact between upper and lower central incisors, class III malocclusion with reverse overjet and negative deep overbite. The starting point in diagnosis and treatment of this case was by establishing centric relation through guiding the mandible into centric relation rather than centric occlusion and then initial contact with the teeth occurs so an edge to edge anterior incisor contact with posterior open bite indicating Pseudo class III (Figures 1-7).
Cephalometric analysis indicated a mild class III malocclusion characterized by a little mandibular protrusion, maxillary retroclined incisors (ANB = −1 degree, Wits = −6 mm, I-SN = 100 degree) (Figure 8, Figure 9) (Table 1).
Treatment objectives: forward movement of 11 maxillary incisors , eliminating functional shift ,mandibular displacement, premature contact, enhancing normal lip profile, achieving class I molar relationship and canine relationship with ideal overjet and overbite.
Treatment plan: fixed orthodontic treatment by using protrusive arch wire for the forward movement of 11 without raising the bite.
1.3. Treatment Procedure
Treatment started so a bondable tubes placed on the buccal surfaces of upper first permanent molars on both sides with brackets (slot 22) placed on the labial surface of the upper central incisors. Then placement of upper
Figure 7. Initial contact between teeth in centric relation.
Figure 8. Lateral cephalometric radiograph.
Table 1. Cephalometric measurements of the patient.
SNA = it represents the relationship of the Maxilla to the anterior cranial base in anteroposterior direction (angular measurement); SNB = it represents the relationship of the Mandible to the anterior cranial base in anteroposterior direction (angular measurement); ANB = it represents the relationship between the Maxilla and the mandible in anteroposterior direction (angular measurement); GoMe-SN = it represents the relationship of the Mandible to the anterior cranial base in vertical direction (angular measurement); FMA = it represents the relationship of the Mandible to the Frankfort plane in vertical direction (angular measurement); I-SN = it represents the relationship of the maxillary central incisor to the anterior cranial base in anteriorposterior direction (angular measurement); IMPA = it represents the relationship of the mandibular central incisor to the mandible in anteriorposterior direction (angular measurement); I/I = it represents the relationship of the mandibular central incisor to the maxillary central incisor (angular measurement); Wits = it represents the relationship between the Maxilla and the mandible in anteroposterior direction (metric measurement).
Figure 9. Cephalometric analysis―pretreatemt. *Redlines indicate the major functional components of the face (cranial base, jaws, teeth and facial profile) before orthodontic treatment while blue lines indicate the Functional Occlusal Plane (FOP) as well as the dashed lines indicate A and B points projection on the FOP.
Niti arch wire rectangular (0.016 × 0.022) (Protrusive Arch Wire) was customized to the arch form of the patient. A V bend was made mesial to the bondable tubes on first permanent molars. The exposed part of arch wire coated with plastic sleeve to prevent irritation to cheek (Figure 10, Figure 11).
After two weeks orthodontic evaluation has been done of the retroclined upper central incisors which were orthodontically adjusted so the patient could bite in the new situation. The total treatment time was two weeks and the appliance was removed on the end of the second week (Figure 12, Figure 13).
Figure 10. Intraoral view of protrusive arch wire.
A 2-year follow-up for this case with good stability of occlusion, optimal functional and aesthetical states. Final superimpositions showed improvements in ANB and Wits values (+1 degree, −1 mm) respectively. The slight maxillary incisor protrusion coupled with the clockwise mandibular rotation produced an overall improvement of the patient’s aesthetic appearance (Figures 14-19).
2. Discussion
Typically, an orthodontic case begins with a basic evaluation of the patient’s occlusion in static state. The view of occlusion has been enlarged so that it must be thought of as it functions as an integral part of the dynamic masticatory system.
The tooth interference may be more pronounced than premature contact and the mandible may be deflected from its normal functional path, now more than the teeth and supporting tissues are involved and the abnormal function may extend into the temporomandibular joints and musculature [5] . If the interferences cannot be
Figure 14. Lateral profile view―post treatment after two weeks.
Figure 15. Lateral-profile view―post treat- ment after 2 years.
Figure 16. Frontal-extraoral view after 2 years.
Figure 17. Frontal-intraoral view after 2 years.
Figure 18. Post-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs.
Figure 19. Cephalometric superimposition, showing tracings of the same individual at an earlier (red) and later (blue) time.
avoided comfortably by mandibular displacement in chewing and swallowing by neuromuscular mechanisms (functional adapatation), if the tooth becomes mobile and is moved out of position (structural adapation) and or if the patient cannot ignore the discomfort or the presence of change even for a short period (behavioral adaptation) overt symptoms of dysfunction of the muscles, joints, periodontium or teeth (pulp) may occur [13] .
The CR position rarely coincides with MI position in the majority of the population, and about 90% of people have a deviation up to 1.75 mm between these two positions [14] . In the cases in which this deviation alters the sagittal relationship between the upper and lower arches, it seems obvious that the diagnosis and orthodontic planning of treatment must be elaborated based on the patient’s examination in CR. When this protocol is neglected, one can obtain an incorrect diagnosis and make an incorrect treatment planning for the real malocclusion. For a clinical example, this error is more common in cases of false class III and unilateral posterior crossbite [15] .
In the presented case, as the upper central incisors are retroclined, so there is premature contact which avoided by forward mandibular displacement associated with functional shift to the left to achieve more comfortable bite in centric occlusion (functional adaptation). While, in contrast an edge to edge relationship between upper and lower teeth with posterior open bite when the mandible is manipulated in centric relation which is not comfortable.
In the current case the method used to eliminate the premature contact was not occlusal adjustment by selective grinding which involves the selective reshaping of tooth surfaces that interfere with normal jaw function, it was an orthodontic occlusal adjustment by correction of the position of the retroclined upper central incisors to procline them forward by using the protrusive arch wire [16] -[20] .
3. Conclusions
1) Functional and structural disturbances in any one of the components of the masticatory system may be reflected by functional or structural disorders in one or more of its other components.
2) Occlusal prematurity can be corrected by fixed orthodontic appliance.
Acknowledgements
First and foremost I would like to thank my family: Dad “Mohammad Naeem Mahfouz” Mom “Wedad Jarrad” Brother Allam Mahfouz, Sisters, Hanin Mahfouz, Suha Mahfouz, Bayan Mahfouz, Wife Yara Mansour and my kids, Omar Mahfouz, Noor Mahfouz and Sara Mahfouz for their valuable great support, guidance and advice.