Dosimetric Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Geometry ICRT Applicators in Patients Treated for Carcinoma Cervix

Sukhvir Singh, Arti Sarin, Manoj Kumar Semwal^*, Ajay Kumar Singh, Pankaj Goyal, Ashok Kumar

Department of Radiation Oncology, Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi, India.

DOI: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2015.41001                

Abstract

In intracavitary radiotherapy (ICRT) for cancer cervix, applicator geometry has the potential to impact the doses to organs at risk (OARs) and the coverage of the target volume. At our centre two Varian made Fletcher-style applicator sets, namely defined (fixed) geometry and flexible geometry, are used for ICRT. In the present work, the two types of applicators were compared dosimetrically as per the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU-38) while delivering high dose rate brachytherapy. Twenty four patients who underwent ICRT were considered for this study. Radiographic method was used for treatment planning on Abacus planning system. ICRU-38 recommended parameters were estimated and compared. Flexible geometry applicator showed 8.8% and 16% higher bladder and rectum point doses as compared to the fixed geometry one but the difference was statistically not significant. The thickness of the pear-shaped isodose volume was larger for the flexible geometry implant also indicating towards higher doses to OARs. The higher bladder and rectum point doses in the case of flexible applicator will need to be validated by a larger data set.

Keywords

Carcinoma Cervix, Intracavitary Radiotherapy, Applicator Geometry, Dosimetry

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Rutten, R.R., Lawyer, A.A. and Berner, P. (1998) Dose Variation Due to Differences in Applicator Placement Used for Intracavitary Brachytherapy of Cervical Cancer. Medical Dosimetry, 23, 57-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0958-3947(97)00110-6
[2]	Chakraborty, S., Patel, F.D., Patil, V.M., Oinam, A.S. and Sharma, S.C. (2014) Magnitude and Implications of Interfraction Variations in Organ Doses during High Dose Rate Brachytherapy of Cervix Cancer: A CT Based Planning Study. ISRN Oncology, Article ID: 687365
[3]	Datta, N.R., Kumar, S., Das, K.J., Pandey, C.M., Halder, S. and Ayyagari, S. (2001) Variations of Intracavitary Applicator Geometry during Multiple HDR Brachytherapy Insertions in Carcinoma Cervix and Its Influence on Reporting as per ICRU Report 38. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 60, 15-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00352-8
[4]	Nag, S., Cardenes, H., Chang, S., Das, I.J., Erickson, B., Ibbott, G.S., et al. (2004) Image-Guided Brachytherapy Working Group. Proposed Guidelines for Image-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Cervical Carcinoma. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 60, 1160-1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.032
[5]	Haie-Meder, C., Potter, R., Van Limbergen, E., Briot, E., De Brabandere, M., Dimopoulos, J., et al. (2005) Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO Working Group (I): Concepts and Terms in 3D Image Based 3D Treatment Planning in Cervix Cancer Brachytherapy with Emphasis on MRI Assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 74, 235-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.032
[6]	Potter, R., Haie-Meder, C., Limbergen, E.V., Barillot, I., Brabandere, M.D., Dimopoulos, J., et al. (2006) Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO Working Group (II): Concepts and Terms in 3D Image-Based Treatment Planning in Cervix Cancer Brachytherapy-3D Dose Volume Parameters and Aspects of 3D Image-Based Anatomy, Radiation Physics, Radiobiology. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 78, 67-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2005.11.014
[7]	Fellner, C., Potter, R., Knocke, T.H. and Wambersie, A. (2001) Comparison of Radiography- and Computed Tomography Based Treatment Planning in Cervix Cancer in Brachytherapy with Specific Attention to Some Quality Assurance Aspects. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 58, 53-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00282-6
[8]	Addeo, D., Duckworth, T., Blank, S., Hitchen, C., Donach, M. and Formenti, S. (2008) Correlation between (ICRU) Point Doses and CT Based Image Planning of Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer. Proceedings of the 50th Annual ASTRO Meeting. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 72, S374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1223
[9]	Wachter-Gerstner, N., Wachter, S., Reinstadler, E., Fellner, C., Knocke, T.H., Wambersie, A. and Potter, R. (2003) Bladder and Rectum Dose Defined from MRI Based Treatment Planning for Cervix Cancer Brachytherapy: Comparison of Dose-Volume Histograms for Organ Contours and Organ Wall, Comparison with ICRU Rectum and Bladder reference Points. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 68, 269-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00189-0
[10]	Jamema, S.V., Saju, S., Mahantshetty, U., Pallad, S., Deshpande, D.D., Shrivastava, S.K., et al. (2008) Dosimetric Evaluation of Rectum and Bladder Using Image-Based CT Planning and Orthogonal Radiographs with ICRU 38 Recommendations in Intracavitary Brachytherapy. Journal of Medical Physics, 33, 3-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.39417
[11]	International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (1985) Dose and Volume Specification for Reporting Intracavitary Therapy in Gynaecology. ICRU Report 38, ICRU, Bethesda.
[12]	Thirion, P., Kelly, C., Salib, O., Moriarty, M., O’Reilly, D., Griffin. M., et al. (2005) A Randomized Comparison of Two Brachytherapy Devices for the Treatment of Uterine Cervical Carcinoma. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 74, 247-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2004.10.018
[13]	Masterson, M.E., Thomason, C., Hunt, M., Anderson, L., Eisenbarth, J. and Belanich, M. (1982) A Comparative Study of Henschke and Fletcher-Suit Cervical Applicators Using Cs-137. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 8, 89.
[14]	Nath, R., Urdaneta, N., Bolanis, N. and Peschel, R. (1991) A Dosimetric Analysis of Moris Fletcher, and Henschke Systems for Treatment of Uterine Cervix Carcinoma. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 21, 995-1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(91)90741-L
[15]	Bansal, A.K., Semwal, M.K., Sharma, D.N., Thulkar, S., Julka, P.K. and Rath, G.K. (2014) A Patient Based Dosimetric Study of Intracavitary and Interstitial Brachytherapy in Advanced Stage Carcinoma of the Cervix. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 15, 63-70.