Mothers’ and health workers’ perceptions of participation in a child-friendly health initiative in rural South Africa
Ntombizodumo Mkwanazi, Tamsen Rochat, Bronwyne Coetzee, Ruth Bland
Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Somkhele, South Africa;Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Somkhele, South Africa;School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Somkhele, South Africa;School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaRoyal Hospital for Sick Children, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
DOI: 10.4236/health.2013.512291   PDF    HTML     3,353 Downloads   4,845 Views   Citations

Abstract

Background: Primary health care clinics promote health in addition to treating illness, but are often perceived as unfriendly and frightening places for children. This research aimed to improve child-friendliness in primary health care settings in a rural, high HIV prevalence area in South Africa. Methods: As part of a larger intervention (“Amagugu” Intervention) health staff in nine primary health care clinics were trained in a child-friendliness approach. 281 enrolled mothers were invited to attend clinic with their primary school-aged children and assessed childfriendliness via structured questionnaires administered by independent assessors; a sub-group also participated in in-depth interviews. Post intervention, focus groups were conducted with 87 primary health staff to determine their experiences of providing child-friendly services. Results: Mothers rated 65% of clerks and 70% of nurses as “very friendly”. Qualitative data showed that heavy clinical loads, limited human resources and inadequate infrastructure were perceived as barriers to child-friendliness, while good clinic leadership and appropriate resources facilitated child-friendliness. Post intervention most health workers reported that child-friendly health promotion activities were rewarding. Conclusions: Providing child-friendliness training and support to primary health care facilities in low-resource settings is feasible, acceptable and yielded encouraging results.

 


Share and Cite:

Mkwanazi, N. , Rochat, T. , Coetzee, B. and Bland, R. (2013) Mothers’ and health workers’ perceptions of participation in a child-friendly health initiative in rural South Africa. Health, 5, 2137-2145. doi: 10.4236/health.2013.512291.

1. INTRODUCTION

In South Africa HIV care is commonly delivered in primary health care clinics (PHCs) where health workers are instrumental in supporting good adherence to antiretroviral treatment (ART) [1]. In the family context HIV-uninfected children often play an important role in supporting their HIV-infected parents, including helping them to adhere to their medication [2-5]. Therefore, increasing children’s access to health care support networks has the potential to improve health outcomes in families.

However, PHCs are often not perceived as childfriendly spaces [6,7]. Barriers reported to lower childfriendliness includes inappropriate physical structures and job dissatisfaction or fatigue amongst health workers [8,9]. Facilitators include staff training on child-friendliness and engaging children with toys and activities [10,11]. In resource-poor settings PHCs are often overburdened, so health promotion is a low priority [12-14]. A multi-site study in Uganda, Kosovo and Pakistan found that children, parents and health workers shared frustrations with rigid health care structures and poor systems for disseminating health information [6]. Even in resource-rich settings health workers acknowledge the challenges of promoting health amongst children in primary health care [6,15].

Despite being home to most of the world’s families living with HIV, literature addressing the health care support needed by HIV-affected families in South and southern Africa is minimal [3,12,16-18]. Most has focused on the utilization of health services by sick people [13,14,17,19,20] and suggests that children are often marginalised as they find health care facilities frightening [21,22] and do not understand the terminology being used [23,24].

A family-centred HIV disclosure intervention, the “Amagugu intervention” [25], was developed and tested in rural South Africa to support HIV-infected mothers to disclose their HIV status to their 6 - 10-year-old, HIVuninfected, children. The intervention was tested with 281 families and found to increase maternal HIV disclosure [25]. After disclosure the mother was encouraged to engage in a health promotion activity by taking her child with her to a clinic visit. The mothers were educated on the importance of early health promotion for children and provided with health education tools for use at the clinic visit. In addition, an intervention to support childfriendliness at the nine participating health facilities was developed and implemented. This research used qualitative and quantitative methodology to explore health workers’ perceptions of delivering child-friendly services and presents maternal data to support improvements in child-friendliness as a result of this intervention.

2. METHODS

The research setting: This study was undertaken at the Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies (www.africacentre.com) in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, in a predominantly rural area with a high HIV prevalence [1,26]. Health care, including HIV care, is delivered through 17 PHCs and one district hospital with a comprehensive, decentralised, HIV Treatment and Care Programme [13,27,28].

Research design: This research used both quantitative rating data from structured questionnaires administered to mothers, and qualitative data from focus groups with health workers and in-depth interviews with a sub-group of mothers. Mixed methodology was chosen because of its value in understanding health behaviours and perceptions in under-researched issues and populations [29,30].

Health care initiative: A health facility intervention was developed specifically for this research, using participatory qualitative techniques to increase its relevance and acceptability for health staff. Thereafter, the training was piloted at four of the nine implementation clinics, selected to include both rural and peri-urban settings. During piloting, dialogue and feedback were elicited from staff at participating clinics to finalise the training programme and clinic resources for a child-friendliness component (see Box 1). The training was then implemented at the five remaining PHCs. The health worker training targeted a diversity of staff including nurses, HIV counsellors and clerks to maximise opportunities for improving the quality of interactions with children during clinic visits.

Box 1. Health care educational materials provided as part of the Amagugu intervention.

Data collection tools: Three data collection tools were utilized in this research: 1) Interviews with mothers (N = 281): These structured interviews followed the health promotion clinic visit and collected maternal ratings of child-friendliness; 2) In-depth interviews with a sub-set of mothers (N = 20): A group of mothers were interviewed at their homes two weeks after the Amagugu intervention, to explore their experiences of participating; 3) Health care worker focus groups (N = 87): Focus groups were conducted with health staff at all nine participating clinics, three months after the intervention. Focus group methodology was used to explore perceptions, opinions and attitudes towards child-friendliness. Prior to the research we identified five key issues from the literature [10-12,19-21,31-33] which were important for the development and uptake of this kind of intervention: 1) willingness to engage in child-friendliness; 2) activities to support child-friendliness; 3) barriers and 4) facilitators of child-friendliness; and 5) contributors to sustainability. These formed the basis of the focus group guide and were also used as guiding categories in focus group analyses.

Data analysis: Quantitative data analysis: Mothers’ data from the post clinic interviews were entered into an Access database and imported into STATA 11 for analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify and describe the demographic characteristics of the participants including mothers and health workers. Qualitative data analysis: Focus groups and in-depth interviews were transcribed verbatim, translated from IsiZulu to English, imported into ATLAS. ti version 7 for analysis [34,35], and organised using the themes explored in the focus group and interview guides. Categories were reviewed for redundancy and similar codes and categories grouped under a single higher order category. Higher order categories which resulted from collapsing codes with similar ideas together reflected the important thematic areas linked to the focus group and interview guide categories.

Ethics permissions: Approval was granted by the University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Research Ethics and the University of Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committees.

3. RESULTS

Sample: All 281 HIV-positive mothers enrolled in Amagugu completed the health promotion training; their socio-demographic and health characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Maternal intervention impact: Mothers’ experiences of the clinic visit, including ratings of child-friendliness of health workers are shown in Table 2. Almost all the mothers took their child to the clinic, with a third reporting waiting less than 5 minutes to see the nurse. Approximately two-thirds of the mothers rated the clerks and nurses as “very friendly”, and most reported that the nurses had used the medical play kits and the childfriendliness posters, although only a third used the HIV Body Map.

Characteristics of health workers participating in focus groups N = 87: Forty-one (47%) participants were nurses, 23 (26.5%) HIV counsellors and 23 (26.5%) clinic clerks. The median age of participants was 39 years (IQR 31 - 49); six were male. Sixty two (71%) participants were from rural, 17 (20%) from peri-urban and 8 (9%) from urban clinics.

Themes from the focus groups of health workers and in-depth interviews of mothers:

Table 1. Maternal and child characteristics.

Table 2. Maternal experiences of child-friendliness at the health promotion clinic visit.

Continued

1) Willingness to participate in, and acceptability of, child-friendly initiatives and health promotion for children

The importance of children’s rights to friendly and accessible health facilities, emphasised in the training, resonated with most participants. In focus groups, discussion centred on beliefs about what a child-friendly clinic should or should not be. Participants felt that clinics should represent safe and welcoming places where children were not discriminated against. One 47-yearold female nurse stated: “I think it (child-friendliness) means that if the child is below the age that they can go to the clinic by themselves, they should not be scared of going to the clinic when left alone at home and they have a running stomach. They should just have that confidence that I’m used to going to the clinic and I know that they are going to help me. They can just go because they know that children are welcome at the clinic, they don’t get scolded and they are not in that frightened state.”

Mothers agreed that the health promotion visit encouraged their children to visit the PHCs. A 49-year-old mother of an 8-year-old boy said: “From there (after disclosing) I started talking to him about positive living, and we continued educating each other about sickness and pills and I made him have an interest in going to the clinic and enjoy it. He used to be that person that fears going to the clinic; he feared that they will give him an injection. He ended up liking the clinic and being interested in going there and wants us to go there all the time.”

A 36-year-old mother of an 8-year-old girl echoed the same sentiments: “Through participating in the Amagugu intervention I got encouraged to go to the clinic because we sometimes forget. The child also enjoyed visiting the clinic”.

2) Activities that support child-friendly initiatives

Table 3 summarises the activities thought to support child-friendliness in the focus groups.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Barnighausen, T., et al. (2012) HIV status and participation in HIV surveillance in the era of antiretroviral treatment: A study of linked population-based and clinical data in rural South Africa. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 17, e103-e110.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02928.x
[2] Edwards, L.V., et al. (2012) Am I my mother’s keeper? Children as unexpected sources of social support among African American women living with HIV-AIDS. Journal of Black Studies, 43, 571-595.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021934712440171
[3] Mkwanazi, N.B., et al. (2012) Disclosure of maternal HIV status to children: Considerations for research and practice in sub-Saharan Africa. Future Virology, 7, 1159-1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fvl.12.109
[4] Madiba, S. and Matlala, C. (2012) Disclosure of parental HIV positive status: What, why, when, and how parents tell their children in the era of HAART in South Africa. World Journal of AIDS, 2, 194-202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/wja.2012.23025
[5] Visser, M., et al. (2012) Development and piloting of a mother and child intervention to promote resilience in young children of HIV-infected mothers in South Africa. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35, 491-500.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.04.001
[6] Clarke, A. and Nicholson, M.S. (2007) The child friendly healthcare initiative—An update. Paediatric Nursing, 19, 36-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/paed2007.10.19.8.36.c4465
[7] Emeghebo, L. (2012) The image of nursing as perceived by nurses. Nurse Education Today, 32, e49-e53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.10.015
[8] Nabirye, R.C., et al. (2011) Occupational stress, job satisfaction and job performance among hospital nurses in Kampala, Uganda. Journal of Nursing Management, 19, 760-768.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01240.x
[9] Jewkes, R., Abrahams, N. and Mvo, Z. (1998) Why do nurses abuse patients? Reflections from South African obstetric services. Social Science & Medicine, 47, 1781-1795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00240-8
[10] Bishop, K.G. (2008) From their perspectives: Children and young people’s experience of a paediatric hospital environment and its relationship to their feeling of wellbeing.
[11] Kennedy, I. (2010) Getting it right for children and young people: Overcoming cultural barriers in the NHS so as to meet their needs.
[12] Govender, L., et al. (2006) Pediatric nursing in the context of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in resource-poor settings-balancing the “Art and the Science”. Holistic Nursing Practice, 20, 247-254.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004650-200609000-00008
[13] Janssen, N., et al. (2010) Successful paediatric HIV treatment in rural primary care in Africa. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 95, 414-421.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.169367
[14] Rujumba, J., Mbasaalaki-Mwaka, C.L. and Ndeezi, G. (2010) Challenges faced by health workers in providing counselling services to HIV-positive children in Uganda: A descriptive study. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 13, 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-13-9
[15] Whiting, L.S. (2001) Health promotion: The views of children’s nurses. Paediatric Nursing, 13, 27-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/paed2001.04.13.3.27.c733
[16] Rochat, T.J. and Mitchell, C. (2011) Young children and HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for practice and intervention, in international perspective on children and mental health.
[17] Richter, L.M., et al. (2012) Evaluation of a brief intervention to improve the nursing care of young children in a high HIV and AIDS setting. Nursing Research and Practice, 2012, 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/647182
[18] McNally, L.M., et al. (2006) HIV-exposed but uninfected children: Why are they vulnerable? Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 1, 139-148.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17450120600872241
[19] Darbyshire, P. (2013) A review of palliative care and support services in south tyrol for children and young people living with a life-threatening or life-limiting illness and their families.
[20] Gibson, F., et al. (2010) Children and young people’s experiences of cancer care: A qualitative research study using participatory methods. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47, 1397-1407.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.03.019
[21] Kikuta, A., et al. (2011) Practices and perceptions regarding pain and pain management during routine childhood immunizations: Findings from a focus-group study with nurses working at Toronto Public Health, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology, 22, 43-48.
[22] Norton-Westwood, D. (2012) The health-care environment through the eyes of a child—Does it soothe or provoke anxiety? International Journal of Nursing Practice, 18, 7-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2011.01995.x
[23] Cox, E.D., Smith, M.A. and Brown, R.L. (2007) Evaluating deliberation in pediatric primary care. Pediatrics, 120, e68-e77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-2602
[24] Coyne, I. (2006) Consultation with children in hospital: Children, parents’ and nurses’ perspectives. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15, 61-71.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01247.x
[25] Rochat, T., Mkwanazi, N. and Bland, R. (2013) Maternal HIV disclosure to HIV-uninfected children in rural South Africa: A pilot study of a family-based intervention. BMC Public Health, 13, 147.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-147
[26] Tanser, F., et al. (2013) High coverage of ART associated with decline in risk of HIV acquisition in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Science, 339, 966-971.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1228160
[27] Hontelez, J., et al. (2012) The impact of antiretroviral treatment on the age composition of the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS, 26, S19-S30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283558526
[28] Houlihan, C.F., et al. (2010) Cohort profile: Hlabisa HIV treatment and care programme. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40, 318-328.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp402
[29] Leech, N.L. and Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2009) A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43, 265-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
[30] Onwuegbuzie, A.J., et al. (2009) Toward more rigor in focus group research: A new framework for collecting and analyzing focus group data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 1-21.
[31] Coyne, I. and Kirwan, L. (2012) Ascertaining children’s wishes and feelings about hospital life. Journal of Child Health Care, 16, 293-304.
[32] Gaskell, S., et al. (2005) Taking the sting out of needles: Education for staff in primary care. Paediatric Nursing, 17, 24-28.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/paed2005.05.17.4.24.c986
[33] Moore, L. and Kirk, S. (2010) A literature review of children’s and young people’s participation in decisions relating to health care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19, 2215-2225.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03161.x
[34] Friese, S., (2012) Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS. SAGE Publications Limited.
[35] Muhr, T. and Friese, S. (2004) User’s manual for ATLAS. Scientific Software Development, Berlin.
[36] Rowe, A.K., et al. (2005) How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in lowresource settings? The Lancet, 366, 1026-1035.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67028-6
[37] Scott, T., et al. (2003) Implementing culture change in health care: Theory and practice. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15, 111-118.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzg021
[38] Reed, P., et al. (2003) Promoting the dignity of the child in hospital. Nursing Ethics, 10, 67-76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0969733003ne540oa
[39] Roohafza, H., et al. (2009) Impact of nurses clothing on anxiety of hospitalised children. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 1953-1959.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02745.x
[40] Salmela, M., Aronen, E. and Salantera, S. (2011) The experience of hospital-related fears of 4-to 6-year-old children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 37, 719-726.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01171.x
[41] Richter, L., Chandan, U. and Rochat, T. (2009) Improving hospital care for young children in the context of HIV/ AIDS and poverty. Journal of Child Health Care, 13, 198-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367493509336680
[42] Richter, L.M., et al. (2012) Evaluation of a brief intervention to improve the nursing care of young children in a high HIV and AIDS setting. Nursing Research and Practice, 2012, Article ID: 647182.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/647182
[43] Parker, G., et al. (2011) Evaluating models of care closer to home for children and young people who are ill.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.