Nurturing Creativity: Whose Wisdom Is of Most Worth?

Huzaina Abdul Halim, Martyn Kingsbury, Charles Drage

Imperial College London, London, UK.
University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2013.49B001                

Abstract

Researchers and practitioners interested in creativity have explored the concept at length. Wehner, Csikszentmihalyi and Magyari-Beck (1991) examined 100 doctoral dissertations on creativity and found a “parochial isolation” of various studies concerning creativity. There were relevant dissertations from psychology, education, business, history, sociology and other fields. However, different fields tended to use different terms and to focus on different aspects of what seemed to be a basic phenomenon. As instances of creativity are located in multiple domains and homes, one of the learning outcomes in ‘The Malaysian Curriculum Specification for English language’ requires that students be able to express themselves creatively and imaginatively. A discussion about what we might call real creativity, and how we might develop pedagogies in fostering this, is long overdue. In this presentation, the researcher will also highlight on how creativity might be conceptualized and how creativity within education in particular might respond to this rapidly shifting world. I hope then to problematize creativity, and to propose ways in which pedagogies may be meaningfully developed or resurrected in the twenty-first century education.

Keywords

Creativity; Risk-Taking; Motivation; Imagination; Problem-Solving

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Ahmad, A. (1998). The effectiveness of the inculcation of citizenship values in history education: A case study in a Malaysian Secondary. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, London: Institute of Education.
[2]	Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
[3]	Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press.
[4]	Cole, D. G., Sugioka, H. L., & Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (1999). Supportive classroom environments for creativity in higher education, Journal of Creative Behaviour, 33, 277-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1999.tb01407.x
[5]	Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas.
[6]	Driver, M. (2001). Fostering creativity in business education: Developing creative classroom environments to provide students with critical workplace competencies. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 28- 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08832320109599667
[7]	Fawcett, M. (2002). Creativity in the early years: Children as “Authors and Inventors”. Early Years. Autumn.
[8]	Fisher, R., & Williams, M. (2004). Unlocking Creativity, London: David Fulton.
[9]	Gardner, H. (1997). Leading minds—An anatomy of leadership. London: Harpers Collins.
[10]	Lucas, B. (2001). Creative teaching, teaching creativity and creative learning. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education. London: Continuum.
[11]	Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Oxford: Routledge.
[12]	National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. Suffolk: DfEE.
[13]	Paul, R. W. (1993). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
[14]	Prentice, R. (2000). Creativity: A reaffirmation of its place in early childhood education. The Curriculum Journal, 11, 145-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585170050045173
[15]	Wehner, L., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Magyari-Beck, I. (1991). Current approach used in studying creativity: An exploratory investigation. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 261-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534398