Effect of Non-Uniform Basic Temperature Gradient on the Onset of Rayleigh-Bénard-Marangoni Electro-Convectionin a Micropolar Fluid ()

Thadathil Varghese Joseph, Sree Ramaiah Manjunath, Subbarama Pranesh

Department of Mathematics, BNMIT, Bangalore, India.

Department of Mathematics, Christ University, Bangalore, India.

**DOI: **10.4236/am.2013.48158
PDF
HTML
4,077
Downloads
6,437
Views
Citations

Department of Mathematics, BNMIT, Bangalore, India.

Department of Mathematics, Christ University, Bangalore, India.

The effects of electric field and non-uniform basic temperature gradient on the onset of Rayleigh-Bénard-Marangoni convection in a micropolar fluid are studied using the Galerkin technique. The eigenvalues are obtained for an upper free/adiabatic and lower rigid/isothermal boundaries. The microrotation is assumed to vanish at the boundaries. A linear stability analysis is performed. The influence of various micropolar fluid parameters and electric Rayleigh number on the onset of convection has been analysed. Six different non-uniform temperature profiles are considered and their comparative influence on onset is discussed.

Share and Cite:

Joseph, T. , Manjunath, S. and Pranesh, S. (2013) Effect of Non-Uniform Basic Temperature Gradient on the Onset of Rayleigh-Bénard-Marangoni Electro-Convectionin a Micropolar Fluid. *Applied Mathematics*, **4**, 1180-1188. doi: 10.4236/am.2013.48158.

1. Introduction

Convection due to variations of densities between two parallel plates caused by temperature difference and variations of temperature dependence surface tension in a horizontal fluid layer is of great importance because of its applications in science and engineering. Such convection in literature is known as Rayleigh-Bénard and Bé- nard-Maangoni convection. The developments of convection and corresponding heat transfer are examples of the physical phenomena to be encountered in these types of problems. The flow associated with Rayleigh-Bénard convection and Marangoni convection has been extensively reviewed in the literature. Particularly, Marangoni convection is found to be of importance in crystal growth melts and nucleate boiling. The problem of onset of convection driven by the combined effect of buoyancy and surface tension is also important in understanding many practical problems.

Pearson [1] was the first person to give a detailed mathematical analysis for the onset of convection driven by surface tension gradients. Nield [2] studied the problem of onset of convection driven by the combined effect of buoyancy and surface tension. Later many authors, Rudraiah [3], Maekawa and Tanasawa [4] studied the onset of convection in a horizontal layer of Newtonian fluid driven by both surface tension variations and buoyancy force by considering the non-deformable surfaces. The corresponding problem with deformable boundaries is studied by Sarma [5,6], Takashima [7], Wilson [8,9], Hashim and Wilson [10].

The application of strong electric field in a poorly conducting fluid can induce bulk motions. This phenomenon is known as Electro convection. In recent years, the study of the interaction of electromagnetic fields with fluid stated gain attention with the promise of new applications. Onset of natural convection in the presence of external electric field had been studied by Turnbull [11], Turnbull and Melcher [12], Takashima and Aldridge [13], Stiles [14], Stiles et al. [15], Siddheshwar [16], Siddheshwar and Abraham [17,18], Siddheshwar and Chan [19], Shivakumara et al. [20], Rudraiah et al. [21] and Siddheshwar and Radhakrishna [22].

Most of the previous studies were concerned with convection in Newtonian fluids. However, very less work has been done on convection in micropolar fluid with electric fields. The theory of micropolar fluids, developed by Eringen [23] is the best established theory of fluid with microstructure. Physically, the micropolar fluid consists of small, rigid, cylindrical suspended particles. Many classical flows were reexamined using the micropolar fluid to study the effect of fluid microstructures. Thermal convection in micropolar fluids with uniform and non-uniform temperature gradients was studied by many authors (Datta and Sastry [24], Siddheshwar and Pranesh [25-27] Pranesh and Riya Baby [28], Pranesh and Arun Kumar [29]). The main result of all these studies is that the micropolar fluid heated from below is more stable compared to the fluid without suspended particles. To the best of our knowledge not much work is done in this field, except the above mentioned.

The main objective of this paper is to provide the theoretical framework for studying the thermo capillary instabilities in the presence of buoyancy instability in earth laboratories for electrically conducting micropolar fluid layers under an AC electric field and non-uniform temperature gradients. Eigen value of the problem is obtained using single term Galerkin method.

2. Mathematical Formulation

Consider an infinite horizontal layer of a Boussinesquian micropolar fluid layer of depth “d”. The uniform electric field is directed along z-axis (see Figure 1). A Cartesian coordinate system is taken with the origin in the lower boundary and z-axis vertically up-wards. Let be the temperature difference between lower and upper boundaries of the fluid. The interface at the upper boundary has a temperature dependent surface tension . Expanding by Taylor series about T_{0}, we get

(1)

where, and. The form of in Equation (1) was used by Pearson.

The governing equations for the problem are:

Equation of continuity:

(2)

Conservation of Linear Momentum:

(3)

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of Rayleigh-Bénard situation for a fluid with suspended particles.

Conservation of Angular Momentum:

(4)

Conservation of Energy:

(5)

Equation of State:

(6)

Equation of State for Dielectric Constant:

(7)

Faraday’s Law:

(8)

Equation of Polarization Field:

(9)

where, is the velocity, is the spin, is the hydrodynamic pressure, T is the temperature is the density of the fluid at a reference temperature, is the coupling viscosity coefficient, is the shear kinematic viscosity coefficient, I is the moment of inertia, and are bulk and shear spin viscosity coefficients, is a Micropolar heat conduction coefficient, is the specific heat, is the thermal conductivity, is the coefficient of thermal expansion, is the electric field, is the dielectric polarization, is the electric permeability of free space and is the dielectric constant.

The “Equations (2)-(9)” are solved subject to containment conditions appropriate for a rigid and thermally perfect conducting wall on the underside and a free surface on the upper side. This free surface is adjacent to a non-conducting medium and subject to a constant heat flux. Further, the no-spin boundary condition is assumed for micro-rotation. Since the shear stress for a non-classical fluid with suspended particles is no different from that of classical fluids, the boundary conditions for flat free boundaries used by Nield [2] in respect of Newtonian fluids are appropriate for micropolar fluids also.

In the quiescent state the velocity, the spin, the temperature T, the electric field, the pressure, the density, the dielectric polarization have the following solution:

(10)

where is a non-dimensional basic temperature gradient, satisfying the condition.

Since the aim of the present study is to understand control of convection in a micropolar fluid layer by different basic temperature profiles, the various non-uniform basic temperature gradients considered in this study are represented in Table 1.

This type of basic temperature gradients arises due to sudden heating or cooling, radiation, through flow, etc.

In order to investigate the stability of the basic solution, infinitesimal disturbances are introduced in the form:

(11)

where the primes indicate that the quantities are infinitesimal perturbations assumed to be small and subscript ‘b’ indicates basic state value.

We assume the principal of exchange of stability to be valid and hence deal with only stationary convection. Introducing the electric potential and substituting “(11)” into “(2)-(9)” and using the basic state solution (10), we get linearized equation governing the infinitesimal perturbations in the form:

(12)

(13)

(14)

, (15)

. (16)

Table 1. Non-uniform basic temperature gradient profile.

The perturbation “(12)-(15)” are non-dimensionalised using the following definitions:

(17)

Using “(16)” in “(13)”, operating curl twice on the resulting equation, operating curl on “(14)” and non-dimensionalising the two resulting equations and also “(15)”, we get

(18)

, (19)

, (20)

. (21)

where the non-dimensional parameters N_{1}, N_{3}, N_{5}, R and L are given by :

(Coupling Parameter),

(Couple Stress Parameter),

(Micropolar Heat Conduction Parameter),

(Rayleigh number),

(Electric Rayleigh number).

The infinitesimal perturbations W, Ω_{z}, T and ϕ are assumed to be periodic waves and hence these permits and normal mode solution in the following form:

(22)

where l and m are the horizontal components of the wave number.

We substituting “(22)” into “(18)-(21)”, then we get

(23)

(24)

, (25)

, (26)

where and.

In “(23)-(26)”, the asterisks have been omitted.

“(23)” and “(26)” are solved subject to the following boundary conditions:

(27)

where is the Marangoni number.

“(27)” indicates the use of rigid, isothermal lower boundary and upper, free, thermally insulating boundary (with respect to perturbation). The condition on G is spin-vanishing boundary condition.

We now use the single term Galerkin expansion technique to find the critical eigenvalue. Multiplying “(23)” by W, “(24)” by G, “(25)” by T and “(26)” by, integrating the resulting equations by parts with respect to z from 0 to 1, using the boundary conditions “(27)” and using W = AW_{1}, G = BG_{1}, T = CT_{1 }and in which A,B,C and E are constants and W_{1}, G_{1}, T_{1} and are trial functions, yield the following equation for the Marangoni number M:

(28)

where,

In “(28)”, denotes integration with respect to between and.

in “(28)” is a functional and EulerLagrange equations for the extremisation of M “(23)- (26)”.

The trial functions satisfying “(27)” are

(29)

such that they satisfy all the boundary conditions “(27)” except the one given by at, but the residual from this is included in the residual from the differential equations. Substituting “(29)” in “(28)” and performing the integration, we can calculate the critical Marangoni number M_{c }which attains its minimum at.

3. Result and Discussion

As per the motivation stated in the introduction to the paper we consider the effects of electric Rayleigh number, micropolar fluid parameters and non-uniform basic temperature distribution on the onset of Rayleigh-Bé- nard-Marangoni convection in a micropolar fluid layer. These three effects are respectively represented by the L, (N_{1}, N_{3} and N_{5}) and f(z) in the Eigen value “(28)”. Due to the thermodynamics restrictions the following values of N_{1}, N_{3} and N_{5} are chosen:

where, m and n are finite, positive real numbers (see Siddheshwar and Pranesh [29]) and the values of L are those chosen for Newtonian fluid problems. One linear and five non-linear basic temperature gradients are considered in the study (see Table 1). The results obtained in the study are depicted by the Figures 2-5. It is observed that for the critical Marangoni number, M_{c}, the following inequality holds for the six models chosen in the study:

i.e., step function is the most destabilizing temperature profile and inverted parabolic temperature is the most stabilizing temperature profile. In the case of piecewise linear and step function profiles, the critical Marangoni number, M_{c}, depends on the thermal depth, ε, in addition to depending on the parameters of the problem. In the case of piecewise linear profile heating from below, cooling from above and step function profiles, the minimum value of M_{c} is attained at ε = 0.95, ε = 0.45 and ε = 0.75 respectively. With the above background and with the motive specified in the introduction we now discuss the results presented by the Figures 2-5.

Figure 2 is the plot of critical Marangoni number M_{c }versus coupling parameter N_{1}_{ }for different non uniform temperature gradients and for different electric Rayleigh number L. Clearly M_{c} increases with N_{1}. Increase in N_{1} indicates increase in the concentration of micro elements. These elements consume the greater part of the energy of

Figure 2. Plot of critical Maragoni number M_{c} versus coupling parameter N_{1} for different non -uniform temperature gradient and different electric Rayleigh Number L. (a) Linear, (b) Heating from below, (c) Cooling from above, (d) Step function, (e) Parabolic, (f) Inverted parabolic.

Figure 3. Plot of critical Maragoni number M_{c} versus coupling parameter N_{3} for different non-uniform temperature gradient and different Electric Rayleigh number L. (a) Linear, (b) Heating from below, (c) Cooling from above, (d) Step function, (e) Parabolic, (f) Inverted parabolic.

Figure 4. Plot of critical Maragoni number M_{c} versus coupling parameter N_{5} for different non-uniform temperature gradient and different Electric Rayleigh number L. (a) Linear, (b) Heating from below, (c) Cooling from above, (d) Step function, (e) Parabolic, (f) Inverted parabolic.

Figure 5. Plot of critical Maragoni number M_{c} versus coupling parameter N_{1} for different non-uniform temperature gradient and different Rayleigh number R. (a) Linear, (b) Heating from below, (c) Cooling from above, (d) Step function, (e) Parabolic, (f) Inverted parabolic.

the system in developing the gyrational velocity of the fluid and as a result the onset of convection is delayed. Therefore, the increase N_{1} is to stabilize the system. It is also observed that increase in electric Rayleigh number decreases the M_{c}. Electric Rayleigh number L is the ratio of electric force to gravitational force. Thus, L has a destabilizing effect on the system.

Figure 3 is the plot of M_{c} versus coupling stress parameter N_{3 }for different non uniform temperature gradients and for different electric number L. Clearly M_{c} decreases with increase in N_{3}. Increase in N_{3}, decreases the couple stress of the fluid which causes a decrease in microrotation and hence makes the system more unstable.

Figure 4 is the plot of M_{c} versus micropolar heat conduction parameter N_{5} for different non uniform temperature profiles and for different electric number L. Clearly M_{c} increases with N_{5}. When N_{5} increases, the heat induced in the fluid due to these microelements also increases which reduces the heat transfer from bottom to top. The decrease in heat transfer is responsible for delaying the onset of instability. Thus increase in N_{5} is to stabilize the system.

Figure 5 is the plot of M_{c} versus coupling parameter N_{1} for different non uniform temperature gradients and for different Rayleigh number R. Clearly M_{c} increases with N_{1}. It is also observed that the increase in R decreases the M_{c} and ultimately we get the case of convection dominated by buoyancy force.

From the Table 2 it is clear that with an increase in N_{1}, M_{c} becomes zero for higher values of R compared to Newtonian fluids. Similar results have been obtained in respect to the influences of N_{3} and N_{5}. Treating Marangoni number as the critical parameter we find from the Table 3 that any particular infinitesimal disturbance can be destabilized with electric field. The results of the Table 3 are in respect of linear temperature gradient. This general observation on the destabilizing influence of electric field, however holds good for the other five temperature gradients as well. From Table 3 as well as Table 2, we also note that as R increases M_{c} decreases. From Table 4, it is found that the critical wave number is in general insensitive to the changes in the micropolar parameters but is influenced by the electric field. This indicates that, the convection cell at the onset increases in size with the increase in electric field. In the limit L tends to zero, we recover the results of Siddheshwar and Pranesh [29] for Chandrasekhar number tends to zero from the present study.

The above result indicates that externally applied electric field is an effective means of controlling, RayleighBénard-Marangoni convection in mircopolar fluids. The result also suggests that Rayleigh-Bénard-Marangoni convection in Newtonian fluids may be delayed by adding micron sized suspended particles. Further by creating

Table 2. Critical Marangoni number (M_{c})_{j} (j = 1 to 6 ) for different values of L, R and N_{1}, L = 100, N_{3} = 2.0, N_{5} = 1.0.

Table 3. Critical Marangoni number M_{c} for different values of L and R with f(z) = 1, N_{1} = 0.5, N_{3} =2.0, N_{5} = 1.0.

Table 4. The values of critical wave number ^{ }for various values of N_{1}, N_{3}, N_{5} and L with f(z) = 1 and for all values of R.

conditions for an appropriate basic temperature gradient, we can also make an appropriate decision delaying the convection. It has been observed that parabolic temperature profile is the most stabilizing temperature profile and step function is the most destabilizing temperature profile.

4. Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank their respective managements for the support in completing this work. One of the authors (TVJ) would like to acknowledge the support of the Christ University administration on deputing him to the Ph.D program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

[1] | J. R. A. Pearson, “On Convection Cells Induced by Sur face Tension,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 4, No. 5, 1958, pp. 489-500. doi:10.1017/S0022112058000616 |

[2] | D. A. Nield, “Surface Tension and Buoyancy Effects in Cellular Convection,” ZAMM, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1966, pp. 131-139. doi:10.1007/BF01594092 |

[3] | N. Rudraiah, V. Ramachandramurthy and O. P. Chandana, “Surface Tension Driven Convection Subjected to Rota tion and Non-Uniform Temperature Gradient,” Interna tional Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 28, No. 8, 1985, pp. 1621-1624. doi:10.1016/0017-9310(85)90264-9 |

[4] | T. Maekawa and I. Tanasawa, “Effect of Magnetic Field and Buoyancy on Onset of Marangoni Convection,” In ternational Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1988, pp. 285-293. doi:10.1016/0017-9310(88)90011-7 |

[5] | G. S. R. Sarma, “Marangoni Convection in a Fluid Layer under the Action of a Transverse Magnetic Field,” Space Research, Vol. 19, 1979, pp. 575-578. |

[6] | G. S. R. Sarma, “Marangoni Convection in a Liquid Lay er under the Simultaneous Action of a Transverse Mag netic Field and Rotation,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 1, No. 5, 1981, pp. 55-58. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(81)90151-4 |

[7] | M. Takashima, “Surface Tension Driven Instability in a Horizontal Liquid Layer with a Deformable Free Surface Part I Steady Convection,” Journal of the Physical Soci ety of Japan, Vol. 50, No. 8, 1981, pp. 2745-2750. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.50.2745 |

[8] | S. K. Wilson, “The Effect of a Uniform Magnetic Field on the Onset of Steady Bénard-Marangoni Convection in a Layer of Conducting Fluid,” Journal of Engineering Mathematics, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1993, pp. 161-188. doi:10.1007/BF00127480 |

[9] | S. K. Wilson, “The Effect of a Uniform Magnetic Field on the Onset of Steady Marangoni Convection in a Layer of Conducting Fluid with a Prescribed Heat Flux at Its Lower Boundary,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 6, No. 11, 1994, pp. 3591-3560. doi:10.1063/1.868417 |

[10] | I. Hashim and S. K. Wilson, “The Onset of Bénard-Ma rangoni Convection in a Horizontal Layer of Fluid,” In ternational Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 37, No. 5, 1999, pp. 643-662. doi:10.1016/S0020-7225(98)00084-6 |

[11] | R. J. Turnbull, “Electro Convective Instability with a Sta bilizing Temperature Gradient. I. Theory,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 11, No. 12, 1968, pp. 2588-2596. doi:10.1063/1.1691864 |

[12] | R. J. Turnbull and R. J. Melcher, “Electrohydrodynamic Rayleigh-Taylor Bulk Instability,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 12, No. 6, 1969, pp. 1160-1166. doi:10.1063/1.1692646 |

[13] | M. Takashima and K. D. Aldridge, “The Stability of a Horizontal Layer of Dielectric Fluid under the Simulta neous Action of a Vertical dc Electric Field and a Vertical Temperature Gradient,” The Quarterly Journal of Mecha nics and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1976, pp. 71-87. |

[14] | P. J. Stiles, “Electro Thermal Convection in Dielectric Li quids,” Chemical Physics Letters, Vol. 179, No. 3, 1991, pp. 311-315. doi:10.1016/0009-2614(91)87043-B |

[15] | P. J. Stiles, F. Lin and P. J. Blennerhassett, “Convective Heat Transfer through Polarized Dielectric Liquids,” Phy sics Fluids, Vol. 5, No. 12, 1993, pp. 3273-3279. doi:10.1063/1.858684 |

[16] | P. G. Siddeshwar, “Oscillatory Convection in Viscoelas tic, Ferromagnetic/Dielectric Liquids,” International Jour nal of Modern Physics B, Vol. 16, No. 17-18, 2002, pp. 2629-2635. doi:10.1142/S0217979202012761 |

[17] | P. G. Siddeshwar and A. Abraham, “Effect of Time-Peri odic Boundary Temperatures/Body Force on Rayleigh Bénard Convection in a Ferromagnetic Fluid,” Acta Me chanica, Vol. 161, No. 3-4, 2003, pp. 131-150. |

[18] | P. G. Siddeshwar and A. Abraham, “Rayleigh-Bénard Con vection in a Dielectric Liquid: Imposed Time-Periodic Boundarytemperatures,” Chamchuri Journal of Mathema tics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2009, pp. 105-121. |

[19] | P. G. Siddeshwar and A. T. Y. Chan, “Ferrohydrodyna mic and Electrohydrodynamics Instability in Viscoelastic Liquids: An Analogy,” Proceedings 4th International Conference on Fluid Mechanics, Dalian, 20-30 July 2004, pp. 167-172. |

[20] | I. S. Shivakumara, M. S. Nagashree and K. Hemalatha, “Electrothermoconvective Instability in a Heat Generat ing Dielectric Fluid Layer,” International Communica tions in Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 34, No. 9-10, 2007, pp. 1041-1047. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2007.05.006 |

[21] | N. Rudraiah, B. M. Shankar and C.-O. Ng, “Electrohy drodynamic Stability of Couple Stress Fluid Flow in a Channel Occupied by a Porous Medium,” Special Topics & Reviews in Porous Media—An International Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2011, pp. 11-22. |

[22] | P. G. Siddeshwar and D. Radhakrishna, “Linear and Nonlinear Electroconvection under AC Electric Field,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, Vol. 17, No. 7, 2012, pp. 2883-2895. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.11.009 |

[23] | A. C. Eringen, “Theory of Micropolar Fluids,” International Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1966, p. 1. |

[24] | B. Datta and V. U. K. Sastry, “Thermal Instability of a Horizontal Layer of Micropolar Fluid Heated from Be low,” International Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 14, No. 7, 1976, pp. 631-637. doi:10.1016/0020-7225(76)90005-7 |

[25] | P. G. Siddheshwar and S. Pranesh, “Magnetoconvection in a Micropolar Fluid,” International Journal of Engi neering Science, USA, Vol. 36, No. 10, 1998, pp. 1173 1181. doi:10.1016/S0020-7225(98)00013-5 |

[26] | P. G. Siddheshwar and S. Pranesh, “Magnetoconvection in Fluids with Suspended Particles under 1 g and ug,” In ternational Journal of Aerospace Science and Technology, France, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2001, pp. 105-114. doi:10.1016/S1270-9638(01)01144-0 |

[27] | P. G. Siddheshwar and S. Pranesh, “Suction-Injection Effects on the Onset of Rayleigh-Bénard-Marangoni Con vection in a Fluid with Suspended Particles,” Acta Me chanica, Germany, Vol. 152, No. 1-4, 2001, pp. 241-252. doi:10.1007/BF01176958 |

[28] | S. Pranesh and R. Baby, “Effect of Non-Uniform Tem perature Gradient on the Onset of Rayleigh-Bénard Elec tro Convection in a Micropolar Fluid,” Applied Mathe matics, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2012, pp. 442-450. doi:10.4236/am.2012.35067 |

[29] | S. Pranesh and A. Kumar, “Effect of Non-Uniform Basic Concentration Gradient on the Onset of Double-Diffusive Convection in Micropolar Fluid,” Applied Mathematics, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2012, pp. 417-424. doi:10.4236/am.2012.35064 |

Journals Menu

Contact us

+1 323-425-8868 | |

customer@scirp.org | |

+86 18163351462(WhatsApp) | |

1655362766 | |

Paper Publishing WeChat |

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.