Teaching of Science and Mathematics in Pre-Schools of Botswana: The Existing Practices

Kabita Bose, Marea Tsamaase, Grace Seetso

Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Department of Primary Education, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2013.47A1006                

Abstract

The study aims to examine the state of mathematics and science education in pre-schools of Botswana. The study intended to find out the knowledge base of the teachers, the content and the process of activities that were carried out in pre-schools, and also gauged availability and usage of resources in pre-schools, while identifying the challenges faced and the strategies used to overcome by the teachers, in carrying out Maths and Science activities. The study adopted both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The research was done using survey questionnaire and observation techniques and was conducted in 26 pre-schools in Gaborone. The sample comprised of 64 teachers and 17 administrators who were identified by using purposive sampling techniques. Quantitative data was also analysed using SPSS version 20, and responses to Open-ended questions were analysed qualitatively. The findings showed that the trained teachers although not in ECE, claimed to have some knowledge base of mathematics and science, and identified pedagogy to be more important than content, for teaching science and mathematics at ECE. They however, were of the view that ECE teacher training influences the knowledge base of the teachers, and hence specialised training in ECE is necessary. The study also showed that mathematics activities were predominant in the pre-schools as compared to science activities; the teachers frequently engaged in mathematics and science activities outdoors; and the mathematics and science corners that were available in most centres, were not utilised adequately. It further revealed that an equal number of the teachers, i.e. almost half of them, faced challenges while teaching mathematics and science in pre-schools, as those who did not. The study therefore recommended ECE teachers’ professional training on knowledge, pedagogy and content; and the menu to include more indoor and science activities.

Keywords

Early Childhood Education; Science and Mathematics Education; Pre-Schools; Botswana; Science and Mathematics Knowledge

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Barnett, D.W., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Witt, J. C. (2007). Achieving science-based practice through response to intervention: What it might look like in preschools. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 17, 31-54.
[2]	Bers, M. U., & Portsmore, M. (2005). Teaching partnerships: Early child hood and engineering students teaching math and science through robotics: ERIC-education resources information centre. New York: Springer.
[3]	Bishop, A. J. (1991). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspec tive on mathematics education. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
[4]	Bose, K. (2008). Early childhood care and education programmes in Botswana: Policy (2001) implementation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in early Childhood Education, 2, 3-23.
[5]	Clements, D. H. (2001) Mathematics in the preschool. Teaching Chil dren Mathematics, 7, 270-275.
[6]	Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 166-173. doi:10.1177/0022487100051003002
[7]	Essa, E. L. (2011). Introduction to early childhood education. Belmont: Wardsworth.
[8]	Fu, V. R. (2010). Learning and teaching in preschool. http://www.pbs.org/teachers/earlychildhood/articles/learning.html
[9]	Gallenstein, N. L. (2004). Creative discovery through classification (early childhood corner). Teaching Children Mathematics, 11, 103-108.
[10]	Garbett, D. (2003). Science education in early childhood teacher educa tion: Putting forward a case to enhance student teachers’ confidence and competence. Research in Science Education, 33, 467-481. doi:10.1023/B:RISE.0000005251.20085.62
[11]	Glasserfeld, V. E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Syntheses, 80, 121-140. doi:10.1007/BF00869951
[12]	Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccilo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20, 238-264. doi:10.1080/10409280802595441
[13]	Johansson, E., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2006). Play and learning inseparable dimensions in preschool practice. Early Child Development and Care, 176, 47-65. doi:10.1080/0300443042000302654
[14]	Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2001). Pre-school teachers’ content knowledge in science: Understandings of elementary science concepts and of issues raised by children’s questions. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9, 165-177. doi:10.1080/09669760120086929
[15]	Lehrer, R, & Schauble, L. (2006). Handbook of child psychology: Scientific Thinking and Science Literacy. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[16]	Lind, K. K. (1999). Science in early childhood: Developing and acquiring fundamental concepts and skills. http://www.project2061.org/publications/earlychild/online/experience/lind.htm
[17]	Moomaw, S. (2011). Teaching mathematics in early childhood. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Company.
[18]	Republic of Botswana (1994). Revised national policy on education. Gaborone: Government Printers.
[19]	Republic of Botswana (2001). Early childhood care and education policy on education. Gaborone: Government Printers.
[20]	Republic of Botswana (2008). Curriculum Development Division, Curriculum Development and Evaluation Department: Ministry of Education. Gaborone: Government Printers.
[21]	Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
[22]	Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2005). Research methods in education. USA: Pearson.
[23]	Witt, S. D., & Kimple, K. P. (2008). “How does your garden grow?” Teaching preschool children about the environment. Early Child Development and Care, 178, 41-48. doi:10.1080/03004430600601156