GPS Signal Short-Term Propagation Characteristics Modeling in Urban Areas for Precise Navigation Applications ()

G. Sateesh Kumar, G. Sasi Bhushana Rao, M. N. V. S. S. Kumar

Department of ECE, Aditya Institute of Technology and Management, Tekkali, India.

Department of ECE, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, India.

**DOI: **10.4236/pos.2013.42019
PDF
HTML XML
5,760
Downloads
8,643
Views
Citations

Department of ECE, Aditya Institute of Technology and Management, Tekkali, India.

Department of ECE, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, India.

GPS navigation signal includes vital information
such as orbital parameters, clock error coefficients etc. This received signal
which is extremely weak is affected by several errors during its propagation
and is of the order of 10^{-16} W. The noise floor of this signal is
400 times higher than the transmitted signal. The situation becomes much worse
particularly when the GPS receiver is located at urban areas where the
multipath effect is predominant in the code and carrier phase measurements. GPS
usage is not limited to the aircraft en-route navigation and missile guidance
where the user receives the satellite signals from the open sky. At the present
time, it has become an essential utility in the car navigation, mobile phones, surveying and aircraft
landing application. The signal propagation characteristics particularly the
short-term variations
severely affect the quality, availability and continuity of the system. In this
paper, short-term propagation characteristics of GPS signal are modeled and analyzed. Short-term
variations are mainly due to multipath reflections and Doppler shift which degrades
the quality of received signal particularly in urban environments. The
variation of signal quality with respect to user velocity is observed using
Rayleigh and Rician fading models.

Share and Cite:

Kumar, G. , Rao, G. and Kumar, M. (2013) GPS Signal Short-Term Propagation Characteristics Modeling in Urban Areas for Precise Navigation Applications. *Positioning*, **4**, 192-199. doi: 10.4236/pos.2013.42019.

1. Introduction

The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a satellite based modern navigation system that provides accurate three dimensional (3D) position, velocity and timing information up to 10^{−}^{6} sec anywhere on or above the earth’s surface [1]. It is primarily designed as a land, marine, and aviation sector navigation system. Each GPS satellite transmits two spread spectrum pseudorandom noise (PRN) ranging codes along with 50 bps navigation data message at two frequencies L1 (1575.42 MHz) and L2 (1227.60 MHz) which are derived from highly stable on-board atomic clocks. The GPS receiver calculates its position by precisely timing the signals sent by satellites above the earth’s surface. The accuracy of the computed position depends on the received signal strength, which may degrade due to several reasons such as travelling long distances through vacuum, dense clouds, dust particles, different layers of the earth’s atmosphere such as troposphere, ionosphere, protonosphere natural elements such as mountains, and even man-made flying objects like airplanes etc. In addition, the random fluctuations in the received signals due to different fading phenomena also affect the signal quality, system availability and are ultimately a major cause of system outages.

In general GPS signal variations can be classified into two types large scale variations and short-term variations. The large scale variations in a signal are mainly due to pathloss and shadowing. The average value of the signal strength at any point depends on its distance, carrier frequency, type of antennas used, atmospheric conditions and so on. It may also vary because of shadowing caused by terrain and clutter such as hills, buildings, and other obstacles [2]. This type of signal variation, which is observable over relatively long distances, has a log normal distribution. The second type of variation is due to multipath reflections. In urban or dense urban areas, there may not be any direct line-of-sight path between a satellite and a receiver antenna. Instead, the signal may arrive at a GPS receiver over a number of different paths after being reflected from tall buildings, towers, and so on. Because the signal received over each path has a random amplitude and phase, the instantaneous value of the composite signal is found to vary randomly about a local mean [3]. In this paper, the short-term fluctuations in the GPS signal amplitude due to phase change is analyzed using Rayleigh and Rician fading models

2. Multipath

Multipath error is one of the predominant error sources in all GPS applications. Particularly the multipath error has to be precisely estimated in the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) as it is the major error source (2 - 4 m) that limits the GPS receiver’s performance [3]. Whenever, a signal is transmitted from a GPS satellite it follows a “multiple” number of propagation “paths” on its way to receiving antenna. These multiple signal paths are due to the fact that the signal gets reflected back to the antenna off surrounding objects, including the earth’s surface. The GPS receiver tracks both the direct and reflected signal components.

The radio wave transmitted from a satellite radiates in all directions, these radio waves including reflected waves that are reflected off due to various obstacles, diffracted waves, scattering waves, and the direct wave from the satellite to GPS receiver (see Figure 1). In this case, since the path lengths of the direct, reflected, diffracted, and scattering waves are different, the time each takes to reach the GPS receiver will be different. In addition the phase of the incoming wave varies because of reflections. As a result, the receiver receives a superpostion consisting of several waves having different phase and times of arrival.

The generic name of a radio wave in which the time of arrival is retarded in comparison with this direct wave is called a delayed wave. Then, the reception environment characterized by a superposition of delayed waves is called a multipath propagation environment. In a multipath propagation environment, the received signal is sometimes intensified. This phenomenon is called multi-

Figure 1. Principle of multipath signal.

path fading and the signal level of the received wave changes from moment to moment.

3. Fading

Fading is a common phenomenon in GPS caused by the superposition of two or more versions of the transmitted signals, which arrive at the receiver at slightly different times. The resultant received signal can vary widely in amplitude and phase, depending on various factors such as the relative propagation time of the waves and bandwidth of the transmitted signal. At the receiver, these multipath waves with randomly distributed amplitudes and phases combine to give a resultant signal that fluctuates in time and space. Therefore, a receiver at one location may have a signal that is much different from the signal at another location, only a short distance away, because of the change in the phase relationship among the incoming radio waves. This causes significant fluctuations in the signal amplitude. This phenomenon of random fluctuations in the received signal level is termed as fading. The short-term fluctuation in the signal amplitude caused by the local multipath is called Rayleigh fading, and is observed over distances of about half a wavelength. The most commonly known statistical representations of fading are: Rayleigh, Rician [4]. Received signal envelope in a typical multipath environment is shown in Figure 2.

4. Rayleigh Fading Model

A GPS receiver in a typical dense populated urban environment is usually surrounded by local scatterers so that the plane waves will arrive from many directions without a direct line of sight component. Two-dimensional isotropic scattering, where the arriving plane waves arrive in from all directions with equal probability is most commonly used scattering model for the GPS system. For this type of scattering environment the received envelope is short-term distributed at any time, and is said to exhibit

Figure 2. Received signal envelope in a typical multipath environment.

Rayleigh fading [5]. Such channels are modelled using Rayleigh fading model. Let us begin with the mechanism by which fading occurs. The delayed wave with incident angle is given by Equation (1) corresponding to Figure 1, when a continuous wave of single frequency, (Hz), is transmitted from the satellite. Delayed wave with incident angle,

(1)

where, delayed signal/phase difference;

carrier frequency;

indicates the real part of a complex number that gives the complex envelope of the incoming wave from the direction of the number, n;

j is a complex number.

The is calculated using the propagation path length of the incoming waves.

(2)

where andare the envelope and phase of the n^{th} incoming wave.

and are the in-phase and quadrature phase factors of, respectively.

speed of GPS receiver;

wavelength;

propagation path length;

incident angle;

wavelength;

Doppler shift.

The incoming n^{th} wave shifts the carrier frequency as by the Doppler Effect (Hz). This is called the Doppler shift in GPS communication. This Doppler shift, which is described as, has a maximum value of, when the incoming wave comes from the running direction of receiver in. Then, this maximum is the largest Doppler shift. The delayed wave that comes from the rear of the receiver also has a frequency shift of (Hz). It is shown by Equation (2), since received wave received in GPS is the synthesis of the abovementioned incoming waves, when the incoming wave number is made to be N. Summation of N reflected signals

(3)

where and are given by

and (4)

and are normalized random processes, having an average value of zero and dispersion of, when N is large enough. The combination probability density is given by,

(5)

where.

In addition, it can be expressed as using the amplitude and phase of the received wave.

(6)

and are given by

and.

By using a transformation of variables, can be converted into. Short-term distribution of is

(7)

By integrating over θ from 0 to 2, we obtain the probability density function. Probability density function of is

(8)

Moreover, we can obtain the probability density function by integrating over R from 0 to ∞.

(9)

From these equations, the envelope fluctuation follows a short-term distribution, and the phase fluctuation follows a uniform distribution on the fading in the propagation path. Next, let us try to find an expression for rayleigh fading. Here, the GPS receives the radio wave as shown in Figure 1, the arrival angle of the receiving incoming wave is uniformly distributed, and the wave number of the incoming waves is N. In this case, the complex fading fluctuation in an equivalent low pass system is

(10)

(11)

where

and are uniformly distributed over 0 to 2π;

Doppler shift frequency;

number of scatterers.

The Doppler frequency shift is calculated by

(12)

where carrier frequency;

receiver velocity;

elevation angle;

velocity of light.

Receiver velocity is positive when the receiver is moving towards the transmitter and negative when moving away from the transmitter. The level crossing rate (LCR) and average fade duration (AFD) are given by the formula

(13)

(14)

where fade level.

5. Rician Fading Model

It is a stochastic model for radio propagation anomaly caused by partial cancellation of radio signal by itself. If the environment is such that, in addition to scattering there is a strong dominant signal seen at the receiver caused by line of sight, the mean of the random process is no longer zero and varies around the power level of the dominant path. Such a situation may be better modelled as Rician fading. Rayleigh fading is a specialized model for Rician fading when there is no line of sight signal. In a microcellular environment, the transmitter antennas are often placed below the skyline of buildings and are surrounded by local scatterers, such that the plane waves will arrive at the base station with a larger AOA (Angle of Arrival) spread [6]. Furthermore, LOS path will sometimes exist between the satellite and receiver, while at other times LOS path does not exist. Even in the absence of LOS propagation conditions, there often exist a dominant reflected or diffracted path between the satellite and receiver.

LOS or dominant reflected or diffracted path produces the specular component and the multitude of weaker secondary paths contributes to the scatter component of the received envelope. In this type of propagation environment, the received signal envelope still experiences fading. However, the presence of the specular component changes the received envelope distribution, and very often a Rician distributed envelope is assumed. In this case the received envelope is said to exhibit Rician fading. Such channels are modelled by Rician fading model. Rician distribution is used to model the GPS signal when a direct line of sight component exists between the obstacle and receiver in addition to the multipath components. It can be expressed as a phasor sum of a constant and a number of scattering point sources.

(15)

where,

constant coherent signal with clear LOS;

Amplitude of j^{th }incoming wave;

Initial phase shift of j^{th }incoming wave.

Rician probability density function is given by

(16)

(17)

where is the mean square value of the Rayleigh distributed component of r and I_{0} is the modified Bessel function of order zero. The phase distribution is no longer uniform like Rayleigh distribution. The phase distribution of Rician distribution is derived by Beckmann as

(18)

where and

Clarke’s simulation model for simulating Rician fading is given by the signal transfer function which is given by

(19)

(20)

where N is the number of propagation paths;

is the maximum Doppler frequency in radians;

and are the angle of arrival and initial phase of the n^{th} propagation path respectively.

Both and are uniformly distributed over for all n and they are mutually independent. The signal transfer function after including the direct LOS component is given by

(21)

(22)

where K is the ratio of multipath to direct component, and are angle of incidence and initial phase of direct component respectively.

6. Results and Discussion

The main aim of the paper is to obtain the response of Rayleigh fading and Rician for a GPS transmitted signal for different velocities of receiver using sum of sinusoids method. The response of Rayleigh fading of GPS signal for different velocities of receiver is obtained using sum of sinusoids method. This response is obtained by considering the carrier frequency to be 1575.42 MHz, number of scatterers and by changing the value of Doppler frequency shift. The value of N is determined from the environment. As the value of N increases, more accurate results are obtained. The response of Rayleigh fading is computed for different configuration. The response of Rayleigh fading of GPS satellite transmitted signal for a receiver moving velocity of 30 km/h is shown in Figure 3. From Figure 3, it is observed that the normalized amplitude of GPS signal changes with respect to time when the receiver is moving with velocity of 30 km/h. The response of Rayleigh fading of GPS transmitted signal for receiver velocities of 60 km/h and 100 km/h are shown in Figures 4 and 5 respectively.

Figure 3. Rayleigh fading response of a typical GPS signal for receiver moving with a velocity of 30 km/h.

Figure 4. Rayleigh fading response of a typical GPS signal for receiver moving with a velocity of 60 km/h.

Figure 5. Rayleigh fading response of a typical GPS signal for receiver moving with a velocity of 100 km/h.

From Figures 3-5, it is concluded that the level crossing rate of the response of receiver moving with velocity of 100 km/h is more than the level crossing rates of the responses of the receivers moving with velocities of 30 km/h and 60 km/h at a fade level of 1 and the average fade duration for a receiver moving velocity of 100 km/h is more in comparison with the average fade duration for receiver velocities of 30 km/h and 60 km/h at a fade level of 1. The values of minimum amplitude, maximum amplitude, mean and Std’s (standard deviations) of GPS transmitted signal with receiver velocities of 30 km/h, 60 km/h and 100 km/h are also calculated. From Figures 3-5, it is observed that the mean and standard deviations vary with change in the receiver velocity.

The Rician fading for a GPS signal for different velocities of receiver are obtained using sum of sinusoids method. The response is obtained by considering the carrier frequency MHz, number of scatterers and by changing the value of Doppler frequency shift. The value of N is determined from the environment. As in Rayleigh fading response, more accurate results are obtained for larger values of N. The response of Rician fading of GPS transmitted signal for a receiver moving velocity of 50 km/h and and are shown in Figures 6 and 7. From these Figures, it is observed that the normalized amplitude of GPS signal changes with respect to time when a receiver is moving with a certain velocity. From the Figures 6 and 7, it is also observed that as the value of K is increased the normalized amplitude of response is reduced. The response of Rician fading of GPS transmitted signal for a receiver moving velocity of 100 km/h and and are shown in Figures 8 and 9. From Figures 8 and 9, it is observed that the normalized amplitude of GPS signal is changing with respect to time when a receiver is moving with velocity of 100 km/h. It is also observed that as the value of K is increased, the normalized amplitude of response is reduced.

From Figures 6-9, it is concluded that for a constant value of K, the mean value of the response decreases with the increase in velocity of the user and for a constant velocity, as the value of K is increased the mean value is reduced. For constant K, the level crossing rate of the receiver moving with velocity of 100 km/h is more in compared with the level crossing rate of the receiver moving with velocity of 50 km/h at a fade level of 1. The average fade duration of a receiver with velocity 100 km/h is more in compared with the average fade duration of a receiver with velocity 50 km/h at a fade level of 1. The values of minimum amplitude, maximum amplitude, mean and standard deviations of GPS transmitted signal with receiver velocities of 50 km/h and 100 km/h are also calculated.

7. Conclusion

In this paper, modeling of short-term variations is presented for the GPS transmitted signal. A short-term variation with Rayleigh fading model is analyzed for different configurations (for example receiver moving with velocities of 30 km/h, 60 km/h and 100 km/h). From the analysis, it is concluded that the level crossing rate and the average fade duration of the receiver’s response due to Rayleigh fading is found higher at a fade level of 1 for a receiver moving with a velocity of 100 km/h in comparison to the receiver moving with a velocity of 30 km/h. Short-term variations of the GPS signal using Rician fading model is also analyzed for different configurations (for example receiver with velocities 50 km/h and 100 km/h for and 6). From the analysis, it is concluded

Figure 6. Rician fading response for a relative velocity of 50 km/h and K = 3 generated by sum of sinusoids method.

Figure 7. Rician fading response for a relative velocity of 50km/h and K=6 generated by sum of sinusoids method.

Figure 8. Rician fading response for a relative velocity of 100 km/h and K = 3 generated by sum of sinusoids method.

Figure 9. Rician fading response for a relative velocity of 100 km/h and K = 6 generated by sum of sinusoids method.

that the level crossing rate and the average fade duration of the receiver’s response due to Rician fading is found higher at a fade level of 1 for a receiver moving with a velocity of 100 km/h in comparison to the receiver moving with a velocity of 50 km/h.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

[1] | G. S. Rao, “Global Navigation Satellite Systems with Essentials of Satellite communications,” McGraw Hill, New Delhi, 2010. |

[2] | B. Vucetic and J. Du, “Channel Modeling and Simulation in Satellite Mobile Communication Systems,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 10, No. 8, 1992, pp. 1209-1218. doi:10.1109/49.166746 |

[3] | P. Osborne and Y. J. Xie, “Propagation Characterization of LEO/MEO Satellite Systems at 900-2100 MHz,” William University of Texas, Dallas, 1999. |

[4] | G. S. Rao, “Mobile Cellular Communication,” Pearson, 2012. |

[5] | B. Sklar, “Communications Engineering Services ‘Rayleigh Fading Channels in Mobile Digital Communication Systems’,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 35, No. 7, 1997, pp. 90-100 |

Journals Menu

Contact us

+1 323-425-8868 | |

customer@scirp.org | |

+86 18163351462(WhatsApp) | |

1655362766 | |

Paper Publishing WeChat |

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.