Adolescents’ Interpersonal Relationships with Friends, Parents, and Teachers When Using Facebook for Interaction


The purpose of the study is to investigate the adolescents’ interpersonal relationships with friends, parents, and teachers when using Facebook for interaction. A total of 740 junior high school students were invited to fill in a questionnaire and 673 questionnaires were available. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and paired-samples t-test. The analytic result confirms that adolescents with high frequency use of Facebook for interactions can expand their interpersonal relationships with friends than those who with low frequency use, regardless of real-life or virtual relationships. However, their real-life interpersonal relationships with parents may weaken if overly use Internet tools for interactions. Another finding, eliminating the factor of the time on Facebook use, reveals that the adolescents’ real-life interpersonal relationships are stronger than virtual interpersonal relationships, regardless of with friends, parents, and teachers. Combining the above two findings, it is worth noting that the real-life interaction with parents may reduce if overly use Internet tools for interactions. This study contributes to the literature by investigating the adolescents’ relationships with friends, parents and teachers and indicates the potential program when adolescents using Facebook use for interaction. This study, thus, further recommends that parents should be concerned their children about Facebook use.

Share and Cite:

Liu, S. , Yin, M. and Huang, T. (2013) Adolescents’ Interpersonal Relationships with Friends, Parents, and Teachers When Using Facebook for Interaction. Creative Education, 4, 335-339. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.45049.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Bouillion Diaz, L., Thompson, C. C., & DeGennaro, D. (2010). Leisure and technological influences. In M. B. Spencer, D. Swanson, & M. Edwards (Eds.), Adolescence: Development during a global era. Philadelphia: Elsevier.
[2] boyd, d., & Hargittai, E. (2010). Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? First Monday, 15.
[3] Chou, C., & Peng, H. (2007). Net friends: Adolescents’ attitudes and experiences vs. teachers’ concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2394-2413. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.015
[4] Desjarlais, M., & Willoughby, T. (2010). A longitudinal study of the relation between adolescent boys and girls’ computer use with friends and friendship quality: Support for the social compensation or the rich-get-richer hypothesis? Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 895-905. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.004
[5] Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633-649. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.005
[6] Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
[7] Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project.
[8] Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.
[9] Martusewicz, R. A. (2010). Facebook and me, or how I spent my sum mer vacation. Educational Studies, 46, 447-449.
[10] McCarty, C., Prawitz, A. D., Derscheid, L. E., & Montgomery, B. (2011). Perceived safety and teen risk taking in online chat sites. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 169-174. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0050
[11] McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00246
[12] Mesch, G., & Talmud, I. (2006). Online friendship formation, communication channels, and social closeness. International Journal of Internet Science, 1, 29-44.
[13] Snell, M., & Janney, R. (2000). Teachers' guide to inclusive practices: Social relationships and peer support. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
[14] Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 420-433. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.003
[15] Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7, 321-326. doi:10.1089/1094931041291295
[16] Suwannatthachote, P., & Tantrarungroj, P. (2012). How facebook connects students’ group work collaboration: A relationship between personal Facebook usage and group engagement. Creative Education, 3, 15-19. doi:10.4236/ce.2012.38B004
[17] Whitty, M. T. (2008). Liberating or debilitating? An examination of romantic relationships, sexual relationships and friendships on the Net. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1837-1850. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.009

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.