Generalist versus Specialist Herbivores on the Invasive Senecio inaequidens and a Native Related Species: What Makes the Difference?


We compared herbivory pressure in the native Jacobaea vulgaris (formely Senecio jacobaea) and the alien invasive S. inaequidens in sites where they co-occur in Belgium. We predicted that the alien species experiences relaxed herbivory pressure by specialist herbivores (enemy release hypothesis ERH) whereas it is still attacked by generalist herbivores. Impacts of two generalist (gastropods and rabbits) and one specialist (the caterpillar Tyria jacobaeae) herbivores were assessed with field observations and exclusion experiments. The generalist herbivores had a higher impact on the biomass and survival of the seedlings of the alien S. inaequidens than on the native J. vulgaris. On the contrary, the specialist Tyria jacobaeae attacked exclusively the adults of the native species, supporting one of the main predictions of the ERH. These results are discussed in relation to differences in pyrrolizidine alkaloid profiles between the two species.

Share and Cite:

A. Jacquemart, V. Vanparys and P. Meerts, "Generalist versus Specialist Herbivores on the Invasive Senecio inaequidens and a Native Related Species: What Makes the Difference?," American Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 2A, 2013, pp. 386-394. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2013.42A050.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] R. I. Colautti, A. Riccardi, I. A. Grigorovich and H. J. Macisaac, “Is Invasion Success Explained by the Enemy Release Hypothesis?” Ecology Letters, Vol. 7, No. 8, 2004, pp. 721-733. HUdoi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00616.xU
[2] S. B. Hill and P. M. Kotanen, “Evidence That Phylogenetically Novel Non-Indigenous Plants Experience Less Herbivory,” Oecologia, Vol. 161, No. 3, 2009, pp. 581590. HUdoi:10.1007/s00442-009-1403-0U
[3] J. A. Harvey, T. Bukovinszky and W. H. van der Putten, “Interactions between Invasive Plants and Insect Herbivores: A Plea for a Multitrophic Perspective,” Biological Conservation, Vol. 143, No. 10, 2010, pp. 2251-2259. HUdoi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.004U
[4] Y. J. Chun, M. van Kleunen and W. Dawson, “The Role of Enemy Release, Tolerance and Resistance in Plant Invasions: Linking Damage to Performance,” Ecology Letters, Vol. 13, No. 8, 2010, pp. 937-946. HUdoi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01498.xU
[5] A. M. O. Oduor and R. A. Lankau, S. Y. Strauss and J. M. Gomez, “Introduced Brassica nigra Populations Exhibit Greater Growth and Herbivore Resistance but Less Tolerance than Native Populations in the Native Range,” New Phytologist, Vol. 191, No. 2, 2011, pp. 536-544. HUdoi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03685.xU
[6] C. S. Elton, “The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants,” Chapman and Hall, London, 1958. HUdoi:10.1177/0309133307087089U
[7] R. M. Keane and M. J. Crawley, “Exotic Plant Invasions and the Enemy Release Hypothesis,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2002, pp. 164-170. HUdoi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0U
[8] F. X. Sans, H. Garcia-Serrano and I. Afan, “Life-History Traits of Alien and Native Senecio Species in the Mediterranean Region,” Acta Oecologica, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2004, pp. 167-178. HUdoi:10.1016/j.actao.2004.04.001U
[9] L. Ca?o, J. Escarré, K. Vrieling and F. X. Sans, “Patability to a Generalist Herbivore, Defence and Growth of Invasive and Native Senecio Species: Testing the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability Hypothesis,” Oecologia, Vol. 159, No. 1, 2009, pp. 95-106. HUdoi:10.1007/s00442-008-1182-zU
[10] C. E. Mitchell and A. G. Power, “Release of Invasive Plants from Fungal and Viral Pathogens,” Nature, Vol. 421, No. 6923, 2003, pp. 625-627. HUdoi:10.1038/nature01317U
[11] J. L. Funk and H. L. Throop, “Enemy Release and Plant Invasion: Patterns of Defensive Traits and Leaf Damage in Hawaii,” Oecologia, Vol. 162, No. 4, 2010, pp. 815823. HUdoi:10.1007/s00442-009-1497-4U
[12] C. V. Hawkes, A. E. Douglas and A. H. Fitter, “Origin, Local Experience, and the Impact of Biotic Interactions on Native and Introduced Senecio Species,” Biological Invasions, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2010, pp. 113-124. HUdoi:10.1007/s10530-009-9435-2U
[13] D. W. Tallamy, M. Ballard and V. D’Amico, “Can Alien Plants Support Generalist Insect Herbivores?” Biological Invasions, Vol. 12, No. 7, 2010, pp. 2285-2292. HUdoi:10.1007/s10530-009-9639-5U
[14] W. E. Morrison and M. E. Hay, “Herbivore Preference for Native vs. Exotic Plants: Generalist Herbivores from Multiple Continents Prefer Exotic Plants That Are Evolutionary Na?ve,” PLoSOne, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2011, Article ID: e17227. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017227U
[15] J. M. Levine, P. B. Adler and S. G. Yelenik, “A MetaAnalysis of Biotic Resistance to Exotic Plant Invasions,” Ecology Letters, Vol. 7, No. 10, 2004, pp. 975-989. HUdoi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00657.xU
[16] A. A. Agrawal, P. M. Kotanen, C. E. Mitchell, A. G. Power, W. Godsoe and J. Klironomos, “Enemy Release? An Experiment with Congeneric Plant Pairs and Diverse Above and Belowground Enemies,” Ecology, Vol. 86, No. 11, 2005, pp. 2979-2989. HUdoi:10.1890/05-0219U
[17] J. D. Parker and M. E. Hay, “Biotic Resistance to Plant Invasions? Native Herbivores Prefer Non-Native Plants,” Ecology Letters, Vol. 8, No. 9, 2005, pp. 959-967. HUdoi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00799.xU
[18] H. Liu and P. Stiling, “Testing the Enemy Release Hypothesis: A Review and Meta-Analysis,” Biological Invasions, Vol. 8, No. 7, 2006, pp. 1535-1545. HUdoi:10.1007/s10530-005-5845-yU
[19] H. Müller-Sch?rer, U. Schaffner and T. Steinger, “Evolution in Invasive Plants: Implications for Biological Control,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 19, No. 8, 2004, pp. 417-422. HUdoi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.05.010U
[20] J. Joshi and K. Vrieling, “The Enemy Release and EICA Hypothesis Revisited: Incorporating the Fundamental Difference between Specialist and Generalist Herbivores,” Ecology Letters, Vol. 8, No. 7, 2005, pp. 704-714. HUdoi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00769.xU
[21] K. J. F. Verhoeven, A. Biere, J. A. Harvey and W. H. van der Putten, “Plant Invaders and Their Novel Natural Enemies: Who Is Na?ve?” Ecology Letters, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2009, pp. 107-117. HUdoi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01248.xU
[22] C. E. Mitchell, A. A. Agrawal, J. D. Bever, G. S. Gilbert, R. A. Hufbauer, J. N. Klironomos, J. L. Maron, W. F. Morris, I. M. Parker, A. G. Power, E. W. Seabloom, M. E. Torchin and D. P. Vazquez, “Biotic Interactions and Plant Invasions,” Ecology Letters, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2006, pp. 726740. HUdoi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00908.xU
[23] L. Lafuma and S. Maurice, “Increase in Mate Availability without Loss of Self-Incompatibility in the Invasive Species Senecio inaequidens (Asteraceae),” Oikos, Vol. 116, No. 2, 2007, pp. 201-208. HUdoi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15220.xU
[24] O. Bossdorf, A. Lipowsky and D. Prati, “Selection of Preadapted Populations Allowed Senecio inaequidens to Invade Central Europe,” Diversity and Distributions, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2008, pp. 676-685. HUdoi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00471.xU
[25] T. Heger and H. J. Boehmer, “The Invasion of Central Europe by Senecio inaequidens DC—A Complex Biogeographical Problem,” Erdkunde, Vol. 59, No. 1, 2005, pp. 34-49. HUdoi:10.3112/erdkunde.2005.01.03U
[26] DAISIE (Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe), “Handbook of Alien Species in Europe,” Invading Nature—Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, Vol. 3, Springer, Dordrecht, 2009.
[27] J. L. Harper and W. A. Wood, “Biological Flora of the British Isles: Senecio jacobaea L.,” Journal of Ecology, Vol. 45, No. 2, 1957, pp. 617-637. HUdoi:10.2307/2256946U
[28] W. H. O. Ernst, “Invasion, Dispersal and Ecology of the South African Neophyte Senecio inaequidens in the Netherlands: From Wool Alien to Railway and Road Alien,” Acta Botanica Neerlandica, Vol. 47, No. 1, 1998, pp. 131151.
[29] V. Vanparys, P. Meerts and A.-L. Jacquemart, “Plant-Pollinator Interactions: Comparison between an Invasive and a Native Congeneric Species,” Acta Oecologica, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2008, pp. 361-369. HUdoi:10.1016/j.actao.2008.06.008U
[30] M. E. Hanley, M. Fenner and P. J. Edwards, “Mollusc Grazing and Seedling Survivorship of Four Common Grassland Plant Species: The Role of Gap Size, Species and Season,” Acta Oecologica, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1996, pp. 331341.
[31] C. Scherber, M. J. Crawley and S. Porembski, “The Effects of Herbivory and Competition on the Invasive Alien Plant Senecio inaequidens (Asteraceae),” Diversity and Distributions, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2003, pp. 415-426. HUdoi:10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00049.xU
[32] M. Macel, P. G. L. Klinkhamer, K. Vrieling and E. Van der Mijden, “Diversity of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Senecio Species Does Not Affect the Specialist Herbivore Tyria jacobaeae,” Oecologia, Vol. 133, No. 4, 2002, pp. 541-550. HUdoi:10.1007/s00442-002-1074-6U
[33] M. Macel, “Attract and Deter: A Dual Role for Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Plant-Insect Interactions,” Phytochemistry Reviews, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2011, pp. 75-82. HUdoi:10.1007/s11101-010-9181-1U
[34] G. Schmitz and D. J. Werner, “The Importance of the Alien Plant Senecio inaequidens DC. (Asteraceae) for Phytophagous Insects,” Zeitschrift für ?kologie und Naturschutz, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2000, pp. 153-160.
[35] T. Engelkes, B. Wouters, T. M. Bezemer, J. A. Harvey and W. H. van der Putten, “Contrasting Patterns of Herbivore and Predator Pressure on Invasive and Native Plants,” Basic and Applied Ecology, Vol. 13, No. 8, 2012, pp. 725-734. HUdoi:10.1016/j.baae.2012.10.005U
[36] H. Garcia-Serrano, F. X. Sans and J. Escarré, “Interspecific Competition between Alien and Native Congeneric Species,” Acta Oecologica, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2008, pp. 6978. HUdoi:10.1016/j.actao.2006.09.005U
[37] V. Vanparys, “Ecology of an Invasive Plant, Senecio inaequidens: Interactions with Pollinators, Herbivores and Soil Fauna,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, 2009.
[38] T. Hartmann, A. Ehmke, U. Eilert, K. von Borstel and C. Theuring, “Sites of Synthesis, Translocation and Accumulation of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid N-Oxides in Senecio vulgaris L.,” Planta, Vol. 177, No. 1, 1989, pp. 98-107. HUdoi:10.1007/BF00392159U
[39] L. Witte, A. Ehmke and T. Hartmann, “Interspecific Flow of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids—From Plants via Aphids to Ladybirds,” Naturwissenschaften, Vol. 77, No. 11, 1990, pp. 540-543. HUdoi:10.1007/BF01139268U
[40] L. Joosten, P. P. J. Mulder, P. G. L. Klinkhamer and J. A. van Veen, “Soil-Borne Microorganisms and Soil-Type Affect Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Jacobaea vulgaris,” Plant and Soil, Vol. 325, No. 1-2, 2009, pp. 133-143. HUdoi:10.1007/s11104-009-9963-7U
[41] M. Macel and K. Vrieling, “Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids as Oviposition Stimulants for the Cinnabar Moth, Tyria jacobaeae,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2003, pp. 1435-1445. HUdoi:10.1023/A:1024269621284U
[42] I. Noy-Meir, M. Gutman and Y. Kaplan, “Responses of Mediterranean Grassland Plants to Grazing and Protection,” Journal of Ecology, Vol. 77, No. 1, 1989, pp. 290310. HUdoi:10.2307/2260930U
[43] M. C. Lopez-Garcia and J. Maillet, “Biological Characteristics of an Invasive South African Species,” Biological Invasions, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2005, pp. 181-194. HUdoi:10.1007/s10530-004-8978-5U
[44] D. A. Wardle, “The Ecology of Ragwort (Senecio jacobaea L.)—A Review,” New Zealand Journal of Ecology, Vol. 10, 1987, pp. 67-76.
[45] V. Vanparys, V. Cawoy, O. Mahaux and A.-L. Jacquemart, “Comparative Study of the Reproductive Ecology of Two Co-Occurring Related Plant Species: The Invasive Senecio inaequidens and the Native Jacobaea vulgaris,” Plant Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 144, No. 1, 2011, pp. 1-9. HUdoi:10.5091/plecevo.2011.434U
[46] A. Vervoort, V. Cawoy and A.-L. Jacquemart, “Comparative Reproductive Biology in Co-Occurring Invasive and Native Impatiens Species,” International Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 172, No. 3, 2011, pp. 366-377.
[47] M. Pairon, O. Chabrerie, C. Mainer-Casado and A.-L. Jacquemart, “Sexual Regeneration Traits Linked to Black Cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) Invasiveness,” Acta Oecologica, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2006, pp. 238-247. HUdoi:10.1016/j.actao.2006.05.002U
[48] S. Lachmuth, W. Durka and F. M. Schurr, “The Making of a Rapid Plant Invader: Genetic Diversity and Differentiation in the Native and Invaded Range of Senecio inaequidens,” Molecular Ecology, Vol. 19, No. 18, 2010, pp. 3952-3967. HUdoi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04797.xU

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.