Comparison between Auditory and Visual Simple Reaction Times
Jose Shelton, Gideon Praveen Kumar
DOI: 10.4236/nm.2010.11004   PDF    HTML   XML   94,578 Downloads   194,013 Views   Citations


Objective: The purpose of this study was to find out whether the simple reaction time was faster for auditory or visual stimulus and the factors responsible for improving the performance of the athlete. Methodology: 14 subjects were as- signed randomly into groups consisting of 2 members. Both the members from each group performed both the visual and auditory tests. The tests were taken from the DirectRT software program from a laptop. The DirectRT software consists of Testlabvisual and Testlabsounds to test the reaction times to visual and auditory stimuli. The 2 members from each group completed both the visual and auditory reaction times, the data was taken and the mean reaction time was calculated excluding the first and last values. Results: The results show that the mean visual reaction time is around 331 milliseconds as compared to the mean auditory reaction time of around 284 milliseconds. Conclusion: This shows that the auditory reaction time is faster than the visual reaction time. And also males have faster reaction times when compared to females for both auditory as well as visual stimuli.

Share and Cite:

J. Shelton and G. Kumar, "Comparison between Auditory and Visual Simple Reaction Times," Neuroscience and Medicine, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2010, pp. 30-32. doi: 10.4236/nm.2010.11004.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] T. G. Matthew Pain and A. Hibbs, “Sprint Starts and the Minimum Auditory Reaction Time,” Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2007, pp. 79-86.
[2] P. D. Thompson, J. G. Colebatch, P. Brown, J. C. Rothwell, B. L. Day and J. A. Obeso, “Voluntary Stimulus Sensitive Jerks and Jumps Mimicking Myoclonus or Pathological Startle Syndromes,” Movement Disorders, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1992, pp. 257-262.
[3] Y. Yagi, K. L. Coburn, K. M. Estes and J. E. Arruda, “Effects of Aerobic Exercise and Gender on Visual and Auditory P300, Reaction Time, and Accuracy,” European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 80, 1999, pp. 402- 408.
[4] R. Verlager, “On the Utility of P3 Latency as an Index of Mental Chronometry,” Journal of Psychophysiology, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1997, pp. 131-156.
[5] B. T. Engel, P. R. Thorne and R. E. Quilter, “On the Relationship Among Sex, Age, Response Mode, Cardiac Cycle Phase, Breathing Cycle Phase, And Simple Reaction Time,” Journal of Gerontology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 1972, pp. 456-460.
[6] S. Dane and A. Erzurumluoglu, “Sex and Handedness Differences in Eye-Hand Visual Reaction Times in Handball Players,” International Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 113, No. 7, 2003, pp. 923-929.
[7] B. J. Kemp, “Reaction Time Of Young And Elderly Subjects in Relation to Perceptual Deprivation and Signal-on Versus Signal-off Condition,” Developmental Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1973, pp. 268-272.
[8] B. J. Van den and G. Neely, “Performance on a Simple Reaction Time Task While Sleep Deprived,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 102, No. 2, 2006, pp. 589-600.
[9] S. Ando, N. Kida and S. Oda, “Practice Effects on Reaction Time for Peripheral and Central Visual Fields,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 95, No. 3, 2002, pp. 747-752.
[10] I. W. Silverman, “Sex Differences in Simple Visual Reaction Time: A Historical Meta-Analysis (Sports Events),” Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, Vol. 54, No. 1-2, 2006, pp. 57-69.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.