Conflict Balanced Design for the Evaluation System of University Research Achievements


Scientific research evaluation has an important guiding significance to university scientific research work. Based on conflict analysis model, it studies the strategies and preferences among the government, universities and scientists in the scientific research evaluation mechanism. It builds a conflict analysis model of  three players and gives all possible equilibrium situations. The paper also analyzes the characteristics analysis of each equilibrium situation, it finds out the Pareto optimal situation of scientific research evaluation. The article provides guidance for the establishment of the evaluation system of university research.

Share and Cite:

Chen, H. and Shu, L. (2012) Conflict Balanced Design for the Evaluation System of University Research Achievements. Creative Education, 3, 126-129. doi: 10.4236/ce.2012.37B033.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Zhang Wei. Frequently Met Problems in Evaluation on Scientific Reaearch in Higher Educational Institutions and Innovation of Evaluation System [J]. Journal of Taiyuan Normal University(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION),2007,(04).
[2] Ceng Yuqing. Evaluation method and application of university research outputs [J]. Hunan social science, 2006,(04).
[3] Zhou Ying, Wang Pusheng.Conflict of interests in peer review, analysis and treatment [J].Science research. 2003,(03).
[4] Deng Yi. Quantitative evaluation of scientific research in universities [J].Modern education, 2006,48(4).
[5] Qiu Junping, Tan Chunhui. Significances, System and Practices of Evaluation of Humanities and Social Science in China [J]. Journal of Chongqing University(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2007,(05).

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.