Purification and characterization of a gastrointestinal tract epithelial receptor for the adhesion factor of Lactobacillus


An epithelial receptor for the Lactobacillus surface adhesion factor was isolated and purified from mucus of the gastrointestinal tract of SPF chickens, using chromatography. The purified protein was analyzed with discontinuous, native gel electrophoresis and binding assay with cultured intestinal epithelial cells. A single band was obtained after purification. The molecular weight of this band was about 60 KDa. The purified protein inhibited the attachment of Lactobacillus to intestinal epithelial cells, suggesting that it is the gastrointestinal receptor for the surface adhesion factor of Lactobacillus.

Share and Cite:

Lin, X. , Wang, Z. , Niu, Z. and Peng, J. (2012) Purification and characterization of a gastrointestinal tract epithelial receptor for the adhesion factor of Lactobacillus. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 3, 274-277. doi: 10.4236/abb.2012.33038.


Under normal physiological conditions, a large amount of bacteria are attached to the surface of gastrointestinal epithelial cells in animals, forming a bacterial biofilm [1-3]. The biofilm is very important for animal immunity, defense, and nutrient absorption. When animals suffer from diarrheal diseases, the normal adhesion is destroyed, causing disturbance of gastrointestinal microflora. The adhesion of normal bacteria to epithelium is mediated by the interaction between adhesion factor from the epithelial cells and the receptor from the surface of normal bacteria [4-6]. Using advanced protein isolation, purification and identification technologies, we successfully isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of SPF chickens an epithelial receptor, determined the molecular weight and adhesive activity. These results provided resources for studying interactions between normal microflora and the host, and provided valuable data for the development of animal microecology. The existence and activity of adhering factors in normal bacteria (for example Lactobacilli) await further study.


2.1. Materials

2.1.1. Intestinal Epithelial Cells

CaCo-2 cells were purchased from Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology.

Cell culture: cells were cultured with DMEM (pH 7.0 - 7.2) supplemented with 10% calf serum, 1000 IU/L penicillin, 100 μg/L streptomycin, in an incubator with CO2 maintained at 5%. When sufficiently attached to the culture flask, cells were washed with phosphate buffered solution (pH 7.4), digested with digestion solution (0.02% EDTA:D-Hanks solution = 10:1, without Ca2+ and Mg2+) for 20 - 30 min. The digestion was stopped before cells detaching from the culture flask by inverting the flask for 3 min. Digestion solution was removed, and 10% DMEM (DMEM containing 10% serum) was added to the flask, mixed thoroughly, split to new flasks.

2.1.2. DMEM Medium

Medium was purchased from Invitrogen. Calf serum was purchased from Beijing Dingguo Biotechnology Inc.

2.1.3. Lactobacillus

Lactobacillus (SDnA) was isolated from SPF chicken (purchased from Shandong Poultry Institute) by Microbiology Laboratory of SAU.

2.1.4. Protein Chromatography System

REC5004V18 system was purchased from Phamarcia (Sweden).

2.1.5. Spectrophotometer

UV-2000 spectrophotometer was purchased from Unico (Shanghai) Instrument Inc.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Sample Collection and Treatment

Ten SPF chickens of 130 days old were sacrificed after fasting for 8 - 10 h. Mucus (10 ml) from the crop and small intestine was collected by scraping the surface. Mucus was diluted with saline (1:2), spun at 5000 rpm, 4˚C for 15 min. Supernatant was saved for future use.

2.2.2. Extraction of Receptor Protein

Sansonetti PJ (1991) indicated that molecular weight of the receptor of Shigella flexneri virulence is about 40 - 60 kDa. Thus, the 30% saturated ammonium sulfate method was used to extract the protein. The extracted precipitate was dissolved in 3 ml of 0.01 mol/L (pH 7.4) phosphate buffered solution, dialyzed in phosphate buffered solution to remove (NH4)2SO4, concentrated with PEG-6000 until 1 ml. Protein concentration was calculated after OD260 and OD280 measurement. Samples were stored frozen until use.

2.2.3. Purification of Receptor Protein (Sephadex Chromatography)

Sephadex 50 was swollen in water, mixed and packed in a column (1.2 × 100 cm). After equilibrating the column with phosphate buffered solution (0.01 mol/L, pH 7.2), the receptor protein crude extract (1 ml) was loaded, then, eluted with phosphate buffered solution (0.01 mol/L, pH 7.2) at 0.2 ml/min. Each peak (280 nm) was collected separately and frozen until use.

2.2.4. Identification of Receptor Protein

1) Discontinuous polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis was performed according to Wang J. Z. (2002) to analyze the products of crude extract (by ammonium sulfate method) and fine extract (sephadex 50 method).

2) Adhesion and Adhesion Inhibition Test: Coverslips were put in 24-well culture plates, then CaCo-2 cells were seeded in the plates and cultured for 2 - 3 days. 200 μl of Lactobacillus cultured for 48 h were added to each well (3 parallel samples), incubated for 24 h. Another plate was treated with 200 μl Lactobacillus (prepared by incubating 1000 μl culture with 200 crude and fine extracts separately) for 24 h at 37˚C in a incubator, each with 3 parallel samples. Then, coverslips were taken out of the plate, washed with phosphate buffered solution (pH 7.4) several times, dried naturally, fixed with methanol, stained with Gram stain, examined under microscope (examining 50 cells, counting the number of Lactobacillus attached to each cell).

2.2.5. Statistics

Between treatment were assessed utilizing with the ANOVA procedure and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test was used for multiple comparisons analyze the treatment effects adherence to the cells.


3.1. Adhesion Factor (Receptor Protein) Extraction

A total of 10 ml of mucus was collected from the gastrointestinal tract of 10 adult SPF chickens. Epithelial adhesion factor was extracted with 30% saturated ammonium sulfate method, resulting in 1 ml receptor protein (24 mg/ml).

3.2. Purification of Adhesion Factor (Receptor Protein)

Three clear peaks appeared after sephadex-50 chromatography (Figure 1). Protein solution (5 ml) was collected from each peak.

3.3. Identification of Adhesion Factor (Receptor Protein)

Electrophoresis was performed to analyze the crude (30% ammonium sulfate) and fine (sephadex 50 chromatography) extracts of adhesion factor (receptor protein). Results were shown in Figures 2 and 3.

3.4. Adhesion and Adhesion Inhibition Test

1) How the crude extract influences the adhesion of Lactobacillus to intestine epithelial cells was shown in Table 1.

Results in Table 1 suggest that the 30% saturated ammonium sulfate extract contains the adhesion factor (receptor protein). This provides the basis for further purification.

2) Table 2 shows the effect of collected 3 peaks after sephadex chromatography on the adhesion of Lactobacillus (Figures 4 and 5).

Table 2 shows that the three elution preparations displayed large differences in their influence on the adhesion of lactobacillus. Peak 2 had the best effect, suggesting this peak contained the epithelial receptor for adhesion factor (receptor protein).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Wang, J.Z. and Fan, M. (2002) Protein technology. Science Press, Beijing.
[2] Zheng, Y.J., Pan, L.J. and Wang, L.S. (1999) Purify adhension from biobacillus. Chinese Journal of Mocrobioloy and Immunology, 19, 196.
[3] Zhao, B. and He, S.J. (2002) Microbiological experiment. Beijing Science Press, Beijing.
[4] Bernet, M.F., Brassart, D. and Neeser, J.R. (1994) Lacto-bacillus acidophilus LA 1 binds to Cultured intestinal cell Lines and inhibits cell attachment cell invasion by enterovirulen. Bacteria Gut, 35, 483-489.
[5] Henriksson, A. and Conway, P.L. (1996) Adhesion of Lactobacillus fermentum 104-S to porcine stomach mucus. Current Microbiology, 33, 31-34. doi:10.1007/s002849900069
[6] Turner, M.S., Peter, T. and Louisem, H. (1997) Identification and characterization of a basic cell surface-located protein from Lacto-bacillus fermentum BR11. Journal of Bacteriology, 179, 3310-3316.
[7] Sansonetti, P.J. (1991) Molecular and cellular bases of Shigella flexneri virulence. Bulletin of the National Academy of Medicine, 175, 803-809.
[8] Shandong Agriculture University (2002) Biochemistry and molecular biological test technology. Shandong Publishing Company, Tai’an.
[9] Sellwood, R. (1980) The interaction of the K88 antigen with porcine intestinal epithelial cell brush borders. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 632, 326-335. doi:10.1016/0304-4165(80)90090-2
[10] Takahiro, T., Ritva, V. and Benita, W. (1995) A collagen-binding s-layer protein in Lactobacillus crispatus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61, 2467-2471

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.