Trade Integration in East Asia: An Empirical Assessment


This study employs a gravity model of bilateral trade flows at the one-digit level of the standard international trade classification (SITC) product categories over the period of 1996 to 2005 to provide an empirical assessment of regional trade integration in East Asia. The formation of the ASEAN free trade area agreement is found to have both positive and negative effects on trade both among members and between members and the rest of the world, subject to SITC product category. Although the differences between actual and predicted levels of intra-ASEAN trade and of trade between ASEAN and other East Asian countries have been reduced, there remain product categories indicating a low degree of trade integration. Those product categories include food and live animals, machinery and transport equipment, and miscellaneous manufactured articles. Finally, the level of intra-industry trade intensity based on predicted trade values confirms that ASEAN is involved in intra-industry trade among its members more than trade with other East Asian countries.

Share and Cite:

Sasatra Sudsawasd, S. (2012) Trade Integration in East Asia: An Empirical Assessment. Modern Economy, 3, 319-329. doi: 10.4236/me.2012.33042.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] M. Mikic, “ASEAN and Trade Integration,” ESCAP Trade and Investment Division, Staff Working Paper 01/09,” United Nations, Bangkok, 2009.
[2] R. Pomfret, “Sequencing Trade and Monetary Integration: Issues and Application to ASIA,” Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2005, pp. 105-204. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2004.12.002
[3] D. Derosa, “US Free Trade Agreement with ASEAN,” In: J. J. Schott, Ed., Free Trade Agreements US Strategies and Priorities, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC, 2004, pp. 117-171.
[4] S. Sudsawasd and P. Mongsawad, “Go with the Gang ASEAN” ASEAN Economic Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2007, pp. 339-353. doi:10.1355/AE24-3D
[5] C. Filippini and V. Molini, “The Determinants of East Asian Trade Flows: A Gravity Equation Approach,” Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2003, pp. 695-711. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2003.10.001
[6] W. C. Sawyer, R. L. Sprinkle and K. Tochkov, “Patterns and Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade in Asia,” Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2010, pp. 485-493. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2010.04.001
[7] J. E. Anderson, “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation,” American Economic Review, Vol. 63, No. 1, 1979, pp. 106-116.
[8] J. H. Bergstrand, “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Micro-Economics Foundations and Empirical Evidence,” Review of Economic and Statistic, Vol. 67, No. 3, 1985, pp. 474-481. doi:10.2307/1925976
[9] M. E. Kreinin and M. G. Plummer, “Effects of Regional Integration of FDI: An Empirical Approach,” Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 19, No. 5-6, 2008, pp. 447-454. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2008.09.005
[10] A. K. Rose, “Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?” American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 1, 2004, pp. 98-114. doi:10.1257/000282804322970724
[11] J.-W. Lee and K. Shin, “Does Regionalism Lead to More Global Trade Integration in East Asia?” North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2006, pp. 283-301. doi:10.1016/j.najef.2006.06.007
[12] B. H. Baltagi, P. Egger and M. Pfaffermayr, “A Generalized Design for Bilateral Trade Flow Models,” Economic Letters, Vol. 80, No. 3, 2003, pp. 391-97. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00115-0
[13] J. A. Hausman, “Specification Tests in Econometrics,” Econometrica, Vol. 46, No. 6, 1978, pp. 1251-1271. doi:10.2307/1913827
[14] S.-J. Wei and J. A. Frankel, “Open versus Closed Trading Blocs,” In: T. Ito and A. O. Krueger, Eds., Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Agreements, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1997, pp. 119-140.
[15] I.-H. Cheng and H. J. Wall, “Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade and Integration,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 87, No. 1, 2005, pp. 49-63.
[16] B. H. Baltagi and P. X. Wu, “Unequally Spaced Panel Data Regressions with AR (1) Disturbances,” Econometric Theory, Vol. 15, No. 6, 1999, pp. 814-823. doi:10.1017/S0266466699156020
[17] I. Arribas, F. Pérez and E. Tortosa-Ausina, “Measuring Globalization of International Trade: Theory and Evidence,” World Development, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2009, pp. 127-145. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.03.009
[18] OECD, “Shaping Policy Reform and Peer Review in Southeast Asia,” OECD, Paris, 2008.
[19] H. G. Grubel and P. J. Lloyd, “Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products,” Macmillan, London, 1975.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.