Authentic Situations Motivate Medical Students for Dealing with Medical Insurance Issues—A Study of Learning Styles and E-Learning


In this study, e-learning based on authentic situations was used as a pedagogic method to stimulate medical students to reflect over their own learning styles and to prepare them for dealing with medical insurance issues in their future profession. The aim was to explore the learning styles used by the students in a Social medicine course when e-learning, based on authentic situations was used as a pedagogical approach. A learning style questionnaire by Kember, Biggs and Leung, and a course evaluation questionnaire designed by the authors were used. Seventy-seven students answered the questionnaires and the questionnaires were analysed by Mann-Whitney U-test, and Fisher’s test was used as a pair comparison. One hundred forty comments made by the students were analysed using content analysis. The results showed that: 69% of the students regarded e-learning as a very good/good pedagogical method to study medical insurance. Men had a significantly higher rate of surface learning than women. A majority of the students thought that it was positive to take part of peer students’ assignments but they highlighted the risk of plagiarism and cheating. The students made use of the flexibility in this type of learning which suited their lifestyle.

Share and Cite:

Nielsen, S. , Plos, K. , Furaker, C. & Jakobsson, A. (2012). Authentic Situations Motivate Medical Students for Dealing with Medical Insurance Issues—A Study of Learning Styles and E-Learning. Creative Education, 3, 120-125. doi: 10.4236/ce.2012.31020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Akerlind, G. S., & Trevitt, C. (1999). Enhancing self-directed learning through educational technology: When students resist the change. Innovations in Education and Training International, 36, 96-105. doi:10.1080/1355800990360202
[2] Bedford, T. A. (2006). Learning styles. A review of English-language literature. In R. R. Sims & S. J. Sims (Eds.), Learning styles and learning. A key to Meeting the accountability demands in Education. New York: Nova Science Publ. Inc.
[3] Bengtsson, M., & Olsson, B. (2010). The nursing and medical students motivation to attain knowledge. Nurse Education Today, 30, 150-156. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.07.005 PMid:19692152
[4] Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at University. London: Open University Press.
[5] Biggs, J. (1976). Dimensions of studying behaviour. Another look at ATI. British journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 68-80. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02987.x
[6] Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. New York: Open University Press.
[7] Carroll, J., Appleton, J. (2009). Plagiarism: A Good Practice Guide. JISC and Oxford
[8] Brookes University. URL (lasted checked 3 January 2012).
[9] Clayton, K., Blomberg, F., & Auld, D. P. (2001). The relationship between motivation, learning strategies and choice of environment whether traditional or including an online component. British Journal of Educational Technology, 4, 349-364.
[10] Cook, D. A. (2009). The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Medical Teacher, 31, 158-162. doi:10.1080/01421590802691393 PMid:19330674
[11] Entwistle, N. J. (1977). Strategies of learning and studying: Regent research findings. British Journal of Educational Studies, 25, 225-238. doi:10.2307/3120694 doi:10.1080/00071005.1977.9973497
[12] Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105-112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 PMid:14769454
[13] Kember, D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. Y. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 133-149.
[14] Kim, S., Phillips, W. R., Huntington, J., Astion, M. L., Keerbs, A., Pin-sky, L., Dresden, G., Sharma, U., & Shearer, D. W. (2007). Medical case teaching on the web. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 19, 106-114. doi:10.1080/10401330701332169
[15] Kjellgren, K., Hendry, G. D., Hultberg, J., Plos, K., Rydmark, M., Tobin, G., & S?lj?, R. (2008). Learning to learn and learning to teach— Introduction to studies in higher education. Medical Teacher, 30, 239-245. doi:10.1080/01421590802258896 PMid:18946811
[16] Lindblom-Yl?nne, S., & Lonka, K. (2001). Students’ perceptions of assessments practice in a traditional medical curriculum. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 6, 121-140. doi:10.1023/A:1011422517238
[17] Marton, F., & Booth, S. A. (1997). Learning and awareness. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[18] Marton, F., & S?lj?, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
[19] Ministry of Education and Research. (2003). The act of ethical trail of research concerning humans (In Swedish). The Swedish Statute Book. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
[20] Njenga, J. K., & Fourie, C. H. (2010). The myths about e-learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 199-212. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00910.x
[21] Ramsden, P. (2007). Learning to teach in higher education. Cornwall: TJ International Ltd.
[22] S?lj?, R. (2000). Learning in practice (in Swedish). Stockholm: Prisma.
[23] Schunk, D. K., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education. Theory research and applications. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
[24] Swedish National Agency for Higher Education (2007). Evaluation of undergraduate training in medicine and care at Swedish universities (in Swedish). Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Higher Education.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.