The Structural Constant s0 of All Atoms as a Universal Physical Constant

Abstract

A universal physical constant (or fundamental constant) is an empirical physical quantity that remains unchanged throughout the universe and across time. All of these properties are satisfied by the structural constant of all atoms s0, shown in the article [1], and fine-structure constant α= e 2 / ( 2 ε 0 hc ) , which was introduced into physics by Arnold Sommerfeld in 1915, and therefore we can claim that that constants are universal physical constants which is also called a natural constants like the speed of light c, Newton constant of gravitation G, vacuum magnetic permeability µ0, vacuum electric permittivity ε0 or others, like cosmological constant Λ, elementary charge e, electron mass me, proton mass mp, neutron mass mn or Avogadro constant NA and so on. I note that Planck’s h is not among the above-mentioned universal constants. The reason for this is that according to my earlier research Planck’s h is a complex physical quantity consisting of the aforementioned universal constants and structural constant s0: h= μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 , [2]. If the fine-structure constant α is determined precisely in a different way, as done in the article [3], then expression α is used to determine Planck’s h and finally to calculate the structural constant s0. We will use this fact to write this article. With very precise data for the fine-structure constant α, this is the most accurate calculation for s0.

Share and Cite:

Perkovac, M. (2026) The Structural Constant s0 of All Atoms as a Universal Physical Constant. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 14, 3293-3300. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2026.149163.

1. Introduction

The structure constant s0 of all atoms refers to the quantity obtained when all atoms in the Mendeleev’s periodic table are ionized, when electrons are ejected from each atom, down to the last electron, until the atom is ionized to the very nucleus of each atom.

I note that the structure constant s0 was independently measured when measuring the ionization energy of all atoms [1]:

s 0 = zZ 2 n ±1 1 [ 1 e V em( n ) m c 2 ] 2 .

Let us now recall the meaning of quantities in this equation. Z is the atomic number in Mendeleev’s periodic table, z is the number of electrons in one orbital of the atom, n±1, is the ordinal number of an orbital (shall) in an atom. This expression, in addition to the usual paths n= n +1 =1,2,3,4, , also predicts paths n= n 1 =1,2,3,4, , which opens up the possibility of electron paths in the atom below the first orbit, so for ex ample a neutron can be considered a hydrogen atom with path n = n1 = 126, whereby the mass of the electron in neutron due its speed and relativistic effects increases so much that the neutron become 0.14% heavier than the proton [2], m is the rest mass of one electron, c is the speed of light in vacuum, e is the charge of one electron and Vem(n) is the ionization potential of a single atom.

From the previous equation for s0, two equations for Vem are obtained:

V em( 1 ) = m c 2 ze [ 1 1 ( 1 n ±1 zZ 2 s 0 2 ) 2 ] ,

V em( 2 ) = m c 2 ze [ 1+ 1 ( 1 n ±1 zZ 2 s 0 2 ) 2 ].

The solution Vem(1) is for the lower (ionization) voltages (namely, we will see later after we determinate s0, for q = −e, z = 1, n±1 = 1) when Z is going from 0 to 137.035999166(15), than ionization voltage Vem(1) is going from 0 V to 510 999 V, and the solution Vem(2) (q = −e, z = 1, Z = 1/n±1) when Z is going from 0 to 137.035999166(15) (ionization) voltage Vem(2) goes in opposite direction from 1 020 130 V to 510 999 V.

The value of structural constant s0 is the same for all atoms (see Table 1).

Table 1. Structural constant of atoms s0 calculated on the basis of ionization voltage according NIST’s data*.

Chemical symbol

Atom number Z

Ionization voltage [V]

Structural constant s0

Remark

n0, H

1

712207.805, 13.59843449*

8.278691910036

In Vem(2) n1 = 126

He

2

54.4177650*

8.277860595602

Li

3

122.4543581*

8.277755226469

Be

4

217.7185843*

8.277739553105

B

5

340.226020*

8.277739896484

C

6

489.993194*

8.277757231963

N

7

667.046116*

8.277771755296

O

8

871.409880*

8.277791688375

F

9

1103.11747*

8.277812276144

Ne

10

1362.19915*

8.277842618038

Ca

20

5469.8615*

8.278203152589

Zn

30

12388.929*

8.278637976575

Zr

40

22236.677*

8.279106265650

Sn

50

35192.39*

8.279610860584

Nd

60

51515.58*

8.280166600276

Yb

70

71574.80*

8.280846679237

Hg

80

95897.70*

8.281775555833

Th

90

125253.40*

8.283267729872

Fm

100

160804.00*

8.286011987216

Ds

110

204394.00*

8.291558770012

Latest data at NIST

NIST: National Institute of Standard and Technology. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institute_of_Standards_and_Technology*https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/ionEnergy.html

As we can see, all s0 values for all atoms are concentrated around the value 8.278 - 8.291. For precise determination, more accurate measurement is required. For this purpose, we will use another most accurate measurement.

The most accurate value of the inverse fine-structure constant, more accurate than previous results obtained based on the ionization energies of atoms, [1], is given in the article [3] and it is by Arnold Sommerfeld:

α 1 = 2 ε 0 hc/ e 2 =137.035999166( 15 )[ 0.11ppb ] . (1)

This was obtained by measuring the magnetic moment of the electron, which is the most accurate way to determine the fine-structure constant α. Therefore, this can be a guide for determining the structure constant s0, and we will use it in the following.

We assume that Planck’s h in Equation (1) is not predefined. Therefore, Planck’s h from Equation (1) can be expressed as:

h= α 1 e 2 / ( 2 ε 0 c ) = α 1 e 2 μ 0 c/2 , (2)

taking into account that it is worth:

μ 0 ε 0 c 2 =1 . (3)

Planck’s h is, according to article [2], based on the Lecher line model of the atom [2], equal to:

h= μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 . (4)

Here is the explanation! The characteristics of an oscillatory circuit obtained from a Lecher line depend only on the parameters of inductance L and capacitance C of that circuit, and not on variables in that circuit, such as charges, currents, or voltages. Thus, it was shown that the electromagnetic energy Eem of this oscillator is proportional to its own frequency f=1/ ( 2π LC ) , and a constant h, Eem = hf, and this constant h itself is h= μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 . This represents the well-known Planck’s law for the energy of an electromagnetic wave, and here it is the energy of an electromagnetic oscillator created from a Lecher line.

Using Equation (1), and equating Equations (2) and (4), the structural constant s0 is obtained:

s 0 = 1 2 =8.27756 . (5)

Using Equation (5), and according to article [2], the maximum number of different type of atoms in Mendeleev’s table, not counting isotopes, is:

1/B =2 s 0 2 =137.035999166 . (6)

The explanation for the stated amount comes from determining the speed that an electron can reach in the first shell of an atom ( n ±1 =1 ) in relation to the speed of light:

β max = v max c = 1 n ±1 z Z max 2 s 0 2 =1 .

From here for z = 1, n ±1 =1 it follows that Z max =2 s 0 2 , that is Equation (6).

From Equation (6) it follows that the distance between two adjacent types of atoms, and I suggest that this measure be called a unit of measurement for a type of substance “boscovich”, B, [4] is equal to:

B=1/ ( 2 s 0 2 ) =7.297352568× 10 3 . (7)

Equation (7) simultaneously represents the fine-structure constant α according to NIST in 2022 CODATA.

From Equations (4) and (5) comes Planck’s h:

h= μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 =6.626070159× 10 34 J Hz 1 .(8)

This value in Equation (8) exactly matches the value of Planck’s h obtained by NIST in 2022, CODATA. In the same time, it can be seen from Table 2 that all other results are precisely aligned with NIST in 2022 CODATA, i.e., without difference, using the results from article [3] and the results from the two remaining articles [1] and [2].

Such good agreement of the results with CODATA values using the new constant s0 would not be possible without a new fundamental constant s0, which is independent and precisely measurable. Namely if s0 were not a universal physical constant, at least one of the 9 physical quantities in Table 2 would not match the values in CODATA 2022.

Table 2. Eight (8) initial constants (s0, B, 1/B, c, μ0, e, m, mp) convert (9) nine constants in interchangeable.

Quantity

Symbol

Formula

Value

Unit

Differencea

Structural constant of all atoms

s0

s0 Equation (5)

8.27756b

1

unknown

Unit of substance type = boscovich

Max. number of diff. type of atoms

Speed of light in vacuum

B

1/B

c

1/ ( 2 s 0 2 ) Equation (7)

2 s 0 2 Equation (6)

ε 0 μ 0 c 2 =1

7.297352568 × 103

137.035999166

299792458

1

1

m·s1

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Vacuum magnetic permeability

μ0

μ0

1.256637061 × 106

N·A2

0.0000

Elementary charge

e

e

1.602176634 × 1019

C

0.0000

Electron mass

m

m

9.1093837139 × 1031

kg

0.0000

Proton mass

mp

mp

1.6726219259 × 1027

kg

0.0000

Down: 9 interchangeable constants

1. Fine-structure constant: e 2 / ( 2 ε 0 hc )

α

e 2 / ( 2 ε 0 hc ) Equation1

7.2973525643 × 103

1

0.0000

1. a) Inverse-fine structure constant

α1

2 ε 0 hc/ e 2 Equation1

1.370035999 × 102

1

0.0000

2. von Klitzing constant

RK

μ 0 c s 0 2

2.581280744 × 104

Ω

0.0000

3. Planck constant

h

μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2

6.626070158 × 1034

J·Hz1

0.0000

3. a) Conversion constant, K0

K0

1/ ( 2 μ 0 ce s 0 2 )

1.208994631 × 1014

Hz·V1

unknown

4. Ratio e/h = 2K0

e/h

1/ ( μ 0 ce s 0 2 )

2.41798926 × 1014

Hz·V1

0.0000

5. Josephson constant = 4K0

KJ

2/ ( μ 0 ce s 0 2 )

4.835978524 × 1014

Hz·V1

0.0000

6. Rydberg constant

R

m/ ( 8 μ 0 e 2 s 0 6 )

1.0973731568 × 107

m1

0.0000

7. Bohr radius

a0

μ 0 e 2 s 0 4 / ( πm )

5.291772116 × 1011

m

0.0000

8. Bohr magneton

μB

μ 0 c e 3 s 0 2 / ( 4πm )

9.274010015 × 1024

J·T1

0.0000

9. Nuclear magneton

μN

μ 0 c e 3 s 0 2 / ( 4π m p )

5.050783626 × 1027

J·T1

0.0000

aIt is the difference with “2022 CODATA recommended values” in percent. https://physics.nist.gov/constants. bThis calculation is based on the values provided by Equation (1), Equation (2) and Equation (4). Structural constant s0 has not yet been included in the physical quantities at NIST. The exact results from this article should change that and the structural constant of all atoms s0 should be included in the universal physical constants.

2. Methods

This article uses a theoretical and experimental approach. First, the method of Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment in [3] was used. From there, a very precise inverse value of the fine-structure constant was obtained in Equation (1). From Equation (1) express the unknown Planck’s h= α 1 e 2 μ 0 c/2 in Equation (2). Since according to article in [2] Planck’s h is equal to h= μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 then

from these last two equations it follows s 0 = 1 2 =8.27756 , that is, Equation (5).

Planck’s h thus derived from the Lecher line as an oscillator is consistent with QED, as can be seen from the article [2]. Thus, we accurately calculated the structure constant of all atoms s0 in the simplest way. Table 2 shows the significance and value of this calculation of the structural constant of all atoms s0, because through this constant all the values of all 9 interchangeable constants in that Table 2 are obtained exactly in accordance with NIST 2022 CODATA. This fulfills the prerequisites for declaring the structural constant of all atoms s0 as a universal physical constant.

Maxwell theory with Theory of relativity give good result in describing most phenomena in the atom, such as the radiation of electromagnetic energy, discretization of states in the atom, the determination of stationary orbits, the determination and calculation of the structural constant of the atom s0.

3. Results

The theory presented here explains that in atoms, in addition to the discrete states n+1 = 1, 2, 3, 4 discrete states n1 = 1, 2, 3, 4, are also present. Therefore, for example, it is possible that in the discrete states n1 = 126 a hydrogen atom acquires the properties of a neutron. To achieve this, the existence of an electromagnetic oscillator inside the atom is assumed. This oscillator is described using the Lecher transmission line. The Lecher line does not actually exist within an atom however, a mathematical model of that line is used, just a mathematical is used in space exploration without the actual presence of planets in that model.

In the paper [2] it was shown that an oscillator derived from the Lecher line corresponds to an atom as an oscillator according to QED (Quantum electrodynamics). Thus, the emitted or absorbed electromagnetic energy of the atom is proportional to the natural frequency fn of that oscillator and the quantity h= μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 , which by definition is Planck’s constant. Provided that s0 is constant, which the measurements in Table 1 show, this is a different way to derive Planck’s constant within the framework of QED. In this case, the natural frequency of the oscillator fn is equal to [2]:

f n = mc z 2 Z 2 8 e 2 μ 0 ( n ±1 ) 2 s 0 6 1 ( 1 n ±1 zZ 2 s 0 2 ) 2 .

The maximum number Z = Zmax in periodic table, not counting isotopes, is determined by the velocity vmax, which can be reached by an electron (z = 1) in its first

shell (n±1 = 1) relative to the speed of light, i.e. when β max = v max c = 1 n ±1 z Z max 2 s 0 2 =1 .

For z = 1 and n = 1 Z max =2 s 0 2 =137.035999166 . Since this number is related to the maximum speed of electrons in an atom, this number does not necessarily have to be a whole number.

4. Conclusions

First, the method of Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment in [3] was used. From there, a very precise inverse value of the fine-structure constant was obtained in Equation (1). From Equation (1) express the unknown Planck’s h= α 1 e 2 μ 0 c/2 in Equation (2). Since according to article in [2] Planck’s h is equal

to h= μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 then from these last two equations it follows s 0 = 1 2 =8.27756 ,

that is, Equation (5). Thus, we accurately calculated the structure constant of all atoms s0 in the simplest way. Table 2 shows the significance and value of this calculation of the structural constant of all atoms s0, because through this constant all the values of all 9 interchangeable constants in that Table 2 are obtained exactly in accordance with NIST 2022 CODATA. This fulfills the prerequisites for declaring the structural constant of all atoms s0 as a universal physical constant.

It is crucial for this article that it directly adopts the results for the fine-structure constant α= e 2 / ( 2 ε 0 hc ) obtained from the article [3]. It is important to note that in this expression Planck’s h is considered a variable, h= μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 , the value of which has yet to be determined. By equating Planck’s h from the previous two expressions, it is possible to calculate the structural constant s0 of all atoms:

s 0 = 1 2 =8.27756 . As can be seen from Table 2, this has achieved an important

goal. Namely, now with the help of eight initial constants (s0, B, 1/B, c, μ0, e, m, mp), nine other constants (α, RK, h, e/h, KJ, R, a0, μB, μN; https://physics.nist.gov/constants) are converted into interchangeable. It is important to note that all of these 9 obtained quantities have values equal to those of NIST in 2022 CODATA. This means that the structural constant of all atoms derived here, s0 = 8.7756, can be taken as a new universal physical constant, with which constant is all this simple and easy to do. The method of calculating all 9 physical quantities using that structural constant s0 is listed in Table 2, see the formulas in that table.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Tomislav Ivezić, Davor Horvatić, Filip Vučić. Branko Kuzmanović supported the idea about the relativistic increase in the mass of the proton to the level of the mass of the neutron and thus the increase in the gravitational field of the isotope. I would like to thank Sonja Fištrek, Nikola Blažević, Srebrenka Ursić, Damir Vuk, Zlatko Voloder, Daobor Belamarić, Josip Silović, Krunomir Dvorski, Anton Lipovka, Eytan Suchard, Stipe Kutleša, Josip Zdenković, Perica Babić, Draženko Jakovac, Zdravko Berić, Slavica Lovrin, Mirjana Moslavac, Fikreta Kovačević, Ksenija Plantak, Branko Žaja, Strahimir Sučić, Jože Muhič and my family for their support in my research.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Perkovac, M. (2026) Fine-Structure Constant Derived from the Structural Constant of All Atoms. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 14, 480-498.[CrossRef]
[2] Perkovac, M. (2025) Discrete States in Atoms as a Consequence of Maxwell’s Equations and the Theory of Relativity. International Journal of Statistics and Data Science, 1, 19-37. https://www.hillpublisher.com/ArticleDetails/5225[CrossRef]
[3] Fan, X., Myers, T.G., Sukra, B.A.D. and Gabrielse, G. (2023) Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment. Physical Review Letters, 130, Article ID: 071801.https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.071801[CrossRef]
[4] Perkovac, M. (2024) New Physical Quantity and Unit of Type of Substance. Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 58. https://biomedres.us/fulltexts/BJSTR.MS.ID.009182.php[CrossRef]

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.