Solution for the Interpretation Problems Regarding Empirical Equations for Calculating the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature

Abstract

We build upon previously proposed empirical equations involving the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature and extend the approach to include an empirical formulation for the fine-structure constant. To ensure consistency across these relationships, revised values for the CMB temperature (Tc) and the gravitational constant (G) were obtained. The recalculated gravitational constant, 6.68917534 × 1011 m3·kg1·s2, remains marginally greater than the accepted value of 6.6743 × 1011. A recalculated CMB temperature of 2.7256307 K matched the observed value of 2.72548 ± 0.00057 K. We subsequently tried to validate Equation (12) independent of the MKSA unit system. However, interpretation problems occurred in our proof. In this report, we propose a correct proof for Equation (12) with an explanation for the relationship between macroscopic units and microscopic units. Furthermore, using our algorithms, we can explain the relationships among the various units within and outside the MKSA unit system.

Share and Cite:

Miyashita, T. (2025) Solution for the Interpretation Problems Regarding Empirical Equations for Calculating the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature. Journal of Modern Physics, 16, 1861-1877. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2025.1612085.

1. Introduction

The symbol list is shown in Section 2. We describe Equations (1), (2) and (3) in terms of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature [1]-[5].

G m p 2 hc = 4.5 2 × k T c 1kg× c 2 (1)

G m p 2 ( e 2 4π ε 0 ) = 4.5 2π × m e e ×hc (2)

m e c 2 e ×( e 2 4π ε 0 )=π×k T c (3)

We derived an empirical equation for the fine-structure constant [6]. Equations (4) and (5) are related to the transference number [7] [8].

1 α =137.0359991=136.0113077+ 1 3×13.5 +1 (4)

13.5×136.0113077=1836.152654= m p m e (5)

Deviations of the values of 9/2 and π have been discussed for reducing the induced errors [9]-[14]. We named the coefficient related to length (m2/s) as follows [15]. In general, we used kL. When we used MKSA units, we used kL0.

k L ( m 2 s )=1837.94538 ( m 2 s ) MKSA k L0 ( m 2 s ) MKSA (6)

where the subscript “MKSA” indicates the MKSA unit system.

3.1327945( Vm )= k L0 × m e c 2 ec (7)

4.4873976( 1 Am )= q m c k L0 × m p c 2 (8)

By redefining the von Klitzing constant (Ω), these values can be adjusted back to 9/2 and π [15].

π( Vm )= k L0 × m e c 2 e new c (9)

4.5( 1 Am )= q m_new c k L0 × m p c 2 (10)

Then, the value of kL0 can be obtained using the following equation.

4.4873976 4.5 × π 3.1327945 =1 (11)

Then, we introduce the following simple equation.

m p c 2 × m e c 2 × 4.5 π h c 2 = ( 2π( 1 )× k T c α ) 2 =1.04985584E39 (12)

The calculated CMB temperature of 2.7256307 K matched the observed value of 2.72548 ± 0.00057 K. We then tried to prove the validity of Equation (12) independent of the MKSA unit system [15]. However, interpretation problems occurred with respect to the units used in the previous proof. In this report, to solve these problems, we propose a correct proof for Equation (12) with an explanation of the relationship between macroscopic units and microscopic units. Furthermore, using our algorithms, we can explain the relationships among the various units within and outside the MKSA unit system. Quantum mechanics [16] and gravity [17] have been used to provide thermodynamic explanations for the validity of this equation. Our motivation is to use thermodynamic principles in the area of solid-state ionics, which we discovered [18].

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the list of symbols used in our derivations. In Section 3, we propose the correct proof of Equation (12) with an explanation for the relationship between macroscopic units and microscopic units. In Section 4, we attempt to explain the relationships among the various units within and outside the MKSA unit system. In Section 5, our conclusions are provided.

2. Symbol List

2.1. MKSA Units (These Values Were Obtained from Wikipedia)

G: Gravitational constant: 6.6743 × 10−11 (m3∙kg−1∙s−2)

(we used the compensated value of 6.68917534 × 10−11 in this study)

Tc: CMB temperature: 2.72548 ± 0.00057 (K)

(we used the compensated value of 2.725630647 K in this study)

k: Boltzmann constant: 1.380649 × 10−23 (J∙K−1)

c: Speed of light: 299,792,458 (m/s)

h: Planck constant: 6.62607015 × 10−34 (J∙s)

ε0: Electric constant: 8.8541878128 × 10−12 (N∙m2∙C−2)

μ0: Magnetic constant: 1.25663706212 × 10−6 (N∙A−2)

e: Electric charge of one electron: −1.602176634 × 10−19 (C)

qm: Magnetic charge of one magnetic monopole: 4.13566770 × 1015 (Wb)

(this value is only a theoretical value, qm = h/e)

mp: Resting mass of a proton: 1.67262192369 × 1027 (kg)

me: Resting mass of an electron: 9.1093837015 × 1031 (kg)

Rk: von Klitzing constant: 25812.80745 (Ω)

Z0: Wave impedance in free space: 376.730313668 (Ω)

α: Fine-structure constant: 1/137.035999081

λp: Compton wavelength of a proton: 1.32141 × 1015 (m)

λe: Compton wavelength of an electron: 2.4263102367 × 1012 (m)

2.2. Symbol List Obtained after the Redefinition Process

e new =e× 4.4873976 4.5 =1.5976897E19( C ) (13)

q m_ new = q m × π 3.1327945 =4.1472823E15( Wb ) (14)

h new = e new × q m_new =h× 4.4873976 4.5 × π 3.1327945 =6.62607015E34( Js )=h (15)

Therefore, the value of Planck’s constant is unchanged.

R k _ new = q m_new e _new =Rk× 4.5 4.4873976 × π 3.1327945 =25957.997( Ω ) (16)

Equation (16) can be rewritten as follows:

R k new =4.5( 1 Am )×π( Vm )× m p m e =25957.997( Ω ) (17)

Z 0_new =α× 2 h new e new 2 =2α×R k new = Z 0 × 4.5 4.4873976 × π 3.1327945 =378.84931( Ω ) (18)

Equation (18) can be rewritten as follows:

Z 0_new =4.5( 1 Am )×π( Vm )×2α× m p m e =378.84931( Ω ) (19)

μ 0_new = Z 0_new c = μ 0 × 4.5 4.4873976 × π 3.1327945 =1.2637053E06( N A 2 ) (20)

ε 0_new = 1 Z 0_new ×c = ε 0 × 4.4873976 4.5 × 3.1327945 π =8.8046642E12( F m 1 ) (21)

c _new = 1 ε 0_new μ 0_new = 1 ε 0 μ 0 =c=299792458( m s 1 ) (22)

Therefore, the value of the speed of light can remain unchanged. Next, the Compton wavelength (λ) is as follows:

λ= h mc (23)

When the values of Planck’s constant and the speed of light are unchanged, the following values in Equations (24), (25) and (26) can be kept constant.

m e_new = m e × 4.4873976 4.5 × π 3.1327945 = m e =9.1093837E31( kg ) (24)

m p_new = m p × 4.4873976 4.5 × π 3.1327945 = m p =1.6726219E27( kg ) (25)

k T c_new =k T c × 4.4873976 4.5 × π 3.1327945 =k T c =3.7631393E23( J ) (26)

To simplify the calculation, GN is defined as follows:

G N =G×1kg( m 3 s 2 )=6.68917521E11( m 3 s 2 ) (27)

In the previous report, we proposed the following compensation relation.

G N_new = G N × 1 ( 1.001113745 ) 2 ( m 3 s 2 )=6.6743E11( m 3 s 2 ) (28)

2.3. Symbol List in Terms of the Compton Length of an Electron (λe), the Compton Length of a Proton (λp) and α

The following equations were proposed in a previous study [10]:

m e_new c 2 × k L0 2 ( J m 4 s 2 )= π 4.5 ( Vm×Am )× λ p c( m 2 s )=2.76564E07( J m 4 s 2 ) (29)

e new c× k L0 ( A m 3 s )= 1 4.5 ( Am )× λ p c( m 2 s )=8.80330E08( A m 3 s ) (30)

m p_new c 2 × k L0 2 ( J m 4 s 2 )= π 4.5 ( J m 2 s )× λ e c( m 2 s )=5.07814E04( J m 4 s 2 ) (31)

q m_new c× k L0 ( V m 3 s )=π( Vm )× λ e c( m 2 s )=2.28516E03( V m 3 s ) (32)

k T c_new × 2π α × k L0 3 ( J m 6 s 3 )= π 4.5 ( J m 2 s )× λ p c× λ e c=2.011697E10( J m 6 s 3 ) (33)

G N_new ( m 3 s 2 )= ( λ p c ) 2 ( m 4 s 2 )×c( m s )×αc 4.5( 1 ) 4π( 1 ) × k L0 1 ( m 2 s ) =6.6891752E11( m 3 s 2 ) (34)

In Equation (34), 4π(1) and 4.5(1) are dimensionless quantities.

2.4. Symbol List for the Algorithms Used to Explain Our Empirical Equations

2.4.1. Equations for Establishing the First Symbol List

Equations (35) and (36) are important for establishing the first symbol list. The following expressions can be obtained on the basis of Equations (29)-(34) [13].

h m p = h new m p_new =3.9614871E07=experimental result (35)

h m e = h new m e_new =7.2738951E04=experimental result (36)

e new c( Am )= 1 4.5 × h m p × k L0 1 ( Am )=4.78975317E11( Am ) (37) q m_new c( Vm )=π× h m e × k L0 1 ( Vm )=1.24332398E06( Vm ) (38)

m e_new c 2 ( J )= π 4.5 × h m p × k L0 2 ( J )= m e c 2 ( J )=8.18710591E14( J ) (39)

m p_new c 2 ( J )= π 4.5 × h m e × k L0 2 ( J )= m p c 2 =1.50327764E10( J ) (40)

h new c 2 ( J m 2 s )= π 4.5 × h m p × h m e × k L0 2 ( J m 2 s )=h c 2 =5.95521E17( J m 2 s ) (41)

k T c_new α ( J )= 1 2π( 1 ) × π 4.5 × h m p × h m e × k L0 3 ( J )= k T c α ( J )=5.15685567E21( J ) (42)

G N_new c ( m 3 s 2 )=α 4.5( 1 ) 4π( 1 ) × ( h m p ) 2 × k L0 1 ( m 3 s 2 )=2.2312686696E18 (43)

2.4.2. Equations for Establishing the Second Symbol List

An arbitrary value of the speed of light is used, and the following example is given:

c arbitrary =12345( m arbitrary s ) (44)

where carbitrary and 1 marbitrary are the values of c and 1 m, respectively, when an arbitrary value of the speed of light is used. Importantly, Equation (44) does not indicate a change in the speed of light.

When carbitrary is used, the calculated values on the right sides of Equations (37)-(43) can remain unchanged. This means that except for the value of kTc/α, the values of e, qm, h, me, mp and G change.

Consequently, we can establish the second list.

2.5. Useful Equations in the Previous Report

R k new ( Ω )=4.5( 1 Am )×π( Vm )× m p m e =25957.997( Ω ) (45)

Z 0_new ( Ω )=4.5( 1 Am )×π( Vm )×2α× m p m e =378.84931( Ω ) (46)

1 ε 0_new c ( Ω= kg C 2 m 2 s )= k T c / α c 2 ( e new ) 2 × k L0 ×2π( 1 )×2α=378.8493064( Ω )= Z 0_new (47)

μ 0_new c( Ω= kg C 2 m 2 s )= k T c / α c 2 ( e new ) 2 × k L0 ×2π( 1 )×2α=378.8493064( Ω )= Z 0_new (48)

m p c 2 ( J )×4.5 e new c( 1 )=2π( 1 )× k T c α ( J )=3.24014789E20( J ) (49)

m e c 2 ( J )× q m c π ( 1 )=2π( 1 )× k T c α c 2 ( J )=3.24014789E20( J ) (50)

h c 2 × k L0 1 ( J )=2π( 1 )× k T c α ( J )=3.24014789E20( J ) (51)

e new ( C )= h( Js ) 4.5π( Ω ) × m e m p =1.597689670E19( C ) (52)

q m_new ( Wb )= h( Js )×4.5π( Ω )× m p m e =4.147282338E15( Wb ) (53)

π 4.5 ×h c 2 = m p c 2 × k L0 × m e c 2 × k L0 =4.15752428E17 (54)

In the previous report, the value of kL0 could be obtained using Equation (54).

2.6. Useful Equations Unpublished in the Previous Report

The list of equations in this section can be easily deduced from the equations published in the previous report.

4.5 π ×h c 2 = ( 2π( 1 )× k T c /α ) m p c 2 × ( 2π( 1 )× k T c /α ) m e c 2 =8.530216942E17 (55)

Equation (55) is equal to Equation (12). In Equation (55), the right side is the multiplication of the mass ratio. Therefore, the left side should be dimensionless and constant.

G N_new ( m 3 s 2 )=αc 4.5( 1 ) 4π( 1 ) ×( 4.5× e new c )× e new c× q m_new c m p c 2 =6.6891752E11( m 3 s 2 ) (56)

G N_new ( m 3 s 2 )=αc 4.5( 1 ) 4π( 1 ) × ( 4.5× e new c ) 2 × e new c× π( Vm ) m e c 2 =6.6891752E11( m 3 s 2 ) (57)

Equations (56) and (57) were published in the previous report. However, many variations exist.

G new ( m 3 s 2 )=αc 4.5( 1 ) 4π( 1 ) × ( 4.5 e new c ) 2 × k L0 1kg =6.6891752E11 (58)

G new ( m 3 s 2 )=αc 4.5( 1 ) 4π( 1 ) × ( q m c π ) 2 × k L0 1kg × ( m e m p ) 2 =6.6891752E11 (59)

G new ( m 3 s 2 )=αc 4.5( 1 ) 4π( 1 ) ×( 4.5 π h c 2 )× k L0 1kg ×( m e m p )=6.6891752E11 (60)

2.7. Relationship between the Number of a Particle Mass in 1 kg (MKSA Units) and kL0

Utilizing kL0, the mass number of a particle in kg (MKSA units) can be defined as follows.

1kg m p =5.9786374066E+26= 4.5 π ( 1 AmVm = s J m 2 )× π q m_new c × k L0 ×1kg× c 2 (61)

1kg m e =1.09776911E+30= 4.5 π × 1 4.5 e new c × k L0 ×1kg× c 2 (62)

1kg/ ( 2π( 1 )× k T c α c 2 ) =2.7738091E+36= 1 h c 2 × k L0 ×1kg× c 2 (63)

Equations (61)-(63) can be deduced from Equations (49)-(51). An easier explanation will be given in a later section. The definition of the minimum mass (Mmin) should be changed from Equation (64) to Equation (65).

M min = k T c α c 2 =5.73777561E38( kg ) (64)

M min =2π( 1 )× k T c α c 2 =3.60515074E37( kg ) (65)

3. Methods

In this section, we explain Equation (12). For convenience, Equation (12) is rewritten as follows:

m p c 2 × m e c 2 × 4.5 π h c 2 = ( 2π( 1 )× k T c α ) 2 =1.04985584E39 (66)

Since the constant value of 4.5 has units of 1/A∙m and π has units of V∙m, the value of 4.5/π × hc2 is dimensionless.

We must prove that the value of 4.5/π × hc2 can be treated as the fundamental constant. However, problems occurred with regard to the units in the previous proof. We explain Equation (12) via the following procedure. In this section, we examine Step 1 below.

Step 1: Without using MKSA units, we mathematically prove Equation (12) with an explanation for the relationship between macroscopic units and microscopic units.

Step 2: We attempt to explain the relationships among the various units within and outside the MKSA unit system.

3.1. Interpretation Problems Encountered in the Previous Report

Equation (102) from the previous report is written as follows.

4.5 ( 1 Am ) MKSA =4.5× 10 3 ( 1 C )× 10 3 ( s mm )=4.5× 10 6 ( s Cmm ) (67)

Afterward, the units of C were changed without any explanation. A reviewer noted the error. Furthermore, in the previous report, Equations (52) and (53) were used to prove Equation (12), which should have been avoided for a distinct proof. The redefined values should not have been used.

3.2. Relationship between Macroscopic Units and Microscopic Units

The relationship between macroscopic units and microscopic units is explained in this section. Utilizing macroscopic units,

1 ( Js ) MKSA =1 ( C ) MKSA ×1 ( Wb ) MKSA (68)

Utilizing microscopic units,

( h ) MKSA = ( e ) MKSA × ( q m ) MKSA (69)

The relationship between macroscopic units and microscopic units is as follows:

1 ( C ) MKSA = 1 1.60217663E19 =6.24150907E+18×e ( C ) MKSA (70)

1 ( Wb ) MKSA = 1 4.13566770E15 =2.41798924E+14× q m ( Wb ) MKSA (71)

1 ( Js ) MKSA = 1 6.62607015E34 × ( h ) MKSA =1.50919018E+33× ( h ) MKSA (72)

When Equations (68) and (69) are defined outside the MKSA unit system, we must prove that the value of 4.5/π × hc2 can be treated as the fundamental constant.

3.3. Definition of the Resistance (Ω)

We define the resistance (Ω). Utilizing macroscopic units and microscopic units,

1 ( Wb ) MKSA =1 ( C ) MKSA ×1 ( Ω ) MKSA (73)

( q m ) MKSA = ( e ) MKSA × ( Rk ) MKSA (74)

Then, Rk (A microscopic unit) × 1Ω (A macroscopic unit) should be constant. When we change the definition of 1Ω, the ratio between the numbers of e in 1 C and qm in 1 Wb should be changed. In our proof, we use 1Ω in the MKSA unit. But there are not any problems, the ratio between the numbers of e in 1 C and qm in Wb are unchanged in our proof.

3.4. The Proof for Equation (12)

We want to prove that 4.5/p × hc2 in Equation (12) is unchanged when MKSA units are not used.

Step 1: The value is unchanged when the definition of 1 m is changed.

Step 2: The value is unchanged when the definition of 1 1 s is changed.

Step 3: The value is unchanged when the definition of 1 kg is changed.

3.4.1. Explanation for Changing the Definition of 1 m

When we use a distance of 1 mm instead of 1 m,

1 ( m ) MKSA = 10 3 ×1 ( m ) mmKSA (75)

where the subscript “mmKSA” indicates that a distance of 1 mm is used instead of 1 m in the MKSA unit system.

Afterward, the values of the Planck constant and the speed of light change.

h=6.62607015E34× 10 6 =6.62607015E28( kg mm 2 s ) (76)

c=299792458× 10 3 ( mm s ) (77)

h c 2 =5.9552149E17× 10 12 =5.9552149E5( kg mm 2 s mm 2 s 2 ) (78)

We must consider the following relationship:

1 ( Js ) mmKSA =1 ( C ) mmKSA ×1 ( Wb ) mmKSA (79)

( h ) mmKSA = ( e new ) mmKSA × ( q m_new ) mmKSA (80)

Then, the definitions of e and qm are changed.

e mmKSA = e MKSA × 10 3 =1.60217663E16 ( C ) mmKSA (81)

q m_ mmKSA = q m_MKSA × 10 3 =4.13566770E12 ( Wb ) mmKSA (82)

When the number of electrons contained in 1 C is decreased, the actual value of 1 C is decreased.

1 ( C ) MKSA = 10 3 ×1 ( C ) mmKSA (83)

1 ( Wb ) MKSA = 10 3 ×1 ( Wb ) mmKSA (84)

Therefore,

( Am ) MKSA = ( Cm s ) MKSA = 10 3 ( C ) mmKSA × 10 3 ( m s ) mmKSA = 10 6 ( Cm s ) mmKSA (85)

( Vm ) MKSA = ( Wbm s ) MKSA = 10 3 ( Wb ) mmKSA × 10 3 ( m s ) mmKSA = 10 6 ( Wbm s ) mmKSA (86)

From Equations (78), (85) and (86),

( 4.5 π h c 2 ) mmKSA =5.95521E17× 10 12 × 10 12 =5.95521E17= ( 4.5 π h c 2 ) MKSA (87)

Consequently, the value of 4.5/π × hc2 can be treated as the fundamental constant.

3.4.2. Explanation for Changing the Definition of 1 s

1) Simpler explanation

When we use a distance of 1 ms instead of 1 s, the value for the speed of the light changes.

c=299792458× 10 3 ( m ms ) (88)

Then,

c=299792458× 10 3 ( km s ) (89)

Therefore, we use a distance of 1 km instead of 1 m. Then, the proof for changing the definition of 1 s is the same as that for changing the definition of 1 m.

Consequently, the value of 4.5/π × hc2 can be treated as the fundamental constant.

2) The other explanation

The units of the Planck constant are as follows.

h=6.62607015E34( kg m 2 s ) (90)

In Equation (90), the units of “seconds” is only one. However, the units of the distance are two. Thus, we cannot use the same method explained in Section 3.4.1. We change the unit of the Planck constant to a Lorentz-invariant mass of 1 (1 kg × 1 s) instead of 1 kg.

h=6.62607015E34( ( kgs ) m 2 s 2 ) (91)

Then, the value of the Planck constant is changed.

h=6.62607015E34× 10 6 =6.62607015E40( ( kgs ) m 2 ms 2 ) (92)

Then,

h=6.62607015E34× 10 6 =6.62607015E40( ( kgs ) km 2 s 2 ) (93)

Therefore, we use a distance of 1 km instead of 1 m. Then, the proof for changing the definition of 1 s is the same as that for changing the definition of 1 m.

Consequently, the value of 4.5/π × hc2 can be treated as the fundamental constant.

3.4.3. Explanation for Changing the Definition of 1 kg

When we use 1 mg as the definition of the mass instead of 1 kg,

1 ( kg ) MKSA = 10 6 ×1 ( kg ) MmgSA (94)

where the subscript “MmgSA” indicates that a mass of 1 mg is used instead of 1 kg in the MKSA unit system.

Afterward, the values of the Planck constant change.

h ( Js ) MmgSA =6.62607015E34× 10 6 =6.62607015E28 ( ( kgs ) m 2 s 2 ) MmgSA (95)

In this case, the definition of the speed of light is unchanged. Considering the relationship between macroscopic units and microscopic units, the definitions of e and qm are changed.

e MmgSA = e MKSA × 10 3 =1.60217663E16 ( C ) MmgSA (96)

q m_ MmgSA = q m_MKSA × 10 3 =4.13566770E12 ( Wb ) MmgSA (97)

When the number of electrons contained in 1 C is decreased, the actual value of 1 C is decreased.

1 ( C ) MKSA = 10 3 ×1 ( C ) MmgSA (98)

1 ( Wb ) MKSA = 10 3 ×1 ( Wb ) MmgSA (99)

Therefore,

( Am ) MKSA = ( Cm s ) MKSA = 10 3 ( C ) MmgSA ×1 ( m s ) MmgSA = 10 3 ( Cm s ) MmgSA (100)

( Vm ) MKSA = ( Wbm s ) MKSA = 10 3 ( Wb ) MmgSA ×1 ( m s ) MmgSA = 10 3 ( Wbm s ) MmgSA (101)

From Equations (95), (100) and (101),

( 4.5 π h c 2 ) MmgSA =5.95521E17× 10 6 × 10 6 =5.95521E17= ( 4.5 π h c 2 ) MKSA (102)

Consequently, the value of 4.5/π × hc2 can be treated as the fundamental constant.

4. Results

In this section, using our algorithm, we attempt to explain the relationships among the various units within and outside the MKSA unit system.

4.1. The Meanings of the Compton Length and kL0

We define the minimum mass (Mmin) as follows:

M min =2π( 1 )× k T c α c 2 =3.60515074E37( kg ) (103)

M min × c 2 =2.02234E01( eV ) (104)

Then, we note that the Compton length of the minimum mass is as follows:

λ Mmin = h 2π×k T c / α c 2 ×c = k L0 c =6.1307259( μm ) (105)

In Equation (105), the reason for dividing the value by the light speed is to express the units (m/s) in the MKSA unit system. Next, we consider the units of KL0, which are expressed in the MKSA unit system.

k L0 =1837.94538( m 2 s )=1837.94538( s m s m s ) (106)

In Equation (104), the units of m/s are increased. To express the increased unit (m/s) in the MKSA unit system, the value should be divided by the light speed. So,

k L0 c 2 = k L0 c 2 = 1837.94538 299792458 2 =2.044990E14( s )= 1 4.889999E+13 ( s ) (107)

According to Einstein,

E=m c 2 (108)

E=hν (109)

Therefore,

ν= m c 2 h (110)

Then, we propose the following equation,

ν× k L0 c 2 = m c 2 h × k L0 c 2 (111)

So, when the Mmin is used as the mass (m),

ν× k L0 c 2 = ( M min × k L0 )× c 2 h c 2 =1 (112)

In Equation (112), the calculated value is 1.

4.2. Relationship between the Macroscopic Units and Microscopic Units of kL0 and 1 kg

Next, we must consider the relationship between the macroscopic units and microscopic units of kL0 and 1 kg.

For convenience, Equations (61)-(63) are rewritten as follows:

1kg m p =5.9786374066E+26= 4.5 π ( 1 AmVm = s J m 2 )× π q m_new c × k L0 ×1kg× c 2 (113)

1kg m e =1.09776911E+30= 4.5 π × 1 4.5 e new c × k L0 ×1kg× c 2 (114)

1kg/ ( 2π( 1 )× k T c α c 2 ) =2.7738091E+36= 1 h c 2 × k L0 ×1kg× c 2 (115)

Utilizing macroscopic units and microscopic units,

1 kg standard =1 kg MKSA × k L0 ( 1 ) 1 =5.44086E04 ( kg ) MKSA (116)

m p_standard = m p × k L0 ( 1 )=3.074187738E24 ( kg ) MKSA (117)

where kL0(1) is 1837.94538 and dimensionless. 1 kgstandard is the standard macroscopic mass. m p_standard is the standard microscopic mass of a proton. Then, from Equations (113)-(115),

1 kg standard m p × k L0 =3.2528918E+23 = 4.5 π ( 1 AmVm = s J m 2 )× π q m_new c ×1 kg standard × c 2 (118)

1 kg standard m e × k L0 =5.97280593E+26= 4.5 π × 1 4.5 e new c ×1 kg standard × c 2 (119)

1 kg standard / ( 2π( 1 )× k T c α c 2 )× k L0 =1.509190180E+33= 1 h c 2 ×1 kg standard × c 2 (120)

In Equations (118)-(120), the number of particles can be changed.

4.3. Modifying the List Given in the Section 2.4.1

We can modify the list written in Section 2.4.1.

e new c( Am )= 1 4.5 × h m p × k L0 ( Am )=4.78975317E11( Am ) (121) q m_new c( Vm )=π× h m e × k L0 ( Vm )=1.24332398E06( Vm ) (122)

m e c 2 × k L0 ( J m 2 s )= π 4.5 × h m p × k L0 =1.50474532E10( J m 2 s ) (123)

m p c 2 × k L0 ( J m 2 s )= π 4.5 × h m e × k L0 ( J m 2 s )=2.76294215E07( J m 2 s ) (124)

h c 2 ( J m 2 s )= π 4.5 × h m p × k L0 × h m e × k L0 ( J m 2 s )=5.95521E17( J m 2 s ) (125)

k T c α × k L0 ( J m 2 s )= 1 2π × π 4.5 × h m p × k L0 × h m e × k L0 ( J m 2 s ) =9.47801882E18( J m 2 s ) (126)

G N_new ( m 3 s 2 )=αc 4.5( 1 ) 4π( 1 ) × ( h m p × k L0 ) 2 × k L0 ( m 3 s 2 )=6.6891752E11( m 3 kg s 2 ) (127)

Then, Equation (127) can be written as follows:

G new ( m 3 kg s 2 )=αc 4.5( 1 ) 4π( 1 ) × ( h m p × k L0 ) 2 × k L0 1kg =6.6891752E11( m 3 kg s 2 ) (128)

Therefore,

G new ( m 3 kg standard s 2 )=αc 4.5( 1 ) 4π( 1 ) × ( h m p × k L0 ) 2 × 1( m 2 s 1 ) 1 kg standard =3.639485E14( m 3 kg standard s 2 ) (129)

In Equation (129), kL0 disappears. However, when 1 kgstandard is compensated, the calculated value remains greater than the accepted value. Perhaps a suitable coefficient is needed.

4.4. Verification of the List

For convenience, Equations (1)-(3) are rewritten and recalculated as follows:

G m p 2 hc × k L0 ( 1 )= 4.5 2 × k T c 1 kg standard × c 2 × k L0 ( 1 )=1.7315060E36 (130)

G m p 2 ( e 2 4π ε 0 ) × k L0 ( 1 )= 4.5 2π × m e e ×hc× k L0 ( 1 ) 1 kg standard =1.4908658E33 (131)

m e c 2 e ×( e 2 4π ε 0 )× k L0 ( 1 )=π×k T c × k L0 ( 1 )=2.17286512E19 (132)

Consequently, the modified list can be verified.

5. Conclusions

We proposed Equation (12), which is very simple, and comprehensively compared it with equations derived from a past study. The calculated value was 2.7256307 K, and the observed value was 2.72548 ± 0.00057 K. In a previous study, we tried to validate Equation (12) independent of the MKSA unit system. Afterward, the units of C were changed without any explanation. A reviewer noted the error. However, we could not fix the error immediately. Furthermore, in the previous report, Equations (52) and (53) were used to prove Equation (12), which should have been avoided for a distinct proof. The redefined values should not have been used.

We thought that these errors were not fundamental flaws but rather interpretation problems. The reason is that there were no intentional embedded coefficients in Equation (12). In this report, we propose a correct proof for Equation (12) with an explanation of the relationship between macroscopic units and microscopic units. This method seems to be a classical approach, but no one has pointed out this relationship.

Furthermore, we proposed the use of a Lorentz-invariant mass. Utilizing this concept, we attempted to explain the meaning of the Compton length. The operation of dividing by the speed of light was performed to express meters in the MKSA unit system. Without dividing by the speed of light, the Compton length is related to time. The real meaning of KL0 is related to 1837.94538 seconds, which is expressed in MKSA units. We tried to explain the relationship between Einstein’s famous two equations.

Our expression for the number of particles seems to be unusual and can change with changing KL0. The list given in Section 2.5.1 can be modified and verified. Then, the gravitational constant G can be expressed without using KL0. However, the calculated value in G when 1 kg is compensated remains greater than the accepted value. A suitable coefficient may be needed.

Appendix

In this section, we clarify the two roles of kL0 in the redefinition method, which is difficult to understand.

Role1: Changing the definition of 1Ω (a macroscopic unit)

Role2: Changing the definition of 1 kg (a macroscopic unit)

Appendix A1. Changing the Definition of 1Ω (a Macroscopic Unit)

By utilizing macroscopic units and microscopic units,

( Rk ) new = 25957.9968739 25812.807459 = 4.5 4.4873976 × π 3.1327945 =1.005624705× ( Rk ) MKSA (A1)

1 ( Ω ) new = 1 1.005624705 ×1 ( Ω ) MKSA (A2)

Therefore,

( Z 0 ) new = 378.8493104 376.7303137 × ( Z 0 ) MKSA =1.005624705× ( Z 0 ) MKSA (A3)

( ε 0 ) new = 8.8541878E12 8.8046642E12 × ( ε 0 ) MKSA = 1 1.005624705 × ( ε 0 ) MKSA (A4)

( μ 0 ) new = 1.2637053E06 1.2566370E06 × ( μ 0 ) MKSA =1.005624705× ( μ 0 ) MKSA (A5)

( e ) new = 1.59768967E19 1.60217663E19 × ( e ) MKSA = 1 1.005624705 × ( e ) MKSA (A6)

Afterward, the following equation was used.

( e 2 ε 0 ) new = ( 1.005624705 ) 2 1.005624705 = ( e 2 ε 0 ) MKSA (A7)

( q m ) new = 4.14728234E15 4.13566770E15 × ( q m ) MKSA = 1.005624705 × ( q m ) MKSA (A8)

Appendix A2. Changing the Definition of 1 kg (a Macroscopic Unit)

By utilizing macroscopic units and microscopic units,

1 kg standard =1 kg MKSA × k L0 ( 1 ) 1 =5.44086E04 ( kg ) MKSA (A9)

M min _standard = M min × k L0 ( 1 )=6.62607015E34 ( kg ) MKSA (A10)

Appendix A3. Conclusion

From (A10), 6.62607015E−34 (kg·m2·s−1) is the Planck constant. Due to satisfy the conditions, using the following Equations, kL0 can be uniquely determined within the MKSA unit system.

4.4873976 4.5 × π 3.1327945 =1 (A11)

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Miyashita, T. (2020) Empirical Equation for the Gravitational Constant with a Reasonable Temperature. Journal of Modern Physics, 11, 1180-1192.[CrossRef
[2] Miyashita, T. (2021) Various Empirical Equations for the Electromagnetic Force in Terms of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature. Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 623-634.[CrossRef
[3] Miyashita, T. (2021) Various Empirical Equations to Unify between the Gravitational Force and the Electromagnetic Force. Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 859-869.[CrossRef
[4] Miyashita, T. (2020) Erratum to “Empirical Equation for the Gravitational Constant with a Reasonable Temperature” [Journal of Modern Physics 11 (2020) 1180-1192]. Journal of Modern Physics, 11, 1159.[CrossRef
[5] Miyashita, T. (2021) Erratum to “Various Empirical Equations to Unify between the Gravitational Force and the Electromagnetic Force” [Journal of Modern Physics 12 (2021) 859-869]. Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 1160-1161.[CrossRef
[6] Miyashita, T. (2022) Empirical Equation for a Fine-Structure Constant with Very High Accuracy. Journal of Modern Physics, 13, 336-346.[CrossRef
[7] Miyashita, T. (2018) Empirical Relation of the Fine-Structure Constant with the Transference Number Concept. Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 2346-2353.[CrossRef
[8] Miyashita, T. (2023) A Fine-Structure Constant Can Be Explained Using the Electrochemical Method. Journal of Modern Physics, 14, 160-170.[CrossRef
[9] Miyashita, T. (2023) Explanation of the Necessity of the Empirical Equations That Relate the Gravitational Constant and the Temperature of the CMB. Journal of Modern Physics, 14, 432-444.[CrossRef
[10] Miyashita, T. (2023) Simplification of Various Empirical Equations for the Electromagnetic Force in Terms of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature. Journal of Modern Physics, 14, 1217-1227.[CrossRef
[11] Miyashita, T. (2024) Correspondence Principle for Empirical Equations in Terms of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature with Solid-State Ionics. Journal of Modern Physics, 15, 51-63.[CrossRef
[12] Miyashita, T. (2024) Ratio of Gravitational Force to Electric Force from Empirical Equations in Terms of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature. Journal of Modern Physics, 15, 674-689.[CrossRef
[13] Miyashita, T. (2024) Algorithms for Empirical Equations in Terms of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature. Journal of Modern Physics, 15, 1567-1585.[CrossRef
[14] Miyashita, T. (2025) Normalization Methods in Algorithms for Empirical Equations in Terms of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature. Journal of Modern Physics, 16, 390-409.[CrossRef
[15] Miyashita, T. (2025) Correction Procedure for Empirical Equations for Calculating the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature. Journal of Modern Physics, 16, 968-984.[CrossRef
[16] Jarzynski, C. (1997) Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Differences. Physical Review Letters, 78, 2690-2693.[CrossRef
[17] Jacobson, T. (1995) Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State. Physical Review Letters, 75, 1260-1263.[CrossRef
[18] Miyashita, T. (2025) Clarification Using Fluctuation Theory Based on Jarzynski’s Equality of Three Unexplained Experimental Results for SOFCs Using Sm-Doped Ceria Electrolytes Based on Wagner’s Equation.[CrossRef

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.