Current Status and Influencing Factors Analysis of Self-Compassion among Oncology Nurses

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the status and influencing factors of self-compassion in oncology nurses. Methods: From November to December 2024, 263 oncology nurses from 6 Grade A hospitals in Guangdong Province were selected as the research objects by convenience sampling. The general information questionnaire, Self-Compassion Scale, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-2nd Edition, and Perceived Organizational Support Scale were used for online questionnaire survey. Results: The total score of self-compassion Scale for Oncology nurses was 85.82 ± 12.93, which was in the upper middle level. The results of multivariate analysis showed that marital status, psychological flexibility and organizational support were the influencing factors of self-compassion of oncology nurses. Conclusions: The self-compassion level of oncology nurses is above the medium level. It is suggested that nursing managers focus on the psychological flexibility of oncology nurses and strengthen the internal psychological efficacy of nurses through institutional guarantee, resource allocation and emotional identification, so as to form an “individual-organization” linkage health promotion model and enhance the self-compassion level of nurses.

Share and Cite:

Pan, Y. , Liu, S. , Yang, F. , Li, M. , Li, F. , Huang, X. , Liu, L. and Xia, L. (2025) Current Status and Influencing Factors Analysis of Self-Compassion among Oncology Nurses. Health, 17, 1459-1471. doi: 10.4236/health.2025.1712097.

1. Introduction

According to global cancer statistics [1] [2], in 2022, the population of mainland China represented 18.66% of the world’s total; however, the incidence and mortality rates of tumors in China accounted for 24.17% and 26.44% of global cases, respectively. These figures exceed the global average and pose a considerable health burden on the country. Oncology nurses, as an essential and irreplaceable component in the cancer care and prevention system, have become increasingly prominent in their roles and contributions. Nevertheless, surveys indicate [3] [4] that oncology nurses are consistently exposed to high-pressure, heavy workload, and high-risk environments, frequently facing complex ethical dilemmas and poor patient prognosis or mortality. Furthermore, influenced by traditional cultural tendencies toward altruism and collectivist values, oncology nurses commonly exhibit a lack of self-care [5]. Such circumstances readily lead to psychological health issues, such as anxiety and depression, and, if left unaddressed over time, may directly compromise their personal well-being and job performance. Self-compassion refers to the practice by which individuals, when confronted with failure, shortcomings, or suffering, consistently maintain a friendly and tolerant attitude toward themselves to regulate emotions and alleviate distress. This reflects a manifestation of psychological health control beliefs [6] [7]. As a healthy self-attitude, self-compassion positively influences the regulation of negative emotions, enhancement of psychological well-being, and improvement of nurses’ life satisfaction [8] [9]. Psychological flexibility is defined as the capacity of individuals to fully engage in the present moment, persist with or adjust behaviors in alignment with value-based goals, and consciously and openly accept their own thoughts and feelings while maintaining consistency with their personal values and objectives [10]. As demonstrated by the study of Qu Libo et al. [11], psychological flexibility is closely associated with mental states; enhancing psychological flexibility can reduce nurses’ negative emotions and, in turn, improve their psychological well-being. Perceived organizational support is conceptualized as the individual’s perception of the extent to which the organization provides assistance, care, and recognition [12] [13]. Research shows [14] [15] that perceived organizational support influences nurses’ professional attitudes, emotions, and work-related performance. Sound organizational support fosters greater identification with the organization and profession, thereby strengthening professional well-being, reducing anxiety and depression, and serving as a critical factor in nurses’ mindfulness. Current domestic research on nurses’ self-compassion mainly concentrates on special units such as emergency, intensive care, and obstetrics [16]-[20], whereas studies specifically addressing oncology nurses are limited and seldom consider organizational factors. Therefore, this study aims to examine the current status of self-compassion among oncology nurses and investigate its influencing factors, providing a reference for the development of targeted interventions to promote oncology nurses’ mental health and ensure clinical nursing safety. The report is presented as follows.

2. Objects and Methods

2.1. Research Subjects

A convenience sampling method was employed to conduct an online survey between November and December 2024 involving 263 oncology nurses from six tertiary hospitals in Guangdong Province. The inclusion criteria were: possession of a nurse practice license, a minimum of one year of oncology nursing experience, and informed consent with voluntary participation in the study. The exclusion criteria were: trainee nurses, and nurses who were on leave or attending off-site training and thus not on duty during the survey period. Based on the sample size calculation for multivariate analysis—which requires a sample size at least 5 to 10 times the number of independent variables, plus 20% to account for invalid responses—the calculated sample size ranged from 114 to 228 participants. Ultimately, 263 valid cases were included in this study. Ethical approval was obtained from the hospital ethics committee (B2024-127-01).

2.2. Research Tools

2.2.1. General Information Questionnaire

Following a review of relevant literature, the researchers independently developed the design, which incorporates variables such as gender, age, marital status, educational background, professional title, years of work experience, job level, whether the institution regularly organizes psychological counseling lectures or activities, the degree of harmony in doctor-nurse relationships within the department, and whether the individual has experienced workplace violence, among others.

2.2.2. Self-Compassion Scale

The scale was developed by international scholars Neff et al. [21], and subsequently adapted for use in Chinese populations by Chen Jian et al. [22]. It comprises six dimensions: self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness (scored positively), as well as self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification (scored reversely), totaling 26 items. Utilizing a five-point Likert scale, responses are scored from 1 (“very inconsistent”) to 5 (“very consistent”), yielding a total score range of 26 to 130. Higher scores indicate greater levels of self-compassion in the subjects. The Cronbach’s α coefficient for the original scale is 0.84, while the coefficient in the present study was 0.896.

2.2.3. Acceptance and Action Questionnaire Second Edition

The scale was originally developed by international researchers, including Bond [23], and was later adapted for use in China by scholars such as Cao Jing [24]. This unidimensional scale comprises 7 items in total. It utilizes a 7-point Likert scoring system, with responses ranging from “never” (1 point) to “always” (7 points), yielding a total possible score between 7 and 49. Higher scores indicate lower psychological flexibility among respondents. The scale demonstrated a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.88. In the present study, the Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.95.

2.2.4. Perceived Organizational Support Scale

The perceived organizational support scale was originally developed by Chinese scholar Zhixia Chen et al. [25], and subsequently revised by Hongmei Zuo et al. [26] to accommodate the specific characteristics of the nursing profession. This scale comprises two dimensions—emotional support and instrumental support—with a total of 13 items. It employs a 5-point Likert scale, assigning scores from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 5 (“strongly agree”), yielding a total score range of 13 to 65. Higher scores indicate a greater level of perceived organizational support among the respondents. The Cronbach’s α coefficient for this scale is 0.934, while in the present study, the Cronbach’s α coefficient is 0.977.

2.3. Data Collection

Following approval from the hospital nursing department, an electronic questionnaire was developed using the Wenjuanwang platform. Each item was designated as mandatory. To minimize invalid responses and enhance data quality, a lie-detection question was integrated into the survey. This involved including a positively-worded item (e.g., “I am generally kind to myself”) and later presenting its reverse-phrased counterpart (e.g., “I am often unkind to myself”) to check for response consistency, a method commonly used in psychological surveys. Restrictions included limiting each IP address to a single submission, requiring completion of all items prior to submission, and enforcing a minimum response time of 3 minutes. Investigators outlined the survey’s purpose, significance, and confidentiality protocols within a WeChat group, after which oncology nurses independently completed the questionnaire. During the review phase, two researchers examined the internal logic of responses and eliminated invalid questionnaires. Of the 267 questionnaires collected, 263 were deemed valid after removing those with inconsistent or repetitive responses, yielding an effective response rate of 98.5%.

2.4. Statistical Methods

Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 27.0. General information and scale scores were described with frequency and mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons between groups employed the independent samples t test or one-way analysis of variance. Correlations between scales were assessed using Pearson correlation analysis. Variables with P < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were subsequently included in the multiple linear regression analysis. A result of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Scores of Self-Compassion, Psychological Flexibility, and Perceived Organizational Support among Oncology Nurses

The total score for the self-compassion scale among oncology nurses was (85.82 ± 12.93), with a mean item score of (3.30 ± 0.50). Given that the theoretical score range of the SCS is 26 to 130, with a midpoint of 78, the observed mean score falls above the median, indicating a moderately high level of self-compassion. This score is also notably higher than those reported in studies involving psychiatric nurses [27], and emergency department nurses [20]. The psychological flexibility scale yielded a total score of (24.55 ± 9.85). The perceived organizational support scale had a total score of (46.68 ± 12.12). Details are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Self-compassion scores of oncology nurses (n = 263).

Project

Number of entries

Score ( x ¯ ±s )

Average score for each item

Total self-compassion score

26

85.82 ± 12.93

3.30 ± 0.50

Self-kindness

5

18.37 ± 3.48

3.67 ± 0.70

Self-criticism

5

15.08 ± 4.19

3.01 ± 0.84

Universal human nature

4

14.51 ± 2.90

3.62 ± 0.73

Excessive addiction

4

11.38 ± 3.60

2.85 ± 0.90

Mindfulness

4

14.68 ± 2.80

3.67 ± 0.71

Sense of isolation

4

11.79 ± 3.40

2.95 ± 0.85

Perceived organizational support

13

46.68 ± 12.12

3.59 ± 0.93

Emotional support

10

35.32 ± 9.56

3.53 ± 0.96

Instrumental support

3

11.36 ± 2.89

3.78 ± 0.96

Psychological flexibility

7

24.55 ± 9.85

3.51 ± 1.41

3.2. Univariate Analysis of Self-Compassion among Oncology Nurses

A group comparison of self-compassion scores was conducted based on the general demographic characteristics of oncology nurses. The results revealed statistically significant differences in self-compassion scores among oncology nurses with different marital statuses and physician-nurse relationships within the department (P < 0.05), as presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Univariate analysis of self-compassion among oncology nurses (score, x ¯ ±s ).

Project

Group

Frequency

Self-compassion score

t/F

P

Gender

Male

24

86.33 ± 11.22

0.205

0.838

female

239

85.76 ± 13.10

Age (years old)

<25

24

88.00 ± 12.00

1.198

0.311

25 - 30

78

83.94 ± 12.73

31 - 40

105

85.66 ± 12.90

>40

56

87.78 ± 13.53

Marital status

Unmarried

141

88.82 ± 13.34

11.412

<0.001

Married

116

82.90 ± 11.41

Divorced/widowed

6

71.33 ± 08.66

Educational background

Junior college and below

21

87.23 ± 13.39

0.335

0.716

Undergraduate

227

85.56 ± 13.03

Master’s degree or above

16

87.73 ± 11.02

Professional title

nurse

31

84.68 ± 11.18

1.301

0.274

Nurse

89

84.96 ± 13.07

Head Nurse

122

85.86 ± 13.15

Deputy chief nurse or above

20

90.90 ± 13.04

Job level

N1

43

83.46 ± 9.93

2.377

0.052

N2

55

83.69 ± 13.62

N3

65

85.69 ± 12.82

N4

86

87.12 ± 12.30

N5 - N6

14

93.93 ± 19.02

Years of service

1 - <3

46

84.07 ± 11.59

0.671

0.613

3 - <6

57

84.78 ± 12.39

6 - <11

25

85.64 ± 14.14

11 - 20

86

86.27 ± 13.49

>20

49

87.98 ± 13.26

The organization regularly organizes psychological counseling lectures/activities

Yes

135

81.14 ± 13.10

0.416

0.678

No

128

85.48 ± 12.78

Department doctor-nurse relationship

Harmonious

196

86.64 ± 12.81

3.584

0.029

General

61

84.36 ± 12.98

Not harmonious

6

73.50 ± 9.81

Have you experienced workplace violence

Yes

121

84.75 ± 11.90

−1.235

0.218

No

142

86.72 ± 13.72

3.3. Multifactorial Analysis of Self-Compassion among Oncology Nurses

The total self-compassion score of oncology nurses was designated as the dependent variable, while variables exhibiting statistically significant differences in univariate analysis—along with the total scores of the perceived organizational support and psychological flexibility scales—were selected as independent variables for multiple linear regression analysis. Variable assignments are presented in Table 3. The results indicate that marital status, perceived organizational support, and psychological flexibility are significant predictors of self-compassion among oncology nurses (all P < 0.05), jointly accounting for 39.5% of the total variance. More detailed results can be found in Table 4.

Table 3. Independent variable assignment table.

variable label

Assignment instructions

Marital status

Unmarried = 1, Married = 2, Divorced/Widowed = 3

Department doctor-nurse relationship

Harmonious = 1, Neutral = 2, Not harmonious = 3

Psychological flexibility

Original scale values input

Perceived organizational support

Enter the original values of the scale

Table 4. Multiple linear regression analysis of factors influencing self-compassion among oncology nurses.

variable

B

SE

β

t

P

(Constant)

102.044

4.582

22.272

<0.001

Marital status

−3.706

1.212

−0.156

−3.058

0.002

Departmental doctor-nurse relationship

−0.286

1.351

−0.011

−0.212

0.832

Perceived organizational support total score

0.160

0.058

0.150

2.782

0.006

Total score of psychological flexibility

−0.726

0.064

−0.553

−11.393

<0.001

Note: F = 43.853, R2 = 0.405; adjusted R2 = 0.395; P < 0.001.

4. Discussion

4.1. Oncology Nurses’ Self-Compassion Is at an Upper-Middle Level

The findings of this study indicate that oncology nurses exhibited a self-compassion score of 85.82 ± 12.93, which exceeds both the scale’s median score of 78 and the self-compassion levels reported among psychiatric nurses [27], emergency department nurses [20], and midwives [18]. This outcome may be attributable to the educational background of the study participants, as 93.9% held a bachelor’s degree or higher. Within the context of higher education, mental health instruction is more prevalent, facilitating greater access to relevant psychological knowledge and resources such as counseling and self-care courses, which foster attitudes of self-kindness. Consequently, oncology nurses with higher educational attainment benefit from cognitive advantages conferred by diverse educational experiences, equipping them with robust critical thinking and problem-solving skills. In their clinical practice, these nurses are able to rationally appraise occupational stress, promptly recognize their own emotional states, actively regulate negative thoughts, and efficiently manage adverse emotions—an essential capacity in an environment characterized by frequent exposure to grief and death. Furthermore, all participants in this study were recruited from tertiary hospitals, where oncology nurses typically have access to more comprehensive training resources, well-developed mental health support systems, and broader social support networks [28]. These institutions place a greater emphasis on the psychological well-being of oncology nurses, routinely offering mental health courses or mindfulness meditation training to enhance nurses’ self-compassion, enabling them to respond to challenges and setbacks more rationally and adapt more effectively. Based on these findings, it is recommended that administrators provide oncology nurses with relevant continuing education, resources, tools, training, and support, and regularly organize in-hospital psychological group activities [5] to promote continuous learning and further enhance self-compassion levels among oncology nurses.

Further investigation revealed that the mindfulness dimension received the highest score. Mindfulness refers to being aware of the present moment with clarity and balance, neither neglecting nor becoming overly entangled in adverse aspects of oneself or life. It represents self-compassion at the attentional level [4]. Oncology nurses are routinely exposed to life-and-death scenarios and must maintain composure and focus to perform complex medical procedures. These occupational demands facilitate greater present-moment awareness and non-judgmental emotional acceptance, which in turn help to reduce emotional exhaustion and enable nurses to support and encourage themselves during periods of low mood or setbacks. These findings suggest that nursing managers in oncology specialty hospitals should regularly implement psychological support programs, with particular emphasis on emotional regulation for nurses. Strategies such as narrative reflection or peer support can provide nurses with channels for emotional expression and contribute to a psychologically safe cultural environment. Consequently, oncology nurses will be able to maintain self-kindness and more effectively cope with emotional challenges, thereby further enhancing their self-compassion.

4.2. Analysis of Factors Influencing Self-Compassion among Oncology Nurses

4.2.1. Marital Status

The findings of this study indicate that unmarried oncology nurses exhibit significantly higher levels of self-compassion compared to their married counterparts. Married oncology nurses frequently assume greater family responsibilities, such as caring for children and elderly family members, which unquestionably heightens both the frequency and intensity of work-family conflicts [29]. When faced with urgent tasks or unexpected situations at work, married nurses may be compelled to concurrently manage additional family obligations, resulting in markedly increased psychological stress. In contrast, unmarried oncology nurses are more likely to closely associate their sense of self-worth with their professional roles [30]. Without the distractions arising from marital roles, they are generally able to concentrate more fully on their professional performance and are willing to invest considerable energy in their work. This heightened focus allows them to actively and accurately define their work roles, enabling more attentive and flexible responses to emergencies. Accordingly, nursing administrators should offer greater understanding, support, and assistance to married as well as divorced or widowed nurses in both their professional and personal lives, ensuring that each nurse truly feels cared for and valued, thereby enhancing their satisfaction and subjective well-being. It is essential to provide effective guidance to oncology nurses in adapting and balancing the relationship between life and work, supporting them to wholeheartedly engage in a positive and active state within oncology nursing.

4.2.2. Psychological Flexibility

The findings of this study indicate a negative correlation between psychological flexibility and self-compassion levels. As the AAQ-II is scored such that higher scores indicate lower psychological flexibility, this result means that oncology nurses with lower psychological flexibility tend to have lower self-compassion levels. Research by Sun Xiangzhi [31]-[33] and others demonstrates that individuals with greater psychological flexibility are able to adaptively shift their cognition and attitudes toward adverse events in the workplace, thereby facilitating more effective adaptation to their work environment. For oncology nurses, a high degree of psychological flexibility signifies advanced emotional regulation skills. When confronted with negative emotions, these nurses are able to employ positive coping strategies to manage emotional distress, reduce tendencies toward self-criticism and self-denial, and thereby enhance their self-compassion levels [34]. Based on these findings, nursing managers should place significant emphasis on cultivating and enhancing the psychological flexibility of oncology nurses in clinical practice. This can be accomplished by implementing a series of comprehensive and targeted psychological interventions, such as providing specialized mental health training programs that include practical skills in emotion management and stress coping; offering individual psychological counseling services to create a private and personalized support space for nurses; and organizing group psychological counseling activities to promote communication and mutual assistance, as well as to strengthen team cohesion and psychological resilience. Through these diverse intervention strategies, nurses’ psychological adaptation abilities in complex work settings can be substantially enhanced, ultimately achieving a meaningful improvement in their self-compassion levels.

4.2.3. Perceived Organizational Support

The findings of this study indicate a positive correlation between perceived organizational support and self-compassion levels; oncology nurses with higher perceived organizational support scores exhibit higher self-compassion scores. Organizational support theory emphasizes that an organization’s care and appreciation for its employees are critical factors in motivating staff retention and effort, and also serve as significant indicators for assessing the degree of organizational support provided to employees [35]. Previous research has demonstrated [14] [36] that the level of perceived organizational support exerts a significant influence on nurses’ professional attitudes, emotions, and job performance. When oncology nurses genuinely experience organizational care and support, enjoy favorable remuneration and benefits, and encounter clear and smooth career development pathways, they are more likely to engage in their work with better physical and mental well-being, exhibit increased motivation, and possess greater confidence in achieving their personal goals. When confronted with problems, they are able to employ positive attribution styles, thereby effectively reducing psychological distress. Within the nursing organizational environment, factors such as organizational policies and culture are often continuously reflected through the role behaviors of nursing managers. Therefore, it is necessary for nursing managers to strengthen their understanding of organizational support theory, while also fully addressing the organizational support needs of oncology nurses. By fostering a harmonious and inclusive work environment, and providing oncology nurses with enhanced training opportunities and avenues for promotion, their sense of organizational support can be increased, thereby improving their self-compassion levels.

4.2.4. Note on the Doctor-Nurse Relationship Factor

It is noteworthy that while the univariate analysis indicated a significant association between the doctor-nurse relationship and self-compassion, this variable was not a significant predictor in the multiple linear regression model. This suggests that its observed effect in the univariate analysis may be accounted for by shared variance with other, stronger predictors in the model, such as perceived organizational support and psychological flexibility. The organizational climate, reflected in perceived support, might encompass aspects of interprofessional collaboration, thereby attenuating the unique contribution of the doctor-nurse relationship when these other factors are considered simultaneously. This is a common phenomenon in multivariate analysis where correlated independent variables are included.

5. Conclusion

This study found that oncology nurses exhibit a moderately high level of self-compassion, with marital status, perceived organizational support, and psychological flexibility identified as key influencing factors. Accordingly, nursing managers should prioritize the cultivation and enhancement of psychological flexibility among oncology nurses, and implement comprehensive and targeted psychological intervention programs to elevate self-compassion levels. Additionally, it is essential for nursing managers to effectively integrate hospital resources across multiple dimensions—including institutional support, resource allocation, and emotional identification—to reinforce nurses’ intrinsic psychological efficacy. Establishing an innovative “individual-organization” synergistic model for mental health promotion may further strengthen nurses’ self-compassion. Future research should investigate the interactive mechanisms among these influencing factors and broaden the scope to include oncology nurses across various levels of healthcare institutions. Exploring more diverse and effective intervention strategies and promotion models will support the improvement of oncology nurses’ psychological health, thereby advancing the high-quality development of oncology nursing in China.

6. Study Limitations and Future Directions

This study has limitations that should be considered. The use of a convenience sampling method, while practical for recruitment, may limit the generalizability of the findings to the broader population of oncology nurses in China. Future research should aim to employ random sampling strategies across more diverse healthcare settings to validate and extend these findings. Furthermore, future studies should investigate the interactive mechanisms among these influencing factors and explore more diverse and effective intervention strategies and promotion models. This will support the improvement of oncology nurses’ psychological health, thereby advancing the high-quality development of oncology nursing.

NOTES

*Co-first authors.

#Corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Cao, G.W. (2025) The Epidemiological Characteristics, Current Status of Prevention and Control, and Future Strategies for Cancer in China. Journal of Naval Medical University, 46, 279-290.
[2] Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Chang, H.J., Xie, M.Y., Chen, J., et al. (2023) Current Status and Potential Profile Analysis of Self-Care Among Clinical Nurses. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 58, 1615-1622.
[4] Zhang, C.Q. and Zhang, H.J. (2023) Survey on the Current Status and Influencing Factors of Mindfulness Self-Care among Oncology Nurses. Journal of Nursing, 38, 100-102, 108.
[5] Chen, W., Wang, C., Xu, Y.M., et al. (2023) Design and Implementation of a Self-Care Intervention Program for Oncology Nurses. Journal of Nursing, 38, 56-59.
[6] Jin, G., Liu, X. and Li, D. (2020) Why Not Treat Yourself with Compassion? The Mechanism and Intervention of Self-Pity. Advances in Psychological Science, 28, 824-832.[CrossRef
[7] Jang, M.H., Jeong, Y.M. and Park, G. (2022) Influence of the Subfactors of Self-Compassion on Burnout among Hospital Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study in South Korea. Journal of Nursing Management, 30, 993-1001.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Wang, A.H., Yin, A.C., Yin, H.H., et al. (2019) Research Progress on Nurses’ Self-Compassion. Journal of Nursing, 34, 110-113.
[9] Wu, T., Yang, N.X., Cai, L., et al. (2021) The Influence of Self-Compassion on Social Anxiety: The Mediating Role of Self-Esteem and Fear of Evaluation. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 169-172, 78.
[10] Xu, X.W. (2025) Analysis of the Current Status and Influencing Factors of Nurses’ Psychological Flexibility. Master’s Thesis, China Medical University. https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.27652/d.cnki.gzyku.2024.000316[CrossRef
[11] Qu, L.B., Li, C.Q., Dong, J., Pan, S.Z. and Cai, D.F. 2022) Correlation between Psychological Flexibility and Nurse Mental Health. Journal of Health Research, 42, 508-512.
[12] Guo, Y.L. (2023) Study on the Relationship between Nurses’ Emotional Domain Competence, Sense of Organizational Support and Social Support. Master’s Thesis, Wuhan Polytechnic University.
[13] Chen, H.J., Zhu, Y., Wang, Z.Y., et al. (2023) The Mediating Role of Clinical Nurses’ Sense of Dignified Labor between Perceived Organizational Support and Work Engagement. Nursing Journal, 38, 47-51.
[14] Yao, Y., Wei, W.H., Wang, Z.X. and Li, Y. (2020) Study on the Correlation between Nurses’ Perceived Organizational Support and Empathy Fatigue in a Specialized Oncology Hospital in Henan Province. Medicine and Society, 33, 114-117.
[15] Zhong, G.K., Lu, Q.H., Zou, G.Y., et al. (2018) The Relationship between Organizational Support and Psychological Distress Among Psychiatric Nurses: The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital. Chinese Nursing Management, 18, 68-72.
[16] Zhao, J., Zhou, F.P. and Wang, X.K. (2021) Study on the Correlation between Self-Compassion, Coping Styles and Job Burnout among Junior ICU Nurses. Journal of Community Medicine, 19, 684-688.
[17] Wen, Y.F., Fu, S.L. and He, M.Q. (2016) Analysis of Current Situation and Influencing Factors of ICU Nurses’ Self-Compassion. Journal of Nursing, 31, 75-77.
[18] Ma, Y.D. and Dong, L.Y. (2021) Research on the Current Status of Self-Compassion of Midwives and Its Influencing Factors. Nursing Research, 35, 3360-3365.
[19] Wu, W.J., Hui, Z.Z., Hou, F., Zhang, Z.X. and Wang, M.X. (2024) Research on the Relationship between Professional Quality of Life and Self-Compassion Among Nurses in 215 Hospitals Across 29 Provinces in China. Occupation and Health, 40, 352-357.
[20] Liu, Y. (2015) Investigation on the Current Status of Self-Compassion among Emergency Department Nurses and Analysis of Influencing Factors. Master’s Thesis, Jilin University.
[21] Neff, K.D. (2023) Self-Compassion: Theory, Method, Research, and Intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 193-218.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Chen, J., Yan, L.S. and Zhou, L.H. (2011) Reliability and Validity Study of the Chinese Version of the Self-Compassion Scale. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19, 734-736.
[23] Bond, F.W., Hayes, S.C., Baer, R.A., Carpenter, K.M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H.K., et al. (2011) Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A Revised Measure of Psychological Inflexibility and Experiential Avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676-688.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Cao, J., Ji, Y. and Zhu, Z.H. (2013) Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II in Assessing College Students. Chinese Journal of Mental Health, 27, 873-877.
[25] Chen, Z.X. (2006) The Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on Work Performance and Turnover Intention of Knowledge Workers. Ph.D. Thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
[26] Zuo, H.M. and Yang, H. (2009) Study on the Relationship between Nurses’ Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Commitment. Nursing Research, 23, 1341-1343.
[27] Lin, J.K., Zhou, Y.M., Wei, G.Y., et al. (2018) Study on the Correlation between Psychological Resilience and Self-Compassion among Nurses in a Tertiary Psychiatric Hospital in Guangdong Province. Chinese Journal of Social Medicine, 35, 498-501.
[28] Liu, Y., Tang, T., Sun, G.Z., et al. (2021) Research Progress on Self-Compassion Assessment Tools. Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing, 27, 4041-4045.
[29] Han, B.R., Chen, X., Xu, F.X., et al. (2021) Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Work-Family Conflict among Nurses in China. Nursing Research, 35, 407-410.
[30] Chen, Y.Y., Chen, J., Feng, Y.J., et al. (2025) Latent Profile Analysis of Factors Influencing Work-Family Conflict among Clinical Nurses. Journal of Nurses Training, 40, 6-11, 17.
[31] Sun, X.Z., Qin, L.M., Miao, Y.M., et al. (2025) Analysis of the Current Status and Influencing Factors of Psychological Flexibility among Operating Room Nurses. Journal of Nursing, 40, 65-69.
[32] Yang, Y.Y., Ren, F., Zhang, Q.Y., et al. (2024) The Relationship between Nurses’ Perceived Social Support and Sense of Loneliness: A Study on the Moderating Role of Psychological Flexibility. Journal of Nursing Management, 24, 839-843, 864.
[33] Xu, Y.P., Ye, X.H., Dong, R.Z., et al. (2020) Correlation between Psychological Flexibility and Anxiety, Depression, and Negative Emotions in Night Shift Nurses. Health Research, 40, 527-529.
[34] Wang, P. (2015) Psychological Flexibility: A Protective Factor for Mental Health. Journal of Soochow University (Educational Science Edition), 3, 57-64.
[35] Wang, M.J. (2025) Research on the Relationship between Nurses’ Professional Benefit, Perceived Organizational Support, and Self-Esteem. Master’s Thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
[36] Jian, X.T., Liu, B.L., Xu, Q.Z., Xu, Y.J. and Li, L.Q. (2015) Investigation and Analysis of the Organizational Support and Needs of Nursing Managers in Secondary Hospitals. Journal of Nursing, 30, 57-59.

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.