Prevalence and Pattern of Congenital Heart Disease among Children—A Population Based Study in a District in North Bengal of Eastern India

Abstract

Introduction: Prevalence of congenital cardiac defects varies in different locations and the types of population selected in study. However CHD is the commonest and present in about 1% of all live births. Age of presentation also varies depending on the type of CHD and its complexity. Main objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of CHD in the population of a specific district in NorthBengal of Eastern India by a direct community level assessment. Such type of study in this area was not known so far. Methods: This retrospective observational study was done at the department of cardiothoracic surgery NRS Medical college during a period from April 22 to March 23. The study was based on all children (0 to 18 yrs age) screened at community level in the district by health workers. All CHD pts screened were notified to this department through an online network. They were called to attend the OPD, and seen by a paediatric cardiologist. Echocardiography was done in all of them and CHDs were categorised. Prevalence of CHD was studied per 1000 paediatric population and per 1000 live births separately during the period. Agewise and diseasewise distribution of CHD in the district was studied. Cases demanding surgery were operated in the department of CTVS of NRS Med coll. Results: The prevalence of CHD in the present community-based study was 4.55 per 1000 live birth which is comparable to many school-based studies but on the lower side of many hospital-based studies. Majority of CHD cases were detected in less than 1 year age (46%) and in 1 - 5 years age (33%). Most of our patients were acyanotic (82%), majority being VSD (43.4%), while the cyanotic patients were 15%, majority being TOF (8%). The rest 3% was of obstructive variety. Conclusion: Our study involved the population at community level involving newborns at point of delivery, pre-school and school (both primary and secondary) children altogether in a district which is more perfect than isolated newborn unit or paedatric OPD patients in tertiary care hospitals where the prevalnce is more possibly because of many factors like quality of care and concentration of patients in those hospitals. VSD and TOF are the most common acyanotic and cyanotic congenital heart defects respectively.

Share and Cite:

Bandyopadhyay, P., Sarkar, B.K. and Sa-maddar, S. (2025) Prevalence and Pattern of Congenital Heart Disease among Children—A Population Based Study in a District in North Bengal of Eastern India. World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 15, 225-232. doi: 10.4236/wjcs.2025.1511022.

1. Introduction

Congenital Heart Disease is present in around 1% of all live births in USA studied in a population based perspective [1]. The prevalence of CHD in India is 0.77 to 5.2 per 1000 in school based studies and 3.9 to 26.4 per 1000 in hospital based studies [2] [3]. In China this is 9.3 per 1000 live births [4] and in Bangladesh this is 25 per 1000 live births [5] [6].

CHD is the commonest group of congenital defects (About 1 per 100 live births and 28% of all congenital defects) worldwide [7]-[9]. Unlike to other group of congenital diseases it has a wide variations of types on which surgical mortality also depends (RACHS-1 risk scoring) [10].

However with the advancement of earlier diagnosis and on going improvement of modalities of treatment majority can be successfully managed at present. Also the prognosis and quality of life have considerably improved in patients with CHD over the past few decades [11].

At times prompt diagnosis and very early intervention become crucial for some newborn with critical congenital heart defects (CCHD) presenting with a combination of cyanosis and heart failure [12].

At present early diagnosis, assessment and management with population based surveillance of CHD is lacking in eastern India where school based or hospital OPD based studies are found [13] [14].

Therefore the present study is aimed at finding the prevalence and classification of CHD in a district of north east India to create a community based framework to identify prevalence, classify the disease of CHD, assessment for possible intervention and its results, leading to improvement of entire outcome strategy of CHD.

2. Materials and Methods

Retrospective observational study was conducted in entire population in Coochbhear district in North Bengal during a period from April 2022 to march 2023. Aim of study was to find out burden of CHD in children in that district. Out ofall children (0 to 18 years) of age newborns (0 - 20 Days old) were screened at delivery point (that is obstetric care unit of primary health center, rural Hospitals, SD, Hospitals, Superspeciality and district Hospitals) of Coochbehar district.

Preprimary school Children (0 - 6 Years) were screened for CHD by accredited social health activist (ASHA) worker and Anganwari worker (AWW). In Coochbehar district there were 2413 ASHA worker (each for 1000 population). They maintained the monthly record of all births and health status of children below 6 years age of that village via door to door visit and regular checkups at AWW centers on fixed day in a week in the village. AWW also share the information related to birth that total patient in a month. Where the ANM reported to PHN and MO of PHC. They conveyed to district headquarters. Where preliminary investigation including echocardiography was being done. The informations from district headquarters were mailed to NRS Medical College for opinion where subsequently patients attended SishuSathi Clinic and were diagnosed and treated. In this way all cases of Congenital Heart disease patient of that district reached NRS Medical College.

Primary School Children (6 - 10 Years) were screened at SishuSikhya Kendra (SSK) and Primary Schools.

Higher School children (10 - 18 Years) were screened at MadhyamikShikhya Kendra (MSK), Secondary and Higher Secondary Schools.

Those screened out babies were verified and referred by MO of MHT through proper referral card to district head quarter were echocardiography was done and then the same was mailed to NRS Medical College.

3. Results and Analysis

A total of 31,824 live birth reported in the district during the period of study (April 2022 - March 2023) and the total cases of CHD reported during that period was 145. The prevalence was calculated using Freeman and Tukey, s method used in EUROCAT analysis.

The Population (0 - 18 Years) was 742,036 (Male-373,267 and female-368,769) during the period of study.

All CHD cases of Coochbehar district referred to the SishuSathi Clinic of NRS Medical College (Monday/Tuesday) where they were thoroughly examined and repeat echocardiography was done in all cases. The types of cases were diagnosed and sorted out as per diagnosis.

Different types of Congenital Heart Diseases detected (April 2022 - March 2023) at Coochbehar district was noted as below Table 1.

Table 1. Major classification and types of congenital heart disease.

Major Classification

Types of CHD

(n)

Subtypes

Percentage and Confidence Interval (Wald)

Acyanotic

(L to R shunt)

n = 118

VSD-63

Membranous-45

43.44% with CI

(from 35.21 to 51.67)

Muscular-9

Inlet-6

Outlet-3

ASD-37

OS ASD-29

25.51% with CI

(from 18.27 to 32.75)

SV ASD-5

OP ASD-3

PDA-16

11.03% with CI

(from 5.83 to 16.23)

AVSD-2

1.38% with CI

(0 to 3.25)

Cyanotic

n = 22

TOF-12

PS-7

(8.27%) with CI

(from 3.69 to 12.85)

PA-4

Absent Pulmonary Valve-1

TAPVC-1

Supracardiac-1

0.69% with CI

(0 to 2.07)

Single Ventricle-2

1.38% with CI

(0 to 3.25)

TGA-2

TGA + VSD + PS-1

TGA + IVS-1

1.38% with CI

(0 to 3.25)

DORV-4

DORV + PS-3

2.76% with CI

(0.04 to 5.48)

DORV + PA-1

Truncus Arteriosus-1

0.69% with CI

(0 to 2.07)

Left or right

side obstructive

lessions n = 5

AS (BAV)-3 (2.07%)

with CI (0 to 4.43)

(2.07%) with CI

(0 to 4.43)

PS-1 (0.69%) with

CI (0 to 2.07) Wald

(0.69%) with CI

(0 to 2.07) Wald

Coarctation of Aorta-1 (0.69%) with CI (0 to 2.07)

(0.69%) with CI

(0 to 2.07)

Total-145

A total of 145 CHD case detected in that district of Coochbehar during this period. Male to female ratio was Male-69 (47.5%) Female-76 (52.4%). The percentage of different types of congenital heart diseases detected in this study and their confidence interval were calculated following Wald technique (Table 1).

In the present study most of the patient i.e. 46.2% were less than 1 year age and next common age group was 2 - 5 years (33.1%). While the number in the age group of 6 - 10 years and 11 - 18 years were exactly same that was (10.35%) each (Table 2).

Table 2. Age wise distribution of various types of congenital heart disease.

Major Classification

Types of CHD

0 - 1 Y

(n)

2 - 5 Y

(n)

6 - 10 Y

(n)

11 - 18 Y

(n)

Total

Acyanotic CHD

n = 118

VSD

38

13

6

6

63

ASD

13

16

5

3

37

PDA

3

10

2

1

16

AVSD

0

1

1

0

2

AP Window

0

0

0

0

0

Cyanotic CHD

n = 22

TOF

4

6

1

1

12

TAPVC

1

0

0

0

1

Single Ventricle

1

0

0

1

2

TGA

1

1

0

0

2

DORV

3

1

0

0

4

Truncus Arteriosus

0

0

0

1

1

CCTGA + VSD + PS

0

0

0

0

0

Obstructive lesion n = 5

AS (BAV)

2

0

0

1

3

PS

0

0

0

1

1

Coarctation of Aorta

1

0

0

0

1

Total no (n) Percentage with confidence

interval

67

46.20%

with CI

37.92 to 54.48

48

33.10%

with CI

25.3 to 40.9

15

10.35%

with CI

5.30 to 15.38

15

10.35%

with CI

5.3 to 15.38

145

Incidences of different types of CHD amongst male and female patients were compared using Chi square test and significant differences were noted in VSD, ASD and PDA (Table 3).

Table 3. Sex wise distribution and its significance in various types of Congenital heart disease.

Diagnosis

Male

Female

Total

P Value

(Chi Square test)

Significant (Y/N)

VSD

39

24

63

0.00029

Yes

ASD

10

27

37

0.011644

Yes

TOF

07

05

12

0.325964

No

PDA

1

15

16

0.001003

Yes

AVSD

1

1

2

0.882254

No

TAPVC

0

1

1

Single Ventricle

0

2

2

TGA

1

1

2

0.882254

No

DORV

3

1

4

0.218511

No

Truncus Arteriosus

1

0

1

AS (BAV)

1

2

3

0.685825

No

PS

0

1

1

COA

1

0

1

Total

65

80

145

The Prevalence of CHD in the age group 0 - 18 years was calculated as 4.55 per 1000 live birth and 0.2 per 1000 population (0 - 18 years). This was done following Freeman and Tukey, s variance stabilising transformation for a random Poisson variable as used in EUROCAT prevalence calculation [15].

Major classification and types of CHD in the present study was depicted in Table 1. Acyanotic CHDs were 118 (82%), Cyanotic CHDs were 22 (15%), Obstructive CHDs were 5 (3%) amongst 145 cases. Maximum cases were of Acyanotic type amongst which VSD was commonest (43.4%). Various sub types of Cyanotic, Acyanotic and Obstructive types were also shown in Table 1. Such results were also confirmatory to other similar studies [16].

4. Discussion

The prevalence of CHD varies in different geographical regions. It is also calculated in 2 ways one is against the population data and the other is against the total live births of the population.

The prevalence when calculated against the paediatric population, the population is considered as either of the following ways:

1) No of children attended in Paediatric OPD in hospital [14].

2) No of school children [17].

3) No of Neonatal age group patients admitted/attended in hospital.

But the studies based on the total paediatric population directly assessed at community level is lacking in India.

The present study is therefore having an importance regarding assessment of the magnitude of the burden of taking care of such children in West Bengal and the facilities to be developed in future.

5. Conclusions

Globally the prevalance of CHD is varying from 4 to 50 per live births [18] and in India from 0.8 to 26.4 per 1000 children either of school students or hospital patients [19]. In the present study we have found this prevalance as 4.55 per thousand live births (3.84 to 5.36, as per 95% confidence limit) following EUROCAT prevalence calculation [15], and 0.2 per 1000 paediatrc population at community level analysis.

The present study also revealed the most common type of CHD was VSD (43.44%) followed by ASD (25.51%), PDA (11.03%) TOF (8.27%). As the present study is including actual population of 0 to 18 years at community level the assessed prevalence value of CHD per 1000 children is less (0.2) in comparison to school based or hospital based study.

Majority of patients in this study were in the age group of less than 1 year as it was found in the study of Meshram and others [20] though in some other studies [21] it is of lesser no in this age group.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Jenkins, K.J., Botto, L.D., Correa, A., Foster, E., Kupiec, J.K., Marino, B.S., et al. (2019) Public Health Approach to Improve Outcomes for Congenital Heart Disease across the Life Span. Journal of the American Heart Association, 8, e009450.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Bhardwaj, R., Rai, S.K., Yadav, A.K., Lakhotia, S., Agrawal, D., Kumar, A., et al. (2015) Epidemiology of Congenital Heart Disease in India. Congenital Heart Disease, 10, 437-446.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Bhat, N.K., Dhar, M., Kumar, R., Patel, A., Rawat, A. and Kalra, B.P. (2013) Prevalence and Pattern of Congenital Heart Disease in Uttarakhand, India. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 80, 281-285.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Xie, D., Fang, J., Liu, Z., Wang, H., Yang, T., Sun, Z., et al. (2018) Epidemiology and Major Subtypes of Congenital Heart Defects in Hunan Province, China. Medicine, 97, e11770.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Fatema, N., Chowdhury, R. and Chowdhury, L. (2008) Incidence of Congenital Heart Disease among Hospital Live Birth in a Tertiary Hospital of Bangladesh. Cardiovascular Journal, 1, 14-20.[CrossRef
[6] Hussain, M., Tahura, S., Sayeed, M.A., Rahman, M.M., Rahman, M.M. and Kar, S.K. (2012) Past and Present Pattern of Congenital Heart Disease at Dhaka Shishu Hospital: A Situation Analysis. Bangladesh Journal of Child Health, 34, 51-55.[CrossRef
[7] Saxena, A. (2018) Congenital Heart Disease in India: A Status Report. Indian Pediatrics, 55, 1075-1082.[CrossRef
[8] WHO, CDC and ICBDSR (year) Congenital Heart Defects, Birth Defects Surveillance and Quick Reference. 23-26.
[9] Mitchell, S.C., Korones, S.B. and Berendes, H.W. (1971) Congenital Heart Disease in 56,109 Births Incidence and Natural History. Circulation, 43, 323-332.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Jenkins, K.J., Gauvreau, K., Newburger, J.W., et al. (2002) Consensus-Based Method for Risk Adjustment for Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 123, 110-118.
[11] Zheng, G.L., Wu, J.X., Chen, P.L., et al. (2021) Characteristics of In-Hospital Mortality of Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) after Surgical Treatment in Children from 2005 to 2017: A Single-Center Experience. BMC Paediatrics, 21, Article No. 521.
[12] van der Linde, D., Konings, E.E.M., Slager, M.A., Witsenburg, M., Helbing, W.A., Takkenberg, J.J.M., et al. (2011) Birth Prevalence of Congenital Heart Disease Worldwide: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, 2241-2247.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Khalil, A., Aggarwal, R., Thirupuram, S. and Arora, R. (1994) Incidence of Congenital Heart Disease among Hospital Live Births in India. Indian Pediatrics, 31, 519-527.
[14] Chatterjee, S., Dutta, S., Ghosh, S., Das, S. and Bhattachary, N. (2020) Congenital Heart Disease in the Pediatric Population in Eastern India: A Descriptive Study. Indian Pediatrics, 57, 174-175.[CrossRef
[15] Begaud, B., Martin, K., Abouelfath, A., Tubert-Bitter, P., Moore, N. and Moride, Y. (2005) An Easy to Use Method to Approximate Poisson Confidence Limits. European Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 213-216.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Jain, P.K., Lazarus, M., et al. (2023) Prevalence and Pattern of Congenital Heart Disease in Pediatric Population—A Study from Central India. International Journal of Research and Medical Sciences, 9, 40-44.
[17] Misra, M., Mittal, M., Verma, A.M., Rai, R., Chandran, G., Singh, D.P., et al. (2009) Prevalence and Pattern of Congenital Heart Disease in School Children of Eastern Uttar Pradesh. Indian Heart Journal, 61, 58-60.
[18] Liu, Y., Chen, S., Zühlke, L., Black, G.C., Choy, M., Li, N., et al. (2019) Global Birth Prevalence of Congenital Heart Defects 1970-2017: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 260 Studies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 48, 455-463.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Bhardwaj, R., Rai, S.K., Yadav, A.K., Lakhotia, S., Agrawal, D., Kumar, A., et al. (2015) Epidemiology of Congenital Heart Disease in India. Congenital Heart Disease, 10, 437-446.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Meshram, R. and Gajimwar, V. (2018) Prevalence, Profile, and Pattern of Congenital Heart Disease in Central India: A Prospective, Observational Study. Nigerian Journal of Cardiology, 15, 45-49.[CrossRef
[21] Mahapatra, A., Sarangi, R. and Mahapatra, P.P. (2017) Spectrum of Congenital Heart Disease in a Tertiary Care Centre of Eastern India. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 4, 314-316.[CrossRef

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.