Weighted Estimates for Marcinkiewicz Integral Operator Associated with Schrödinger Operator and Its Commutator on Generalized Fractional Morrey Spaces ()
1. Introduction
In 2014, Chen and Zhou investigated the boundedness of
on
(
) spaces when
in [1]. In 2023, Zhang et al. established the boundedness of
on
spaces and further derived corresponding results for the commutator
in [2], where
and
. In 2020, Xuan et al. introduced weighted generalized Morrey-type spaces associated with Schrödinger operators and established the boundedness of singular integrals in [3]. More researches about the Marcinkiewicz integral operators associated with Schrödinger operators on various function spaces can be seen in [4]-[7]. Building on these results, this paper primarily investigates the weighted boundedness of Marcinkiewicz integral and its commutators associated with Schrödinger operators on the generalized fractional Morrey spaces. Before stating the organization of this paper, we first recall some necessary notation.
The following definition of Laplacican operator is defined by
is a non-negative potential, and belongs to the inverse Hölder class
. For
, there exists a constant
such that for an arbitray sphere
. We have
(1)
Let
, for any
, the critical radius function
is dependent on
as follows:
(2)
The Marcinkiewicz integral
associated with the Schrödinger operator
is defined as
(3)
where
is the kernel of
for
. Let
and
be the kernel of classical Riesz transform
. Then
The following definition of spaces
is from [8].
Definition 1.1 In this article, we define
where
represents a sphere with
as its center and
as its radius.
A new class of BMO spaces is introduced in the literature, that is given a local function
, and
where
The commutator generated by
and given function
is defined by
(4)
Let
, weighted function
refers to an arbitrary sphere B in
. There exists a constant
such that
Weighted function
is refer to the arbitrary sphere
in
. There exists a constant
and
such that the following reverse Hölder inequation sets up
Let
,
and
respectively defined as
where
.
Definition 1.2 ([9]) Let
be a non-negative increasing function on
. For any
satisfy
(5)
where
is independent of
,
and
. The generalized fractional weighted Morry space is defined by
where
Definition 1.3 ([10]) Let
. If
, there exists a constant C such that
(6)
It is called a non-negative measurable function
, so we have
and
. For
, it is evident that
where
.
Remark (a): It is evident that when
, the space
coincides with the generalized weighted Morrey space
introduced by Guliyev in the literature in [11], which extends the classical weighted Morrey space. For
, it reduces to the classical Morrey space
proposed by Komori and Shirai.
(b): When
,
corresponds to the classical Morrey space
in [12], originally introduced by Morrey in the literature to investigate the local behavior of solutions to second-order elliptic partial differential equations. Further advancements and properties of Morrey spaces can be referenced in existing studies in [13] [14], notably for
,
simplifies to the weighted Lebesgue space
as established in prior works in [15]. Our main results are as follows:
Theorem 1.1 Let
,
,
,
and
. There exists a positive constant
that is independent of f such that
Theorem 1.2 Let
, and
is defined by (1.4),
. If
,
,
and
, then there exists a positive constant
that is independent of f such that
2. Preliminary Knowledge
To prove the main theorems, in this section, we need to recall some necessary lemmas, respectively.
Lemma 2.1 ([2]) Let
and
. There exists a positive constant C such that
Lemma 2.2 ([2]) Let
,
and
. If
, then there exists a positive constant C such that
Now we state the characterizations of spaces
as follows.
Lemma 2.3 ([16]) Let
. If
such that
where
.
Lemma 2.4 ([17]) Let
. If
, then there exists positive constant
,
and C. For any measurable set E of sphere B, we have
Lemma 2.5 ([18]) Let
,
. For any measurable subset E of an arbitrary sphere B, then there exists constant
such that
Lemma 2.6 ([19]) Let
. For any
, we have (1). There exists a constant C such that
(2) For
, there exists a constant C such that
where
.
Lemma 2.7 ([20]) Let
. If
and
, then there exist two normal numbers C and
such that sphere
. We have
Lemma 2.8 ([21]) Let
, where
. We have
3. Proofs of Main Theorems
By the aid of some ideas and methods form the proofs, we mainly state the proof of Theorem 1.1 as follows.
Proof of Theorem 1.1. Let
and a sphere
with
as the center and
as the radius. Decompose
, where
and
. We have
which yields the desired result.
Firstly, we estimate
, from definition 1.1 and Lemma 2.1
For the term
, from Minkowski’s inequality and Lemma 2.6, we can get
Notice that where
,
and
, we have
. For
, from Lemma 2.3 and Lemma 2.4, we have
Combining the inequality (1.6), we know that
Thus, we can get
(7)
Using (3.1), we can get
Because of
, there exists
such that
. Therefore, use (1.5) and Lemma 2.5 formula, and observe
,
. we have
Observing that
,
, we have
Combining with the estimates of E and F, we conclude that
Hence, the proof of Theorem 1.1 is completed.
Proof of Theorem 1.2. Similar to the proof of Theorem 1.1, decompose
. Among which
, we note that
Similarly, then it follows that
, from Lemma 2.2
For the term
, it is similar to the argument of
For
, use Hölder’s inequality and the weight condition of
.
(8)
Based on the above estimates (3.2), we have
Because of
, there exists
such that
. By the Hölder’s inequality and Lemma 2.8, we can deduce that
Obviously, we can get
Hence, we can divide
into two parts as follows:
By the Hölder’s inequality, from Lemma 2.7, we have
The similar argument as what we have done in the proof of Theorem 1.1 yields that
Combining the above inequality, following estimates are obtained
(9)
Based on the above estimate (3.3), we can get
For
, note that
[22]. We can get
Similar to the argument of
, we have
Synthesize the above results, we can get
(10)
From (3.4), we conclude that
Combined
and
estimates, the proof of Theorem 1.2 is completed.
Acknowledgements
We thank the referees for their time and comments.