Prevalence and Clinical Profile of Breast Cancer at Anoalite Hospital in Mungbere
Jean-Faustin Atakuru Gaga1,2orcid, Jeremy Likilo Osundja2, Jean-Marie Demupondo Lukangi3, Amos Kaghoma Sivulyamwenge4, Jean-Didier Bosenge Nguma2, Noel Labama Otuli2, Gédéon Katenga Bosunga2, Jean-Jeannot Juakali Sihalikyolo2, Emmanuel Komanda Likwekwe2, Antoine Modia O’yandjo2
1Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Université of Uélé, Isiro, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
2Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Kisangani, Kisangani, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
3Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Kindu, Kindu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
4Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Catholic University of Graben, Butembo, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
DOI: 10.4236/jbm.2025.134004   PDF    HTML   XML   24 Downloads   144 Views  

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is a global threat that mainly affects women. This study was conducted to assess the prevalence and clinical profile of breast cancer at Anoalite Hospital in Mungbere. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at the Anoalite Hospital in Mungere, in the extreme northeast of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. It was a cross-sectional descriptive study with retrospective collection data carried out from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2023, i.e. over a period of 5 years. The study population consisted of all patients who visited the hospital during our study period. We used exhaustive sampling. Data collection was retrospective and based on documentary techniques. Data were entered using Microsoft Office 365 Excel 2024 and analysed using Epi-Info CDC version 7.5.2.0. Results: The prevalence of breast cancer was 18.2%. Many patients were overweight (45.6%) and 26.3% were obese. Most of our patients discovered their breast cancer during medical consultations (92.6%); almost all had a breast nodule/mass and mastodynia (95.9 and 96.8%); 75.1% had an ulceration; 94.5% had an orange peel; 13.4% had an ecchymosis; 3.7% had an eczematous Paget’s lesion. About the characteristics of breast discharge, we observed that 22.6% of patients had a lactescent and colostral discharge. As for nipple abnormalities, 75.6% of patients had breast retraction. For most patients, the manoeuvre Tillaux was positive in 97.2% of cases; most patients were at TNM clinical stage III in 94% of cases. Conclusion: The prevalence of breast cancer is high in our community. Several measures are needed to make early detection more accessible.

Share and Cite:

Atakuru Gaga, J.-F., Likilo Osundja, J., Demupondo Lukangi, J.-M., Kaghoma Sivulyamwenge, A., Bosenge Nguma, J.-D., Otuli, N., L., Katenga Bosunga, G., Juakali Sihalikyolo, J.-J., Komanda Likwekwe, E. and Modia O'yandjo, A. (2025) Prevalence and Clinical Profile of Breast Cancer at Anoalite Hospital in Mungbere. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 13, 26-36. doi: 10.4236/jbm.2025.134004.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is a global threat that mainly affects women, accounting for almost 12% of all cancer cases worldwide [1].

According to WHO statistics, its prevalence in 2020 was 2.3 million cases and its incidence was 58.5 per 100,000 population [2]-[7].

The African continent is one of the regions that pays a heavy price. Several studies describing the prevalence and anatomopathological aspects of breast cancer have been carried out in different countries. A study conducted in Morocco in 2023 showed that the prevalence of breast cancer was 17% [8]. It should be noted that breast cancer almost doubled during this period, rising from 417 to 887 cases in 2023 [9].

A study carried out in the People’s Republic of the Congo showed that the prevalence of breast cancer was estimated at 32.3% in 2023 [10].

Our country, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), is not spared: in 2019, a study revealed a prevalence of 13.7% [11].

This study was carried out to assess the prevalence and clinical profile of breast cancers diagnosed in a health facility located in the bush in the Haut-Uélé province, which has an anatomopathology laboratory.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Study Framework

The study was carried out at the Anoalite Hospital in Mungere, in the far northeast of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The choice of this hospital as our study site was motivated by the fact that it has a laboratory for histopathological analysis of results, which means that it receives a number of cancer cases transferred from other nearby facilities, and even from other provinces.

2.2. Study Population

The study population consisted of all patients who consulted the Mungbere Hospital, specifically its Gynaecology Department, during the period of our study.

2.3. Types of Study and Duration

This was a cross-sectional descriptive study with retrospective data collection from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2023, i.e. over a 5-year period.

2.4. Sampling

We carried out an exhaustive sampling and included a total of 217 patients who met our inclusion criteria.

Inclusion Criteria

All patients with a histologically proven diagnosis of breast cancer had a medical file, complete, i.e. containing all the parameters sought in our study (socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients).

2.5. Data Collection

Data collection was retrospective and based on a documentary technique. The consultation form, the patient’s file, the laboratory register, the analysis vouchers and the results of the histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations, the ultrasound registers, the protocol registers operating and the follow-up sheets were used as sources of data.

2.6. Data Processing and Analysis

The data was entered using Excel 2024 from Microsoft Office 365 to create a database that could be analysed using specialised software.

We used Epi-Info CDC software version 7.5.2.0 to analyse the data. For the qualitative variables, we calculated the numbers and percentages, while the quantitative variables were grouped into classes (brackets) in order to determine the numbers and percentages.

2.7. Ethical Considerations

This work was carried out in strict compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [12], namely the protection of patients, autonomy, privacy and confidentiality. We also obtained the approval of the Research Ethics Committee of the Université de l’Uélé.

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence of Breast Cancer

During our study, we received 1186 patients who consulted the gynaecology department for various conditions, 217 of whom had histologically diagnosed breast cancer, representing a prevalence of 18.2%.

3.2. Distribution of Patients According to History Data

3.2.1. Medical History and Intoxications

Analysis of Table 1 shows that many patients were overweight, with 99 cases out of 217, or 45.6%. Obesity was observed in 57 cases out of 217, i.e. 26.3%. Most of the patients consumed alcoholic beverages (171 cases, or 78.8%). Only 6.0% of patients smoked, 35.7% of whom smoked more than 15 cigarettes a day. Finally, in terms of socio-economic status, the majority of patients had a low socio-economic level (172 cases, or 79.3%).

Table 1. Breakdown of data according to medical history and poisoning.

Features

Workforce

N = 217

Percentage

(%)

Overweight

Yes

99

45.6

No

118

54.4

Obesity

Yes

57

26.3

No

160

73.7

Alcohol consumption

Yes

171

78.8

No

46

21.2

Taking up smoking

Yes

13

6.0

No

204

94.0

Number of cigarettes per day (n = 14)

<15

9

64.3

≥15

5

35.7

Socio-economic status

Low income

172

79.3

Moderate income

41

18.9

High income

4

1.8

3.2.2. Gynaecological and Obstetric History of Patients

Table 2 shows that 125 patients, or 57.6%, had menarche between the ages of 12 and 13. Most of our respondents had telarche between the ages of 9 and 10, with 193 cases, or 88.9%; 40.1% of the women were genitally active, of which 93.1% had an average duration of 3 to 5 days and 92.0% an average duration of 24 to 32 days. As regards gestation, 114 patients (53.9%) were nulliparous; as for parity, 117 cases (53.9%) were nulliparous.

Table 2. Breakdown of data according to gynaecological and obstetrical history.

Features

Workforce

N = 217

Percentage

(%)

Age at menarche (years)

12 - 13

125

57.6

14 - 15

90

41.5

>15

25

11.5

Ignored

2

0.9

Age of telescope (years)

9 - 10

193

88.9

≥1

22

10.2

Ignored

2

0.9

In genital activity

Yes

87

40.1

No

130

59.9

Average length of menstruation (days) (n = 87)

3 - 5

81

93.1

≥6

6

6.9

Length of menstrual cycles (days) (n = 87)

24 - 32

80

92.0

>32

7

8.0

Gesture

Nulligestes

114

52.5

Paucigestes

45

20.7

Multigest

27

12.4

Great

31

14.3

Parity

Nulliparous

117

53.9

Paucipares

55

25.3

Multiparous

30

13.8

Large multiparous females

15

6.9

3.3. Distribution of Patients According to Clinical Data

Analysis of Table 3 shows that most of our patients discovered their breast cancer during medical consultations (92.6%). Almost all patients had a breast nodule/mass and mastodynia (95.9 and 96.8%); 75.1% had an ulceration; 94.5% had an orange peel; 13.4% had ecchymosis; 3.7% had an eczematous Paget’s lesion. As regards the characteristics of the breast discharge, we observed that 22.6% of patients had a lactescent and colostral discharge. With regard to nipple abnormalities, 75.6% of patients had breast retraction. As for the presence of lymph nodes, we observed that 48.8% of patients had axillary lymph nodes. For most patients, the manoeuvre Tillaux was positive in 97.2%. The majority of patients were at TNM clinical stage III in 94% of cases, followed by those at T4d clinical stage in 6.0% of cases.

Table 3. Breakdown of data by clinical aspect of breast cancer.

Features

Workforce

N = 217

Percentage

(%)

How to find out

Medical consultation

201

92.6

Consultation/mass

16

7.4

Breast cancer clinic

Mastodynia

210

96.8

Nodule/mass

208

95.9

Skin changes

Orange peel skin

205

94.5

Ulceration

163

75.1

Ecchymosis

29

13.4

Paget’s eczematous lesion

8

3.7

Types of breast discharge

Lactescent/colostral

49

22.6

Serous

35

16.1

Bloody

16

7.4

Purulent

10

4.6

Nipple abnormality

Withdrawal

164

75.6

Umbilical

53

24.4

Presence of lymph nodes

Axillary

203

93.5

Sus or subclavicular

97

44.7

Thoracic

1

0.5

Tillaux manoeuvre

Positive

211

97.2

Negative

3

1.4

Not carried out

3

1.4

Clinical stage

III B TNM

204

94.0

T4d

13

6.0

4. Discussion

4.1. Prevalence

In our study, we found that the hospital prevalence of breast cancer was 18.2%.

Looking at the literature, few studies have looked at the prevalence of this condition. The prevalence found in our study is higher than that reported in most studies conducted in Africa.

However, according to the literature, Nigeria, the most populous African country, has a high hospital prevalence, with 40% of cases diagnosed at advanced stages (stages III - IV) [12].

In metropolitan France, the incidence of breast cancer in women was 58.5 per 100,000 inhabitants, or 0.058% in 2018 [3]. In Mexico, the prevalence was 17.7% in 2022 [13]. In the United States, breast cancer alone is expected to account for 29% of all new cancers in women [13].

The prevalence of breast cancer in Africa shows regional variations and distinct molecular subtypes. In Sub-Saharan Africa, studies report an age-standardised incidence ranging from 25 to 38 per 100,000 women, with an estimated annual increase of 3% to 5% [14]. In North Africa, a meta-analysis combining data from Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Egypt indicates an average incidence of 34.5 per 100,000 women [15]. Triple-negative cancers, which are particularly aggressive, account for 20% - 30% of cases in Sub-Saharan Africa, compared with 10% - 15% in Western countries [16]. Registries from 12 African countries confirm the geographical disparities, with lower incidences in East Africa (22 per 100,000) than in Southern Africa (32 per 100,000) [17] [18]. These figures underline the urgent need to strengthen surveillance and early detection systems.

The high prevalence of breast cancer found in our study could be explained by the fact that the health facility which was the subject of our study is the only breast cancer screening and treatment centre in the region, given the anatomopathological laboratory facilities it has, which means that almost all patients with a clinical suspicion of breast cancer and/or diagnosed elsewhere are referred there.

4.2. The Patient’s History

In this study, the prevalence of overweight (45.6%) in breast cancer patients was higher than the 30% - 40% reported by Lauby-Secretan et al. [19] in Western populations. This implies a probable increased exposure to local metabolic or nutritional factors, or to genetic predispositions in the population. Alcohol consumption in our study (78.8%) is significantly higher than the 25% - 35% trends observed in recent meta-analyses [20]. We believe that this difference could be explained by the cultural habits of the society. On the other hand, smoking (6.0%) is much lower than the 15% - 25% described by Gaudet et al. in 2018, suggesting behavioural differences between societies [21]. In fact, in our environment, smoking is predominantly male, which explains the low trend in our study. Finally, 79.3% of patients had a low socio-economic level, a rate exceeding the 40% - 60% reported by Coughlin [20] in 2019, which highlights inequalities in access to care or exacerbated social determinants in this population [4].

These shortcomings illustrate the need to analyse risk factors by taking into account local contexts and socio-cultural disparities.

In this study, 57.6% of breast cancer patients reported having their first menstrual period between the ages of 12 and 13, a result similar to the recent data from Bodicoat et al. in 2020 [22], who report a prevalence of 50% - 60% in Western populations.

With regard to the length of menstrual cycles, 92.0% of patients had cycles of 24 to 32 days.

In addition, we found that 52.5% were nulliparous and 53.9% nulliparous, significantly higher than the 25% - 35% reported in high-income countries by Fortner et al. [23] in 2019, perhaps reflecting distinct socio-cultural norms or barriers to accessing health services basic.

These variations underline the importance of contextualising hormonal and reproductive risk factors according to regional specificities and socio-economic dynamics.

4.3. Clinical Aspects of Breast Cancer

The presence of breast nodules/mass (95.9%) and mastodynia (96.8%) is higher than the 90% described by Ochalefu et al. [24] in 2019, suggesting a more advanced clinical presentation or limited self-monitoring. Ulceration (75.1%) and orange peel skin (94.5%) exceeded the 40% and 60% observed by Traoré et al. [25] in 2020 in Mali, possibly linked to delays in management. Ecchymosis (13.4%) and Paget’s eczematous lesions (3.7%) are less well documented in the African literature, while milky discharge (22.6%) and breast retraction (75.6%) are more frequent than in the work by Bado et al. [26] in 2021 in Burkina Faso, who found 67%.

Regarding the presence of lymph nodes, 93.5% of patients had axillary lymph nodes, compared with 60-70% in the study by Ali-Gombe et al. [27] in 2021 in Ghana, highlighting variations in tumour aggressiveness or clinical follow-up.

These data highlight distinct clinical profiles and regional disparities in Africa.

5. Conclusion

At the end of our study, we came to the following conclusion: the prevalence of breast cancer in our study was 18.2%. It generally affects women aged between 61 and 70 who are single and unemployed. The majority of patients were overweight and alcoholics. In terms of socio-economic status, the majority of patients were of low socio-economic status.

6. Limits of the Study

In our study, we were unable to collect data prospectively. In addition, we focused on the descriptive aspect of the results without analysing the various factors associated with breast cancer in our setting.

7. Outlook

We envisage and recommend that future researchers carry out an analytical study with prospective data collection, in order to determine the proportion of each factor associated with the occurrence of breast cancer in our environment. We recommend that an experimental study be carried out to analyse the various means of treating these cancers in our environment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Anyigba, C.A., Awandare, G.A. and Paemka, L. (2021) Breast Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Current State and Uncertain Future. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 246, 1377-1387.
https://doi.org/10.1177/15353702211006047
[2] Fitzmaurice, C., Allen, C., Barber, R.M., Barregard, L., Bhutta, Z.A., Brenner, H., et al. (2017) Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived with Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015. JAMA Oncology, 3, 524-548.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688
[3] Saucedo, M. and Deneux-Tharaux, C. (2024) Mortalité maternelle en France, 2016-2018, fréquence, causes et profil des femmes. Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie, 52, 185-200.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2024.02.020
[4] Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., Soerjomataram, I., et al. (2024) Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 74, 229-263.
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834
[5] DeSantis, C.E., Fedewa, S.A., Goding Sauer, A., Kramer, J.L., Smith, R.A. and Jemal, A. (2015) Breast Cancer Statistics, 2015: Convergence of Incidence Rates between Black and White Women. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 66, 31-42.
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21320
[6] Ferlay, J., Colombet, M., Soerjomataram, I., Parkin, D.M., Piñeros, M., Znaor, A., et al. (2021) Cancer Statistics for the Year 2020: An Overview. International Journal of Cancer, 149, 778-789.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33588
[7] WHO (2023) Framework for Implementation of the Global Breast Cancer Initiative. Evaluation, Strengthening and Scaling up for Early Detection and Management of Breast Cancer. World Health Organization.
[8] Abdellatif, M. (2015) Epidemiological Data on Cancer in the World and in Morocco. Revue Bibliographique. Annales des Sciences de la Santé, 1, 20-29.
[9] Raiah, M., Terki, K., Benrabah, L., Ammour, F., Lounis, A. and Ahmed Fouatih, Z. (2022) Épidémiologie des cancers en Algérie, 1996-2019. Bulletin du Cancer, 109, 909-915.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.05.003
[10] Agence d’Information d’Afrique Centrale (2023) Breast Cancer: Prevalence Rises to 32.3% in Congo.
[11] Kingu, M., Rahma, T., Nlandu, M., Bebele, K., Kiyabwe, S. and Ukundji, O. (2019) Profil épidémio-clinique et moléculaire du cancer du sein dans les hôpitaux de la ville Kinshasa. KisMed, 9, 326-332.
[12] Adebamowo, C.A., Famooto, A., Ogundiran, T.O., Aniagwu, T., Nkwodimmah, C. and Akang, E.E. (2008) Immunohistochemical and Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer in Nigeria. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 110, 183-188.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9694-5
[13] Joko-Fru, W.Y., Miranda-Filho, A., Soerjomataram, I., Egue, M., Akele-Akpo, M.T., N’da, G., et al. (2021) Breast Cancer Survival in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Population-Based Registry Study. International Journal of Cancer, 149, 1218-1228.
[14] Hercules, S.M., Alnajar, M., Chen, C., Mladjenovic, S.M., Shipeolu, B.A., Perkovic, O., et al. (2022) Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Prevalence in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMJ Open, 12, e055735.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055735
[15] Safiri, S., Noori, M., Nejadghaderi, S.A., Sullman, M.J.M., Bragazzi, N.L., Almasi-Hashiani, A., et al. (2022) Burden of Female Breast Cancer in the Middle East and North Africa Region, 1990–2019. Archives of Public Health, 80, Article No. 168.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-00918-y
[16] Brinton, L.A., Figueroa, J.D., Awuah, B., Yarney, J., Wiafe, S., Wood, S.N., et al. (2014) Breast Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: Opportunities for Prevention. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 144, 467-478.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2868-z
[17] Motolouze, K., Ndoua, C., Okobalemba, E., Njassine, R., Mapoko, B., Fosso, L., et al. (2023) Clinical, Paraclinical and Therapeutic Profile of Patients Operated on for Breast Cancer at the Yaoundé Gynaecological-Obstetric and Paediatric (HGOPY). Pan African Medical Journal, 44, Article No. 2.
[18] Kemfang Ngowa, J.D., Ebune, J.L., Ngassam, A., Atangana, J., Kabeyene, A. and Kasia, J.M. (2015) Clinicohistopathological Features and Molecular Markers of Breast Cancer in a Group of Patients at the Yaoundé General Hospital—Cameroon. Journal Africain du Cancer/African Journal of Cancer, 7, 108-112.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12558-015-0380-y
[19] Lauby-Secretan, B., Scoccianti, C., Loomis, D., Grosse, Y., Bianchini, F. and Straif, K. (2016) Body Fatness and Cancer—Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. New England Journal of Medicine, 375, 794-798.
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsr1606602
[20] Coughlin, S.S. (2019) Social Determinants of Breast Cancer Risk, Stage, and Survival. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 177, 537-548.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05340-7
[21] Gaudet, M.M., Gierach, G.L., Carter, B.D., Luo, J., Milne, R.L., Weiderpass, E., et al. (2018) Pooled Analysis of Nine Cohorts Reveals Breast Cancer Risk Factors by Tumor Molecular Subtype. Cancer Research, 78, 6011-6021.
https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-0502
[22] Bodicoat, D.H., Schoemaker, M.J., Jones, M.E., McFadden, E., Griffin, J., Ashworth, A., et al. (2020) Correction to: Timing of Pubertal Stages and Breast Cancer Risk: The Breakthrough Generations Study. Breast Cancer Research, 22, Article No. 19.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-020-1257-2
[23] Fortner, R.T., Sisti, J., Chai, B., Collins, L.C., Rosner, B., Hankinson, S.E., et al. (2019) Parity, Breastfeeding, and Breast Cancer Risk by Hormone Receptor Status and Molecular Phenotype: Results from the Nurses’ Health Studies. Breast Cancer Research, 21, Article No. 40.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1119-y
[24] Ochalefu, Y.M., Ogbole, G.I. and Oluwadiya, K.S. (2019) Clinical and Mammographic Profiles of Breast Cancer Patients in Abuja, Nigeria. Nigerian Medical Journal, 60, 123-129.
[25] Traoré, B., Togo, A. and Kanté, L. (2020) Epidemiological and Clinical Profile of Breast Cancer in Mali. Mali Medical, 35, 1-6.
[26] Bado, N.A., Zida, M. and Kaboré, R.A. (2021) Clinical and Histological Characteristics of Breast Cancer in Burkina Faso. Bulletin du Cancer, 108, 689-696.
[27] Ali-Gombe, M., Inuwa Mustaph, M., Folasire, A., Ntekim, A. and Campbell, O.B. (2021) Pattern of Survival of Breast Cancer Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in South West Nigeria. ecancermedicalscience, 15, Article 1192.
https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2021.1192

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.