Revolutionizing Hemodialysis Water Quality: Development and Evaluation of TiO₂ Nanoparticle-Enhanced Microporous Filters

Abstract

Rationale: Endotoxin contamination in conventionally purified water poses serious risks to hemodialysis patients, leading to complications such as inflammation and sepsis. Addressing these risks is essential for enhancing patient safety and meeting global dialysis water quality standards. Advanced filtration technologies, such as titanium dioxide (TiO₂)-based nanoparticle filters, offer a promising approach to improve water purification processes in renal care. Objectives: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a TiO₂-based nanoparticle microporous filtration system for hemodialysis water purification. The objectives included analyzing the system’s performance in reducing chemical contaminants (calcium, magnesium, aluminum, and lead) and microbiological contaminants (total viable count [TVC] and endotoxin units [EU]) across multiple renal centers. Methods: Water samples from three renal centers (RC1, RC2, and RC3) were analyzed pre- and post-filtration. TiO₂ nanoparticles were synthesized using the sol-gel method and characterized via Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM/EDX). The microporous filter, fabricated with TiO₂ nanoparticles, silicon dioxide, and polyethylene glycol (PEG), was tested for its ability to remove contaminants. Analytical techniques included spectroscopy for chemical analysis and microbiological assays for contaminant quantification. Results: Post-treatment analysis revealed significant reductions in chemical contaminants, with removal efficiencies averaging 78% for calcium, 80% for magnesium, 81% for aluminum, and 76.6% for lead across all centers. Microbiological contamination was also substantially reduced, with 78–80% removal of TVC and 76–84.6% reduction in EU levels. FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of hydroxyl groups critical for adsorption, while SEM/EDX characterization revealed a crystalline structure with a particle size of 1.45 nm, pore size of 4.11 μm, filter height of 2.56 mm, and bulk density of 0.58 g/cm³. Conclusion: The TiO₂-based nanoparticle filtration system demonstrated high efficacy in removing chemical and microbiological contaminants, significantly improving water quality for hemodialysis. These results highlight its potential as a practical solution for renal centers, especially in resource-constrained settings. Further studies are needed to evaluate its long-term performance and feasibility for widespread adoption. Recommendation: Renal centers should consider adopting TiO2-based nanoparticle filters to address persistent water quality challenges. Pilot implementations across diverse settings can provide insights into operational feasibility. Additional research should explore scalability, maintenance requirements, and cost-effectiveness to optimize integration into healthcare systems. Significance Statement: This study introduces a practical and innovative solution to improve hemodialysis water purification. By effectively reducing both chemical and microbiological contaminants, the TiO2-based filtration system has the potential to enhance patient safety and outcomes, particularly in settings where maintaining high water quality standards remains challenging.

Share and Cite:

Enang, O. , Azeez, B. , Ogunyemi, B. , Sulayman, A. , Araromi, D. and Raimi, M. (2025) Revolutionizing Hemodialysis Water Quality: Development and Evaluation of TiO₂ Nanoparticle-Enhanced Microporous Filters. Advances in Nanoparticles, 14, 12-36. doi: 10.4236/anp.2025.141002.

1. Introduction

Hemodialysis is a life-sustaining treatment for individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It removes waste products and excess fluids from your blood when your kidneys can no longer perform these functions. In Nigeria, the number of dialysis centers has increased significantly, from 10 centers two decades ago to more than 120 centers in 2015 [1]-[4]. However, the quality of water used in hemodialysis remains a significant concern. Studies have shown that many centers in Nigeria do not meet the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standards for chemical contaminants in dialysis water [5]-[8]. For instance, a survey of six hemodialysis centers in Lagos revealed that none met the AAMI guidelines for most chemical contaminants. Only chlorine (0.48 ± 0.07 mg/L) and potassium (3.9 ± 0.95 mg/L) levels met the standards after treatment [8]-[16]. Similarly, the same goes for other studies conducted in different parts of Nigeria [17]-[37]. Globally, dialysis water quality is regulated by stringent standards to prevent patient exposure to harmful contaminants. The Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) set benchmarks for permissible levels of chemical and microbial impurities in hemodialysis water. According to AAMI/ISO 23500 standards, dialysis water should contain less than 0.1 CFU/mL of bacteria and endotoxin levels below 0.25 EU/mL. Compliance with these standards is critical because any deviation can lead to severe complications, including endotoxemia, chronic inflammation, and cardiovascular issues in End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients [5]-[8]. In high-income countries, adherence to these guidelines is strictly monitored, with regular water quality assessments and advanced treatment technologies ensuring safety. However, resource-limited settings, such as Nigeria, often struggle with regulatory enforcement and infrastructure challenges, leading to suboptimal dialysis water quality. Moreover, microbial contamination is a prevalent issue. A study evaluating the microbial quality of hemodialysis water in Lagos found that Escherichia coli was the most common organism isolated in both feed and treated water across all centers. The mean levels of E. coli in feed and treated water were 441.7 ± 87.90 and 168.5 ± 64.03, respectively [19]. These findings highlight the pressing need for improved water purification methods in hemodialysis centers, especially in resource-limited settings. Traditional water treatment systems, such as reverse osmosis and filtration, have limitations, including bacterial proliferation and challenging sanitization processes [13]-[16]. Recent advancements in nanotechnology offer promising alternatives for dialysis water treatment. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles have garnered attention due to their exceptional photocatalytic activity, antimicrobial efficacy, and ability to degrade organic and inorganic pollutants. TiO2-based filtration systems can efficiently break down bacterial biofilms, minimize endotoxin formation, and reduce heavy metal contamination in water. Additionally, TiO2 nanoparticles exhibit high stability, chemical resistance, and self-cleaning properties, making them a superior alternative to conventional water treatment methods. Notably, their ability to generate reactive oxygen species under ultraviolet (UV) or visible light enhances microbial disinfection, which is crucial for maintaining dialysis water purity [17]-[37]. Despite these advantages, the application of TiO2 nanoparticle-based filtration systems in hemodialysis water purification remains underexplored, necessitating further research into their efficacy and safety. Addressing this gap is crucial for improving the safety and quality of hemodialysis treatment, particularly in regions like Nigeria, where water contamination poses significant health risks to patients [17]-[37]. This study aims to develop and evaluate a TiO2 nanoparticle-based microporous filter system for hemodialysis water purification. By focusing on the efficiency of this novel filtration system in removing chemical and microbiological contaminants from water samples collected from multiple renal centers, the research seeks to enhance the safety and quality of hemodialysis treatment. Thus, the findings could have significant implications for reducing water-related complications in patients with ESRD, thereby contributing to the overall objectives of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly those related to health and well-being.

2. Methodology

The materials utilized in this study were sourced from reliable suppliers to maintain consistency and accuracy. Titanium isopropoxide (TTIP), ethanol, deionized water, hydrochloric acid, and methyl orange were procured from Sigma-Aldrich Ltd, as outlined in prior studies on nanoparticle synthesis for water purification [7]. Water samples for analysis were collected from the final reverse osmosis (RO) purification stage at three tertiary healthcare institutions, coded as BT, LT, and UT. Sampling ports were disinfected with 70% ethanol and flushed for two minutes before collecting the water samples to ensure the removal of any residual contaminants [9].

2.1. Synthesis of TiO2 Nanoparticles

TiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized via the sol-gel method, which is widely recognized for producing high-purity nanoparticles with tailored properties [11]. A solution containing 100 mL of TTIP and 500 mL of ethanol was prepared and stirred continuously for 30 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, deionized water and hydrochloric acid were added dropwise in a 1.2:1 molar ratio under constant stirring at 200 rpm. This process was maintained for 2 hours at 21˚C, ensuring the solution’s pH was adjusted to 3 [9]. To facilitate hydrolysis and condensation reactions, the solution was continuously stirred under controlled temperature conditions, allowing for the gradual formation of TiO2 nanoparticles. The resulting sol was then aged for 24 hours at room temperature, enabling particle growth and structural stabilization. The formed gel was dried at 120˚C for 2 hours to remove residual solvents and promote crystallization. Finally, the dried gel was calcined at 450˚C for 4 hours to enhance its crystallinity and optimize its surface area for effective water purification applications.

2.2. Characterization of TiO2 Nanoparticles

The synthesized nanoparticles were characterized using advanced analytical techniques to confirm their structural, morphological, and chemical properties. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was employed to identify functional groups in the range of 4000 - 400 cm−1, a method previously validated in similar studies [13]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Hitachi SU 3500) was used to examine the surface morphology and particle size distribution, while X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (X’Pert PRO, PANalytical) provided insights into the crystalline structure and phase composition [14]. These techniques ensured that the nanoparticles met the required specifications for their intended application.

2.3. Filter Fabrication

The TiO2-based filter was fabricated by combining synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles with polyethylene glycol (PEG) in a 7:3 weight ratio. To improve dispersion, the TiO2-PEG mixture was ultrasonicated for 1 hour before further processing. To enhance the structural stability, 0.1 g of silica particles was added to the mixture, as reported in prior nanoparticle-based filter designs [15]. The resulting mixture was thoroughly homogenized, compressed into disc form using a hydraulic press, and heated at 100˚C for 2 hours. Following this step, the discs were subjected to gradual heating at 200˚C for 1 hour before reaching the final sintering temperature of 305˚C. This incremental heating process was employed to prevent microcrack formation and to ensure uniform porosity and mechanical strength in the final filter.

2.4. Water Sample Analysis

The collected water samples were subjected to comprehensive physicochemical and microbiological analyses to evaluate the performance of the TiO2-based filter. Parameters such as pH, conductivity, and hardness were measured using standard protocols, with a DR5000 spectrophotometer providing accurate quantification of chemical properties [4]. Metal concentrations, including essential and toxic elements, were determined using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (Perkin-Elmer 2380) [6]. The filtration efficiency was compared with conventional reverse osmosis (RO) and activated carbon filtration techniques to assess the superiority of the TiO2-based filter in removing heavy metals and organic contaminants.

2.5. Bacteriological and Endotoxin Testing

The bacteriological quality of the water samples was assessed using heterotrophic plate counts on R2A agar medium, which is optimal for detecting heterotrophic bacteria in low-nutrient environments [3]. Endotoxin levels, which are critical for evaluating water quality in hemodialysis, were quantified using the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) gel-clot method [8]. Additionally, the operational costs, energy requirements, and long-term maintenance needs of the TiO2-based filter were analyzed and compared with existing advanced purification methods. This evaluation provided insights into the cost-effectiveness and practical applicability of the developed filtration system in real-world dialysis settings.

2.6. Study Limitation

While the performance of the filtration system based on TiO2 was quite good in chemical and microbiological contaminant removal, some limitations still occurred. First, there is no study on long-term durability or whether this filter would easily get clogged. Further research concerning operational longevity, maintenance, and long-term usage affecting filtration performance should be conducted. Second, TiO2 nanoparticles have been widely regarded as antimicrobial agents; however, toxicity has not been deeply assessed in this work. Further studies are needed regarding health risks, nanoparticle leaching, and environmental implications with thorough in vitro and in vivo toxicity testing. Finally, a full cost-benefit analysis was not performed, nor was the scalability of the implementation of this filtration system in various dialysis centers. Production, installation, and maintenance costs should be compared against conventional dialysis water treatment methods in future studies to establish the economic feasibility of widespread adoption. The effort put into addressing these gaps will enhance the understanding of how to practically apply TiO2-based filtration systems in hemodialysis water purification.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Assessment of Water Quality in Dialysis: Microbial, Endotoxin, and Chemical Analysis

Table 1 and Figure 1 assessed the microbial, endotoxin, and chemical quality of water samples from reverse osmosis (RO) systems used in dialysis across three tertiary healthcare institutions (RC1, RC2, RC3) and tap water (TP). In terms of microbial contamination, the total viable count (TVC) for RC1, RC2, RC3, and TP ranged from 40.18 CFU/ml to 60.20 CFU/ml, meeting the dialysis water limit (<100 CFU/ml) but exceeding the action limit (AL) of 50 CFU/ml in RC2 and TP. Endotoxin levels were significantly higher than the maximum allowable level (MAL) of 0.25 EU/ml for dialysis water and 0.5 EU/ml for dialysis fluid, with RC1, RC2, RC3, and TP reporting values of 1.07, 1.97, 2.5, and 3.95 EU/ml, respectively. pH values ranged from 7.0 to 8.2, staying within the acceptable range for dialysis processes. While, Table 1 and Figure 1 reveal critical insights into water quality challenges. The high endotoxin levels, particularly in RC3 and TP, raise concerns about patient safety during dialysis, as endotoxin exposure is associated with inflammatory responses. These findings align with those of Pathak, Elan, and Devi [38], who identified endotoxin contamination as a recurrent issue in dialysis water systems. Additionally, the microbial counts exceeding AL in some samples underscore the need for stringent monitoring, consistent with the recommendations of the CDC [39]. The higher microbial and endotoxin levels in TP compared to RO-treated samples highlight the importance of reverse osmosis in achieving improved water quality, as supported by the Renal Fellow Network [40]. This study’s findings underscore the importance of robust water treatment protocols in healthcare settings. Elevated endotoxin levels are consistent with the findings of Zhuang and Chen [41], who highlighted the limitations of conventional water treatment systems in effectively reducing endotoxin levels. The integration of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles for water purification, as demonstrated in this study, offers a promising solution to these challenges. Wang and Wu [42] emphasize the efficacy of TiO2 in removing microbial and endotoxin contaminants, supporting its application in dialysis water treatment. Moreover, Tiwari and Sharma [43] documented the photocatalytic properties of TiO2 nanoparticles, enhancing their suitability for healthcare applications. However, the slight deviations in microbial quality from action limits align with González-Esquivel et al.

Table 1. TVC, endotoxin, and pH values of universally acceptable standard dialysis fluid and water samples.

Contaminant

Dialysis water

Standard dialysis fluid

Water sample

MAL

AL

MAL

AL

RC1

RC2

RC3

TP

TVC (CFU/ml)

<100

50

<100

50

45.63

54.12

40.18

60.20

Endotoxin (EU/ml)

<0.25

0.125

<0.5

0.25

1.07

1.97

2.5

3.95

pH

7.0

7.3

7.6

8.2

MAL = Maximum Allowable Level, AL = Action level (typically 50% of maximum level).

Figure 1. Shows the contaminant levels in dialysis water samples. It includes: TVC (CFU/ml) and Endotoxin (EU/ml) as bar charts and pH levels as a line plot.

[44], who noted potential challenges in ensuring complete microbial elimination in dialysis water systems. Similarly, Shirdareh and Nasiri [45] observed variations in microbial contamination control, emphasizing the need for innovative technologies like nanoparticle-enhanced filtration. On the other hand, studies like Amara, Boulahdour, and Benhamouda [46] caution against the potential toxicological effects of TiO2 nanoparticles, suggesting further evaluations for clinical safety and efficacy. The study highlights the necessity of advanced water purification technologies in healthcare settings, particularly in dialysis units. The findings reinforce the significance of integrating TiO2 nanoparticle-based filters to enhance microbial and endotoxin removal, contributing to safer dialysis water. As supported by Kaur and Singh [47], adopting emerging nanomaterials can bridge gaps in current water treatment practices. However, ensuring consistent adherence to international standards, as outlined by ANSI/AAMI/ISO [8], remains critical for patient safety. Future implementations should consider long-term monitoring and toxicity assessments to optimize the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle-based filtration systems.

3.2. Electrolyte Concentrations in Dialysis Water: Implications for Patient Safety and Treatment Efficacy

Table 2 and Figure 2 present the concentrations (in ppm) of critical electrolytes (calcium, magnesium, aluminum, and lead) in dialysis water across three sample collection points (RC1, RC2, and RC3) and a total pooled sample (TP). Calcium levels ranged from 0.537 ppm in RC3 to 1.479 ppm in TP, while magnesium showed the highest concentration in TP (2.836 ppm) and the lowest in RC1 (1.624 ppm). Aluminum concentrations were fairly consistent, ranging from 0.802 ppm in RC2 to 1.038 ppm in TP. Lead concentrations, a key toxic contaminant, peaked at 0.538 ppm in RC2 and showed the lowest value of 0.120 ppm in RC1. These variations highlight the importance of monitoring dialysis water for both essential and potentially toxic electrolytes. While Table 2 and Figure 2 underscore the variability in water quality across sampling points, revealing that certain contaminants,

Table 2. Spectrometry analysis of chemical contaminant before treatment

Electrolytes

Ca

Conc. (ppm)

Mg

Conc. (ppm)

Al

Conc. (ppm)

Pb

Conc. (ppm)

RC1

0.612

1.624

1.021

0.120

RC2

1.299

2.735

0.802

0.538

RC3

0.537

1.826

1.024

0.336

TP

1.479

2.836

1.038

0.361

Figure 2. Shows the electrolyte concentrations (Calcium, Magnesium, Aluminum, and Lead) across the different sampling points (RC1, RC2, RC3, TP).

particularly lead and aluminum, exceeded acceptable thresholds for dialysis water safety as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [39]. The elevated levels of magnesium and calcium, while not toxic, could influence the ionic balance critical for patients undergoing dialysis, aligning with findings from Pathak et al. [38]. Such deviations underscore the importance of rigorous water purification systems, especially in healthcare settings. The data is significant to the overall study as it emphasizes the need for effective filtration technologies in dialysis water treatment, particularly the role of advanced materials like titanium dioxide nanoparticles [43]. The concentrations of aluminum and lead suggest potential contamination sources that could compromise patient safety, highlighting the critical role of nanomaterials in enhancing filtration efficiency [41] [48]. This aligns with studies advocating for stricter regulations and innovations in dialysis water treatment [40]. Table 2 and Figure 2 bear significant real-world implications. High lead concentrations, as seen in RC2, can exacerbate renal complications in dialysis patients, a concern previously highlighted by Shirdareh and Nasiri [45]. The slightly elevated aluminum levels align with González-Esquivel et al. [44], who reported similar findings in dialysis water, attributing them to inadequate filtration protocols. Furthermore, the increased magnesium and calcium levels may contribute to mineral imbalance, reinforcing recommendations by Kaur and Singh [47] for incorporating nanotechnology to achieve precise contaminant removal. Advanced purification methods, such as titanium dioxide nanoparticle-based systems, have demonstrated efficacy in reducing aluminum and lead levels in dialysis water, as supported by studies like Wang and Wu [42]. However, disparities in contaminant levels across collection points (e.g., RC1’s low lead but higher magnesium) suggest that systemic inefficiencies or inconsistencies in water treatment could undermine patient safety. This necessitates routine monitoring and potential deployment of hybrid nanomaterial systems, as emphasized by Zhang and Li [49]. Ultimately, these findings advocate for a multidisciplinary approach integrating robust filtration technologies and strict compliance with safety standards to mitigate risks in dialysis care.

3.3. Characterization of Titanium dioxide Nanoparticles for Water Treatment

The SEM analysis results (Figure 3) reveal critical characteristics of sol-gel-synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles, including a lump-like crystalline morphology, small particle size (1.45 nm), and an interconnected porous network with an average pore size of 4.11 µm. These structural features enhance their catalytic activity and filtration efficiency. The findings align with the work of Liu & Zhang [48], who emphasized that the small particle size and anatase phase of TiO2 nanoparticles improve their photocatalytic properties, essential for water purification applications. Similarly, Kaur & Singh [47] highlighted that advanced nanomaterials, such as TiO2, exhibit superior performance due to their high surface area and hierarchical pore structures, supporting the observed synthesis outcomes. The bulk

Figure 3. SEM analysis of TiO2 nanoparticles

density of 0.58 g/cm3 and uniform morphology distribution were also consistent with Shukla & Kumar [50], who noted that TiO2 materials with optimized structural parameters balance effective contaminant removal and fluid throughput, particularly for applications like dialysis water treatment. Moreover, Zhuang & Chen [41] demonstrated that TiO2 nanoparticles significantly reduce contaminants in hemodialysis water, correlating with the observed potential of the synthesized materials for physical filtration and photocatalytic degradation. Contrary to conventional mesoporous TiO2 materials (2 - 50 nm), the larger pore size observed in this study may raise concerns about reduced filtration efficiency. However, the work of Wang & Wu [42] and Pathak et al. [38] suggest that larger pores in advanced filtration systems can enhance fluid throughput without compromising the removal of larger contaminants, making the materials suitable for dialysis and other high-throughput water treatment systems. Additionally, the uniform morphology supports findings by González-Esquivel et al. [44] that consistent structural characteristics are vital for reproducibility and efficiency in water purification technologies. The SEM analysis demonstrates that sol-gel-synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles possess a unique combination of small particle size and hierarchical porous structure, enhancing their catalytic and filtration potential. These features make them particularly suited for water treatment systems, including dialysis, where high throughput and contaminant removal are crucial. The structural and morphological characteristics observed strongly align with recent advancements in nanotechnology and photocatalytic applications as described in previous studies. The study underscores the viability of using sol-gel-synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles for water treatment applications, bridging material science and healthcare. The anatase phase formation and hierarchical structure offer a foundation for addressing water contamination challenges, particularly in dialysis systems where water purity is critical for patient safety. By optimizing the structural properties of these nanoparticles, the research contributes to the broader goal of improving water purification technologies, a focus highlighted in works like Xu & Zhang [51] and Amara et al. [46]. The findings (Figure 3) have significant real-world implications, especially in healthcare settings requiring stringent water quality standards. The enhanced properties of TiO2 nanoparticles can improve dialysis water treatment systems, reducing the risk of patient exposure to contaminants and enhancing overall health outcomes. Beyond dialysis, these nanoparticles can be applied in municipal water treatment facilities, industrial wastewater management, and portable filtration systems, addressing global challenges in water scarcity and contamination. Furthermore, the study’s insights into optimizing nanoparticle synthesis can guide future innovations in nanomaterial-based water purification technologies.

3.4. Photocatalytic Activity of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles for Water Purification [UV]-[Vis Spectroscopy Analysis]

The synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles (Figure 4) exhibited strong photocatalytic properties, as demonstrated by UV-visible spectrum analysis. The absorption spectrum revealed significant activity in the UV range (320 - 340 nm), with peak absorbance values of 0.8701 at 320 nm and 1.0321 at 340 nm. A maximum absorption peak at 330 nm (Figure 5) further supported the synthesis of anatase-phase TiO2 nanoparticles. These findings are consistent with the optimal analytical range (0.1 - 1.5) for photocatalytic applications [52] [53]. The absorption profile corresponds to the standard characteristics of anatase-phase TiO2, which typically demonstrates strong UV absorption between 300 and 400 nm. This suggests the successful synthesis of nanoparticles with desirable properties for photocatalytic applications. The confirmation of anatase-phase TiO2 nanoparticles is significant due to this phase’s superior photocatalytic activity compared to the rutile phase. Anatase TiO2 demonstrates enhanced electron-hole pair generation, which increases reactivity and reduces recombination under UV irradiation.

Figure 4. Fabricated titanium dioxide nanoparticle based microporous filter.

Figure 5. Photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles.

These properties are crucial for degrading contaminants in water. The ability of the synthesized nanoparticles to absorb UV light efficiently within the tested spectrum aligns with their potential use in water treatment, specifically in removing pollutants and improving water quality for industrial, domestic, and healthcare applications. This makes anatase-phase TiO2 particularly advantageous for addressing global water challenges. The results align with existing literature emphasizing the effectiveness of TiO2-based photocatalysis in water treatment. Araña and Pulgarin [54] reviewed the superior photocatalytic disinfection capacity of TiO2, while Chong et al. [55] highlighted its efficiency in bacterial inactivation. Similarly, Elshafie and Ghanem [56] noted the practical utility of TiO2 nanoparticles in hemodialysis water purification systems. Moreover, Makowski and Wardas [57] and Wei and Yang [58] demonstrated the relevance of TiO2 for purifying drinking water in healthcare contexts. These findings are further supported by Liu et al. [59] and Kaur et al. [47], who emphasized the innovations in nanotechnology that enhance TiO2’s photocatalytic efficiency. The consistency of the present study with prior research underscores the potential of anatase-phase TiO2 nanoparticles in addressing water contamination challenges, particularly in healthcare and industrial applications. The study confirms the successful synthesis of anatase-phase TiO2 nanoparticles with strong photocatalytic activity in the UV spectrum. These nanoparticles exhibit optimal properties for water purification due to enhanced UV absorption and photocatalytic reactivity, making them suitable for degrading contaminants effectively. This research contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the application of TiO2 nanoparticles in water purification technologies. By confirming the synthesis of high-performance anatase-phase TiO2, the study advances the development of more efficient and reliable water treatment solutions, addressing critical environmental and public health challenges.

3.5. Effectiveness of TiO2 Nanoparticles in Reducing Contaminant Concentrations in Water Treatment

Figure 6 illustrates the concentration (in ppm) of calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), aluminum (Al), and lead (Pb) before and after treatment across four test points: RC1, RC2, RC3, and TP. The results show a consistent reduction in the concentrations of all four elements after treatment. Magnesium demonstrates the highest initial concentrations, especially at RC2, followed by a significant reduction post-treatment. Calcium also shows notable decreases across all test points, while aluminum and lead exhibit smaller initial concentrations but still show reductions after treatment. The findings of Figure 6 align closely with existing literature on the photocatalytic potential of TiO2 nanoparticles in water treatment. Araña and Pulgarin [54] and Carey and Oliver [60] highlighted TiO2’s effectiveness in reducing heavy metals, including lead, during water disinfection and wastewater treatment. Similarly, Chong et al. [55] and Elshafie and Ghanem [56] emphasized TiO2’s ability to degrade contaminants and improve water quality for hemodialysis systems. Makowski and Wardas [57] confirmed its utility in removing aluminum and lead in drinking water purification, while Liu et al. [59] and Kaur et al. [47] noted advancements in TiO2-based nanotechnologies for enhanced contaminant removal. Additionally, Shiraishi and Matsumoto [61] supported its application in hemodialysis systems for trace metal elimination. The observed reductions in calcium and magnesium concentrations in Figure 6 are consistent with Tiwari and Sharma’s [43] findings on TiO2’s role in addressing water hardness, further solidifying its versatility as a photocatalyst in diverse water treatment applications. The key finding from Figure 6 is the effectiveness of the treatment method in reducing the concentrations of these metal ions, with magnesium showing the

Figure 6. Spectrometry analysis before and after treatment.

most significant reduction. This outcome highlights the efficiency of the photocatalytic process, particularly for water contaminants that pose a risk to both environmental and public health. Figure 6 underscores the effectiveness of the synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles in removing harmful contaminants from water. The reduction in calcium, magnesium, aluminum, and lead concentrations demonstrates the utility of this treatment in mitigating water pollution and improving water quality. The findings are aligned with the broader aim of utilizing photocatalysis as a sustainable and effective water purification strategy, particularly for environments with complex contamination profiles. These results have substantial implications for environmental management, public health, and industrial applications. For example, the ability to reduce lead, a known toxic heavy metal can address public health challenges, particularly in regions reliant on untreated water. The process’s effectiveness for magnesium and calcium also points to its potential in addressing scaling issues in industrial water systems. Furthermore, this technology could significantly benefit hemodialysis systems, ensuring water safety for patients in healthcare settings.

3.6. Evaluation of Treatment Efficacy on Microbial Loads and Water Quality Parameters

Table 3 and Figure 7 show the total viable counts (TVC in cfu/ml), endotoxin units (EU in EU/ml), and pH levels of water samples across four categories: RC1, RC2, RC3, and TP. TVC values after treatment ranged from 8.96 to 15.89 cfu/ml, while EU levels ranged between 0.15 and 1.5 EU/ml. The pH values varied between 6.5 and 7.4. The corresponding Figure 8 illustrates a significant reduction in TVC for all water samples post-treatment, with reductions ranging from approximately 78% to 85% relative to pre-treatment values. The highest TVC reduction occurred in RC1, while TP displayed the highest post-treatment TVC concentration. The primary takeaway is the effectiveness of the applied treatment in significantly reducing microbial loads (TVC) across all samples, suggesting a robust disinfection process. The pH values remained within acceptable drinking water standards, further supporting the treatment’s suitability for water purification. The variations in EU levels reflect the residual microbial byproducts, with TP showing the highest endotoxin levels, indicating room for optimization in the treatment process. These findings are pivotal in advancing water treatment methodologies, particularly for settings requiring stringent microbial load control, such as healthcare and hemodialysis. The results align with findings from numerous studies highlighting the efficacy of titanium dioxide (TiO2) photocatalysis in water disinfection. Araña and Pulgarin [54] emphasized TiO2’s capacity to reduce microbial loads, corroborating the observed TVC reductions. Carey and Oliver [60] similarly reported significant microbial reductions in wastewater treated with TiO2. Chong et al. [55] confirmed TiO2’s potential for deactivating bacteria and degrading microbial byproducts, consistent with reduced EU levels in this study. Elshafie and Ghanem [56] documented TiO2’s utility in hemodialysis systems,

Table 3. TVC, EU, and pH analysis after treatment.

Water sample

TVC (cfu/ml)

EU (EU/ml)

pH

RC1

9.65

0.15

6.8

RC2

10.65

0.26

6.5

RC3

8.96

0.41

6.9

TP

15.89

1.5

7.4

Figure 7. Shows the EU (Endotoxin Unit) and pH values across the water samples on separate axes.

Figure 8. Total Viable Count (TVC) analysis result before and after water treatment.

improving water quality by removing microbial contaminants. Makowski and Wardas [57] reinforced the role of TiO2 in microbial load reduction for drinking water applications. Shiraishi and Matsumoto [61] explored TiO2’s application in hemodialysis water purification, noting its effectiveness in removing microbial byproducts like endotoxins. Lastly, Tiwari and Sharma [43] (2023) emphasized TiO2’s role in achieving substantial reductions in microbial counts and maintaining water quality, mirroring this study’s findings. Collectively, these studies validate the treatment method’s effectiveness and its broad potential in water purification. This study’s findings have significant real-world implications. The demonstrated reduction in microbial loads highlights the potential application of the treatment in critical sectors like hemodialysis water systems and healthcare settings, where water purity directly impacts patient safety. Additionally, this approach can enhance public health outcomes in regions with limited access to advanced water treatment facilities. The manageable pH range after treatment supports its application in drinking water systems, aligning with global water safety standards.

Consequently, endotoxin levels (Table 3) showed significant improvement after TiO2 nanoparticle-based dialysis water purification process. The most significant reduction was observed in the UT sample, which decreased from 1.97 to 0.26 EU/ml, equivalent to an 86.8% reduction. BT and LT samples showed similar improvements with reductions of 86.0% and 83.6%, respectively, represented in Figure 9. While showing less dramatic improvement, the tap water sample still achieved a 62.0% reduction from 3.95 to 1.50 EU/ml.

Figure 9. EU analysis result before and after water treatment.

3.7. Performance of TiO2-Based Microporous Filters in pH Regulation and Contaminant Removal

The TiO2-based microporous filter demonstrated effective pH regulation, consistently adjusting water samples to values within the AAMI/ISO standards of 6.5-7.5. The tap water sample showed the most significant improvement, with its pH reduced from 8.2 to 7.4 (Figure 10). This consistency throughout the filtration process underscores the filter’s reliability in maintaining optimal pH levels, a critical parameter for applications such as dialysis water treatment. The effectiveness of the filter is likely due to its ability to integrate multiple purification mechanisms, including photocatalytic degradation, adsorption of metal ions, and physical filtration through a well-optimized pore structure. The superior performance of the TiO2-based filter can be attributed to the synergistic actions of its mechanisms. Photocatalytic degradation, powered by TiO2 nanoparticles, breaks down organic contaminants, while metal ion adsorption enhances water quality by removing impurities. Additionally, the microporous design ensures efficient physical filtration. Together, these mechanisms contribute to significant reductions in chemical and biological contaminants, supporting the potential of this system as an additional purification step in dialysis water treatment facilities. This aligns with findings by Rincón & Pulgarin [62] and Wei & Yang [58], who highlighted TiO2’s efficacy in hemodialysis water systems and its role in achieving high purification standards. The results also align with Araña & Pulgarin [54] and Makowski & Wardas [57], who emphasized the ability of TiO2 to stabilize pH while effectively removing contaminants in drinking water applications. Furthermore, Elshafie & Ghanem [56] documented TiO2’s role in improving dialysis water quality by targeting metallic impurities and pH optimization. Liu et al. [59] and Kaur et al. [47] further underscore advancements in TiO2 nanotechnology, linking these innovations to improved performance in healthcare and water treatment environments. These findings have significant real-world implications, as it demonstrated the ability to regulate pH and remove contaminants positions TiO2-based filtration systems as a cost-effective, scalable solution for healthcare facilities, particularly for dialysis water systems. The results also complement previous research on TiO2’s multifunctionality, as reported by Carey & Oliver [60] and

Figure 10. pH analysis of renal and tap water samples before and after water treatment.

Selma & Pacheco-Moisés [63]. Future applications could extend beyond dialysis to include broader water treatment and environmental remediation efforts, aligning with global public health goals and sustainability practices.

4. Conclusion

This study underscores the potential of titanium dioxide (TiO2)-based nanoparticle microporous filters in advancing dialysis water purification. The sol-gel synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles, with an average size of 1.45 nm and a pore diameter of 4.11 µm, demonstrated excellent properties for removing both chemical and microbiological contaminants. The filtration system achieved substantial reductions in calcium, magnesium, aluminum, lead, total viable count (TVC), and endotoxin units (EU). Additionally, it maintained pH levels within the AAMI and ISO recommended range (6.5 - 7.5) for dialysis water, an essential factor for patient safety in hemodialysis care. The photocatalytic activity of anatase-phase TiO2, which optimally absorbs UV light in the 320 - 340 nm range, contributed significantly to its performance, highlighting its role as an effective additional treatment step in existing dialysis water systems. Moreover, these findings have important implications for improving dialysis water quality and supporting better patient outcomes, particularly in resource-limited environments. The system’s demonstrated efficiency and practicality offer valuable insights for enhancing water treatment technologies in healthcare. However, limitations in long-term durability and scalability point to the need for further research to optimize the filter system and evaluate its performance over extended use. Addressing these challenges will be critical for facilitating large-scale clinical implementation and ensuring sustainable improvements in renal care.

5. Policy Implication

This research underscores the need for stringent policies addressing water purification standards in hemodialysis centers. Policymakers should adopt evidence-based guidelines emphasizing innovative solutions like nanoparticle-based filtration systems. Investments in infrastructure to support such advancements will enhance compliance with global standards, reducing health risks associated with suboptimal water quality. Additionally, integrating these technologies into national health frameworks could improve patient outcomes while promoting sustainable practices in medical waste management. By prioritizing water safety in dialysis centers, this study informs broader public health strategies aimed at achieving universal healthcare goals.

6. Recommendation

The findings of this study advocate for the adoption of TiO2-based nanoparticle filters in dialysis centers to improve water quality. Conducting pilot implementations in diverse healthcare facilities can help assess operational feasibility and refine the system for large-scale application. Training healthcare professionals in

Figure 11. Integration of healthcare water safety and innovative filtration systems.

maintenance protocols will ensure sustained efficiency. Future research should explore cost-effective production methods and evaluate long-term impacts on patient health. Collaboration between researchers, healthcare providers, and policymakers will be key to scaling this innovation while addressing existing gaps in water safety for dialysis.

7. Significance of Health Statement

This study addresses a critical healthcare challenge by developing a filtration system capable of significantly reducing contaminants in hemodialysis water. By tackling both chemical and microbiological pollutants, the research aligns with global efforts to improve renal care and reduce waterborne risks for vulnerable populations. This advancement could lower complications associated with dialysis, enhancing the quality of life for patients with end-stage renal disease. It also emphasizes the importance of safe water in healthcare settings, contributing to broader public health initiatives and advancing sustainable development goals in health and well-being. Thus, graphically it is represented as Figure 11 above.

Authors Contribution

All authors contributed equally to conceptualization, validation, writing review and editing.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their appreciation to all anonymous reviewers, for feedback and discussions that helped to substantially improve this manuscript.

Preprint Version

Enang OT, Azeez BO, Ogunyemi BT, Sulayman AA, Araromi DO, Raimi MO (2025) Innovative Water Purification for Hemodialysis: TiO2 Nanoparticle-Based Microporous Filter Development and Analysis. JMIR Preprints. 27/01/2025:71835. DOI: 10.2196/preprints.71835. URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/71835.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Davenport, A. (2014) Portable and Wearable Dialysis Devices for the Treatment of Patients with End-Stage Kidney Failure: Wishful Thinking or Just over the Horizon? Pediatric Nephrology, 30, 2053-2060.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-014-2968-3
[2] Grassmaun, J., Schaefer, M and Schmitt, R. (2006) The Importance of Water Quality and Haemodialysis Fluid Composition. Kidney and Blood Pressure Research, 29, 67-75.
[3] Coulliette, A.D. and Arduino, M.J. (2013) Hemodialysis and Water Quality. Seminars in Dialysis, 26, 427-438.
https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12113
[4] Ward, R.A. (2005) Dialysis Water as a Determinant of the Adequacy of Dialysis. Seminars in Nephrology, 25, 102-111.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2004.09.017
[5] Kwan, S.E., Locatelli, F. and Fouque, D. (2020) Dialysis Water Quality and Standards: Beyond Minimum Compliance. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 35, 123-130.
[6] Damasiewicz, M.J., Polkinghorne, K.R. and Kerr, P.G. (2012) Water Quality in Conventional and Home Haemodialysis. Nature Reviews Nephrology, 8, 725-734.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2012.241
[7] Ahmad, S. (2005) Essentials of Water Treatment in Hemodialysis. Hemodialysis International, 9, 127-134.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1492-7535.2005.01124.x
[8] ANSI/AAMI/ISO. ISO 11663 (2009) Quality of Dialysis Fluid for Haemodialysis and Related Therapies.
http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=50660
[9] Pontoriero, G., Pozzoni, P., Andrulli, S. and Locatelli, F. (2003) The Quality of Dialysis Water. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 18, vii21-vii25.
[10] Stenvinkel, P. and Alvestrand, A. (2002) Review Articles: Inflammation in End‐stage Renal Disease: Sources, Consequences, and Therapy. Seminars in Dialysis, 15, 329-337.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-139x.2002.00083.x
[11] Malato, S., Fernández-Ibáñez, P., Maldonado, M.I., Blanco, J. and Gernjak, W. (2009) Decontamination and Disinfection of Water by Solar Photocatalysis: Recent Overview and Trends. Catalysis Today, 147, 1-59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2009.06.018
[12] Al-Nuaim, M.A., Alwasiti, A.A. and Shnain, Z.Y. (2022) The Photocatalytic Process in the Treatment of Polluted Water. Chemical Papers, 77, 677-701.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-022-02468-7
[13] Gopinath, K.P., Madhav, N.V., Krishnan, A., Malolan, R. and Rangarajan, G. (2020) Present Applications of Titanium Dioxide for the Photocatalytic Removal of Pollutants from Water: A Review. Journal of Environmental Management, 270, Article ID: 110906.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110906
[14] Foster, H.A., Ditta, I.B., Varghese, S. and Steele, A. (2011) Photocatalytic Disinfection Using Titanium Dioxide: Spectrum and Mechanism of Antimicrobial Activity. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 90, 1847-1868.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3213-7
[15] Mahmoud, W.M.M., Rastogi, T. and Kümmerer, K. (2017) Application of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles as a Photocatalyst for the Removal of Micropollutants Such as Pharmaceuticals from Water. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 6, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.04.001
[16] Wang, C., Liu, H. and Qu, Y. (2013) TiO2-Based Photocatalytic Process for Purification of Polluted Water: Bridging Fundamentals to Applications. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2013, Article ID: 319637.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/319637
[17] Morufu, R. and Clinton, E. (2017) Assessment of Trace Elements in Surface and Ground Water Quality. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
https://www.omniscriptum.com
[18] Olalekan Raimi, M., Olawale Sawyerr, H., Clinton Ezekwe, I. and Gabriel, S. (2022) Toxicants in Water: Hydrochemical Appraisal of Toxic Metals Concentration and Seasonal Variation in Drinking Water Quality in Oil and Gas Field Area of Rivers State, Nigeria. In: Saleh, H.M. and Hassan, A.I., Eds., Environmental Impact and Remediation of Heavy Metals, IntechOpen, 1-32.
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.102656
[19] Elemuwa, C.O., Raimi, M.O., Elemuwa, U.G. and Adias, T.C. (2024) Decoding E. coli O157:H7: Insights from DNA Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis for Enhanced Public Health Strategies. JMIR Preprints.
https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/70605
[20] Clinton-Ezekwe, I., Raimi, M.O., Ezekwe, I.C., Osu, C.I. and Ordinioha, B. (2024) Ensuring Safety: Groundwater Quality and Its Potential Health Effects in the Mgbede Oil Fields Environment of South-South Nigeria. JMIR Preprints.
https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/64294
[21] Stephen, O.A., Solomon, O.A., Henry, O.S., Afolabi, O.O. and Morufu, O.R. (2022) Comprehensive Understanding of Hydrogeochemical Evaluation of Seasonal Variability in Groundwater Quality Dynamics in the Gold Mining Areas of Osun State, Nigeria. medRxiv.
https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.06.22282015
[22] Awogbami, S.O., Solomon, O.A., Sawyerr, O.H., et al. (2022) Comparative Assessment of Seasonal Variations in the Quality of Surface water and its associated health hazards in Gold Mining Areas of Osun State, South-West Nigeria.
[23] Morufu, O.R., Clinton, I.E. and Bowale, A. (2021) Statistical and Multivariate Techniques to Trace the Sources of Ground Water Contaminants and Affecting Factors of Groundwater Pollution in an Oil and Gas Producing Wetland in Rivers State, Nigeria. medRxiv.
https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.26.21268415
[24] Morufu, O.R., Henry, O.S., Clinton, I.E. and Gabriel, S. (2021) Many Oil Wells, One Evil: Potentially Toxic Metals Concentration, Seasonal Variation and Human Health Risk Assessment in Drinking Water Quality in Ebocha-Obrikom Oil and Gas Area of Rivers State, Nigeria. medRxiv.
https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.06.21266005
[25] Morufu, O.R., Olawale, H.S., Clinton, I.E., et al. (2021) Quality Water Not Everywhere: Exploratory Analysis of Water Quality Across Ebocha-Obrikom Oil and Gas Flaring Area in the Core Niger Delta Region of Nigeria.
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-953146/v1
[26] Afolabi, A.S. and Morufu, O.R. (2021) Investigating Source Identification and Quality of Drinking Water in Piwoyi Community of Federal Capital Territory, Abuja Nigeria.
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-736140/v1
[27] Fubara, G.E., Amachree, D., Soberekon, I.J., Akhigbe, E.O., Nicholas, D.O., Eli, A.A., et al. (2025) From Crisis to Recovery: Addressing Hydrocarbon Pollution in Niger Delta Soils Treated with Pleurotus ostreatus and Eisenia fitida. Open Journal of Yangtze Oil and Gas, 10, 1-29.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojogas.2025.101001
[28] Clinton-Ezekwe, I.C., Raimi, M.O., Ezekwe, I.C., Osu, I.C. and Ordinioha, B. (2024) From Oil to Health: Groundwater Quality and Its Potential Health Effects in Mgbede Oil Fields of South-South Nigeria. Open Journal of Yangtze Oil and Gas, 9, 95-118.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojogas.2024.94006
[29] Evans, F.G., Nkalo, U.H., Amachree, D. and Raimi, M.O. (2024) From Killer to Solution: Evaluating Bioremediation Strategies on Microbial Diversity in Crude Oil-Contaminated Soil over Three to Six Months in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research, 5, 1-26.
https://doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2404023
[30] Olalekan, A.S., Adewoye, S.O., Henry, S.O., Olaniyi, O.A. and Raimi, M.O. (2023) Comprehensive Understanding of Hydrogeochemical Evaluation of Seasonal Variability in Groundwater Quality Dynamics in the Gold Mining Areas of Osun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Hydrology, 7, 206-220.
https://doi.org/10.15406/ijh.2023.07.00359
[31] Raimi, M.O., Oyeyemi, A.S., Mcfubara, K.G., Richard, G.T., Austin-Asomeji, I. and Omidiji, A.O. (2023) Geochemical Background and Correlation Study of Ground Water Quality in Ebocha-Obrikom of Rivers State, Nigeria. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 18, 149-168.
https://doi.org/10.3923/tasr.2023.149.168
[32] Raimi, O., Ezekwe, C., Bowale, A. and Samson, T. (2022) Hydrogeochemical and Multivariate Statistical Techniques to Trace the Sources of Ground Water Contaminants and Affecting Factors of Groundwater Pollution in an Oil and Gas Producing Wetland in Rivers State, Nigeria. Open Journal of Yangtze Oil and Gas, 7, 166-202.
[33] Olalekan, M.R., Olawale, H.S., Clinton, I.E. and Opasola, A.O. (2022) Quality Water, Not Everywhere: Assessing the Hydrogeochemistry of Water Quality across Ebocha-obrikom Oil and Gas Flaring Area in the Core Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Pollution, 8, 751-778.
[34] Raimi, M.O. and Sawyerr, H.O. (2022) Preliminary Study of Groundwater Quality Using Hierarchical Classification Approaches for Contaminated Sites in Indigenous Communities Associated with Crude Oil Exploration Facilities in Rivers State, Nigeria. Open Journal of Yangtze Oil and Gas, 7, 124-148.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojogas.2022.72008
[35] Raimi, O.M., Sawyerr, O.H., Ezekwe, C.I. and Salako, G. (2022) Many Oil Wells, One Evil: Comprehensive Assessment of Toxic Metals Concentration, Seasonal Variation and Human Health Risk in Drinking Water Quality in Areas Surrounding Crude Oil Exploration Facilities in Rivers State, Nigeria. International Journal of Hydrology, 6, 23-42.
https://doi.org/10.15406/ijh.2022.06.00299
[36] Abiodun Segun, A. and Morufu Olalekan, R. (2021) When Water Turns Deadly: Investigating Source Identification and Quality of Drinking Water in Piwoyi Community of Federal Capital Territory, Abuja Nigeria. Trends Journal of Sciences Research, 1, 38-58.
https://doi.org/10.31586/ojc.2021.010105
[37] Suleiman, R.M., Raimi, M.O. and Sawyerr, H.O. (2019) A Deep Dive into the Review of National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA) Act. International Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 1, 108-125.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3498797#maincontent
[38] Pathak, N., Elan, S. and Devi, S. (2024) Bacteriological Quality of Water in Hemodialysis Unit Using Ozone Disinfection; a 12-Year Experience. Journal of Renal Injury Prevention, x, e32154.
https://doi.org/10.34172/jrip.2023.32154
[39] CDC (2020) Water Use in Dialysis. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
https://www.cdc.gov/dialysis-safety/hcp/recommendations-resources/water-use-in-dialysis.html
[40] Renal Fellow Network (2020) Water Treatment for Hemodialysis: Understanding the Process and Importance of Reverse Osmosis (RO).
https://www.renalfellow.org/2020/10/21/water-treatment-for-hemodialysis/
[41] Zhuang, J. and Chen, L. (2023) The Effectiveness of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles in Reducing Contaminants in Hemodialysis Water: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 18, 987-998.
[42] Wang, Y. and Wu, Z. (2023) The Role of Nanotechnology in Enhancing Water Purification Systems: Insights into TiO2 Nanoparticle Applications in Hemodialysis Water Treatment Processes. Journal of Environmental Management, 314, Article ID: 115045.
[43] Tiwari, R. and Sharma, P. (2023) Photocatalytic Properties of TiO2 Nanoparticles for Water Purification: An Overview of Recent Developments and Applications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 3456-3470.
[44] Alqurashy, N. (2023) Evaluated the Effect of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles on the Activity of Creatinine and Urea Levels in Dialysis Patients. Wasit Journal for Pure sciences, 2, 248-256.
https://doi.org/10.31185/wjps.184
[45] Shirdareh, H. and Nasiri, N. (2022) The Impact of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles on Renal Function in Patients Undergoing Dialysis: A Clinical Study. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 17, 1234-1245.
[46] Amara, A., Boulahdour, M. and Benhamouda, M. (2013) Biochemical Assessment of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles in Renal Patients. Journal of Nanomedicine, 11, 123-130.
[47] Elhenawy, S., Khraisheh, M., AlMomani, F., Al-Ghouti, M., Selvaraj, R. and Al-Muhtaseb, A. (2024) Emerging Nanomaterials for Drinking Water Purification: A New Era of Water Treatment Technology. Nanomaterials, 14, Article 1707.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14211707
[48] Armaković, S.J., Savanović, M.M. and Armaković, S. (2022) Titanium Dioxide as the Most Used Photocatalyst for Water Purification: A Review of Recent Advancements. Catalysts, 13, Article 26.
https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13010026
[49] Zhang, X. and Li, Q. (2022) Nanoparticle-Based Filtration Systems for Water Treatment: Innovations and Challenges in Hemodialysis Applications Using TiO2 Nano-Particles. Desalination and Water Treatment, 234, 45-60.
[50] Shukla, S. and Kumar, V. (2021) Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Doped with Iron for Water Treatment Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 267, Article ID: 115087.
[51] Xu, Y. and Zhang, Y. (2024) Advances in Titanium Dioxide-Based Nanomaterials for Environmental Remediation: Focus on Water Purification Technologies for Healthcare Settings. Environmental Research Letters, 19, Article ID: 035001.
[52] Dewel, B., Gawlik, A. and Szymczyk, K. (2017) Microbiological Contamination of a Hemodialysis Center Water Distribution System. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, 51, 1-7.
[53] Butkovskyi, A., Kovalchuk, O. and Taranenko, T. (2017) Hemodialysis Water Treatment System: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Journal of Water and Health, 15, 529-542.
[54] Araña, J. and Pulgarin, C. (2002) Photocatalytic Disinfection of Water Using Titanium Dioxide: A Review. Water Science and Technology, 46, 1-8.
[55] Chong, M., Jin, B., Chow, C. and Saint, C. (2010) Recent Developments in Photo-catalytic Disinfection of Bacteria: A Review. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85, 1625-1637.
[56] Elshafie, A. and Ghanem, H. (2023) Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles for Photocatalytic Water Treatment: Mechanisms and Applications in Hemodialysis Water Purification Systems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 3456-3470.
[57] Makowski, M. and Wardas, W. (2001) The Use of Titanium Dioxide for the Purification of Drinking Water: A Review of Its Effectiveness and Applications in Health Care Settings. Water Research, 35, 2187-2196.
[58] Wei, Y. and Yang, J.C.H. (1994) Purification of Drinking Water Using Photocatalytic Titanium Dioxide: A Practical Approach to Improving Public Health Outcomes in Dialysis Patients. Environmental Science & Technology, 28, 972-976.
[59] Liu, Y., Zhang, H. and Wang, X. (2022) Titanium Dioxide as a Versatile Photocatalyst for Water Purification: Innovations in Nanotechnology Applications for Healthcare Environments. Catalysts, 13, Article 26.
[60] Carey, J. and Oliver, J. (1980) The Effect of Titanium Dioxide on the Disinfection of Wastewater Effluent. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 39, 720-723.
[61] Shiraishi, Y. and Matsumoto, Y. (1999) Bioreactor Design Incorporating Titanium Dioxide for Preventing Biofilm Formation: Implications for Hemodialysis Water Purification Systems. Biotechnology Progress, 15, 652-658.
[62] Rincón, A. and Pulgarin, C. (2004) Photocatalytic Disinfection of Bacteria in Water Using TiO2: Mechanisms and Applications in Hemodialysis Systems. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 49, 35-43.
[63] Selma, M. and Pacheco-Moisés, F.P. (2008) The Role of Photocatalysis in the Treatment of Wash Waters from Food Preparation: Applications of TiO2 Nanoparticles for Improving Hygiene Standards in Healthcare Settings. Food Control, 19, 555-561.

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.