Agroclimatic Suitability of Malanga (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) under Rainfed Conditions in Mexico

Abstract

Malanga (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott), also known as taro or quiscamote in Latin America, is a plant species with ornamental, culinary and industrial uses, adapted to warm and humid climates. Nowadays, Malanga fit very well in the overseas growing trend towards a healthier lifestyle, which is reflected in the incorporation of foods and drinks that have nutraceutical characteristics. These products, which offer numerous health benefits, are driving a notable increase in their consumption and popularity. Considering that the cultivation of Malanga could be a great opportunity to diversify the Mexican market this work had the objective to identify suitable agroclimatic areas for the cultivation of Malanga under rainfed conditions in Mexico. For zoning, two sets of key factors were evaluated for optimal crop development: Edaphic factors, such as slope, depth, texture and pH of the soil; And climatic factors, such as precipitation, temperature, hours of daylight and altitude. The results revealed areas with high and medium productive potential. The methodology used included the definition of the agroecological requirements of the crop, based on databases, scientific literature and consultations with experts. The information was processed by using: 1) The QGIS 3.22.14 Biatowieza software, 2) the georeferenced databases of the Mexican-INEGI Digital Elevation Model, 3) the World climate database version 2.0 and 4) the WRB soil database with maps at a scale of 1:250,000. The results indicated the existence of more than two million hectares with high productive potential and more than three million with medium potential, located mainly in the states of Tabasco, Veracruz, Oaxaca, Chiapas and Campeche.

Share and Cite:

Ramírez-Jaramillo, G., Lozano-Contreras, M.G. and Ramírez-Silva, J.H. (2024) Agroclimatic Suitability of Malanga (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) under Rainfed Conditions in Mexico. Open Access Library Journal, 11, 1-14. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1112539.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, there is a growing trend towards a healthier lifestyle, which is reflected in the incorporation of foods and drinks that have nutraceutical characteristics. These products, which offer numerous health benefits, are driving a notable increase in their consumption and popularity. An example of these foods is Malanga (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott), an edible tuber belonging to the Araceae family, native to Asia that later spread to Africa. The plant has an edible central tuber or cormels, formed in the soil at the base of the plant. It has a spherical, ellipsoidal or conical shape with a white pulp rich in starch (21.1% - 26.2% on a wet basis), and a dark brown peel [1]-[3].

This crop is important in the food and industrial sectors. In the industry, it is used due to the high proportion of amylose and amylopectin in its corms. It can be used in the manufacturing industry to make paper, adhesive and biodegradable packaging, as well in the pharmaceutical industry [4].

In the food sector, the Malanga is considered nutritious and highly digestible food rich in minerals such as: Magnesium, iron, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, copper and manganese; and vitamins C, E and B6 [5]. It is used for snacks, soups, pastas, salads, stews, cookies, bread, tortillas, drinks and sweets.

Malanga has gained great interest worldwide, especially due to its good acceptance among consumers, the low inputs required for its establishment, easy management and adaptation to agroclimatic conditions, and resistance to adverse environmental and biological factors. Due to its partial tolerance to shade, it can be stablished under intercroped systems [6].

Two types are planted worldwide, those that grow in wetlands (flooded cultivation) and those that prefer well-drained soils (dry crops) [7]. In Mexico, this crop was introduced in the 1970s by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA), which is currently known as the National Institute of Agricultural, Livestock and Forestry Research (INIFAP). With the aim of observing its adaptability and development in the country, using some improved taro genotypes from Cuba [8] [9].

Malanga has been grown commercially in the states of Oaxaca, Puebla, Nayarit, Tabasco and Sinaloa. However, the state of Veracruz is, currently, the only national producing state with a planted area of 495 hectares and a production value of 250,172.35 million pesos (MXN). In Veracruz, the main producing municipalities are Paso de Ovejas, La Antigua, Puente Nacional, Úrsulo Galván and Actopan [10]-[12].

Economically, it is a profitable crop for producers, since it is a marketable product nationally and internationally, particularly in the United States of America and Canada [2]. According to Martínez-Herrera et al., (2022) [13], producing Malanga or Taro is a profitable business, since there is a growing demand in Mexico and abroad. However, to supply the increase in national and international markets, greater production is required and taro cultivation should be directed where the best conditions exist for its development. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the best agroclimatic zones to produce Malanga in Mexico.

2. Methodology

The spatial determination of optimal and sub-optimal areas of a crop can be carried out using different methodologies; however, in this case it was done based on the use of map algebra, taking as input variables such as: the agroecological requirements of Malanga in Mexico.

The use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), as a tool to develop and plan agricultural programs, has been a successful method to discriminate areas of different productive potentials for different crops [14]. Through GIS, it is possible to manage the agroecological variables representing different spatial physical environment (climate and soil) where the agriculture programs are to be developed.

The main contribution of these maps is to facilitate the adequate management of resources and, in this way, support producers, technicians and those responsible for public policies in agricultural management and planning.

In this study, three fundamental aspects were addressed: agroecological requirements, the use of agroclimatic variable databases, and information processing, following the recommendations proposed by Ramírez-Jaramillo et al. (2023) [15].

2.1. Determination of Agroecological Requirements

The agroecological information was integrated based on different bibliographic sources in: [16]-[18]. On the other hand, the experience of some experts in the cultivation of Colocasia esculenta L. was also taken into consideration.

2.2. Obtaining Spatial Information

Several geospatial databases were considered. The edaphic information was taken from the World Soil Resource Reference Base, known by its acronym in English as WRB, published by FAO (2014) [19], in vector format.

Climatic data were taken from the WorldClim version 2.0 database, specifically average temperature and precipitation during the crop cycle. The Digital Elevation Model (DEM) was obtained from the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI), in raster format with a resolution of 500 m2.

The map of slopes, bodies of water, mangroves, urban and rural areas of Mexico, as well as protected natural areas, were recovered from the Geoportal of the national information system for biodiversity of the National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO).

2.3. Data Processing

Map algebra is understood as the set of techniques and procedures that, operating on one or several layers in raster and/or vector format, allow us to obtain derived information, generally in the form of new data layers. For this case, the procedures that were applied to the geographical information, in vector format, basically consisted of classifying the climatic and edaphic attributes in the agroecological ranges established under rainfed conditions.

Vector data are entities associated with each attribute, and have their own spatial characteristics, and the geometry that defines each attribute serves on its own to carry out numerous analyzes, such as cuts and intersections. With these geometric operations on vector data, it is possible to intercept the edaphic and climatic layers in order to subsequently eliminate the areas related to mangroves, protected areas, and urban and rural settlements.

All information was processed and reclassified using the QGIS 3.22.4 Biatowiza Public License software [20].

3. Results

3.1. Agroecological Requirements of Colocasia Esculenta L. Shott

The main variables considered to regionalize the agroclimatic suitability for Malanga under Mexican rainfed conditions were: 1) Average annual temperature, 2) average annual precipitation, 3) altitude, 4) daylight hours, 5) soil types, 6) soil texture (Sand-clay-silt), 7) soil depth, 8) soil pH and 9) drainage. For each of the variables, an optimal, suboptimal and unsuitable ranges were proposed (Table 1).

The cultivation of Malanga requires a warm and humid climate, that is, tropical monsoon or mesothermal climates, with temperatures greater than 20˚C, with adequate luminosity. It does not tolerate low temperatures [18].

In Mexico, warm-humid climates are distributed mainly in the coastal areas of the country, both those near the Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico, and in the Pacific.

3.1.1. Average Annual Temperature for Taro

The ideal temperature for Malanga development ranges from 25˚C to 30˚C. When temperatures are lower than 18˚C, plant growth stops and the photosynthesis process is interrupted. Therefore, to ensure healthy growth, it is essential to maintain a warm and adequate environment [16].

The optimal average annual temperatures (25˚C to 30˚C) for Malanga are well distributed in the south and south-southeast of Mexico, while the suboptimal ones occur mainly in the north of the state of Veracruz, Tamaulipas and part of Nuevo León, as well as Sonora, Baja California North and South (Figure 1).

Table 1. Agroecological requirements of Colocasia esculenta L. Schott

Variable

Unit

Optimal

Suboptimal

Not Suitable

Average Annual Temperature

˚C

25 - 30

20 - 25

Less than 20

30 - 35

Greater than 35

Altitude

masl

0 - 1000

1000 - 2000

Greater than 2000

Average Annual Precipitation

mm

2000-2500

1000 - 1500

Less than1000

2500 - 3500

Greater than 3500

Soils

Types

Fluvisoles

Cambisoles

Solonchaks

Luvisoles

Andosoles

Leptosoles

Nitisoles

Arenosoles

Vertisoles

Calcisoles

Gleysoles

Regosoles

Phaeozems

Kastañozems

Texture

Types

Loamy

Sandy

Clay

Depth

m

Greater than 1

1 to 0.5

Less than 0.5

pH

Indicator

6.0 to 7.0

5.5 to 5.9

Less than 5.5

7.1 to 7.5

Greater than 7.5

Ligth Hours

Light hours

Greater than 3000

2500 to 3000

Less than 2500

Drainage

Types

Efficient

Efficient

Deficient

3.1.2. Average Annual Rainfall of Taro

The humidity requirements are significant for Malanga´s good development. A significant amount of precipitation, ranging between 1800 and 2500 mm. It is essential, but it should be distributed uniformly over time. When soil moisture is a limiting factor to the crop, the leaves will change color, turning yellowish and wither [16].

As for Mexico, the optimal average annual precipitation is considered to be 2000 to 2500 mm, which is distributed mainly in the states of Tabasco, Chiapas, Campeche, Veracruz, Puebla, San Luis Potosí, Oaxaca, Guerrero, Jalisco and Nayarit (Figure 2).

3.1.3. Light Hours Per Year for Taro

Light is a key factor in plant care, since it is essential for photosynthesis and growth process. Light provides the energy necessary for plants to convert carbon dioxide and water into sugars and oxygen.

Malanga requires an optimal number of light hours per year and the optimal number is considered to be more than 3000, which is distributed in most of the country (Figure 3). When temperatures are very high, Malanga prefers partial shade in full sun. On the other hand, in very warm climates, it may need protection from direct sun during the hottest hours of the day. It is a species that can be considered to intercrop or associate with other perennial species that provide the shade required.

Veracruz, Puebla, San Luis Potosí, Oaxaca, Guerrero, Jalisco y Nayarit (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Suitability of mean annual temperature for Colocasia esculenta L.

Figure 2. Suitability of mean annual precipitación for Colocasia esculenta L. Schott.

Figure 3. Suitability of light hours per year for Malanga.

Figure 4. Distribution of altitude in Mexico to produce Malanga.

3.1.4. Height Above Sea Level Taro

Altitude is the vertical distance between any point on Earth in relation to sea level. To calculate the altitude, the sea level is taken as a reference, and that is why the altitude is expressed with the acronym masl (meters above sea level).

Malanga is a tropical plant that thrives in low and medium altitude areas no higher than 1000 meters above sea level [18]. The optimum for this crop ranges from 0 to 1000 masl which is distributed in all states bordering the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans of Mexico, with the exception of the states of Nuevo León and Coahuila (Figure 4).

3.1.5. Types of Soils for Taro

Malanga adapts perfectly in fertile and deep soils, with a sufficient amount of natural water and well drained. Soils with excessive clay or sand content should be avoided. The optimum pH should be between 5.5 - 6.5, although there are other materials adapted to 4.5 - 7.5. The crop shows problems in sandy or very heavy soils, as well as rocky and stony soils [21].

However, some materials grow best in clayey-heavy soils with high moisture-holding capacity. Well-drained clay soils with a high water table are preferred. For any type of Malanga, flooded and waterlogged soils are well tolerated and preferred for certain cultivars.

Apparently, Malanga, growing under flooded conditions and poor soils, is capable of transporting oxygen from the aerial parts to the roots; in this sense, roots are capable to breathe and grow normally. This plant can tolerate saline soils better than many other crops [22]. In all states of the country there are optimal and suboptimal soils to produce Malanga (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Distribution of optimal and sub-optimal soils in Mexico for Malanga.

3.1.6. Distribution of Potential Areas for Taro

The distribution of potential areas in the Mexican Republic is presented in Figure 6 where the green and orange colors represent the high and medium potential areas respectively. The surface in hectares is shown in Table 2.

Malanga adapts perfectly in fertile and deep soils with sufficient amount of natural water and well drained. In some Mexican states, Malanga can be found under natural vegetation and it is traditionally cooked by Boyling. It is eaten with honey and different beverages like the Atole. Its cultivation can be a profitable business, although greater production is required to satisfy the growing demand.

In Mexico, some Malanga producers grow it in a small scale, either in monoculture or intercropped with other crops in the household garden by using traditional technology. Under rainfed conditions, the average yield of 20 t ha1 is very low as compared to more than 70 t ha1 under irrigation.

Figure 6. Distribution of Potential areas in Mexico for Malanga production.

Table 2. High and medium potential areas (hectares) in Mexico to cultivate Malanga under rainfed conditions in different states.

State

High Potential (has)

Medium Potential (has)

Campeche

103,207.00

169,541.00

Chiapas

206,721.00

585,912.00

Oaxaca

331,354.00

231,213.00

Tabasco

486,891.00

125,635.00

Veracruz

889,286.00

1,672,057.00

Oher States

151,477.00

1,062,004.00

TOTAL

2,168,936.00

3,846,362.00

4. Discussion

In Mexico, there are both optimal and suboptimal soils for growing Malanga, thanks to its notable adaptability to various soil conditions. This species can thrive in a wide range of environments, from well-drained and dry soils to areas with high rainfall and waterlogged soils [23]. However, it is recommended to avoid its establishment in soils with excessive clay or sand content, since these conditions can limit its development [20], as well as in rocky and stony soils, such as those of the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico.

Furthermore, Malanga prefers soils with a high content of organic matter and optimal pH between 5.5 and 6.5, such as those found in the states of Oaxaca, Puebla, Veracruz and in the south of the state of Sinaloa [13].

Although in Mexico, the optimal altitude ranges between 0 and 1000 masl, in Ethiopia, it is cultivated from 1300 to 2300 masl [24] whilst in Vietnam 5 to 1800 masl has been reported [25]. In Bhutan (South Asia) located in the Himalayan Mountain range, it thrives at altitudes between 500 and 3000 masl [26].

Malanga also known as Taro is one of the least water-efficient crop [27], with high water demand to achieve optimal yields. It is estimated that it requires an annual precipitation of approximately 2500 mm, uniformly distributed [28] [29]. The lack of rainfall inhibits the growth of corms, since water stress generates low yields, deformations in the corms (such as the dumbbell shape) and lower-quality products [30].

In India, taro is grown both in flooded lowlands, taking advantage of monsoon rain but in the highlands where the precipitation ranges between 1500 and 2000 mm [31] supplementary irrigationan is needed. In Mexico, it is suggested an optimal average annual rainfall from 2000 and 2500 mm and these conditions are found in the states of Tabasco, Chiapas, Campeche, Veracruz, Puebla, San Luis Potosí, Oaxaca, Guerrero, Jalisco and Nayarit.

Malanga is a heliophilous plant that requires an average of 12 sunlight hours per day for optimal growth [32]. In Mexico, that light condition is fully satisfied. Regarding temperature, according to Raju et al. (2022) [33], the crop in India can tolerate maximum temperatures of at least 21˚C and a minimum of 10˚C. This qualified Malanga as the more cold-resistant tuber than other ones.

Mazariegos-Sánchez et al. (2017) [34] point out that the crop thrives in warm-humid climates, with an ideal temperature range between 15˚C and 35˚C. For Mexico, the optimal temperature is between 25˚C and 30˚C, mainly in the southern and southeastern regions. In contrast, suboptimal conditions occur in northern Veracruz, Tamaulipas, parts of Nuevo León, and the states of Sonora, Baja California Norte and Sur.

To date, in Mexico there are no official reports of Malanga cultivated under rainfed conditions. However, previous studies by López et al., (2020) [35] and Salgado-Molina et al., (2023) [36] agree in pointing out that: Tabasco, Veracruz and Campeche are the main states with the largest high potential areas.

Our analysis expands this perspective by identifying additional areas with high productive potential as in the case of: Oaxaca, Chiapas, Guerrero, Jalisco and Nayarit located in Humid Tropic of Mexico, representing only 9% of the national territory [37]. On the other hand, Taro is a viable economic alternative to offer new employments since it is a high demanding labor crop.

5. Conclusions

Nowadays, Malanga fit very well in the overseas growing trend towards a healthier lifestyle reflected in the incorporation of foods and drinks with nutraceutical characteristics. These products can offer different health benefits, and that is the reason why there has been a notable increase in their consumption and popularity.

Malanga could be a great opportunity to diversify the Mexican market and so was the reason to launch this work with the objective to identify suitable agroclimatic areas for the cultivation of Malanga under rainfed conditions in Mexico.

The main findings of this work were the following:

1) There are optimal agroecological conditions to produce Malanga under rainfed conditions in Mexico.

2) The states with the largest High Potential Areas under rainfed conditions are: Veracruz, Tabasco, Oaxaca, Chiapas and Campeche.

3) Altitude, precipitation and temperature are determining factors in the definition of High and Medium potential areas under rainfed conditions.

4) The High Potential areas detected in this work far exceed the current cultivated area of Malanga in the country.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Mexican-National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research (INIFAP) for financing this work, as part of a former project: Estrategia Integral de reconversion productive (Integral Strategy for Productive Reconversion).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Rao, R., Hunter, D., Eyzaguirre, P. and Mathews, P. (2010) Ethnobotany and Global Diversity Taro. In: Rao, V., Mathews, P.J., Ezyaguire, P.B. and Hunter, D., Eds., The Global Diversity of Taro: Ethnobotany and Conservation, Ramanatha Bioversity International, 2-5.
[2] Parra-Melchor, M.E., Pérez-Vázquez, A. and Arvizu-Barrón, E. (2020) Evolution of the Agri-Food Chain Concept in the 21st Century: The Taro Case. Agro Productividad, 13, 81-86.
https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v13i11.1818
[3] Huang, C., Chen, W. and Wang, C.R. (2007) Comparison of Taiwan Paddy and Upland-Cultivated Taro (Colocasia esculenta L.) Cultivars for Nutritive Values. Food Chemistry, 102, 250-256.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.04.044
[4] Kaushal, P., Kumar, V. and Sharma, H.K. (2013) Utilization of Taro (Colocasia esculenta): A Review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52, 27-40.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-0933-y
[5] Madrigal-Ambriz, L.V., Hernández-Madrigal, J.V., Carranco-Jáuregui, M.E., Calvo-Carrillo, M.D.L.C. and Casas-Rosado, R.D.G. (2018) Caracterización física y nutricional de harina del tubérculo de “MalangaColocasia esculenta L. Schott) de Actopan, Veracruz, México. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición, 68, 175-183.
https://doi.org/10.37527/2018.68.2.008
[6] Nacir Colombo, J., Puiatti, M., Barros da Silva Filho, J., Piña, M., Silva Santos, R.H. and Barbosa Vieira, J.C. (2021) Agroeconomic Viability of Intercropping Taro and Okra Plants According to Planting Dates and Plant Arrangements. Idesia (Arica), 39, 49-58.
https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-34292021000400049
[7] Montaldo, A. (1991) Cultivo de raíces y tubérculos tropicales. IICA. San José, Costa Rica, 21, 53-70.
[8] Sama, A.E., Hughes, H.G., Abbas, M.S. and Shahba, M.A. (2012) An Efficient in Vitro Propagation Protocol of Cocoyam [Xanthosoma Sagittifolium(l) Schott]. The Scientific World Journal, 2012, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/346595
[9] Olguín, P.C. and Álvarez, Á.M. (2011) La malanga (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) bajo un enfoque de investigación-desarrollo. Agroproductividad, 4, 26-33.
https://revistaagroproductividad.org/index.php/agroproductividad/article/view/584
[10] Soto Estrada, A. (2019) Sistema de trazabilidad en la cadena de suministro de malanga (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) en Veracrúz, México. Tesis Maestría en Ciencias, especialista en Agroecosistemas Tropicales, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, México.
[11] Sistema de Información Agroalimentario y Pesquera (2024) Anuario estadístico-Agricultura. SADER. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Cierre de la Producción Agrícola (1980-2023). Consultado el 29 de agosto de 2024.
https://www.gob.mx/siap/acciones-y-programas/produccion-agricola-33119
[12] Sánchez Chino, X.M., Corzo Ríos, L.J., Jiménez Martínez, C., Argüello García, E. and Martinez Herrera, J. (2021) Nutritional Chemical Analysis of Taro (Colocasia esculenta Schott) Accessions from the State of Tabasco, Mexico. Agro Productividad, 21, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v14i10.2074
[13] Martínez Herrera, J., Sánchez Hernández, R. and Ramos Reyes, R. (2022) Potential Areas for Taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) Cultivation in Tabasco, Mexico. Agro Productividad, 15, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v15i1.1999
[14] Kahsay, A., Haile, M., Gebresamuel, G. and Mohammed, M. (2018) Gis-Based Multi-Criteria Model for Land Suitability Evaluation of Rainfed Teff Crop Production in Degraded Semi-Arid Highlands of Northern Ethiopia. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 4, 1467-1486.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0499-9
[15] Ramírez-Jaramillo, G., Lozano-Contreras, M.G. and Silva, J.H.R. (2023) Agroclimatic Suitability of Phaseolus vulgaris L., in the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico. Open Access Library, 10, 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110996
[16] Púa, A.L., Barreto, G.E., Zuleta, J.L. and Herrera, O.D. (2019) Análisis de Nutrientes de la Raíz de la Malanga (Colocasia esculenta Schott) en el Trópico Seco de Colombia. Información tecnológica, 30, 69-76.
https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-07642019000400069
[17] Quito León, E.P. (2016) Zonificación del cultivo de Malanga (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) para la provincia de el Oro. Tesis de Licenciatura de Ingeniería Agronó-mia. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad de Guayaquil.
[18] Veloz Gaibor, S.P. (2014) Utilización de la Malanga (Colocasia esculenta Schott) como suplemento de la harina de trigo en repostería, en la escuela de gastronomía de la Espoch, Periodo 2013-2014. Tesis en Licenciada en gestión gastronómica. Escuela Superior Politecnica de Chimborazo.
[19] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2014) Ecocrop, Ecological Requirements of Plant Species, Database.
[20] QGIS (2023) QGIS Deskstop 3.22 User Guide. QGIS Project.
https://docs.qgis.org/3.22/pdf/es/QGIS-3.22-DesktopUserGuide-es.pdf
[21] Robles Idrovo, J. (2014) Proyecto de exportacion de Malanga hacia Estados Unidos-Miami. Tesis Ingeniero en Ciencias Empresariales. Facultad de Economía y Ciencias Empresariales. Universidad Espiritu Santo.
[22] Lloyd, G. R., Uesugi, A. and Gleadow, R. M. (2021) Effects of Salinity on the Growth and Nutrition of Taro (Colocasia esculenta): Implications for Food Security. Plants, 10, 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112319
[23] Ferdaus, M.J., Chukwu-Munsen, E., Foguel, A. and da Silva, R.C. (2023) Taro Roots: An Underexploited Root Crop. Nutrients, 15, Article 3337.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15153337
[24] Dagne, Y., Mulualem, T. and Kifle, A. (2014) Development of High Yielding Taro (Colocacia esculenta L.) Variety for Mid Altitude Growing Areas of Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Sciences, 2, 50-54.
[25] Yongping, Y. and Jianchu, X. (2000) Ethnobotanical Studies of Taro, Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott, in Yunnan, China. In: Zhu, D., Eyzaguirre, P.B., Zhou, M., Sears, L. and Liu, G., Eds., Proceedings of the Symposium of Ethnobotanical and Genetic Study of Taro in China: Approaches for the Conservation and Use of Taro Genetic Resources, Shandong, 10-12 November 2000, 6-10.
[26] Sultana, N., Jahan, F.N., Attaluri, S. and Hossain, M.B. (2021) Status and Scope of Promoting Underutilized Taro for Sustainable Biodiversity and Nutrition Security in SAARC Countries. In: Sultana, N., Jahan, F.N., Attaluri, S. and Hossain, M.B., Eds., Promotion of Underutilized Taro for Sustainable Biodiversity and Nutrition Security in SAARC Countries, SAARC Agriculture Centre (SAC), Dhaka, 3-4 November 2020, 15.
[27] Uyeda, J., Radovich, T., Sugano, J., Fares, A. and Paull, R. (2011) Effect of Irrigation Regime on Yield and Quality of Three Varieties of Taro (Colocasia esculenta). 2011 ASHS Annual Conference, Hawaii, 23-30 September 2011, 285.
[28] Ganança, J.F.T., Freitas, J.G.R., Nóbrega, H.G.M., Rodrigues, V., Antunes, G., Gouveia, C.S.S., et al. (2018) Screening for Drought Tolerance in Thirty-Three Taro Cultivars. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 46, 65-74.
https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha46110950
[29] Mwenye, O.J. (2009) Genetic Diversity Analysis and Nutritional Assessment of Cocoyam Genotypes in Malawi. University of the Free State.
[30] Lim, T.K. (2014) Colocasia esculenta. In: Edible Medicinal and Non Medicinal Plants, Springer, 454-492.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9511-1_13
[31] Sunitha, S., Kumar, J.S., Sreekumar, J., Suja, G., Ramesh, V. and Byju, G. (2022) Water Requirement of Upland Taro (Colocasia esculenta) under Humid Tropical Zones of India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 92, 1364-1368.
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i11.125277
[32] Morales Orccottoma, A.F. (2012) Fitogeografia e industrializacion del almidón de pituca (Colocasia esculenta). Espacio Y Desarrollo, 24, 97-117.
https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/espacioydesarrollo/article/view/7587
[33] Raju, J., Shiny, R. and Byju, G. (2022) Change in Climate and Climate Suitability of Major Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott] Growing Regions of India. Journal of Root Crops, 48, 47-56.
https://ojs338.isrc.in/index.php/jrc/article/view/630
[34] Mazariegos-Sánchez, A., Águila-González, J.M., Milla-Sánchez, A.I., Espinosa-Zaragoza, S., Martínez-Chávez, J. and López-Sánchez, C. (2017) Taro Cultivation (Colocasia esculenta Schott) in Tuxtla Chico, Chiapas, Mexico. Agroproductividad, 10, 75-80.
[35] López, J.M., Martínez-Herrera, J. and Arguello, G.E. (2020) La malanga (Colocasia esculenta Schott) un cultivo alternativo paraTabasco. Villahermosa, Tabasco. Revista Agroregión, 102, 16-21.
[36] Salgado-Molina, A., Alvarez-Avila, M.C., Asiain Hoyos, A., Platas-Rosado, D.E., Figuera-Rodríguez, K.A. and Ducrocq, C. (2023) Taro (Colacasia esculenta (L.) SCHOTT) value chain in Veracruz, Mexico. Agro Productividad, 16, 21-28.
https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v16i2.2290
[37] Ramírez-Jaramillo, G., Ramírez-Silva, J. and Lozano-Contreras, M.G. (2023) Caracte-rización Agroecológica de la Zona Tropical de México. En Memoria de la Semana Internacional de la Agronomía XXXV. Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango. Facultad de Agricultura y Zootecnia. Venecia, Durango.

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.