Virus-Encoded MicroRNAs Reveal How Ranavirus Interacts with Amphibian Immune Defense
Aaron Yang
Horace Mann School, Bronx, NY, USA.
DOI: 10.4236/jbise.2024.1710014   PDF    HTML   XML   223 Downloads   1,705 Views  

Abstract

Ranaviruses are harmful viruses that infect amphibians, fish, and reptiles, and have caused particularly devastating declines in amphibian populations. One particular type of ranavirus, called Frog Virus 3 (FV3), has been extensively studied due to its prevalence and impact on amphibians. Previous research has primarily focused on the virus’s genes, but little attention has been given to the non-coding regions of its genome. This article reviews recent studies that reveal the ability of ranaviruses, including FV3, to encode microRNA (miRNA), a type of regulatory RNA. These viral miRNAs play a crucial role in suppressing frog immune genes, modulating the virus-host interaction, and promoting viral infection. Understanding how ranaviruses use miRNAs to control disease progression is essential for addressing the health threat they pose to wildlife and ecosystems.

Share and Cite:

Yang, A. (2024) Virus-Encoded MicroRNAs Reveal How Ranavirus Interacts with Amphibian Immune Defense. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 17, 179-184. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2024.1710014.

1. Introduction

Frog Virus 3 (FV3) is a large virus (measuring approximately 150 nm in diameter with a large single linear dsDNA genome of roughly 105 kbp) that belongs to the Ranavirus family [1]. It infects amphibians at different stages of their life cycle, causing lethal infections in tadpoles but often remaining unnoticed in adult frogs [1-7]. Due to a broad virulence among virus isolates and particular variation of immune status of animals, FV3 has been found in both sick and seemingly healthy frogs, indicating its ability to adapt to its host and effectively spread [8-16]. This ability is similar to what we see in other successful viruses that have caused epidemics in animals and humans. The impact of ranaviruses on amphibians is a significant concern, as they contribute to the global decline of these species, threatening biodiversity and ecological balance by disrupting food webs, reducing biological diversity, and impairing ecosystem functions such as pest control and nutrient cycling [2-7]. FV3 is the most commonly reported ranavirus worldwide, found in wild amphibians and turtles in North America. Additionally, there have been reports of genetic recombination between FV3 and another ranavirus called common midwife toad virus (CMTV) in Canada and Europe [2, 11-16]. Reports of genetic recombination between FV3 and other ranaviruses are important because they could lead to the emergence of new, more virulent strains, making it crucial to understand genomic and molecular mechanisms to better predict and manage potential outbreaks [11, 12]. To better understand the biology of ranaviruses and their impact, further research is needed at the genomic and molecular levels. In this context, the recent studies about if ranaviruses encode microRNAs and how these virus-derived microRNAs (v-miR) play roles in the virus-host interaction are crucial to understand ranaviral pathogenesis in amphibians [8-10].

2. Brief about Virus-Derived MicroRNA (V-MiR)

Viruses employ various strategies to evade the host’s immune response. In addition to viral proteins, some viruses, particularly DNA viruses, also produce microRNA (miRNA) to regulate gene expression. miRNAs are small non-coding RNA molecules that target specific regions of cellular transcripts, silencing or modulating their expression [8-10]. Virus-derived miRNAs (v-miRNAs) can mediate the expression of both host and viral genes, shaping the interaction between the virus and its host. Several DNA viruses, including ranaviruses, have been found to encode miRNAs [8-10]. These miRNAs play a crucial role in viral pathogenesis for some DNA viruses by interfering with host defense mechanisms and impacting cellular processes such as cell death and proliferation. The presence and role of v-miRNAs in ranaviruses, including FV3, are not well understood and require further investigation [8-10]. As illustrated in Figure 1, some DNA viruses, including human hepatitis B virus and papillomavirus, can adopt cell miRNA biosynthesis complex (Drosha-Dicer as shown) to produce virus-derived miRNA (v-miR) and targeting viral particularly host gene expression. Our question is if ranaviruses like FV3 have similar capacity to modulate disease progress in amphibians [8, 9].

Figure 1. Do ranaviruses like FV3 produce miRNA to modulate disease progress in amphibians? Reproduced from the major idea of the references [8-10]. See Abbreviations in the associated text.

3. Virus-Encoded miRNA in Ranaviruses Other than FV3

Viral miRNAs, may function like the host counterpart, to regulate the expression of both viral and host genes and play a role in evading the host’s antiviral immune response. For example, in other ranaviruses like Singapore grouper iridovirus (SGIV) and tiger frog virus (TFV), several miRNAs have been identified and shown to influence virus replication and infection [8-10]. These miRNAs target host genes involved in antiviral signaling pathways. The identification and study of these viral miRNAs contribute to our understanding of ranavirus biology and their interactions with host organisms [8-10].

4. Virus-Encoded miRNA in FV3 and Its Potential Role in Modulating the Immune Response

Recent research has analyzed the entire transcriptome of FV3-infected frog tissues to explore the presence of both viral and cellular RNA [10]. This study revealed the presence of viral miRNAs in the intergenic regions of the FV3 genome (Figure 2) [10]. These miRNAs are particularly concentrated in specific intergenic regions located near highly transcribed genes. Analysis of these viral miRNAs showed that they target important components of the frog’s immune system, such as interferon receptor subunits and interferon regulatory factors that represent key antiviral immune regulators in high vertebrates (Table 1) [17-19]. The differential expression of these target genes in infected tissues further confirms the potential regulatory role of these viral miRNAs. Further study identified additional FV3-encoded miRNAs and found that they target genes involved in antiviral signaling pathways and other cellular functions [10]. These findings provide valuable insights into the non-coding regulatory mechanisms employed by ranaviruses, shedding light on how they manipulate host gene expression and evade immune responses.

Table 1. Enrichment of predicted FV3 miRNA targeting sites in the mRNA 3-UTR regions of interferon receptors, especially the beta subunits [10].

mRNA (GenBank Acc. #)

3’-UTR length (kb)

Target sites/kb by predicted FV3 miRNA

No. of FV3 miRNA/Group

Ifnar1.L (XM_018245928)

0.163

0

0

Ifnar1.S (XM_018248888)

0.406

2.46

1/1 (1AT)

Ifnar2.L (XM_018245430)

0.439

84.28

26/9 (11C, 4AF, 4AT, …)

Ifnar2.S (NM_001095360)

2.305

76.79

69/14 (30C, 15AT, 6R, 5AF, …)

Ifnar2.2S (XM_018248427)

0.495

68.69

27/6 (14C, 4R, 3AF, 3AT, …)

ifngr1.S (XM_018265300)

0.138

7.25

1/1 (1C)

ifngr2.L (XM_018245930)

0.656

25.91

16/5 (9C, 4AT, …)

ifngr2.S (XM_018248887)

1.241

45.93

42/7 (19C, 8AT, 4R, 4AF, …)

ifnlr1.L (XM_018242320)

0.156

0.00

0

il10rb.L (XM_018245931)

0.438

25.11

11/6 (3C, 3AT, 2AF, …)

il10rb.S (NM_001093545)

0.955

77.49

42/12 (17C, 10AT, 4AF, …)

Ave: 0.672

Ave: 37.63

Abbreviations: Acc., Accession; Ave., Average; kb, kilobase; UTR, Untranslated Region.

Figure 2. Virus-derived miRNA (v-miR) sequences in intergenic regions of FV3 genome. The prediction of miRNA-like sequences in most intergenic regions (marked as UTR start-end site along FV3 reference genome including the 5- and 3-untranslated regions), which are especially enriched in five regions (named as C, I, R, AF and AT per putative miRNA density/Kb) as marked using blue dash line. Some v-miR have identified function against frog antiviral immune genes are shown with sequence-paired structure with their targets. Adapted from Tian et al., 2021 with authors’ permission [10].

5. Conclusion

While many viruses have been found to encode miRNAs to modulate disease progression, their presence and role in ranaviruses have been less studied. Recent research on ranaviruses, particularly FV3, has demonstrated their ability to encode miRNAs that regulate both viral and host gene expression. Understanding how ranaviruses utilize miRNAs to modulate disease progression is crucial for addressing the health threats they pose to wild animals and ecosystems. By unraveling the intricate mechanisms of virus-host interactions, we can develop strategies to mitigate the impact of ranaviruses and protect vulnerable amphibian populations [2-7].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Chinchar, V.G., Yu, K.H. and Jancovich, J.K. (2011) The Molecular Biology of Frog Virus 3 and Other Iridoviruses Infecting Cold-Blooded Vertebrates. Viruses, 3, 1959-1985.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Miller, R.E., Lamberski, N. and Calle, P.P. (2019) Fowler’s Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine Current Therapy. W.B. Saunders, W.B. Amphibians and Reptiles, Vol. 9, 356-432.
[3] Miller, D., Gray, M. and Storfer, A. (2011) Ecopathology of Ranaviruses Infecting Amphibians. Viruses, 3, 2351-2373.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Courtney, E.P., Goldenberg, J.L. and Boyd, P. (2020) The Contagion of Mortality: A Terror Management Health Model for Pandemics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 607-617.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Collins, J. (2010) Amphibian Decline and Extinction: What We Know and What We Need to Learn. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 92, 93-99.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Alan Pounds, J., Bustamante, M.R., Coloma, L.A., Consuegra, J.A., Fogden, M.P.L., Foster, P.N., et al. (2006) Widespread Amphibian Extinctions from Epidemic Disease Driven by Global Warming. Nature, 439, 161-167.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Green, D.E., Converse, K.A. and Schrader, A.K. (2002) Epizootiology of Sixty-Four Amphibian Morbidity and Mortality Events in the USA, 1996-2001. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 969, 323-339.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Mishra, R., Kumar, A., Ingle, H. and Kumar, H. (2020) The Interplay between Viral-Derived miRNAs and Host Immunity during Infection. Frontiers in Immunology, 10, Article No. 3079.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Ahmad, I., Valverde, A., Siddiqui, H., Schaller, S. and Naqvi, A.R. (2020) Viral MicroRNAs: Interfering the Interferon Signaling. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 26, 446-454.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Tian, Y., Khwatenge, C.N., Li, J., De Jesus Andino, F., Robert, J. and Sang, Y. (2021) Virus-Targeted Transcriptomic Analyses in Frog Virus 3-Infected Frog Tissues Reveal Non-Coding Regulatory Elements in Intergenic Regions of Ranaviral Genome and Their Molecular Interaction with Host Immune Response. Frontiers in Immunology, 12, Article ID: 705253.
[11] Vilaça, S.T., Bienentreu, J., Brunetti, C.R., Lesbarrères, D., Murray, D.L. and Kyle, C.J. (2019) Frog Virus 3 Genomes Reveal Prevalent Recombination between Ranavirus Lineages and Their Origins in Canada. Journal of Virology, 93, e00765-19.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Saucedo, B., Garner, T.W.J., Kruithof, N., Allain, S.J.R., Goodman, M.J., Cranfield, R.J., et al. (2019) Common Midwife Toad Ranaviruses Replicate First in the Oral Cavity of Smooth Newts (Lissotriton vulgaris) and Show Distinct Strain-Associated Pathogenicity. Scientific Reports, 9, Article No. 4453.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Goorha, R. (1982) Frog Virus 3 DNA Replication Occurs in Two Stages. Journal of Virology, 43, 519-528.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Willis, D.B., Goorha, R., Miles, M. and Granoff, A. (1977) Macromolecular Synthesis in Cells Infected by Frog Virus 3. VII. Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Virus Gene Expression. Journal of Virology, 24, 326-342.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Goorha, R., Willis, D.B. and Granoff, A. (1979) Macromolecular Synthesis in Cells Infected by Frog Virus 3 XII. Viral Regulatory Proteins in Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Controls. Journal of Virology, 32, 442-448.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Grayfer, L., De Jesús Andino, F. and Robert, J. (2014) The Amphibian (Xenopus laevis) Type I Interferon Response to Frog Virus 3: New Insight into Ranavirus Pathogenicity. Journal of Virology, 88, 5766-5777.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Tian, Y., DeJesus, F.A., Robert, J. and Sang, Y. (2021) Virus-Targeted Transcriptomic and Functional Analyses Implicate Ranaviral Interaction with Host Interferon Response in Frog Virus 3-Infected Frog Tissues. Journal of Virology, 13, 1325.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Sang, Y., Liu, Q., Lee, J., Ma, W., McVey, D.S. and Blecha, F. (2016) Expansion of Amphibian Intronless Interferons Revises the Paradigm for Interferon Evolution and Functional Diversity. Scientific Reports, 6, Article No. 29072.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Tian, Y., Jennings, J., Gong, Y. and Sang, Y. (2019) Xenopus Interferon Complex: Inscribing the Amphibiotic Adaption and Species-Specific Pathogenic Pressure in Vertebrate Evolution? Cells, 9, Article No. 67.[CrossRef] [PubMed]

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.