Can the Hypothetical Protons Emitted by the Shroud’s Man Furnish an I(z) Correlation?

Abstract

Recently, we have investigated the hypothesis radiative demonstrating that the two penetrated thicknesses (in air and linen) are not compatible with a single energy of the protons. Furthermore, we deduced that the distribution of energy, released by the above particles, on the burial linen has not a linear trend when the body-burial linen distance changes. Now, in this article we want to deduce the I(z) relationship, between the Image Intensity of the colour produced by protons on a linen and the z distance from the source (of Protons) and the same linen. To achieve the result in an analytical form and make a comparison with the same function extracted from the Shroud, we used the empirical expression Range-Energy for protons in air of Wilson-Brobeck. Thus, we obtain a result I(z) = Im [1 − (z/R)5/9] that is different from the one extracted from the Turin Linen I(z) = IM (1 − z/R0). We have also the same information using the Range-Energy curves for protons of Rogozinski. The result is negative for the radiative hypothesis that is unable to produce the Shroud Body Image. Therefore, to investigate the above unknown process of formation, it is necessary to think about another one.

Share and Cite:

Fazio, G. (2024) Can the Hypothetical Protons Emitted by the Shroud’s Man Furnish an I(z) Correlation?. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 14, 1979-1984. doi: 10.4236/ojapps.2024.148129.

1. Introduction

The Shroud of Turin is the most studied archaeological find in the world. People have been waiting for an answer for decades about the distribution of the yellowed fibrils and the mechanism that produces them. In fact, it is the above distribution that forms the Body Image, as we see it on the Shroud of Turin, with his 2D characteristic [1]. In fact, the Shroud Image appears with inverted, colours and left with right. Exactly like a photographic negative. Before and after, other discoveries have been made and, in 1982, a new characteristic, the 3D has been added to 2D [2] [3]. These two characteristics are the ones that give charm to the Shroud.

In 1985, observing and analysing the results that come from the research on the Shroud, the scientist Lukasik deduced that a Photochemical Reaction would be the appropriate process to obtain an Image as the one presented on the Burial Linen of Turin [4]. In other words, the emission of an electromagnetic radiation of opportune wavelength (and hence energy) should cause the above Reaction in the surface of the linen fibrils. Thus, some scientists have considered radiations in the far ultraviolet region (for example [5]), others have looked nuclear particles such as protons (for example [6]).

The protons are subatomic particles with mass mP = 1.672 × 10−27 Kg, radius rp = 10−15 m = 1 fm and a positive electrical charge e+ = 1.602 × 10−19 C. These particles are present in nuclei. In a nucleus the number of protons is equal to the Atomic Number Z that characterizes each element present on Earth: in the natural ones Z varies from 1 (Hydrogen, H) to 92 (Uranium, U); in those produced artificially by Nuclear Reactions, the Atomic Number Z varies from 93 (Neptunio, Np) to 118 (Oganesson, Og). Beyond, there are only theoretical hypotheses [7] [8]. These particles when penetrate the matter, due to the Coulomb Forces, have elastic and inelastic interactions with electrons and nuclei (with a cross section for electron greater than the one for nuclei). The effects are excitation, ionization, scattering, radiative losses and other possible nuclear processes. Despite the complexity of these processes, to affirm that the protons cross the matter ionizing the atoms is acceptable [9]-[11].

Now, it is necessary to consider that the protons, with ionization, take electrons away from the nuclei oxidizing the matter. In our case, at macroscopic level, the linen turns yellow. With these characteristics some scholars have thought that the protons, emitted from the body of the Nazarene, still wrapped in his burial linen in the Tomb, could be considered the source of energy in the formation of the Shroud Body Image.

The formation mechanism of the above Image is the goal of the research on the Linen of Turin. In fact, for several decades researchers and scientists have been working to achieve the desired result. Unfortunately, the obtained hypotheses, between theoretical studies and experiments, are a lot and can be divided into three groups: false mechanisms, Miracles and natural events. With this state of affairs and taking also into account that exists, and it is always present, a conflict of religious interests, the comparison becomes a clash among the different proposed mechanisms of the Body Image formation. Today, there is only confusion. We think that a true comparison of the ideas performed among various scientists is impossible.

2. I(z) Correlation Produced by Protons

In the years 1982/1984, Jackson et al. have extracted from the Shroud of Turin 13 pairs of values of Image Intensity I with the respective distance corpse-burial linen z in well-known points of the Image (points where the above distance had already been evaluated). The measures of Intensity of Image have been performed, using a microdensitometer, by Vernon Miller of the Brooks Institute of Photography, Santa Barbara, California [2] [3]. These pairs of values represented in an (Iz) plane appeared quite scattered. However, the fitting procedure provided a result: the I(z) Correlation for the Shroud Body Image, that was aligned best with the data, was a straight line, decreasing as z increased (a line with negative constant slope, dI/dz = −IM/R0). In an analytical form, we can write it as follows:

I( z )= I M ( 1z/ R 0 ) (1)

where I(z) is the Image Intensity (or the Yellowed Fibrils Density) at a z distance, IM is the maximum value of Intensity present only in the contact areas (where R0 = 0) and R0 is the distance corpse-burial linen z that makes I(R0) = 0. The distance corpse-linen z ranges between 0 and R0. This last one represents the Discoloration Effects Range.

Unfortunately, we do not know with certain what kind of energy was involved in the formation mechanism that produced the Shroud Body Image. Today again, the choice of the radiative hypothesis prevails among the scientists. In fact, many are the supporters who accept the idea of a body (the corpse of the Nazarene) able to emit electromagnetic radiations in the far ultraviolet region (close to X-ray) or nuclear particles as the protons. On the contrary, we think that the only source of energy present, for a short time, in an ancient Sepulcher, is thermal energy.

We have always been against these hypotheses [12] [13] which smacks of the miraculous, and Physics with Theology do not agree with them. For Rogers, an authoritative chemical scientist and STURP member, the above radiative processes are pseudoscience [14]. Also, we believe in a natural process: the Stochastic one [15]. Therefore we want to see when the hypothetical emitted protons reach the Burial Linen leaving their kinetic energy, what kind of I(z) Correlation there will be. To obtain this result, with an acceptable reliability, at first, we will use the empirical formula Range-Energy for protons in air of Wilson and Bobreck: R(Ep) = (Ep/9.3)1.8. This expression, where the energy is measured in MeV and the air distance in meter [16], it has already been used in one of our article [17], because furnishes acceptable different values from those obtained using the Bethe calculation. So, we can write:

E p ( z )=9.3 z 5/9 (2)

where Ep(z) is the energy that the protons lose to cross a space z in air. The corpse-burial linen distance z ranges between 0 and R. Now, it is evident that the energy transferred to the linen at a z distance, to make it yellow, is the difference between the one of emission Em and the lost one through the thickness of air equal to z:

E p ( z )= E m 9.3 z 5/9 (3)

The I(z) Image Intensity (or the Yellowed Fibril Density) is proportional to the energy that the protons, after passing through the air, transfer to the linen: I(z) = C × EmC × 9.3 × z5/9, where C is a constant. Therefore, the Intensity of Image, also considering that we want the distance z expressed in mm, can be written as: I(z) = ImC × 9.3 × 10−15/9 × z5/9. Here, when z = R, the Intensity of Image becomes I(R) = 0 and we deduce Im = C × 9.3 × 10−15/9 × R5/9 Therefore, the I(z) Correlation produced by using protons, emitted from the corpse of the Man of the Shroud, with kinetic energy Em can be written:

I( z )= I m [ 1 ( z/R ) 5/9 ] (4)

Also, without a graphic representation, we can see the Correlation produced by the protons is different from the one extracted from the Shroud of Turin. We think that the Im and R values, in general, are different from IM and R0, respectively. The trend of the (4) is not the one of a linear regression and has a slope dI(z)/dz = −(5 Im/9 R5/9) × z−4/9. This is a very important result of our work: the slope is not constant. The Image Intensity ranges between I = Im (when z = 0) and I = 0 (when z = R). This last distance, which we do not know, represents the Discoloration Effects Range when the source, to obtain a colouring on a linen, is of protons. However, the radiative hypothesis to be accepted it should produce a distribution of Image Intensity values and a Discoloration Effects Range equal to the ones deduced of the Shroud of Turin.

After the measurements of Image Intensity in 13 points and a fitting procedure made by Jackson et al. [2] [3], we have accepted the values R0 = 37 mm, as best as possible given the scattered of the measured data. This value is an important characteristic of the Shroud of Turin and it has been obtained experimentally. Therefore, we look at the function (4) inserting both the value of R0 in place of R and the one of IM in place of Im: I(z) = IM [1 − (z/R0)5/9].

Subsequently, we also used the Rogozinski formula that describes the Range-Energy curves for protons [18]. In this formula R(Ep) = a−1.8 × (Ep)1.8 the protons energy is measured in MeV and R(Ep), the depth penetration in matter, in g/cm2. The matter is characterized by “a” parameter; in the air its value is equal to 29. The penetration depth is measured in g/cm2. The ratio between this value and the density of the crossed matter expressed in g/cm3 furnishes the value of R in centimeters. The use of this formula to obtain the above Correlation in the case of protons has furnished the same result of the Wilson-Bobreck formula.

Thus, only observing the two functions (1) and (4), it is natural not to consider the radiative process as a possible formation mechanism of the Shroud Body Image.

3. Conclusions

After what was written in “I(z) Correlation produced by Protons”, it is necessary to underline that the radiative model has many other problems. Some of these are insurmountable:

1) The emission, in this case of protons, from the corpse of the Nazarene when it was still wrapped in his burial linen placed in the Sepulcher.

2) These particles, as happens also with the electromagnetic radiations, are unable to distinguish the fibrils that must be affected to form the Shroud Body Image from those that must maintain the background optical density (as the one of the fibrils that are outside the Image).

3) The yellowed fibrils, those that formed the Body Image on the Shroud, they should have the same optical density.

4) The resolution of coloration obtained by radiative process, it should be the same of the one of the Body Image.

5) Both, Physics and Theology, are contrary to the radiative hypotheses because they cannot accept the above emissions from a corpse or a body. An emission of this nature has never been seen in the History of Humanity.

6) When the kinetic energy of the protons is able to penetrate the linen only for 200 nm [19], at same time, it is unable to reach the Discoloration Effects Range Value in air that is 3.7 cm. [2] [3]. In this case, we may not have complete colour because some areas may not be reached by the protons.

This article is made to demonstrate to the people that the above miraculous hypothesis is not supported by common sense, by Physics and Theology. We do not know how much this sentence is worth and how it will be considered. For us it is the Truth, therefore, we underline it.

Acknowledgements

The author remembers his friend Giovanni Sturniolo Villa (1943-2020) for the long discussions about the Shroud of Turin; particularly those on the formation mechanism of the Shroud Body Image. He, with his determination, is always present when I write about the Linen of Turin.

Conflicts of Interest

Regarding the publication of this article, the author declares no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Boschiero, G. (1998) Secondo Pia Fotografo della Sindone. Editore Comune di Asti, Asti. (Italian Language)
[2] Jackson, J.P., Jumper E.J. and Ercoline, R.W. (1982) Three Dimensional Characteristic of the Shroud Image. IEEE 1982 Proceedings International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, Seattle, 28-30 October 1982, 559-575.
[3] Jackson, J.P., Jumper, E.J. and Ercoline, W.R. (1984) Correlation of Image Intensity on the Turin Shroud with the 3-D Structure of a Human Body Shape. Applied Optics, 23, 2244-2270.
https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.23.002244
[4] Lukasik, S.J. (1985) Some Speculations Concerning the Process Leading to the Formation of the Image on the Shroud of Turin.
https://shroud.com/pdfs/lukasik1985.pdf
[5] Di Lazzaro, P., Murra, D., Nichelatti, E., Santoni, A. and Baldacchini, G. (2012) Superficial and Shroud-Like Coloration of Linen by Short Laser Pulses in the Vacuum Ultraviolet. Applied Optics, 51, 8567-8578.
https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.51.008567
[6] Antonacci, M. (2012) Particle Radiation from the Body Could Explain the Shroud’s Images and Its Carbon Dating. Scientific Research and Essays, 7, 2613-2626.
https://doi.org/10.5897/sre12.376
[7] Fazio, G., Giardina, G., Mandaglio, G., Ruggeri, R., Muminov, A.I., Nasirov, A.K., et al. (2005) Strong Influence of the Entrance Channel on the Formation of Compound Nuclei Th 216, 222*and Their Evaporation Residues. Physical Review C, 72, Article ID: 064614.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.72.064614
[8] Giardina, G., Mandaglio, G., Nasirov, A.K., Anastasi, A., Curciarello, F. and Fazio, G. (2018) Uncertainties and Understanding of Experimental and Theoretical Results Regarding Reactions Forming Heavy and Superheavy Nuclei. Nuclear Physics A, 970, 169-207.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.11.010
[9] Meyerohf, W.E. (1967) Elements of Nuclear Physics. Mc-Graw-Hill Inc.
[10] Evans, R.D. (1955) The Atomic Nucleus. Mc-Graw-Hill Inc.
[11] Moe, H.J., Lusak, S.R. and Schumaker, M.C. (1971) Radiation Safety Technicians Training Course Argonne National Laboratory. Industrial Hygiene and Safety Division.
[12] Fazio, G. (2022) The Body Image on the Shroud Was Not Produced by Protons. Scientific Culture, 8, 17-21.
[13] Fazio, G. (2022a) Could the VUV Radiation Yield the Shroud Body Image? Global Journal of Archaeology & Anthropology, 12, 1-3.
[14] Rogers, R.N. and Arnoldi, A. (2002) Scientific Method Applied to the Shroud of Turin: A Review.
https://shroud.com/pdfs/rogers2.pdf
[15] Fazio, G., Mandaglio, G. and Anastasi, A. (2018) Describing, Step by Step, the Shroud Body Image Formation. Heritage, 2, 34-38.
https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2010003
[16] Wilson, R.R. (1947) Range, Straggling, and Multiple Scattering of Fast Protons. Physical Review, 71, 385-386.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.71.385
[17] Fazio, G. (2023) Discoloration Range and Shroud Image Depth Values Cannot Be Satisfied by the Same Proton Energy. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 13, 1224-1232.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2023.138096
[18] Rogozinski, A. (1951) Sur quelques relations approchées entre l’énergie, l’ionisation spécifique et le parcours d’une particule de grande énergie. Journal de Physique et le Radium, 12, 955-956.
https://doi.org/10.1051/jphysrad:019510012010095501
[19] Fanti, G., Botella, J., Di Lazzaro, P., Heimburger, T., Schneider, R. and Svensson, N. (2010) Microscopic and Macroscopic Characteristics of the Shroud of Turin Image Superficiality. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, 54, 40201-1-40201-8.
https://doi.org/10.2352/j.imagingsci.technol.2010.54.4.040201

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.