Management of a Huge Ovarian Cyst in Pregnancy at the Douala General Hospital, Cameroon: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Abstract

Background: Ovarian cysts in pregnancy are common and are usually small benign functional cysts (corpus luteum and theca-lutein cysts) that usually resolve spontaneously between 14 and 16 weeks of gestation. However, large ovarian cysts are rare in pregnancy, with an incidence of 0.2% - 2%, and most of them are benign. The first-line diagnostic modality is ultrasonography. Complications of ovarian cysts in pregnancy include miscarriage, ovarian torsion, cyst rupture, etc. Laparotomy is the treatment modality commonly used in our setting, and histopathologic diagnosis is important for the prognosis of the treatment. Case Presentation: MC is a 32-year-old G3P2002 married housewife of the Bakweri tribe who was referred to our department because of progressive abdominal discomfort and shortness of breath for 1 month’s duration. Her medical history is consistent with two normal vaginal deliveries at term and the use of implants (for contraception) until one month prior to the index pregnancy. Her booking visit was at 16 weeks gestation at a primary (missionary) healthcare facility, and she underwent ultrasonography and was diagnosed with a singleton viable intrauterine pregnancy and a simple septate cystic mass measuring 17 cm situated on top of the uterus, appearing to originate from the left ovary. She was referred to seek the expertise of an obstetrician-gynecologist, but she came to our department at 35 weeks gestation and underwent cesarean birth at 37 weeks gestation. In the pathological review, serous cystadenoma was diagnosed, and there were no positive findings in peritoneal cytology. Conclusion: The ultrasonographic diagnosis of the huge ovarian cyst in the index case was after 16 weeks gestation because of her late booking visit at 16 weeks gestation. The index case deferred referral to the obstetrician because of a lack of finances, came to our department at 35 weeks gestation because of abdominal pain that may have resulted from a torsion of the ovarian cyst, and underwent cesarean birth because of malpresentation and fear of cyst rupture during labor. We recommend cesarean section in such cases because of suboptimal antenatal care uptake and histopathology of the specimen to exclude malignancy.

Share and Cite:

Kobenge, F. , Elong, F. , Mpono, E. and Egbe, T. (2024) Management of a Huge Ovarian Cyst in Pregnancy at the Douala General Hospital, Cameroon: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Advances in Reproductive Sciences, 12, 165-178. doi: 10.4236/arsci.2024.123014.

1. Introduction

Ovarian cysts in pregnancy are common and are usually small benign functional cysts (corpus luteum and theca-lutein cysts) that usually resolve spontaneously between 14 and 16 weeks of gestation [1] [2]. These cysts are occasional findings of a first-trimester ultrasound scan [1] [3]. However, large ovarian cysts are rare in pregnancy, with an incidence of 0.2% - 2%, and most of them are benign [3] [4]. Besides, ovarian cysts that persist beyond 16 weeks of gestation are usually non-functional [1] [5] [6] [7]. The first line diagnostic modality is ultrasonography (transvaginal/transabdominal) while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to sonography in characterizing the cystic contents (benign or malignant) and diagnosis of adnexal torsion and relation to neighboring organs [5] [8] [9]. Complications of ovarian cysts in pregnancy include miscarriage, ovarian torsion, cyst rupture, and intrabdominal hemorrhage [1] [10] [11], which can be life-threatening. The accurate and timely diagnosis of ovarian cysts is important to determine the most appropriate treatment modality: surgery (laparotomy or laparoscopy) or expectant management [12]. Histopathologic diagnosis is important for the prognosis of the treatment. We are presenting the case of a huge ovarian cyst that was diagnosed and managed at our hospital.

2. Case Presentation

MC is a 32-year-old G3P2002 married housewife of the Bakweri tribe who was referred to our department because of progressive abdominal discomfort and shortness of breath for 1 month’s duration. Her medical history is consistent with two normal vaginal deliveries at term (2016 and 2019) and the use of implants (for contraception) until one month prior to the index pregnancy. She had her menarche at 12 years old with a regular cycle of 29 days, and her coitarche at 21 years old. Her last menstrual period was May 1, 2022. She is living with her husband and her two daughters, all in good health, and the rest of her medical history is unremarkable.

Her booking visit was at 16 weeks gestation at a primary (missionary) healthcare facility, and since then, she has been regularly followed up by midwives, where she underwent ultrasonography and was diagnosed with a singleton viable intrauterine pregnancy and a simple septate cystic mass measuring 17 × 16 cm situated on top of the uterus, appearing to originate from the left ovary. She was referred to seek the expertise of an obstetrician-gynecologist, but she did not do so because of a lack of finances. She continued her pregnancy follow-up with the midwives where she underwent full blood counts with a hemoglobin (Hb) range of 11.5 - 12.2 g/dL and fasting blood glucose of 86 mg/dL; syphilis, hepatitis B, and HIV were negative. A vaginal smear and urine dipstick showed no infections (Table 1).

At about 31 weeks gestation, she stated having abdominal discomfort and shortness of breath, difficulty finding a comfortable sleeping position, and feeling full after eating small amounts of food and she came to our department at 35 weeks gestation.

When we received the patient at our department at 35 weeks gestation, she was oriented in time and space; her conjunctivae were not pale. Her body mass index (calculated from her pre-pregnancy weight found in her exercise book)

Table 1. Results of paraclinical examinations of Antenatal care visits of the patient.

Variable

Result

Normal value or
other findings

Estimated fetal
weight (g)

Mean Hemoglobin (g/L)

11.85

12 - 16


Range

11.5 - 12.2



Fasting blood sugar (mg/dL)

86

70 - 100


Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2)

21

18.5 - 24.9


HBsAg

Negative

-


HIV

Negative

-


Syphilis serology

Non-reactive

-


Ultrasound scan at

booking visit

Singleton
intrauterine pregnancy normally evolving at
16 weeks gestation

Simple septate
left ovarian cyst
17 cm diameter


Ultrasound scan at
35 weeks gestation

Singleton
intrauterine pregnancy at the 75th percentile of
35 weeks gestation

Huge septate left ovarian cyst with the largest diameter
at 30 cm

2400

HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; BMI = body mass index; g/L = grams per liter; Kg/m2 = kilograms per meter square; HBsAg = hepatitis B surface antigen; cm = centimeters; dL = deciliter; g = gram.

was 21 kg/m2. The examination of the heart and lungs was normal. The abdomen was overdistended, with a palpable, voluminous, soft cystic mass encompassing all the upper abdomen and extending to the left flank, making examination of the liver and spleen difficult. The fundal height was 30 cm, the fetus was in a transverse position, and the head was on the left side of the abdomen. The fetal heart tones were perceptible, and the fetal heart rate was 148 beats per minute (bpm). The vulva was clean, and the speculum examination was normal. The cervix was long, posterior, and closed and the presenting part was not palpable on digital vaginal examination, and there was no pedal edema at the medial part of both ankles.

A repeat ultrasound scan on arrival at our department showed a singleton intrauterine pregnancy normally evolving at 36 weeks gestation with an estimated fetal weight of 2400 g. There were no fetal anomalies detected. The placenta was posterior and homogeneous, and the amniotic fluid volume was normal. There was a huge cystic mass with intra-cystic septa appearing to arise from the left ovary, extending into the left flank and all the upper abdomen. The largest diameter of the mass was 30 cm. No Doppler studies were done in ultrasonography.

An MRI was requested but not done due to a lack of finances.

Fetal lung maturation was done with dexamethasone 12 mg, twelve hourly for 24 hours, and she underwent an elective cesarean section at 37 weeks gestation under spinal anesthesia, giving birth to a male fetus (Figure 1) with a 5-minute Apgar score of 10/10 after the preoperative blood tests (Table 2).

Table 2. Perioperative follow-up of index case.

Variables

Results

Comments or normal value

Hemoglobin level (g/L)

11.8

12 - 16

Hematocrit (%)

35.4

36 - 48

Prothrombin ratio (%)

100

85 - 100

Prothrombin time (seconds)

12.5

11.0 - 13.5

International normalized ratio

1.0

0.8 - 1.10

Birth weight (g)

2600

2500 - 4000

Aspartate aminotransferase (units/L)

15

<45

Alanine aminotransferase (units/L)

11

<56

Fasting blood sugar (mg/dL)

85

70 - 100

Blood urea nitrogen (g/L)

0.25

0.15 - 0.42

Creatinine level (mg/dL)

0.9

0.7 - 1.1

Estimated blood loss (mL)

450

-

5-minute Apgar score

10

normal

% = percent; g = gram; L = liter; mg = milligram; dL = deciliter; mL = milliliter.

Figure 1. Cesarean delivery of foetus with ovarian mass seated at the uterine fundus.

During the cesarean section, we used a para-umbilical median incision for better access to the uterus and ovarian cyst. There was a serous peritoneal fluid that was sampled and sent for cytologic analysis. The huge cyst was exteriorized and confirmed to arise from the left ovary. However, the ovarian tissue at the proximal end of the cyst appeared healthy. There was a single twist (torsion) involving both the index ovary and the left fallopian tube, but the blood supply to the concerned ovary appeared preserved (Figure 2). Clampage and section at the base of the cyst (partial oophorectomy) without rupture of the left ovarian cyst were done (Figure 3). The remaining ovarian tissue was sutured or repaired. We also did peritoneal washing for cytology, but no frozen section was done.

The rest of the abdominal organs examined (omentum, liver, gall bladder, spleen, stomach, and intestines) appeared macroscopically normal. We did a random biopsy of the peritoneal cavity and peritoneal toileting with 1 liter of normal saline. The weight of the ovarian cyst with the liquid content was 6.5 kg and was sent for histopathology analysis including the random peritoneal biopsy samples.

The intraoperative care of the patient included administration of ceftriaxone 2 g, tranexamic acid 1000 mg after birth of the fetus, and oxytocin 10 units intravenously, then 20 units in a 500 ml dextrose solution and 400 mcg of misoprostol sublingually after delivery of the placenta. The placenta was delivered manually and hysterorrhaphy was done in two layers. The blood loss was estimated at 450 mL and the post-operative stay in the hospital was uneventful.

Intraoperatively, we administered ceftriaxone (2 g) and tranexamic acid (1 g) after the birth of the baby. We also administered a bolus of 10 units of oxytocin, then 20 units in 500 ml of a 5% dextrose solution, and 400 mcg of misoprostol sublingually after the delivery of the placenta. The placenta was delivered manually, and hysterorrhaphy was done in two layers. The blood loss was estimated at 450 mL, and the post-operative stay in the hospital was uneventful. The pathological review diagnosed serous cystadenoma and there were no positive findings in the peritoneal cytology and tissue biopsy.

Figure 2. Torsion of the left adnexa.

Figure 3. Post operative image of the left ovarian cyst.

3. Discussion

The incidence of ovarian cysts in pregnancy ranges from 1 in 84 to 1 in 2500 [13] while the incidence of ovarian malignancy in pregnancy is 0.85 in 10,000 pregnancies (range 0.44 - 1.71 in 10,000 pregnancies) compared to previous studies that reported an incidence of 1:12,000 - 1:47,000 [14]. Ovarian masses in pregnancy are usually diagnosed incidentally during antenatal care visits. Previously, the detection rate of such masses was low because of the lack of techniques for early detection. However, the incidence and detection rate of ovarian masses significantly increased with the application of ultrasonography in antenatal care [15] [16] [17]. However, in most low-income countries and Cameroon in particular, booking visits are usually late. A study in a semi-urban area in Fako Division, Cameroon reported that the mean gestational age at booking visits was 19 ± 4.2 weeks (8 to 31 weeks) [18], other Cameroon studies reported a gestational age of initiation of antenatal care greater than 12 and 14 weeks respectively [19] [20]. As regards the index case, a booking visit to a midwife at a primary healthcare facility was at 16 weeks gestation. The importance of early diagnosis of ovarian tumors in pregnancy is to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors and ensure fetal safety and good oncological outcomes [21]. This will also help identify those tumors that could benefit from early surgical treatment from those that may necessitate expectant management till delivery.

3.1. Diagnosis of Ovarian Cysts in Pregnancy

Ovarian masses in pregnancy are usually asymptomatic. However, in some cases, they may present with lower abdominal pain. The identification of a pelvic mass during an abdominal or vaginal examination can be difficult because of the increased size/volume of the uterus. If a mass is discovered, a complete physical examination becomes mandatory where the bladder should be diagnosed empty, signs of pelvic infection should be sought, and cancer screen effected by a recto-vaginal examination and search for lymph nodes [12]. Furthermore, ultrasonography is the first-line diagnostic tool for the diagnosis and characterization of ovarian masses in pregnancy [5] [12]. This modality is readily available in many centers in Cameroon, easy to use, cheap or inexpensive, devoid of side effects, and has a high sensitivity and specificity to characterize ovarian masses. Ultrasonography could also be used to monitor the progression or regression of ovarian masses as pregnancy progresses. In addition, several scoring systems have been proposed for the diagnosis, characterization, and differentiation of ovarian masses between benign and malignant tumors like the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA). The common features of each ovarian scoring system are size, proportion of solid tissue, papillary projections, inner wall structure, locules, wall thickness, septa, echogenicity, acoustic shadows, and the presence of ascites [22]. The added value of the Whirlpool sign visualized by moving the ultrasound probe back and forth along the ovarian ligament when torsion of the adnexa is suspected in bothGray scale and Doppler ultrasound has been reported [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]. In the index case, ultrasonography showed a huge ovarian cyst of 17 cm largest diameter with thin intracystic septa by 16 weeks’ gestation with abdominal pain. The cyst was located on the uterine fundus, seemingly originating from the left ovary. Color Doppler studies of the ovarian ligament and cyst including vascularization of the septa were not done and gray scale search for whirlpool sign was not reported but the intra-operative findings in the index case included torsion of both fallopian tube and ovary (Figure 2). Besides, the proposed scoring systems are not commonly or completely used in Cameroon. Furthermore, it has been reported that ultrasound results may depend on the experience of the person who does the examination and the center where the examination is done [28] [29]. In addition, this patient may have been a candidate for surgery from her booking visit, but she refused referral to a tertiary healthcare facility because of a lack of finances.

When choosing a diagnostic modality in pregnancy, the effect of the test on the fetus must be taken into consideration. The computed tomography (CT) scan may not be suitable for diagnosis of ovarian cysts in pregnancy because of the adverse effects of radiation on the fetus [30]. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be superior to ultrasound scan as regards characterization of the cystic content, or diagnosis of torsions [31] [32] [33] [34]. Besides, in a recent study, the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing malignant ovarian cysts was 100%, the specificity of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign ovarian cysts was 78.3%. The overall accuracy was 89.3% with a positive predictive value of 57.14% and a negative predictive value of 100%. It was therefore concluded that MRI should be reserved for problem solving when ultrasound findings are inconclusive, non-diagnostic or unequivocal because of its higher cost and it is a more accurate diagnostic tool [31]. That notwithstanding, the ACOG and other international guidelines stated that although there is no evidence of prenatal risk from MRI, like teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, or acoustic danger, it is nevertheless advisable to avoid MRI in the first trimester [35]. However, in the index case MRI was requested but it was not done because of lack of finances to pay for it and MRI is not cost effective in a low-income country like Cameroon where there is a lack of health insurance coverage for most of its inhabitants and the monthly wages of civil servants range from 43, 470 XAF to 353, 526.4 XAF (US$ 73.34 to US$ 588.29) [36].

3.2. Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Cyst in Pregnancy

As shown in Table 3 are the sonographic, magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic finding of ovarian cysts from previous studies [21] [37].

3.3. Tumor Markers and Ovarian Tumor in Pregnancy

The use of tumor markers for ovarian cyst diagnosis in pregnancy could provide important clues for cyst diagnosis but remains controversial. Nevertheless, some tumor markers like CA 125 and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) could be elevated during pregnancy, especially in the first trimester making it difficult to accurately diagnose a malignancy [30], therefore, having a low specificity. However. some studies have reported elevated levels of AFP at 30 weeks and 38 weeks of gestation and CA-125 [30]. Notwithstanding, we did not request these tests in the index case.

3.4. Management of Ovarian Cyst in Pregnancy

The management of ovarian masses during pregnancy has been controversial on whether to adopt a wait-and-see attitude or expectant management of surgery, However, since most ovarian cyst diagnosed early in pregnancy tend to regress during the course of the pregnancy by 16 weeks gestation, therefore tumors 5 - 10 cm in diameter without evidence supporting malignancy, expectant management was recommended, and surgery was indicated when there was an acute

Table 3. Pathological, sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings of adnexal masses in pregnancy.

Pathologic diagnosis of 453
adnexal masses in pregnancy [37]

Sonographic findings of
adnexal masses in pregnancy [21]

Magnetic resonance imaging findings
of adnexal masses in pregnancy [21]

Variable

Number

(%)

Variable

Description of findings

Variable

Description
of findings

Benign

adnexal masses

184

(40.62)

Functional cysts


Functional cyst

T1W1/T2W1

Mature teratoma

71

(15.67)

Corpus luteum

“Ring of fire” sign with doppler

Endometrioma

T1W1, T2W1, T1W1/T2W1

Mucinous
cystadenoma

49

(10.82)

Hemorrhagic cyst

Reticular pattern with solid component

Mature

cystic teratoma

T1W1

Serous cystadenoma

31

(6.84)

OHSS

“Spoke wheel” sign with
markedly elongated ovary

Serous
cystadenoma

T1W1, T2W1

Thecoma fibroma

8

(1.77)

Hyperetio
Lutealis and
theca lutein cyst

Markedly enlarged ovaries and similar to OHSS

Mucinous
cystadenoma

T1W1, T2W2, CEMR

Struma ovarii

6

(1.32)

Luteoma

Hyperechoic and heterogeneous with increased vascularity

Fibroma

T1W1, T2W1, CEMR

Thecoma
of the ovary

5

(1.10)

Endometrioma

Cystic and solid masses,
thick and hypovascular walls, homogeneous low internal echogenicity, calcified with acoustic shadowing

Paratubal cyst

T1W1, T2W1

Fibroma

4

(0.88)

Mixed
cystic teratoma

Rokitansky nodule,
dermoid plug, icebeg phenomenon, dermoid mesh

Hydrosalpinx

T1W1, T2W1

Serous adenofibroma

2

(0.44)

Cystadenoma

Serous: large smooth unilocular cyst, hypoechoic thin septations, papillary projections, bilateral in 20%. A large multiloculated cyst with multiple septations and hypoechoic locules mostly unilateral

Uterine fibroid

T2W1

Malignant
adnexal masses

269

(59.38)

Fibroma

Solid hypoechoic mass with
edge refraction and acoustic shadowing calcifications with different degrees of vascularity

Borderline ovarian neoplasia

T1W1, T2W1

Serous
cystadenocarcinoma

158

(34.88)

Ovarian torsion

Whirlpool sign with Doppler, enlarged affected ovary, anechoic or hyperechoic echogenicity. Absence of septations, solid portions or vegetation

Granulosa cell tumor

T1W1 and T2W1

Borderline mucinous cystadenoma

28

(6.18)

Hydrosalpinx

“Cog wheel” sign, “bead-on-a-string” sign

Dysgerminoma

T1W1, T2W1, CEMR

Borderline serous cystadenoma

20

(4.42)

Uterine fibroid

Hypoechoic solid mass with edge refraction posterior acoustic shadowing, cystic and calcified components inside cyst

Serous cystadenocarcinoma

T1W1

Clear cell carcinoma

15

(3.31)

Borderline ovarian neoplasm

Unilocular cyst (serous/markedly septate cyst (mucinous) ovarian crescent sign, honeycomb appearance, multiple vascular mural wall nodules, papillary projections

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma

T1W1

Metastatic carcinoma

13

(2.87)

Granulosa
cell tumor

Solid multilocular mass with heterogeneous echogenicity, hemorrhage components inside the cyst, increased
vascularity on Doppler



Endometroid
carcinoma

6

(1.32)

Dysgerminoma

Multilobulated solid ovarian
mass, prominent fibrovascular septations and calcifications, heterogeneous echogenicity (anechoic or hypoechoic)



Malignant Mullerian
tube mixed tumor

5

(1.10)

Malignant
epithelial ovarian tumor

Serous cystic adnexal mass with heterogeneous echogenicity, multiple septations, papillary projections, thick walls,
mucinous multiloculated cystic mass with heterogeneous echogenic patterns and
solid portions



Granular cell tumor

4

(0.88)





Mixed carcinoma

4

(0.88)





Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma

3

(0.66)





T1W1, T1 weighted image; T2W1, T2 weighted image; CEMR, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance; OHSS, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. This table has been generated from references 21 and 37.

like rupture and torsion, complications caused by obstruction (e.g. hydronephrosis), risk of birth canal obstruction, and strong evidence of malignancy [1] [12]. Traditionally, the main surgical approach is by open surgery or laparotomy [12] and the recommended surgery time included 14 - 24 weeks of gestation, surgery during cesarean section, and 6 weeks postpartum [1]. However, when an acute complication occurs, surgery is indicated in any trimester. Notwithstanding, complications may arise after surgery such as miscarriages, and preterm births. Laparoscopy has increasingly been advocated and used to treat ovarian complication cysts in pregnancy with no increased adverse outcomes reported compared with laparotomy [7] [12] [38] [39] [40]. However, this will require an experienced laparoscopic surgeon to carry out such procedures. For this case, surgery was done at 37 weeks gestation because of fetal malpresentation (transverse lie) and fear of rupture of cyst during vaginal delivery. During the cesarean section, detorsion of the twisted adnexa and left partial oophorectomy was done. The histopathology report showed serous cystadenoma, Literature reports have shown that one of the most common benign ovarian neoplasms occurring concurrently with pregnancy are serous or mucinous cystadenomas and mature cystic teratomas [37].

4. Conclusion

The ultrasonography diagnosis of the huge ovarian cyst in the index case was after 16 weeks gestation because of her late booking visit at 16 weeks gestation. The index case deferred referral to the obstetrician because of a lack of finances, came to our department at 35 weeks gestation because of abdominal pain that may have resulted from a torsion of the ovarian cyst, and underwent cesarean birth because of malpresentation and fear of cyst rupture during labor. We recommend cesarean section in such cases because of suboptimal antenatal care uptake, avoid spillage of cystic contents of unknown malignant potential at the peritoneal cavity and histopathology of the specimen to exclude malignancy.

Acknowledgements

We are extremely grateful to Prof. Fewou Ahmadou MD for the histopathology assessment and to the nurses and operating theatre team including the anesthesiologist for assistance during the surgery of the index case.

Ethical Approval

Our hospital does not require ethical approval for case reports.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and the accompanying images.

Authors’ Contributions

Thomas Obinchemti Egbe and Fidelia Mbi Kobenge were responsible for the conception and writing the initial draft of the manuscript. Mpono Pascale and Felix Elong proofread the manuscript. Thomas Obinchemti Egbe and Fidelia Mbi Kobenge were on the surgical team. Thomas Obinchemti Egbe supervised manuscript writing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] de Haan, J., Verheecke, M. and Amant, F. (2015) Management of Ovarian Cysts and Cancer in Pregnancy. Facts, Views and Vision in ObGyn, 7, 25-31.
[2] Kolluru, V., Gurumurthy, R., Vellanki, V. and Gururaj, D. (2009) Torsion of Ovarian Cyst during Pregnancy: A Case Report. Cases Journal, 2, Article No. 9405.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1626-2-9405
[3] Acharya, K., Poudel, D., Dahal, S., kuikel, S. and Adhikari, A. (2022) A Case of Huge Ovarian Cyst in Second Trimester: A Rare Case Report. Annals of Medicine & Surgery, 82, Article ID: 104765.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104765
[4] Arteaga-Gómez, A.C., Aranda-Flores, C., Márquez-Acosta, G. and Colín-Valenzuela, A. (2010) Adnexal Tumor and Pregnancy: Diagnosis and Treatment. Ginecología y Obstetricia de México, 78, 160-167.
[5] Zvi, M.B., Thanatsis, N. and Vashisht, A. (2023) Ovarian Cysts in Pregnancy. In: Jha, S. and Madhuvrata, P., Eds., Gynaecology for the Obstetrician, Cambridge University Press, 1-13.
[6] Olalere, F.D.H., Kuye, T.O., Agbara, J.O. and Tijani, A.F. (2020) Large Ovarian Dermoid Cyst in Pregnancy with Successful Pregnancy Outcome: A Case Report. World Journal of Innovative Research, 8, 76-79.
[7] Niyaf, N.A., Ravikanth, G.O., Doppa, G. and Bhavya, H.U. (2021) Antenatal Laparoscopic Management of Ovarian Cyst: A Case Report. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10, 1734-1739.
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20211171
[8] Friedrich, L., Meyer, R. and Levin, G. (2021) Management of Adnexal Mass: A Comparison of Five National Guidelines. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 265, 80-89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.020
[9] Ding, D., Huang, C. and Hong, M. (2017) A Review of Ovary Torsion. Tzu Chi Medical Journal, 29, 143-147.
https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_55_17
[10] Senarath, S., Ades, A. and Nanayakkara, P. (2020) Ovarian Cysts in Pregnancy: A Narrative Review. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 41, 169-175.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2020.1734781
[11] Aliyu, R., Sada, S., Umar Hauwa, S., Mahmud, F., Randawa, A. and Onwuhafua, P. (2020) A Review of Surgically Managed Complicated Ovarian Cysts in Pregnancy in a Northern Nigerian Tertiary Hospital. Archives of International Surgery, 10, 22.
https://doi.org/10.4103/ais.ais_20_20
[12] D’Ambrosio, V., Brunelli, R., Musacchio, L., Del Negro, V., Vena, F., Boccuzzi, G., et al. (2020) Adnexal Masses in Pregnancy: An Updated Review on Diagnosis and Treatment. Tumori Journal, 107, 12-16.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0300891620909144
[13] Aboulghar, M., Mansour, R. and Serour, G. (1992) Ovarian Cysts during Pregnancy: The Role of Ultrasonically Guided Transvaginal Aspiration. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2, 349-351.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1992.02050349.x
[14] Wang, L., Huang, S., Sheng, X., Ren, C., Wang, Q., Yang, L., et al. (2020) Malignant Ovarian Tumors during Pregnancy: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis. Cancer Management and Research, 12, 10841-10848.
[15] Petousis, S., Chatzakis, C., Westerway, S.C., Abramowicz, J.S., Dinas, K., Dong, Y., et al. (2022) World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine Review Paper: Incidental Findings during Obstetrical Ultrasound. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 48, 10-19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.09.010
[16] Mansour, S., Hamed, S. and Kamal, R. (2023) Spectrum of Ovarian Incidentalomas: Diagnosis and Management. The British Journal of Radiology, 96, Article ID: 20211325.
https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211325
[17] Testa, A.C., Mascilini, F., Quagliozzi, L., Moro, F., Bolomini, G., Mirandola, M.T., Moruzzi, M.C., Scambia, G. and Fagotti, A. (2021) Management of Ovarian Masses in Pregnancy: Patient Selection for Interventional Treatment. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 31, 899-906.
https://ijgc.bmj.com/content/31/6/899.abstract
[18] Halle-Ekane, G.E., Fotabong, C.M., Njotang, P.N., Atashili, J., Bechem, N.N., Nsagha, D.S., et al. (2015) Quality of Antenatal Care and Outcome of Pregnancy in a Semi-Urban Area in Fako Division, Cameroon: A Cross-Sectional Study. Womens HealthOpen Journal, 1, 31-39.
https://doi.org/10.17140/whoj-1-105
[19] Tolefac, P.N., Halle-Ekane, G.E., Agbor, V.N., Sama, C.B., Ngwasiri, C. and Tebeu, P.M. (2017) Why Do Pregnant Women Present Late for Their First Antenatal Care Consultation in Cameroon? Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology, 3, 29.
[20] Venyuy, M.A., Cumber, S.N., Nkfusai, C.N., Bede, F., Ijang, Y.P., Wepngong, E., et al. (2020) Determinants to Late Antenatal Clinic Start among Pregnant Women: The Case of Saint Elizabeth General Hospital, Shisong, Cameroon. The Pan African Medical Journal, 35, 112.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7321684/
[21] Kim, J., Lim, J., Sohn, J., Lee, S.M. and Lee, M. (2023) Diagnostic Imaging of Adnexal Masses in Pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 66, 133-148.
https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22287
[22] Bruno, M., Capanna, G., Stanislao, V., Ciuffreda, R., Tabacco, S., Fantasia, I., et al. (2023) Ultrasound Features and Clinical Outcome of Patients with Ovarian Masses Diagnosed during Pregnancy: Experience of Single Gynecological Ultrasound Center. Diagnostics, 13, Article No. 3247.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203247
[23] Adu-Bredu, T.K., Arkorful, J., Appiah-Denkyira, K. and Wiafe, Y.A. (2021) Diagnostic Value of the Sonographic Whirlpool Sign in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Torsion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 49, 746-753.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23021
[24] Navve, D., Hershkovitz, R., Zetounie, E., Klein, Z. and Tepper, R. (2013) Medial or Lateral Location of the Whirlpool Sign in Adnexal Torsion: Clinical Importance. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 32, 1631-1634.
https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.32.9.1631
[25] Valsky, D.V., Esh-Broder, E., Cohen, S.M., Lipschuetz, M. and Yagel, S. (2010) Added Value of the Gray-Scale Whirlpool Sign in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Torsion. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 36, 630-634.
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7732
[26] Bardin, R., Perl, N., Mashiach, R., Ram, E., Orbach-Zinger, S., Shmueli, A., et al. (2019) Prediction of Adnexal Torsion by Ultrasound in Women with Acute Abdominal Pain. Ultraschall in der MedizinEuropean Journal of Ultrasound, 41, 688-694.
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1014-2593
[27] Jabeen, N., Sattar, A., Bakhsh, M.M., Farhan, N., Siddiqui, R.Q.U. and Noorani, A. (2023) Positive Predictive Value of Ultrasonography for Detection of Ovarian Masses Taking Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Gold Standard. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 17, 163-163.
[28] Yousaf, K.R., Saeed, S., Chaudhry, S., Bashrat, R., Khalid, A., Baig, U., et al. (2020) Usefulness of Grey Scale and Doppler Transvaginal Sonography in Diagnosis of Ovarian Torsion. Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University, 14, 97-102.
https://doi.org/10.37018/kori7947
[29] Yaakov, O., Ashwal, E., Gemer, O., Peled, Y., Kapustian V, Namazov, A., Eitan, R. and Krissi, H. (2022) Acute Adnexal Torsion: Is Immediate Surgical Intervention Associated with a Better Outcome? Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 87, 100-104.
[30] Runowicz, C.D. and Brewer, M. (2015) Adnexal Mass in Pregnancy.
[31] Jassim, T.N., Ibrahim, R.T., Jasim, M.H., Dalfi, N.J., Fatta, M. and Sahib, M.A. (2024) Comparing the Physical Characteristics of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose Ovarian Cysts.
http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06019
[32] Ray, J.G., Vermeulen, M.J., Bharatha, A., Montanera, W.J. and Park, A.L. (2016) Association between MRI Exposure during Pregnancy and Fetal and Childhood Outcomes. JAMA, 316, 952-961.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.12126
[33] Yamashita, Y., Torashima, M., Hatanaka, Y., Harada, M., Higashida, Y., Takahashi, M., et al. (1995) Adnexal Masses: Accuracy of Characterization with Transvaginal US and Precontrast and Postcontrast MR Imaging. Radiology, 194, 557-565.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.194.2.7824738
[34] Patel-Lippmann, K.K., Sadowski, E.A., Robbins, J.B., Paroder, V., Barroilhet, L., Maddox, E., et al. (2020) Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules to Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Guidelines for Detection of Malignancy in Adnexal Cysts. American Journal of Roentgenology, 214, 694-700.
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.18.20630
[35] Gatta, G., Di Grezia, G., Cuccurullo, V., Sardu, C., Iovino, F., Comune, R., et al. (2021) MRI in Pregnancy and Precision Medicine: A Review from Literature. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12, Article No. 9.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010009
[36] Temo Group (2023) Categories and Cameroon Civil Service Grades & Salaries.
https://www.temogroup.net/2020/12/cameroon-civil-service-grades-and-salaries.html
[37] Xie, W.T., Wang, Y.Q., Xiang, Z.S., Du, Z.S., Huang, S.X., Chen, Y.J., et al. (2022) Efficacy of IOTA Simple Rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses. Journal of Ovarian Research, 15, Article No. 15.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-022-00947-9
[38] Ball, E., Waters, N., Cooper, N., Talati, C., Mallick, R., Rabas, S., et al. (2019) Evidence-Based Guideline on Laparoscopy in Pregnancy: Commissioned by the British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE) Endorsed by the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (RCOG). Facts, Views and Vision in ObGyn, 11, 5-25.
[39] Grauso, F., Lannino, R.G. and Perone, C. (2018) Laparoscopic Management of Bilateral Ovarian Torsion Following Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in a Twin Pregnancy. Critical Care Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4, Article No. 4.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Flavio-Grauso/publication/327155494_Laparoscop-ic_Management_of_Bileral_Ovarian_Torsion_Following_Ovarian_Hyperstimulation_Syndrome_in_a_Twin_Pregnancy/links/5b7d2a9fa6fdcc5f8b5b4269/Laparoscopic-Management-of-Bilateral-Ovarian-Torsion-Following-Ovarian-Hyperstimulation-Syndrome-in-a-Twin-Pregnancy.pdf
[40] Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Huang, J. and Wang, L. (2016) Meta-Analysis Comparing the Safety of Laparoscopic and Open Surgical Approaches for Suspected Adnexal Mass during the Second Trimester. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 136, 272-279.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12069

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.