Prevalence of Mastitis and Associated Risk Factors in Lactating Camels (Camelus Dromedarius) on Dairy Farms in Benadir Region, Somalia ()
1. Introduction
Somalia boasts the world’s largest camel population, with these one-humped camels (Camelus dromedarius) being vital for both milk and income in arid and semi-arid regions of the Middle East and Africa [1] . Nomads consume camel milk in various forms, and in the realm of farm animals, mastitis, an inflammation of mammary gland tissue, significantly impacts animal health and productivity [2] . Camel mastitis remains insufficiently researched globally, especially concerning the prevalence of subclinical mastitis [3] . Despite the sizable camel population in Somalia, milk production is hindered by diseases like mastitis [4] . This disease stands as a major economic blow for dairy camel farmers in developing countries, leading to substantial losses [5] . Mastitis is a global challenge affecting animal health, milk quality, and the economics of milk production, affecting both developing and developed nations.
Transmission of udder infection leading to mastitis in camels is primarily through the teat channel, either from the environment or from infected udders of other animals, transmitted to the mammary gland during milking [6] . The severity and spread of this disease, which is widespread and a significant issue globally, are influenced by various risk factors, including breed, milk production level, hygiene, milking practices, age, parity, and stage of lactation [7] . Diagnosis involves clinical observation, including inspection and palpation, for clinical mastitis and the California Mastitis Test (CMT) for subclinical mastitis [8] .
In a study conducted in the Deyniile District, Benadir Region of Somalia, the overall prevalence of mastitis was 16.66%, with clinical and subclinical mastitis at 22.78% and 9.85% on an animal basis, and 9.37% and 6.15% quarterly, respectively [9] . Mastitis poses a frequent and significant challenge to livestock herds across the globe, with risk factors including parity of the she-camel, presence of ticks, age, and lactation stage [10] . Despite this, there remains a need for a comprehensive understanding of the status of camel mastitis and associated risk factors, especially in the context of intensive and semi-intensive farms in Somalia. Thus, this study was conceived to determine the prevalence of mastitis and its related risk factors among lactating camels on dairy farms in Benadir, Somalia.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethical Approval and Informed Consent
The ethical review committee approved our study protocol and procedures (Reference number BUERC178). All participants provided informed consent.
2.2. Study Area
The Benadir region in Somalia, comprising 17 districts, shares borders with the middle Shebelle in the north and east, the lower Shebelle in the west, and the Indian Ocean in the south. This study focused on five districts within Benadir: Dharkenley, Hodan, Dayniile, Hiliwaa, and Karan. Geographically, the region lies between latitude 2˚2'59''N and longitude 45˚15'44''E. Despite being the smallest administrative region in Somalia, Benadir has the largest population, estimated at approximately 2.3 million, and covers an area of around 96,878 km². Specific data regarding the camel population in Benadir were unavailable; hence, these five districts were selected based on their significant animal population. Samples were collected randomly from both semi-intensive and intensive camel dairy farms.
2.3. Study Design
A cross-sectional study design was employed, involving 96 lactating camels from managed intensive and semi-intensive farms in the selected districts. The study was conducted from May to September 2022, covering the Dharkenley, Hodan, Dayniile, Hiliwaa, and Karan districts within the Benadir region.
2.4. Selection of Study Area and Sampling Technique
The districts in Benadir were chosen based on the presence of dairy camel farms. The employees and owners of the dairy farms were then selected randomly. As no records were available, the age of camels was estimated by observing the eruption and wearing of permanent front teeth.
2.5. Sample Size
The sample size for lactating camels was determined using Thrusfield’s formula (2005) for simple random sampling:
N = 1.962 p exp (1 − pexp)
n = (1.96) 2 * 0.5 * 0.5 = 384 Sample.
d2 (0.05) 2
Where N = required sample size; P exp= expected prevalence; d = desired absolute precision (usually 0.05).
Accordingly, the prevalence of Mastitis in camels was not estimated previously. Thus, adopting a p of 50% and L of 5%, a total of (96 camels * 4 quarters) 384 camel milk samples were sampled for the present study.
3. Milk Sample Collection
Milk samples were collected in adherence to the Mastitis protocol. The udder was washed and dried using sterile water and towels. Teat ends were swabbed with cotton soaked in 70% ethyl alcohol. Approximately 5 - 10 ml of milk was aseptically collected from each quarter of the lactating camel into a sterile container, and an equal volume of California Mastitis Test (CMT) was added. CMT is a cost-effective and swift screening test for Mastitis.
4. Questionnaire Survey
The study used a carefully designed and pretested questionnaire that was thoroughly tested at the Kaliil and Alrayan Camel dairy farms. The questionnaire was prepared in English and then translated into the local language, Somali. To ensure accuracy and consistency, it was later back-translated into English. This meticulous process instills confidence in the reliability of the study’s findings. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 20 farm employees/owners to gather information on hygiene, parity, lactation stage, tick infestation, and udder/teat lesions. Data regarding parity and lactation stage were obtained through owner interviews.
5. Data Analysis
The data collected on specifically designed forms were recorded and entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet for analysis using SPSS version 20 statistical software. The prevalence of Mastitis (clinical and sub-clinical) was calculated as a percentage, and potential associations with risk factors were analyzed using the Chi-square test and predictive value (P-value).
6. Results
A total of 96 camels (4 quarters) were sampled, which is equivalent to 384 camel milk samples. Additionally, 20 farm employees and owners were interviewed.
6.1. Prevalence of Clinical and Subclinical Mastitis at Camel and Quarter Level
Table 1 illustrates the camel-level Mastitis prevalence using CMT, indicating a rate of 34.4% (33 out of 96 camels), with clinical cases at 4.6% and subclinical cases at 29.2%. Likewise, at the quarter level, the prevalence is 46.3%, with clinical and subclinical Mastitis at 4.6% and 41.2%, respectively.
![]()
Table 1. Prevalence of clinical and subclinical Mastitis at camel and quarter level.
![]()
Table 2. Prevalence of subclinical Mastitis at a quarter level in Banadir region.
6.2. Prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis at a Quarter Level in Banadir Region
Table 2 presents the quarter-wise prevalence of Mastitis. The right hind quarter exhibited the highest prevalence at 60.4% (58 out of 384), followed by the left hind quarter at 58.3% (56 out of 384). In comparison, the right front quarter showed a prevalence of 39.5% (38 out of 384), and the left front quarter had a prevalence of 27% (26 out of 384). The collective subclinical quarter-level prevalence in the Benadir region was 46.3% (178 out of 384).
6.3. The Prevalence of Mastitis at the Camel Level in the Farms
Shows the prevalence of Mastitis at the animal level. Subclinical Mastitis was the most prevalent, accounting for 29.2% (28 out of 96), whereas clinical Mastitis had a lower prevalence at 5.2% (5 out of 96).
6.4. Association between the Occurrence of Mastitis, Stage of Lactation, and Age Group
Table 3 suggests that Mastitis prevalence is significantly higher in the early lactation stage (1 - 3 months) compared to the mid and late lactation stages. The odds of Mastitis occurrence are 6.68 times higher in the early stage than in other stages. The Chi-square value of 6.68 indicates a significant association between Mastitis and the lactation stage. This information is crucial for understanding the vulnerability of lactating camels to Mastitis at different stages of lactation.
![]()
Table 3. Associations between mastitis occurrence and lactation stage, as well as age group.
![]()
Table 4. Association between the occurrence of Mastitis and parity.
The age distribution of lactating camels affected by Mastitis. The majority, comprising 20.8%, fall within the age range of 11 - 14 years. Additionally, 9.3% were aged between 8 - 10 years, and 4.1% were in the age group of 5 - 7 years. Notably, the highest number of positive Mastitis cases was observed in old-age camels. This study underlines a significant difference in Mastitis prevalence across different age categories.
6.5. Association between the Occurrence of Mastitis and Parity
Table 4 indicates that lactating camels with a parity of more than two calvings were 2.78 times more likely to contract Mastitis compared to camels with a parity of two or fewer calvings.
6.6. Association between the Occurrence of Mastitis and Tick Infestation
Table 5 reveals that lactating camels infested with ticks were 0.813 times more likely to contract Mastitis than camels without tick infestations.
![]()
Table 5. Association between the occurrence of Mastitis and tick infestation.
![]()
Table 6. Association between the occurrence of Mastitis and udder lesion.
Table7. Association between the prevalence of Mastitis and body condition.
6.7. Association between the Occurrence of Mastitis and Udder Lesion
Table 6 indicates that the majority, accounting for 21.8% (21 out of 96), of the camels tested positive for Mastitis without any udder lesions. Following this, 12.5% (12 out of 96) tested positive for udder lesions. Therefore, no significant association was found between udder lesions and camel mastitis.
6.8. Association between the Prevalence of Mastitis and Body Condition
Table 7 illustrates various body conditions in relation to the number of positive cases. Approximately 27% (26 out of 96) of the lactating camels exhibited a thin body condition, while 7.2% (7 out of 96) were normal. The results strongly suggest that lactating camels with a thin body condition are more susceptible to Mastitis. Furthermore, the data establishes a significant association (P = 0.005) between body condition and camel mastitis.
6.9. Management and Hygienic Practices in the Camel Dairy Farms
In this study focusing on management and hygienic practices in camel dairy farms, 40% milk camels twice daily, while 60% prefer thrice. All farms (100%) use hand milking, primarily by herd keepers (90%). Hygiene concern arises as 80% don’t wash their hands before milking, and udder washing is neglected.
![]()
Table 8. Management and hygienic practices in the camel dairy farms.
Milking-infected mastitis animals are rare (20%). Husbandry is mainly semi-intensive (100%), but 85% have poor hygiene scores. Enhancements in hand washing, udder drying, and hygienic scoring are imperative, alongside adjusting milking rates and involving diverse milking personnel (Table 8).
7. Discussion
In the study conducted, the prevalence of camel mastitis was found to be 34.4%, which is higher than the findings of other studies [11] reported a prevalence of 30.5% in Hargeisa, Somalia, while [12] reported a prevalence of 29% in Jijiga Zone, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia. However, the prevalence in this study was lower than that reported in the Afar Region, North Eastern Ethiopia (59.8%), and Sudanese camel herds (66.8%). In this study, the proportion of clinical and subclinical mastitis was found to be 5.2% and 29.2%, respectively. These findings are consistent with the results of [13] , who reported a subclinical mastitis prevalence ranging from 28.6% to 37.6% and clinical mastitis ranging from 10% to 17% in dromedary camels in the Borana area of Southern Ethiopia. Moreover, the prevalence of clinical mastitis in this study aligns with the findings of other studies, which reported a prevalence of 5.9% in Sudan and 8.3% in Jijiga [14] .
During a study, udder or teat lesions were found to be a critical risk factor for mastitis in camels, as they increase the chances of bacterial entry and cause permanent tissue damage. Out of 96 camels, 12.5% (12/96) tested positive for mastitis if they had udder or teat lesions. The researchers observed both penetrating and non-penetrating superficial skin lesions in the udder or teat, which could be due to the thorny plants in the area. Similar studies in Southern Ethiopia found a higher prevalence of mastitis (72.2%) in camels with udder lesions [15] . Trauma was also found to be a direct factor responsible for mastitis. Although tick infestation was considered a potential risk factor, it was not found to be significant in causing camel mastitis, unlike previous studies that suggested it predisposes the udder to mastitis-causing pathogens [16] .
Statistically significant variation in subclinical mastitis prevalence was noted concerning the stage of lactation. It was higher in the early 21.8% and mid-stage of lactation 7.2%, and lower in the last stage of lactation, in line with the findings of studies conducted in southern Ethiopia, which shows a high prevalence of subclinical mastitis in the early stage of lactation [17] . The highest prevalence in the mid-stage of lactation might be attributed to the common practice in the study area of not milking she-camels for the first two to three weeks after giving birth, potentially decreasing udder contamination. Variation was also observed among she-camels in different parities; in animals at their first calving, subclinical mastitis was 7.3%, sharply rising to 27% in she-camels that had three or more births. This aligns with the findings of [18] , who reported a higher prevalence of subclinical mastitis in she-camels with three or more parities [19] . However, this study contradicts the findings [20] . who noted that during the first, second, and third calving, the prevalence of mastitis was 25%, increasing to 43.8% at the fourth and fifth calving and decreasing to 16.7% in the sixth, seventh, and eighth calving. The increase in subclinical mastitis with parity could be linked to lower immunity defense, changes in udder morphology (higher elasticity of mammary gland), and an increase in udder trauma with the number of parties; The study faced difficulties in restraining and palpating animals, collecting milk samples from lactating animals, and obtaining a sufficient number of participants for the questionnaire.
8. Conclusion
This study highlights the significant occurrence of mastitis among lactating camels in Benadir, which is attributed to inadequate hygiene practices and tick infestations. It is worth noting that mastitis is more prevalent in the early stages of lactation. Therefore, it is crucial to implement effective management practices, including proper sanitation and tick control measures, to prevent mastitis. Public awareness and education are also essential in promoting the right herd health practices and hygienic milking processes, which can ultimately reduce the impact of mastitis on milk quality and yield.
Appendix I: Questionnaire
Section A: Individual animal (camel)
Data
1. Age ………………………………………………………………
2. Breed
a. Exotic breed
b. Local breed
3. Parity
a. Primiparous
b. Multiparous
4. Lactation stage
a. Early (1 - 3 months)
b. Mid (4 - 9 months)
c. Late (10 - 18 months)
5. Body condition
a. Normal
b. Thin
6. Teat lesion
a. With lesion
b. Without lesion
7. Udder Tick infestation
a. Tick free
b. Infested
Section B: Management and hygienic practices in Camel dairy farms
8. Do wash hands before milking.
a. Yes
b. No
9. Do you prepare (wash) the udder before milking?
a. Yes
b. No
10. Udder drying after washing
a. Yes
b. No
11. Milking mastitis camel last
a. Yes
b. No
12. Milking frequency
a. twice a day
b. Three times a day
13. Housing condition
a. Poor
b. Good
14. Husbandry system
a. Intensive
b. Semi-intensive
c. Extensive
15. Hygienic scoring
a. Good
b. Fair
c. Poor
16. Milking practice (method)
a. Hand Milking (manual)
b. Machine Milking
17. How often do you remove the manure from the farm?
a. Once a week
b. Once a Month
c. Once two months
d. three months
e. Others (specify)
18. Who milks the camels
a. Owner
b. employee
c. Others (specify)
19. Have you heard of mastitis in camels?
a. Yes
b. No
20. Have you ever had any case of mastitis?
a. Yes
b. No
21. If yes, what signs did you see that indicated it was mastitis?
a. Swollen and painful Udder/quarter
b. Bloody milk
c. Reduced milk
d. Other signs (specify)
22. Was any treatment given?
a. Yes
b. No
23. Who administered the treatment?
a. Veterinary doctor b. Animal Health technician
c. Community Animal Health worker
d. Self-treatment
e. Others (specify)