ions to problems. They state that the creative “problem solving (design) process” is a “sequence of stages∙∙∙ on a journey to a destination” which once experienced and learnt is internalized by the individual  . The steps in their model “need not be linear”  which allows for the random nature of the creative process, this was also recognized by Wallas who stated, “it is unlikely that creative procedure can ever by strictly formulated”  . The seven steps in their model were also identified by Koberg and Bagnallas alternating between being divergent or convergent as well as having an evaluation step at the end of the process for review and planning.
Table 6. Breakdown of the Koberg & Bagnall “universal traveler” model.
Source: Adapted from  .
This contrasts with the other stage models where the focus is on verification of the solution (Wallas), testing of the solution (Rossman), judging the solution (Osborn) and accepting/implementing the solution (Parnes-Osborn).
Models of creativity have also been developed to reflect certain contexts and specific environments such as engineering, commercial and business planning. These models still look to achieve a balance of creative and analytical thinking. An example of this is a model put forward for creative strategic planning by Bandrowski’s process for creative strategic planning. In this model (Table 7), Bandrowski places “judgment” in the middle as an important part of the analytical part of the process and he specifies the specific creative skills that are to be used to achieve the result through the process including skills in insight development, creative leaps, and creative contingency planning  .
Other models also look at providing a greater proportion to the external reality that an individual is applying their creativity to as well as the internal processes that they are employing, an example of this is the model put forward by Fritz as the “process for creation”  . He identifies the beginning of the process as the creative acts of conception and vision followed by analysis of current reality, action, evaluation, public scrutiny (building momentum), and completion as well as seeing the creative process is cyclical in nature-“living with your creation” being a meaningful end part of the process that leads to the next creative conception and vision.
Fritz’s model, which is shown in Table 8 focuses on the creative aspects of the individual and was sceptical of formulaic approaches to the classification of the creative process presented by other models. The stages identified in the models of Wallas, Rossman and Osborn focused on the identification of the problem and the application of a creative solution in contrast to Fritz whose focus is on the individual and the identification of problems and creative problem solving through their actions. The actions of individuals are fundamental to the identification of a problem as well as its solution and the level of motivation that an individual has affects these actions. A range of factors can impact on motivation including autonomy, ownership, influence, reward, challenge as well as personal
Table 7. Breakdown of the Brandowskis model for creative strategic planning.
Source: Adapted from  .
Table 8. Breakdown of the fritz’ process for creation.
Source: Adapted from  .
behaviour characteristics. In the literature relating to the motivation of staff working in organizations’ these factors can be identified; being in control, having independence, owning and influencing your own work    ; requirements to perform, achieve targets and timescales    .
6. Innovation: Social Housing
A significant amount of the literature identifies looks at innovation within social housing relating to the design and build of housing, reduced carbon usage and sustainable construction  -  . Innovation in technological advances in medicine and health care which is applied to housing services, mostly used by elderly people through telecare and assistive technologies  -  . There is very limited literature relating to innovation across the whole services provided by Housing Associations as social housing providers. Two studies that looked at innovation in HAs were undertaken by Walker & Jeanas  and a further study undertaken by Walker et al.  . Both used a two-dimensional typology put forward by Osborn  to look at innovations within their research studies.
This model built on the traditional split of innovation between product and process allowing for “innovation to occur at any stage of the life cycle thereby highlighting discontinuity (innovation) and continuity (organizational development) along the dimensions of services and users”  . Within the two-dimensional model, the first dimension focuses on the impact of organizational change upon the services that are delivered, and these are identified as existing or new ones which also includes the discontinuity of services. The second dimension focuses on the relationship of an organizational change to its users both new and existing as well as how their needs are met “which involves end-user discontinuity”  .
Four types of innovation were identified: the first is total innovation which includes “discontinuous change that is new to the organization and serves a new user group”, the second is expansionary innovation whereby “the change involves offering an existing service of the organization to a new user group”, the third is evolutionary innovation whereby “the change involves providing a new service to the existing user group of an organization” and the final classification is developmental innovation where “the services of an organization to its existing user group are modified or improved”  .
The information within Table 9 is plotted on an XY graph format whereby the two-dimensional typology and innovations identified are plotted against the four categories in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Typology of social policy innovation. Source:  .
Table 9. Typology of public services innovation.
Source: Adapted from  .
In the first study, Walker and Jeanas  researched innovation in three housing associations in the late 1990s. The organizations’ selected for the case studies represented the larger HAs in England who provided the most rented accommodation. A main problem identified with the case study approach was that it was not possible to gain a representative sample of housing providers as the sector is so diverse with no two organizations’ being the same  . The identified innovations were focused under six areas of activity: cultural change; customer focus/information technology; diversification; new management techniques; organizational expansion and organizational structure. Many of these were internally focused emphasizing service changes and reflecting the financial, commercial, customer service and performance within an operating environment that was constantly changing and becoming increasingly competitive.
From the study (Table 10), the researchers found that in relation to new innovations change is discontinuous and radical, though more limited, incremental innovation takes place through change. It was found that the iterative and dynamic nature of innovation make the process of classifying them problematic not only because this process can be subjective but also because the innovations themselves change through time. A further study  carried out on innovation in housing associations also measured innovations that had been identified against Osborn’s two-dimensional typology. Both studies highlighted several common themes that emerged from the transformation of the sector during the 1990s including: diversification of activity into regeneration, community facilities, care, special needs, private renting and contract management; the adoption of new organizational forms through mergers and group structures; a greater emphasis on a business ethos and management; and, a changing regulatory regime    .
This study shows that there is a process connected with innovation and that there are different definitions within the academic literature about innovation. Innovation can be considered as being product or process that is new or is existing
Table 10. Classification of case study HA innovations.
Source: Adapted from  .
but has been improved. There are different models regarding the process of innovation and from these it can be identified that there is a strong link to creativity as part of the innovation process. In looking at the application of innovation in social housing as part of the public sector this study has focused on two academic studies which looked at Housing Associations and Innovation and these identified that innovations can be seen with a typology as new products or services or improvements on existing products and services. Further research could be undertaken to look at innovation within the social housing sector within the United Kingdom within the twenty first century.
The author acknowledges help from his PhD supervisors at the University of Cumbria in researching the area of innovation.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
|||Godin, B. (2008) Innovation: The History of a Category. Montreal: Project of the Intellectual History of Innovation, Working Paper No. 1, p. 26.|
|||Skinner, M. and Hanlon, N. (2015) Ageing Resource Communities: New Frontiers of Rural Population Change, Community Development and Voluntarism. Routledge, New York, London.|
|||Bannet, E. (2007) Quixotes, Imitations and Transatlantic Genres. Eighteenth Century Studies, 40, 553-569.|
Force, P. (2005) Innovation as Spiritual Exercise: Montaigne and Pascal. Journal of the History of Ideas, 66, 17-35.
|||Cole, B. (1995) Titan and the Idea of Originality in the Renaissance. In: Ladis, A., Wood, C. and Eiland, W.U., Eds., Craft of Art, University of Georgia Press, Athens, 86-112.|
Macleod, C. (1988) Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The England Patent System 1660-1800. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
|||Popplow, M. (1998) Protection and Promotion: Privileges for Inventions and Books for Machines in the Early Modern Period. History of Technology, 20, 103-124.|
|||Berg, M. (1999) New Commodities, Luxuries and their Consumers in Eighteenth-Century England. In: Berg, M. and Clifford, H., Eds., Consumers and Luxury: Consumer Culture in Europe 1650-1850, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 63-85.|
Berg, M. (2002) From Imitation to Invention: Creating Commodities in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Economic History Review, 55, 1-30.
Clifford, H. (1999) Concepts of Invention, Identity and Imitation in the London and Provincial Metal-Working Trades, 1750-1800. Journal of Design History, 12, 241-255.
|||Dumont, L. (1977) From Mandeville to Marx. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.|
|||Branigan, A. (1981) The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries. Cambridge University Press, New York.|
|||Sweezy, P.M. (1968) Karl Marx and the Industrial Revolution. In: Eagly, R.V., Ed., Events, Ideology and Economic Theory, Wayne State University Press, Detroit, 107-126.|
Rosenberg, N. (1976) Marx as a Student of Technology. Monthly Review, 28, 56-77.
|||Stern, B.J. (1927) Social Factors in Medical Progress. Columbia University Press, New York.|
|||Schon, D.A. (1967) Technology and Change: The Impact of Invention and Innovation on American Social and Economic Development. Delta Book, New York.|
Schumpeter, J.A. (1928) The Instability of Capitalism. The Economic Journal, 38, 361-386.
|||Schumpeter, J.A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Enquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. Oxford University Press, London.|
|||Schumpeter, J.A. (1939) Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.|
|||Schumpeter, J.A. (1942) The Process of Creative Destruction. In: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Chapter 7, Harper, New York.|
Schumpeter, J.A. (1947) The Creative Response in Economic History. Journal of Economic History, 7, 149-159.
|||Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. and Nelson, R.R., Eds. (2005) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.|
Malerba, F. and Brusoni, S., Eds. (2007) Perspectives on Innovation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Linton, J.D. (2009) De-Babelizing the Language of Innovation. Technovation, 29, 729-737.
|||OECD/Eurostat (2005) The Oslo Manual. OECD, Paris.|
|||Wolfe, R. (1994) Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31, 405-431.|
|||Mulgary, G. and Albury, D. (2003) Innovation in the Public Sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, London.|
|||National Audit Office (NAO) (2009) Innovation across Central Government. The stationery Office, London.|
|||Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2009) Innovation in the Public Sector. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.|
|||Confederation of British Industry (CBI)/QUINETIQ (2008) Excellence in Service Innovation. CBI.|
|||Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (2008) Innovation Research Initiative Distributed Projects Cost Specification. ESRC, Swindon.|
Damanpour, F. and Schneider, M. (2009) Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organisations: Assessing the Role of Managers. Journal of Public Resources and Theory, 19, 495-522.
|||De Vires, H.A., Bekkers, V.J.J.M. and Tummers, L.G. (2014) Innovations in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review. Ottawa IRSPM Conference, 9-11 April 2014.|
|||Evers, A., Ewert, B. and Brandsen, T., Eds. (2014) Social Innovations for Social Cohesion: 77 Cases from 20 European Cities 2010-14. European Commission, Nijmegen.|
|||NESTA (2012) Plan 1: The Case for Innovation Led Growth. NESTA, London, 17.|
Seaden, G. and Manseau, A. (2001) Public Policy and Construction Innovation. Building Research & Information, 29, 182-196.
|||Cropley, D.H., Kaufman, J.C. and Cropley, A.J. (2011) Measuring Creativity for Innovation Management. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6.|
|||Klein, J.L. and Tremblay, D.G. (2011) Cultural Creation and Social Innovation as the Basis for Building a Cohesive City. Montreal, Canada.|
|||Florida, R. (2005) Cities and Creative Class. Psychology Press, New York.|
Markusen, A. (2006) Urban Development and the Politics of a Creative Class: Evidence from a Study of Artists. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1921-1940.
|||Vinacke, W. (1953) The Psychology of Thinking. McGraw Hill, New York.|
|||Wertheimer, M. (1945) Production Thinking. Harper, New York.|
|||Plsek, P. (1996) Working Paper: Models for the Creative Process. Directed Creativity.|
|||Fritz, R. (1991) Creating. Fawcett, New York.|
|||Jung, C.G. (1928) Contributions to Analytical Psychology. Kegan, Trench & Trubner, London.|
|||Barron, F. (1988) Putting Creativity to Work. In: Sternberg, R., Ed., The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.|
|||Weiberg, R.W. (1993) Creativity: Beyond the Myth of Genius. Freeman & Co., New York.|
|||Wallas, G. (1926) Art of Thought. Brace and Company, New York, 79.|
|||Simonton, D.K. (1999) Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.|
|||Truman, S. (2011) A Generative Framework for Creative Learning: A Tool for Planning Creative-Collaborative Tasks in the Classroom. Transnational Working Papers, No. 1101. Border Crossing.|
|||Torrance, E.P. (1988) The Nature of Creativity as Manifest in Its Testing. In: Sternberg, R.J., Ed., The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.|
|||Rossman, J. (1931) The Psychology of the Inventor. Inventors Publishing, Washington DC.|
|||Osborn, A. (1953) Applied Imagination. Charles Scribner, New York, 114.|
|||Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997) Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life. Basic Books, New York, 7.|
|||Osborn, A. (1952) Your Creative Power: How to Use Imagination. Charles Scribner, New York.|
|||Osborn, A. (1963) Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving. 3rd Edition, Charles Scribner, New York.|
|||Osborn, A. (1948) Your Creative Power. Charles Scribner, New York.|
Rossiter, J.R. and Lillien, G.L. (1994) New “Brainstorming” Principles. Australian Journal of Management, 19, 61-72.
|||Parnes, S.J. (1967) Creative Behaviour Guidebook. Scribner, New York.|
|||Koberg, D. and Bagnall, J. (1974) The Universal Traveller. W Kaufman, Los Altos, CA, p. 7, 16, 27.|
|||Bandrowski, J.F. (1985) Creative Planning Throughout the Organization. American Management Association, New York.|
Bailyn, L. (1985) Autonomy in the Industrial R & D Lab. Human Resource Management, 24, 129-146.
Paolillo, J.G. and Brown, W.B. (1978) How Organisation Factors Affect R & D Innovation. Research Management, 21, 12-15.
|||Pelz, D.C. and Andrews, F.M. (1966) Scientists in Organisations: Productive Climates for Research and Development. Wiley, New York.|
Amabile, T.M. and Gitomer, J. (1984) Children’s Artistic Creativity: Effects of Choice in Task Materials. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 209-215.
Amabile, T.M. and Gryskiewicz, N. (1989) The Creative Environment Scales: The Work Environment Inventory. Creative Research Journal, 2, 321-254.
|||Amabile, T.M. (1994) The Delicate Balance of Managing for Creativity. R & D Innovator, 3, 1-9.|
|||Kaluarachi, Y. (2015) 8. Challenges to Leaders in Promoting Innovative and Sustainable Social housing In the UK. In: Opoku, A. and Ahmed, V., Eds., Leadership and Sustainability in the Built Environment, Taylor and Francis Group, Abingdon, 109-122.|
Marchesi, M., Kim, S.G. and Matt, D.T. (2015) Assessing the Design Innovation Potential of Timber Prefabricated Housing through Axiomatic Design. ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Houston, TX, 13-19 November 2015, 10 p.
Hjort, B. and Widén, K. (2015) Introduction of Sustainable Low-Cost Housing in Ethiopia—An Innovation Diffusion Perspective. Procedia Economics and Finance, 21, 454-460.
Nanyam, V.N., Basu, R., Sawhney, A. and Prasad, J.K. (2015) Selection Framework for Evaluating Housing Technologies. Procedia Engineering, 123, 333-341.
Forster, A.M., Fernie, S., Carter, K., Walker, P. and Thomson, D. (2015) Innovation in Low Carbon Construction Technologies: An Historic Analysis for Obviating Defects. Structural Survey, 33, 52-72.
Madeddu, M., Gallent, N. and Mace, A. (2015) Space in New Homes: Delivering Functionality and Liveability through Regulation or Design Innovation? Town Planning Review, 86, 73-95.
|||Abbott, C., Sexton, M. and Barlow, C. (2015) Regulation and Innovation in New Build Housing. In: Orstavik, F., Dainty, A. and Abbott, C., Eds., Construction Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 79-88.|
Pässilä, P., Pulkka, L. and Junnila, S. (2015) How to Succeed in Low-Energy Housing—Path Creation Analysis of Low-Energy Innovation Projects. Sustainability, 7, 8801-8822.
|||Springer, D. and German, A. (2015) New Whole-House Solutions Case Study: Zero Energy Ready Home Multifamily Project: Mutual Housing at Spring Lake (No. DOE/GO-102015-4690). ARBI.|
|||Wigfield, A., Moore, S., Buse, C. and Fry, G. (2012) Workforce Development for Assisted Living Technology: Understanding Roles, Delivery and Workforce Needs. Centre for International Research on Care, Labour and Equalities University of Leeds (CIRCLE), Found, 35.|
Marriot, P., Hinshaw, K., Nayar, R. and Emmerson, C. (2013) Development of a Multi Matrix Multi Partner Telehealth Model in Pregnancy Care in South of Tyne and Wear, UK. International Journal of Integrated Care, 13, 1-2.
Parker, S.G. (2013) Telecare for an Ageing Population? Age and Ageing, 42, 424-425.
Hunter, R.H., Sykes, K., Lowman, S.G., Duncan, R., Satariano, W.A. and Belza, B. (2011) Environmental and Policy Change to Support Healthy Aging. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 23, 354-371.
Williamson, T. (2011) Grouchy Old Men? Promoting Older Men’s Mental Health and Emotional Well Being. Working with Older People, 15, 164-176.
Wilder, A.R. (2011) A Review of: “Aging Friendly Technology for Health and Independence: 8th International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics, Icost 2010”. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 29, 142-146.
|||Walker, R. and Jeanas, E. (1999) Innovation in a Regulated Service: The Case of English Housing Associations. Paper Given at ENHR “The Process of Change in Housing” Conference, Laboratrio Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Lisboa, Portugal, 27-28 May 1999.|
Walker, R., Jeanas, E. and Rowlands, R. (2002) Measuring Innovation—Applying the Literature-Based Innovation Output Indicator to Public Services. Public Administration, 80, 201-214.
|||Osborn, S.P. (1998) Voluntary Organisations and Innovation in Public Services. Routledge, London.|
|||Clapham, D. and Evans, A. (1998) From Exclusion to Inclusion: Helping to Creating Successful Tenancies and Communities. Hastoe Housing Association, London.|
|||Mullins, D. and Riseborough, M. (1999) Changing with the Times. University of Birmingham, Birmingham.|
Walker, R. (2000) The Changing Management of Social Housing: The Impact of Externalisation and Managerialism. Housing Studies, 15, 281-299.
Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.