[1]
|
Achard, M., & Niemeier, S. (Eds.) (2004). Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
|
[2]
|
Arnold, J. (1999). Affect language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[3]
|
Baddeley, A. (1990). Human memory. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
[4]
|
Beréndi, M., Csábi, S., & K?vecses, Z. (2008). Using conceptual metaphors and metonymies in vocabulary teaching. In F. Boers and S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology (pp. 65-100). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
|
[5]
|
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (Eds.) (2008). Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
|
[6]
|
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2006). Cognitive linguistics application in second or foreign language instruction: Rationale, proposals, and evaluation. In G. Kristiansen, et al. (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Cu- Rrent Applications and Future Perspectives (pp. 305-358). New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110197761.4.305
|
[7]
|
Boers, F., & Lindstomberg, S. (2005). Finding ways to make phrase- learning feasible: The mnemonic effect of alliteration. System, 33, 225- 238. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.12.007
|
[8]
|
Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M. (2004). Cross-cultural variation as a variable in comprehending and remembering figurative idioms. European Journal of English Studies, 8, 375-388.
doi:10.1080/1382557042000277449
|
[9]
|
Boers, F. (2000a). Enhancing metaphoric awareness in specialised reading. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 137-147.
doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00017-9
|
[10]
|
Boers, F. (2000b). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistic, 21, 553-571. doi:10.1093/applin/21.4.553
|
[11]
|
Boers, F. (1999). When a bodily source domain becomes prominent: The joy of counting metaphor in the socio-economic domain. In R. W. Gibbs and G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 47-56). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
|
[12]
|
Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M. (1998). Cognitive semantic approach to teaching preposition. English Language Teaching Journal, 52, 197- 204. doi:10.1093/elt/52.3.197
|
[13]
|
Boers, F. (1996). Spatial prepositions and metaphor: A cognitive semantic journey along the up-down and the front-back dimensions. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
|
[14]
|
Bolinger, D. (1971). The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
[15]
|
Broukal, M. (1995). Idioms for everyday use. IL: NTC Publishing Group.
|
[16]
|
Cameron, L., & Low, G. (1999). Researching and applying metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[17]
|
Clark, J. M. & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149-170.
doi:10.1007/BF01320076
|
[18]
|
Cohen, P. R. (2000). Learning Concepts by Interaction. Technical Report, Computer Science Department, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
|
[19]
|
Condon, N. (2008). How cognitive linguistic motivations influence the learning of the phrasal verbs. In F. Boers and S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology (pp. 133-158). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
|
[20]
|
Croft, W (1998). Mental representations. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 151- 174. doi:10.1515/cogl.1998.9.2.151
|
[21]
|
Cuyckens, H., Dirven, R., & Taylor, J., B. (Eds.) (2003). Cognitive Approaches to Lexal Semantics. New York: Mouton de Gruyte.
|
[22]
|
Ellis, N. C., & Freeman, D. L. (2006). Language emergence: implications for applied linguistics—introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 27, 558-589. doi:10.1093/applin/aml028
|
[23]
|
Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
|
[24]
|
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the minds hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books. A Member of the Perseus Books Group.
|
[25]
|
Fillmore, C. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222-254.
|
[26]
|
Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of lexical semantics. New York: Oxford University Press.
|
[27]
|
Gibbs, R. (1992). What do idioms really mean? Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 485-506. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90025-S
|
[28]
|
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[29]
|
Hampe, B., & Grady, J. (2005). From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
doi:10.1515/9783110197532
|
[30]
|
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
[31]
|
K?vecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. London: Cambridge University Press.
|
[32]
|
K?vecses, Z. (2006). Language, mind and culture: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
[33]
|
K?vecses, Z., & Szabó, P. (1996). Idioms: A view from cognitive semantics. Applied Linguistics, 17, 326-355.
doi:10.1093/applin/17.3.326
|
[34]
|
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
|
[35]
|
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
[36]
|
Langacker, R. W. (1987)..Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Volume I). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
|
[37]
|
Lazar, G. (1996). Using figurative language to expand students’ vocabulary. ELT Journal, 50, 43-51. doi:10.1093/elt/50.1.43
|
[38]
|
Lazar, G. (2003). Meaning and metaphors: Activities to practise figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[39]
|
Lindner, S. (1981). A lexico-semantic analysis of English verb-particle constructions with UP and OUT. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, San Diego, University of California.
|
[40]
|
Littlemore, J. (2001a). Metaphoric competence: A language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style? TESOL Quarterly, 35, 459-491. doi:10.2307/3588031
|
[41]
|
Littlemore, J. (2001b). An empirical study of the relationship between cognitive style and the use of communication strategy. Applied Linguistics, 22, 241-265. doi:10.1093/applin/22.2.241
|
[42]
|
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
doi:10.1057/9780230627567
|
[43]
|
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Metaphoric competence, second language learning, and communicative. Language Ability Applied Linguistics, 27, 268-294.
|
[44]
|
Radden, G., & Panther, K.-U. (2004). Studies in linguistic motivation. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
|
[45]
|
Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). A dual coding theory of reading and writing. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
|
[46]
|
Sophia, S. (2008). Conceptual metaphoric meaning clues in two idiom presentation methods. In F. Boers and S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology (pp. 101-132). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
|
[47]
|
Gao, Y. M. (2010). Applying CL to L2 acquisition. Tianjin: Nankai University Press.
|
[48]
|
Gao, Y. M. (2001). Learn how to learn: Comparative research on learning style preferences. Teaching English in China, 4, 51-57.
|
[49]
|
Gao, Y. M. (1996). T.R.I. model and college English reading. Foreign Language World, 3, 34-37.
|
[50]
|
Li, F. Y. (2004). Applied cognitive linguistics. Beijing: China Wenshi Publishing.
|
[51]
|
Liang, X. B. (2000). Enlightenments of the cognitive linguistics on English vocabulary teaching. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2, 35-39.
|
[52]
|
Liu, Z. G. (2010). Cognitive linguistic view of language and principles for FL teaching. Foreign Language Research, 1, 10-16.
|
[53]
|
Yu, N. (1998). The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
|
[54]
|
Wang, Y. (2006). A Survey to cognitive linguistics. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
|