Share This Article:

Model of Traffic Speed-Flow Relationship at Signal Intersections

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:1116KB) PP. 319-327
DOI: 10.4236/ojapps.2017.76025    728 Downloads   1,156 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

Speed-flow relationship is the fundamental for the traffic simulation and traffic volume forecast. Traditional quadratic polynomial model can’t reflect the saturate flow at signal intersections. In order to determine the speed-flow relationship at signal intersections, the speed and time-headway of vehicles at two signal intersections were investigated and the accuracy of software used to get the speed was tested. After vehicle starting-up from queuing, the time-headway reduces gradually with the increase of speed. The relationship of power exponential function between speed and time-headway is formulated. Traffic volume can be calculated by the vehicle time-headway. Then the speed-flow relationship was developed and an S-shaped curve model was built in this paper. In the S-shaped curve model, traffic flow approaches to the saturate when the speed doesn’t increase. Thus, S-shaped curve model is better to describe the speed-flow relationship at signal intersection. The results can provide a reference to determine the parameters in traffic simulation and for the study of level of service of intersections.

1. Introduction

The relationship between speed and volume is the fundamental in the traffic flow theory. It was first studied by Greenshields. Then, there were many efforts to develop theoretical models, including models by Greenberg (1959), Underwood (1961), and other models [1] . The Greenshields model is widely used, which is a quadratic polynomial model:

(1)

Q: traffic flow rate;

Kj: critical density;

V: operating speed;

Vj: free flow speed.

According to the ways of data collection and data analysis, there are many other different models, because of different. Guo, et al. [2] found that the traffic flow characteristics in expressway of Beijing were similar to those of highways in other countries. Based on the field data of urban streets, an adapted S-curve model was developed by Chen [3] . Shao analyzed the vehicles operation characters on urban individual freeway lanes, and established a power exponential function model for the speed-flow relationship. At the same time, he pointed out that the speed decreased when traffic flow reaches a certain value [4] . Traffic flow was divided into three categories by Li [5] : free flow segment, stable flow segment, and congested-evacuation segment. Three models for the for the speed-flow relationship were built.

In summary, all the researches on the speed-flow relationship in China focus on the expressway. The speed (V) is the average operating speed, which containing all vehicles on investigated section of the road. This can not apply for the intersections. After starting-up for the queuing vehicles, the time-headway reduces gradually as the speed increases and the flow rate ends up with the saturation rate. This is different from the characters of traffic flow on highways and freeways. At the same time, the actual models were quadratic polynomial model, exponential or logarithmic function model. These models can’t reflect the saturate flow at signal intersections.

The purpose of this paper is to develop the model of speed-flow relationship at signal intersection. After vehicle starting-up from queuing, the time-headway reduces gradually with the increase of speed. The speed and time-headway of vehicles at signal intersections were investigated and the relationship between them was formulated. Traffic volume can be calculated by the vehicle time- headway. Then the speed-flow relationship can be developed.

2. Data Collection

The imagery data have been collected by a camera placed at corners of two intersections in order to get the accurate bird-view. These typical urban four- approach intersections operate with a four-phase signal plan with a protected left-turn phase for both heavily traveled streets. The data collection lasts for three consecutive workdays for each signal intersections. The data are collected under good weather with only small vehicles (excluding the data from the protected phase when buses, large trucks and U-turn vehicles are present). The information for the investigated intersections is shown in Table 1.

The following variables are obtained: start-up time of the queuing vehicles after the green light, the speed and the time of vehicles when passing through the stop line. The start-up time of the vehicles was calculated from the field video which is played one by one frame (the accuracy is 0.04 s). The speed is obtained by a positioning software, based on the coordinate system which is illustrated at the intersections (Figure 1).

The accuracy for the measurement error of speed gotten by the software is tested, which is shown in Figure 2. Two lines are painted on the ground (l1, l2), and the distance between them is two meters (L12). Then the actual travel speed (V1) can be calculated. The difference between the actual travel speed (V1) and

Table 1. Information of the investigated intersections.

(a) (b)

Figure 1. Layout of the investigated intersections. (a) Intersection A; (b) Intersection B.

Figure 2. Accuracy test for the measurement error of speed.

Table 2. Measurement test of speed.

the travel speed (V2) obtained by the positioning software is the measurement error.

The results of accuracy test are illustrated in Table 2. The average difference between V1 and V2 is 0.1 km/h, and the max is ±1.2 km/h, the relative difference of the speed is within 5%. Thus, the vehicle speed got from the software can be used to build the model of speed-flow Relationship.

3. Analysis

Assume that the first vehicle in the queue starts from the stop line, and the initial velocity is zero. Vehicles followed the front one. The time-headway of vehicles (Ht) can be expressed as:

(2)

where,

Ht = time-headway of vehicle(s);

= the time when the front car passes through the stop line;

T1 = the time when the following car passes through the stop line.

The vehicle speed (V) is the average speed between the front vehicle passes through the stop line and the vehicle itself passes through. It can be calculated as follows.

(3)

where,

V = speed (m/s);

= the speed of the following car when the front car passes through the stop line;

= the speed of the following car when it passes through the stop line.

3.1. Model of Time-Headway and Speed (Ht-V)

According to the investigated data, the scatter plots of time-headway and speed were displayed in Figure 3. The time-headway (Ht) reduced gradually as the speed (V) increased and the flow rate ended up with the saturation rate from zero. The speed of saturation flow at intersection A was 6.5 m/s, and 5.5 m/s at intersection B. The time-headway of saturation flow is about two seconds.

Vehicles started one by one from queuing. The start-up reaction time for different drivers is approximate [6] . Then, the following conclusions can be found so far: 1) time-headway (Ht) reduces gradually as the speed increases; 2) time- headway (Ht) is greater than a certain value. Thus, the power exponential function is selected to fit the relationship between Ht and V, which is showed in Equation (4).

(4)

where:

Ht = time-headway of vehicle (s);

V = speed (m/s);

a, b, c: constant parameter.

The equations fitted by the field data using the software at intersection A, B are as follows:

(5)

(6)

Ht(A): time-headway of vehicle at intersection A (s);

Ht(B): time-headway of vehicle at intersection B (s).

The correlation coefficient (R-square) is 0.89 at intersection A and 0.81 at intersection B.

Figure 3. Scatter plot vs. fitted curve for the Ht-V relationship at intersections A/B.

3.2. Model Checking

The Ht of saturate flow is the minimum at signal intersection. At this time, Ht can be expressed as flow:

(7)

where:

Hts = time-headway of saturate flow (s);

hd = distance-headway of the queuing vehicles(m);

Vf: speed of saturate flow (m/s);

tr: start-up reaction time for queuing vehicles(s).

When,the (Equation (7)), tr is the reaction times of the queuing vehicles, which is the constant parameter c in Equation (4). According to the Equations ((5) and (6)), the average reaction time is 1.13 s at intersection A, and 1.06 s at intersection B.

The reaction time also can be investigated by the field video. The queuing vehicles begin to start one by one after the start-up reaction and the lag of start-up time between adjacent queuing vehicles is the reaction time. A linear regression model [6] is used to describe the law of start-up time (Figure 4, (Equations ((8), (9))). The results showed that reaction time at intersection A is 1.05 s and 1.07 s at intersection B.

The fitting formulas are as follows:

Intersection A:

(8)

Intersection B:

(9)

Ts: the start-time after the green light(s);

Ka: queue order (intersection A);

Kb: queue order (intersection B).

The two reaction times (model of time-headway in Equations ((5), (6)) and investigated by the field video) were compared in Table 3. Two of them were approximate. Thus, the model of time-headway is reasonable.

Figure 4. Regressive analysis between position of queued vehicles and start-up time. (a) Intersection A; (b) Intersection B.

Table 3. Comparison to the Tr (reaction time).

Figure 5. Fitted model for the Ht-V relationship.

3.3. Speed-Flow Relationship

The final power exponential function of Ht-V is fitted by the combined data (intersection A and intersection B), which is showed in Figure 5.

The relationship between traffic flow rate (Q) and time-headway (Ht) is as follows:

(10)

Q: traffic flow rate (pcu/h);

Thus, Speed-Flow Relationship is:

(11)

Equation (11) is a formula of S-shaped curve. In the speed-flow relationship, the Q increases gradually with the speed increases after vehicle starting-up. Traffic flow approaches to the saturation when the speed (V) doesn’t increase. The constant parameters a and c are greater than zero, and b is smaller than zero but greater than negative one. The value c represents the reaction time of drivers.

The traditional quadratic polynomial model (Greenshields model, Equation (1)) is compared with the S-shaped curve model. The blue dotted line is quadratic polynomial model and the red line is S-shaped curve model in Figure 6. There is no significant difference for two models when speed is in a low level. However, when the flow reaches to saturation flow, the flow rate tends to decrease for Greenshields model. This does not comply with the actual situation. E.g, the speed of saturate flow is 6.5 m/s at intersection A, and the investigated saturate flow rate is 1739 pcu/h. The saturate flow rate calculated by the model of S-shaped curve is 1749 pcu/h, and is 1670 pcu/h by Greenshields model. At this time, there are some errors for the Greenshields model when speed is zero.

Figure 6. Comparison of two models.

When speed is zero, the traffic flow rate (Q) is also zero.

The S-shaped curve model developed in this paper is well to fit the speed-flow relationship, and it can reflect the character of stable saturate flow. Thus, the V-flow relationship of S-shaped curve model is better than traditional quadratic polynomial model at signal intersections.

4. Conclusions

In order to explore the speed-flow relationship at signal intersections, the imagery data have been collected by a camera placed at two intersections. The relationship between speed and time-headway is analyzed and a law of power exponential function is formulated in this paper. Based on the field data, the equation is fitted by the software and it is tested by the parameter of reaction time of the drivers. Then, the model of speed-flow relationship (S-shaped curve) is developed.

After vehicle starting-up from queuing, the time-headway reduces gradually with the increase of speed and traffic flow approaches to the saturate when the speed (V) doesn’t increase. The S-shaped curve model developed in this paper can reflect these characters. Through analyzing the traffic data, the error of traditional quadratic polynomial model will be larger as the flow reaches to saturation and the speed further increases. Thus, the S-shaped curve model is better to fit the speed-flow relationship at signal intersections.

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by the Open Project of Key Laboratory of Ministry of Public Security for Road Traffic Safety (2016ZDSYSKFKT06).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Chen, Y. (2017) Model of Traffic Speed-Flow Relationship at Signal Intersections. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 7, 319-327. doi: 10.4236/ojapps.2017.76025.

References

[1] Xu, J.Q. and Chen, X.W. (2008) Fundamentals of Traffic Engineer. 3rd Edition, China Communications Press, Beijing.
[2] Guo, J.F., Qua, Y.S., Zheng, M. and Li, X. (2002) Study on the Traffic Flow of the Ex-pressway System in Bejing. Urban Transport, 24, 42-44.
[3] Chen, S. (2004) Research on Practical Velocity—Volum Model of Urban Streets. Ph.D. Thesis, Southeast University, Nanjing.
[4] Shao, C.Q. and Zhao, L. (2006) Study of Speed-Flow Relationships Model on Urban Individual Freeway Lanes. Road Traffic and Safety, 6, 8-10.
[5] Li,Y., Lu, H.P., Bian, C.Z. and Sui, Y. (2009) Traffic Speed-Flow Model for the Mix Traffic Flow on Beijing Urban Expressway. International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA), 3, 641-644.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMTMA.2009.312
[6] Zong, E. (2007) Research on Capacity of Left-Turn Lanes at Signalized Intersection. Master’s Thesis, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.