Beam Characteristics at Low Dose Monitor Unit Settings for Vero4DRT

DOI: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2015.44034   PDF   HTML   XML   2,751 Downloads   3,325 Views   Citations


The stability of delivery of low monitor unit (MU) setting is important especially for step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), because the nature of the technique is inherent to repeat beam on/off according to the number of the segments. This study evaluates the dose linearity and profile flatness/symmetry under low MU settings for Vero4DRT, a new linear-accelerator based irradiation system that currently implements step-and-shoot IMRT. To evaluate the dose linearity and flatness/symmetry, the point doses and beam profiles were measured as functions of MU and dose rates. The accuracy of dose delivery depended on the dose rate. Under all dose rates, the dose was linear within 1% above 5 MU and within 2% above 3 MU. The beam symmetry was degraded in-line compared with crossline, although both profiles were symmetric within 2% at all dose settings. The profile flatness was also within 2% above 5 MU at any dose rate and showed no significant variation among the low MU settings. To ensure stable beam delivery without increasing the treatment time of Vero4DRT, we recommend a delivery of 5 MU per segment at a dose rate of 500 MU/min.

Share and Cite:

Miura, H. , Ozawa, S. , Tsuda, S. , Hayata, M. , Yamada, K. and Nagata, Y. (2015) Beam Characteristics at Low Dose Monitor Unit Settings for Vero4DRT. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 4, 284-289. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2015.44034.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] LoSasso, T., Chui, C.S. and Ling, C.C. (1998) Physical and Dosimetric Aspects of a Multileaf Collimator System Used in the Dynamic Mode for Implementing Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy. Medical Physics, 25, 1919-1927.
[2] Kuperman, V.Y. and Lam, W.C. (2006) Improving Delivery of Segments with Small MU in Step-and-Shoot IMRT. Medical Physics, 33, 1067-1073.
[3] Otto, K. (2008) Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy: IMRT in a Single Gantry Arc. Medical Physics, 35, 310-317.
[4] Miura, H., Fujiwara, M., Tanooka, M., et al. (2012) Dosimetric and Delivery Characterizations of Full-Arc and Half-Arc Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy for Maxillary Cancer. Journal of Radiation Research, 53, 785-790.
[5] Kamino, Y., Takayama, K., Kokubo, M., et al. (2006) Development of a Four-Dimensional Image-Guided Radiotherapy System with a Gimbaled X-Ray Head. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 66, 271-278.
[6] Kamino, Y., Miura, S., Kokubo, M., et al. (2007) Development of an Ultrasmall C-Band Linear Accelerator Guide for a Four-Dimensional Image-Guided Radiotherapy System with a Gimbaled X-Ray Head. Medical Physics, 34, 1797-1808.
[7] Nakamura, M., Sawada, A., Ishihara, Y., et al. (2010) Dosimetric Characterization of a Multileaf Collimator for a New Four-Dimensional Image-Guided Radiotherapy System with a Gimbaled X-Ray Head, MHI-TM2000. Medical Physics, 37, 4684-4691.
[8] Mukumoto, N., Nakamura, M., Sawada A., et al. (2013) Accuracy Verification of Infrared Marker-Based Dynamic Tumor-Tracking Irradiation Using the Gimbaled X-Ray Head of the Vero4DRT (MHI-TM2000). Medical Physics, 40, Article ID: 041706.
[9] Hansen, V.N., Evans, P.M., Budgell, G.J., et al. (1998) Quality Assurance of the Dose Delivery by Small Radiation Segments. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 43, 2665-2675.
[10] Das, I.J., Kase, K.R. and Tello, V.M. (1991) Dosimetric Accuracy of Low Monitor Unit Setting. The British Journal of Radiology, 84, 806-811.
[11] Ravikumar, M., Asmary, M.A., Sultan, R. and Ghamdi, H.A. (2005) Dose Delivery Accuracy of Therapeutic Photon and Electron Beams at Low Monitor Unit Settings. Strahlentherapie and Onkologie, 181, 796-799.
[12] Kang, S.K., Cheong, S.K., Hwang, et al. (2008) Dosimetric Characteristics of Linear Accelerator Photon Beams with Small Monitor Unit Settings. Medical Physics, 35, 5172-5178.
[13] Li, J., Wiersma, R.D., Stepaniak, C.J., et al. (2012) Improvements in Dose Accuracy Delivered with Static-MLC IMRT on an Integrated Linear Accelerator Control System. Medical Physics, 39, 2456-2462.
[14] Sharpe, M.B., Miller, B.M., Yan, D., et al. (2000) Monitor Unit Settings for Intensity Modulated Beams Delivered Using a Step-and-Shoot Approach. Medical Physics, 27, 2719-2725.
[15] Almond, P.R., Biggs, P.J., Coursey, B.M., et al. (1999) Task Group 51 Report: A Protocol for Clinical Reference Dosimetry of High Energy photon and electron beams. Medical Physics, 26, 1847-1870.
[16] Klein, E.E., Hanley, J., Bayouth, J., et al. (2009) Task Group 142 Report: Quality Assurance of Medical Accelerators. Medical Physics, 36, 4197-4212.
[17] International Electrotechnical Commission (1987) Medical Electrical Equipment Part 2. Particular Requirements for Safety of Gamma Beam Therapy Equipment IEC 601-11.
[18] Grigorov, G.N., Chow, J.C.L. and Barnett, R.B. (2006) Dosimetry Limitations and a Dose Correction Methodology for Step-and-Shoot IMRT. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51, 637-652.
[19] Bhangle, J.R., Sathiya Narayanan, V.K. and Deshpande, S.A. (2007) Dose Linearity and Uniformity of Siemens ONCOR Impression plus Linear Accelerator Designed for Step-and-Shoot Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy. Journal of Medical Physics, 32, 103-107.
[20] Takahashi, Y., Koizumi, M., Sumida, I., et al. (2010) What Is the Optimum Minimum Segment Size Used in Step and Shoot IMRT for Prostate Cancer? Journal of Radiation Research, 51, 543-552.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.